Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Thanks to Sarah Palin, We Get to See the Cruelness of the GOP as It Really Is

By Larry Beinhart, AlterNet. Posted November 3, 2008.


Palin has helped reveal to the public pit-bull snarl that rouses GOP supporters to cry out, "Traitor!" against Obama, and "Kill him!"

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Is Blind Faith in God and the Bible a Modern Invention?
Devilstower

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
What Can the Morass of the 1970s Tell Us About the Current Economic Crisis?
Alejandro Reuss

DrugReporter:
Why Are We Locking Up Traumatized Veterans for Their Addictions Instead of Offering Them Treatment?
Penny Coleman

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Soda Helps Make Americans Unhealthy and Fat -- Will Soda Tax Prevail Despite Pushback by Beverage Industry?
Christine Spolar, Joseph Eaton

Health and Wellness:
Does the House Bill's Public Option Kill Off the Senate's?
Booman

Immigration:
Recent Democratic Victories May Grease the Wheels for Immigration Reform in Congress
Marcelo Balive

Media and Technology:
Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh Stoking GOP Civil War
Eric Boehlert

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Obama Is Up Against in His Own Branch of Government
Russ Baker

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
"Precious" Star Claims the Spotlight
Emily Wilson

Rights and Liberties:
Hard to Believe: 73 U.S. Kids Sentenced to Life Without Parole at 14 or Younger, and All Are Black
Liliana Segura

Sex and Relationships:
9 Silly Things People Say When They Hear You Don't Want Kids (And Ways to Counter Them)
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Radioactive Wastewater in New York Raises More Concerns About Oil Drilling
Abrahm Lustgarten

World:
Afghanistan Is Worse Off Than Ever, Thanks to the Sham Army We're Propping Up
Chris Hedges

More stories by Larry Beinhart

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg


It was Jesus Christ, if Matthew is to be believed, who said, "Love thine enemy." It is in that spirit that I write this belated valentine to Sarah Palin.

Sarah, I love you for having revealed unto the media the snarling heart of the beast that is the base (and the soul) of the Republican Party. Yes, you have the lipstick and the heels, not to mention the calves and bosoms, that send Republican men into swoons, but you have more; the pit-bull snarl that rouses your supporters to cry out, "Traitor!" against Obama, and "Kill him!"

George Bush kept those folks in their kennels, ran as a "compassionate conservative," and always masked his most heinous plans in double speak. Bush the Elder, Ronald Reagan, and even Richard Nixon never explicitly ran on hate and fear of "the other." They used words that were coded enough that it was possible to pretend that they were true.

But now the beast is loose.

The Republican Party likes to remember Abraham Lincoln. And so they should. It's a nice memory and brings credit to them. As does the accidental ascension of Teddy Roosevelt, environmentalist and basher of corporations. Back in the 1950s and '60s, their party included such figures as Dwight Eisenhower -- whose reputation grows ever better in retrospect -- Nelson Rockefeller, who built New York's state university system, and New York City mayor John Lindsey.

But there is another strand that runs through their history.

Back in the 1840s, there was a group called the Know Nothings. They were against immigrants and for real Americans. ("Real American" did not then, as it does not now, refer to Indians; it refers to descendants of English immigrants.) The movement was based on fear. Irish and German Catholics were going to take over. They would take orders from the Pope-in-Rome (one word). Their values were not "our values." They drank. Their nunneries were virtual brothels and when the nuns had babies they practiced infanticide.

The Know Nothings started with secret societies like the Order of the Star Spangled Banner, associated with William Poole, better known as Bill the Butcher, depicted by Daniel Day Lewis in Gangs of New York. Their public political face was the American Republican Party, which became the Native American Party, and finally the American Party.

Their platform was:

Severe limits on immigration, especially from Catholic countries.
Restricting political office to "native-born" Americans.
Mandating a wait of 21 years before an immigrant could gain citizenship.
Restricting public school teaching to Protestants.
Mandating daily Bible readings in public schools (from the Protestant version of the Bible).
Restricting the sale of liquor.

For a brief time, the American Party was wildly popular. In 1854 party membership swelled from 50,000 to over a million in a matter of months. It elected mayors in Philadelphia, Boston, Washington, DC, San Francisco, and Chicago, and won the state legislature and governorship of Massachusetts.

But there were other things going on: the Mexican War, slavery, secession, and the Civil War. The movement didn't last long and was soon absorbed by the Republican Party.

Fair is fair. Things morph and change. The Republican Party freed the slaves and tried to create an interracial democratic South during Reconstruction. The Democratic Party became the party of segregation in the South and the second home of the Klu Klux Klan. To be Republican is not to be necessarily narrow-minded and in dread fear of foreigners. To be Democratic is not necessarily to be liberal, progressive and open-minded.

But enough of being fair.

The Great Depression demonstrated that the principles of the Republican Party were bankrupt. Like most of the country. The Democrats became the progressive party, representing social justice and programs that would protect capitalism from its own worst tendencies, moving toward a vision of a perfectable world. The Republicans became -- in a very literal sense -- a reactionary party, reacting against whatever the Democrats were doing, engaged in a 60-year-long war against the New Deal.

Lyndon Johnson is the pivotal figure, both heroic and deeply tragic. The Democratic Party's dirty public secret was that its political hegemony rested on the Solid South, still refusing to vote Republican out of hatred of Lincoln. Johnson knew that if he pushed through the Civil Rights Act his party would lose the South for a generation. Or more. His heroism is that he did anyway. No, he did not end the race issue, but he broke the back of segregation.

The Republicans saw their opportunity. They pursued the Southern Strategy, wooing resentful whites with great success.

But two things happened.

Racism became less and less tenable. The generation that cherished it has grown old. That pillar of the Republican Party is crumbling.

And then along came Bush-Cheney. Like Herbert Hoover, in the process of leading the country to bankruptcy they demonstrated that the Republican Party's ideas were also bankrupt. They made government bigger, not smaller -- and more intrusive, too. They didn't oppose special interests, they were the special interests. They didn't oppose lobbyists, they forced lobbyists to join their party at fiscal gunpoint. They were militaristic on parade, but could not run a war. They could not protect the country nor punish the people who actually attacked us. Their policies demonstrated that free markets are a fiction, and real markets need more supervision than a grade-school playground.

Along came John McCain. He looked out, from sea to shining sea, from the mountains, to the prairies, in search of voters who would vote for him. All he could find were the new Know Nothings. People who, frightened of the way things are changing, want to change back to that white, Protestant place it was, oh, sometime back before 1840. America Firsters. Anti-immigrant. Anti-foreigner. Anti-elite. Anti-intelligence.

Not quite capable of running as a true Know Nothing himself, he chose someone who could: Sarah Palin. She does it well, and in so doing, shows us, clearly and simply, who they really are.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: gop, election 2008, sarah palin

Larry Beinhart is the author of "Wag the Dog," "The Librarian," and "Fog Facts: Searching for Truth in the Land of Spin." All available at nationbooks.org.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Let This Be An End To It
Posted by: ranchero42 on Nov 3, 2008 1:24 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A campaign based on fear borne up out of self-loathing. The truly sad thing about John McCain is that his lack of contrition for this dirty campaign has more to do with his lack of cojones in 2000, his feeble attempts at regaining from the filthy business of Rove what must now remain beyond his reach. Eight years on, and all eyes can see the bitter old man he has become. No Presidency for those whose waning leadership abilities were never very strong in the first place. Going through the motions punctuated by childish or worse, demented behavior has never been a winning combination. It's too late for a do-over with Huckabee, Romney, Thompson. Good lord, the GOP should've sat this one out, what a herd of horses asses they've become. What doesn't kill you makes you stronger than you've ever smelled before.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Christian Right's Worldview
Posted by: AlexLawyer on Nov 3, 2008 1:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Palin's aggressive, intolerant, militant, jingoistic, economically elitist, anti-scientific worldview isn't unique to her. She's a creature of the Christian right, and her attitudes reflect, and resonate with, the norms of that group. We've seen it throughout the Republican party since the fundamentalists began to dominate it in the late 70s. Tragically, nearly half of our country subscribes to these values, which they share with al Qaeda and the Taliban. They want to repeal the Enlightenment and go back to medieval ignorance and superstition, and in the last 8 years they've taken us farther down that road than any of us ever thought possible.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Who Believes in Witches Posted by: LeaderofMen
» RE: Who Believes in Witches Posted by: WyrdSister
» RE: The Christian Right's Worldview Posted by: noalternative
Just the bad and the ugly
Posted by: progressive-life on Nov 3, 2008 3:47 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The demoncrats are just as bad. Look at the violent activist out side the conventions - actions are worse than words but in the end they have both revealed how low the supporters and whats worse, our politicians can go!

Our two party dictatorship has prevailed...again!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Just the bad and the ugly Posted by: mainspark
» RE: Just the bad and the ugly Posted by: mainspark
» RE: Just the bad and the ugly Posted by: progressive-life
» RE: Just the bad and the ugly Posted by: mainspark
» RE: Just the bad and the ugly Posted by: progressive-life
» RE: Just the bad and the ugly Posted by: quicklime
» RE: Just the bad and the ugly Posted by: blitzmesser
» RE: Just the bad and the ugly Posted by: progressive-life
» Few to no violent actions Posted by: mgmyers79
» RE: Just the bad and the ugly Posted by: rwspisak
» RE: Just the bad and the ugly Posted by: progressive-life
» RE: Just the bad and the ugly Posted by: blitzmesser
» RE: Just the bad and the ugly Posted by: progressive-life
» RE: Just the bad and the ugly Posted by: Malamute
» RE: Just the bad and the ugly Posted by: progressive-life
» RE: Just the bad and the ugly Posted by: Malamute
Palin means the end for Republicans
Posted by: Phr2 on Nov 3, 2008 4:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you Sara for concentrating so much on your own future political career. Because of that, you are going to:

1. Make Mc Cain lose the vote, frightening away those independents that he and Lieberman could have won, both of them could have turned the Republicans into a center-right party. But no, Sara came along.

2. Thanks also for dividing the Republicans for many years to come, on one side right wing religious zealots, on the other side plain old conservatives. Jimmy Carter got the evanlegist voters to vote for him, then those turned towards the Republicans. Now that is history...

Thanks to Ms Palins' political greed !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Also, Read Beinert in WP 11-3-08
Posted by: Lilly on Nov 3, 2008 4:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Print out two articles to save for your grandchildren: this one, and Peter Beinart's "Last of the Culture Warriors" on washingtonpost.com this morning. This one tells the story; the Beinart puts the story in context. (Authors' names are similar, Beinart and Beinhart, not to confuse.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Morality Play
Posted by: Lilly on Nov 3, 2008 4:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wrote to a friend last week that I had not realized it would be so terrifying to live in a morality play, since Evil might actually win.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Morality Play Posted by: True2Blue
A bit nitpicky, but...
Posted by: Fitzy on Nov 3, 2008 4:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"cruelness"? Whatever happened to the perfectly good word "cruelty"? Perhaps your headline writer also makes up the non-existent words in the NY Times crossword!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A bit nitpicky, but... Posted by: sophiej
» RE: A bit nitpicky, but... Posted by: Darvon
Love it or leave it
Posted by: sliver on Nov 3, 2008 5:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After Bush won, Republicans kept telling liberals to leave the country if they didn't like it. So if Obama wins, and they have declared themselves to be his enemies, doesn't that mean that they have to leave the country?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Love it or leave it Posted by: kiel
» Oh, I hope so! Posted by: Beck
» RE: Oh, I hope so! Posted by: wmike
» RE: Love it or leave it Posted by: Regina1959
Know-nothings
Posted by: kiel on Nov 3, 2008 5:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've been calling the Right wingnuts this for years, referencing that previous political stain on our history. The parallels are even more striking than drawn in this article.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

For the love of pit bulls!
Posted by: ritadona69 on Nov 3, 2008 5:39 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wish the media would stop using the pit bull metaphor already. We have a pit bull, and she is the most loving, sweet, smart, loyal dog--if only our politicians could really be like that! I don't think there's an animal in the kingdom that is as knowingly hateful as the Republicans have been lately. Only human beings can be that way to one another. So, please, most people already have the wrong notion about pit bulls without using them to describe the behavior of certain Republicans. Enough already.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: For the love of pit bulls! Posted by: QuestionAuthority
» RE: For the love of pit bulls! Posted by: john mont
» RE: SO..... MAD DOG PALIN? Posted by: blurider
» RE: For the love of pit bulls! Posted by: ranchero42
My address is 702 Lincoln ST.
Posted by: solrev on Nov 3, 2008 5:51 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
“The Republican Party freed the slaves and tried to create an interracial democratic South during Reconstruction. The Democratic Party became the party of segregation in the South and the second home of the Klu Klux Klan.”

If one goes to the Lincoln Library and Museum and looks at the state map, the states that voted for Lincoln are colored blue. They are the same blue states you see on TV every day. Labels did not free the slaves, blue states did. This election has sharpened the divisions in this country. The republicans have fractured into the Palin hate mongers who were the media mouth conservatives, and the supply side conservatives whose financial system just collapsed. If Obama can control the democratic congress, we have the opportunity to create a good government for the people. If the congress goes wild and builds bridges to no where, they will not last long. The fiscal conservatives will create an alliance with the other two conservative groups and throw them out. If the democrats can suck the fiscal conservatives into the Democratic Party, Hannity and the investor class will be out of a job forever. The question is, can politicians actually govern?
"and the Holy Spirit entered into their hearts, so they would agree to turn their land over to the beast."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thank you for a great article !!!!!
Posted by: Live Gently on Nov 3, 2008 5:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Larry, thank you.
I truly enjoyed reading your article. Some how my history books in school never wrote of the Know Nothing Party and it was delightful to read of them. Thank you for enriching my knowledge of our political past. Now that you have shared that history with us, I feel that we have a responsibility to do what we can to make sure it doesn't continue to repeat itself. I long for the day when we can view each other as fellow human beings and a day when we treat each other as we would an angel, with deep respect and unconditional love.
My hope is that President Obama will restore humanity, which our current adminstration took away. But true change comes from within and for anyone who is still reading this I ask you to do the following, look at the people in your life and ask yourself how would you interact with them if you knew that they were angels, (or whatever you consider to be divine) - would you respond to them differently?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wow.
Posted by: CosmoViking on Nov 3, 2008 6:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What a fascist bitch!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

larry b. has
Posted by: collins101 on Nov 3, 2008 6:34 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
his lips firmly planted on barry hussein's backside. By the way where's barry's birth certificate?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: larry b. has Posted by: xi_people
» RE: larry b. has Posted by: Midway54
» RE: larry b. has Posted by: seaoftears
» RE: larry b. has Posted by: ldyradr
» Palin's Tax Return Posted by: LeaderofMen
» RE: larry b. has Posted by: iolanthe
In Celebration of the Anti-Intellectual American
Posted by: RJ Kruger on Nov 3, 2008 6:35 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our Founding Fathers were learned men and I'm sure they would be weeping to see the history of anti-intellectualism that has prospered in our country--for dozens of generations. It is so blatantly displayed with the hollowness and low-information of the Sarah Palin exhibition.

The article is dead-on....I'm surprised Mr. Beinhart neglected to mention Father Charles Coughlin, Charles Lindberg and the America Firsters of the 1930s. The only thing we have to fear is ignorance. And it's been a fear woven throughout our illustrious history.

Even political cartoonist Thomas Nast--in the 1870s/1880s--illustrated the "egghead" intellectual vs. the prize fighter...that brawn, guts and violence is a great force to be reckoned with than knowledge, intelligence and depth.

It is refreshing to see the curtain lifted on the vile, vapid movement for which today Sarah Palin is the foremost spokesperson. For the McCain campaign, it isn't "Country First," it's "Ignorance First, Fear First." I would even go so far to say it is "All Ignorance, All the Time."

Thanks for the article. It inspired me to respond before I take off for work.

Ms. Palin, Angela Merkel on line 2....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ignorance
Posted by: wagnerrocks@gmail.com on Nov 3, 2008 6:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have spent too many years living by the notion: "never underestimate the ignorance of the American people". I look forward to Obama and the re-writing this creedo to "never underestimate the enlightenment of the American people." The sun is shining on the USA today.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Know Nothings Posted by: boing007
» RE: The Know Nothings Posted by: zeek2
» RE: ignorance Posted by: chasaturn
» RE: ignorance Posted by: darsimaj
Beauty is only skin deep
Posted by: Grandma Crabby on Nov 3, 2008 7:07 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For all of Ms. Palin's outer beauty, she sure is an ugly bitch on the inside.

The know nothings still know nothing. They have merely changed their name to something less honest and revealing.

As entertaining as she has been, I am going to be extremely grateful when Sarah is forced back into hinterland oblivion.

The outrageous reality of such a bimbo being nominated for VP inspired me to do a crazy video with a naked alien newscaster calling her what she is, a Barbie doll covered in horse poop. It's pretty dang funny if I do say so myself. And no, I do not make money off these, I just do them for fun. click the link below for my you tube channel. Have fun!


Granny's crazy videos = Go get a chuckle!


Luv,
Granny

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The new Tell Nothings
Posted by: MartianBachelor on Nov 3, 2008 7:53 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would be burned at the stake if people knew I was actually voting for John McCain. I have not told one person, nor do I intend to.
The Obama "Cult" persona makes it difficult for us to admit we are not voting for "The One".

- Jules

Given the insane vilification of Republicans, and Sarah Palin in the press, I have no doubt that the spiral of silence* is in full operation this campaign cycle.
It's cosmic justice, really. Obama people called everybody a racist or an idiot so much and so often that no one would tell pollsters anything. They were snookered by their own tactics, and will watch in stunned disbelief as McCain-Palin win easily.

* - spiral of silence: the tendency of voters for the less fashionable party du jour to keep their intentions to themselves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The new Tell Nothings Posted by: zeek2
» RE: Cone of Wackness* Posted by: Longdream
» RE: The new Tell Nothings Posted by: blitzmesser
Claytn
Posted by: Clayton on Nov 3, 2008 7:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Pretty good recap of the political pendulum but you said nothing about the labor movement. Did they become America firsters too, know nothings?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WOULD NEVER CONSIDER VOTING FOR MCCAIN
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Nov 3, 2008 8:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But I'll never believe that he chose Sarah Palin. He was sold out by his own people. It was one last try for power by the right wing religious nuts and they shoved McCain out in front of the bus. Granted, he's any angry guy but Sarah Palin is beneath him. It's that simple. He got screwed by Bush and hasn't been the same since. In the hope that Obama wins, it's good that people like Palin have been put out there in our faces. In all honesty, I knew they were out there but not in such great numbers. So we've been enlightened in that respect. Palin has a mean streak that jumped out at me from the very beginning. She does nothing but take cheap shots at people far more credible and experienced than she is. Her 'experience' consists of doing what she's told by the oil guys for which she is well paid. Religion serves as some kind of fertilizer for people like Palin. I think it feeds the "cruelness" and helps them to justify themselves and their actions. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

So called Patriot Act should arrest Palin for insighting terrorism
Posted by: common intelligence on Nov 3, 2008 9:03 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If any of us where to say the things the the way GOP candidates do we would be arrested under the Patriot Act for conspiring to insight rioting and terrorism.

How is it these like McCain and Palin can get away with saying things "We the the People" would be arrested for. Therefore to, not told why we are being arrested and not be allowed any legal consule until the"system" sees fit?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: repealing the Patriot Act Posted by: VZEQICVA
sahi
Posted by: What did you say? on Nov 3, 2008 9:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
dear heart...great article...but for the millionth time...neither Abraham Lincoln nor the Reublican party freed the slaves. It was the Abolitionist movement and the effort of many Black people, those who were free/d and those who escaped slavery that brought this about. Every time freeing the slaves is attributed to Lincoln and the Repubs, you inadvertently rewrite history to erase these contributions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: sahi Posted by: Cynic13
What's real....
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Nov 3, 2008 10:24 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What's real - real is an old man like McCain, he has sold his soul (if he ever had one) for his last chance to gain the highest political office in this country! Real is his pick of woman who is in-curious, anti-intellectual, anti-science, and believes in "Creation-ism" as a science! Real is the generational threat (to future children) they would be if elected into the White House! Very real is the religious rights attempts to hi-jack our government and hurdle us back to the stone age! This cadre has truly blown the lid off of the sham that the Republican party is inclusive of anyone that is not white and ignorant!

The sad reality is that these "Jerry Springer-esque" types don't want to see that while they are not "trust-fund" babies, they are not included in the benefits packages that continue to go to the rich & corporate! Maybe instead of thumping on those bibles they say they believe in, what they should do is read and meditate on the word, not just what the pimp in the pulpit tells them it says!!

While they maybe "nice" people neither McCain/Palin have any clue about the rest of the world, he because he's been allowed his whole life to cover his non-knowledge with an irascible temper, she because in one of the more isolated states she is allowed to be ignorant!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What's real.... Posted by: VZEQICVA
Here's the cold reality. CALL BUSH AND TELL THEM NOT TO STEAL THE ELECTION
Posted by: cori on Nov 3, 2008 12:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1 202 456 1111 TELL BUSH YOU DON'T WANT HIM TO STEAL THE ELECTION.

that's the nightmare. Here's the cold reality.

Swing state Colorado. Before this election, two Republican secretaries of state purged 19.4 percent of the entire voter roll. One in five voters. Pfft!

Swing state New Mexico. One in nine voters in this year's Democratic caucus found their names missing from the state-provided voter registries. And not just any voters. County by county, the number of voters disappeared was in direct proportion to the nonwhite population. Gore won the state by 366 votes; Kerry lost it by only 5,900. Despite reassurances that all has been fixed for Tuesday, Democrats lost from the list in February told me they're still "disappeared" from the lists this week.

Swing state Indiana. In this year's primary, ten nuns were turned away from the polls because of the state's new voter ID law. They had drivers' licenses, but being in their 80s and 90s, they'd let their licenses expire. Cute. But what isn't cute is this: 566,000 registered voters in that state don't have the ID required to vote. Most are racial minorities, the very elderly and first-time voters; that is, Obama voters. Twenty-three other states have new, vote-snatching ID requirements.

Swing state Florida. Despite a lawsuit battle waged by the Brennan Center for Justice, the state's Republican apparatchiks are attempting to block the votes of 85,000 new registrants, forcing them to pass through a new "verification" process. Funny thing: verification applies only to those who signed up in voter drives (mostly black), but not to voters registering at motor vehicle offices (mostly white).



Here's an ugly little secret about American democracy: We don't count all the votes. In 2004, based on the data from the US Elections Assistance Commission, 3,006,080 votes were not counted: "spoiled," unreadable and blank ballots; "provisional" ballots rejected; mail-in ballots disqualified.

This Tuesday, it will be worse. Much worse.

That's what I found while traveling the nation over the last year for BBC Television and Rolling Stone Magazine, working with voting rights attorney Robert F. Kennedy Jr. This we guarantee: there will be far more votes disappeared by Tuesday night than the three million lost in 2004. A six-million vote swipe, quite likely, shifts 4 percent of the ballots, within the margin of error of the tightest polls.

Begin with this harsh statistic: since the last election, more than ten million voters have been purged from the nation's vote registries. And that's just the start of the steal.

If the noncount were random, it wouldn't matter. But it's not random. A US Civil Rights Commission analysis shows that the chance a black voter's ballot will "spoil" or be blank is 900 percent higher than a white voter's.

Does that mean the election's stolen and you should forget voting and just go back to bed for four years? Hell, no. It means you vote and vote smart, learn how to pry their filthy little hands off your ballot (there's a link at the end).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sarah Palin brings out the best or . . .
Posted by: Betsy L. Angert on Nov 3, 2008 1:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dearest Larry Beinhart . . .

I thank you for this thought. The research shared is wondrous.

For me, while Republicans may rant more aggressively, Grand Old Party participants may attack with vigor, as you stated, Democrats too do their deeds.

I believe Sarah Palin has brought out the worst traits that can be characterized as human. Mankind kills for the sake of slaughter.
Sarah Palin; Science or Survival of the Fittest

Humans can abort babies already born abroad and call the combat love or the want to spread Democracy. Yet, to take the life of one who has yet to fully form is considered cruel.
Sarah Palin; Formidable Force
Pro-Life; Pro-Choice

Humans teach and express hate and call it just. In America, Sarah Palin gave birth to liberty and justice for "real Americans" whoever they may be.
Not in my backyard.
What Pulls Us Apart.

Sarah Palin reminds us that people such as she, speak of a respectable record as they rewrite personal history.
Palin On Fire
Sarah Palin; Wrong Woman, Woeful Record

Perchance what Sarah Palin has brought to the American people is the reminder; sex sells.
To Vet or Not to Vet

I invite your thoughts on any of the tomes that touch on the ways Sarah Palin has changed the American experience.

Betsy L. Angert
BeThink.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

866-OUR-VOTE/888-VE-Y-VOTE h
Posted by: cori on Nov 3, 2008 1:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
866-OUR-VOTE/888-VE-Y-VOTE h
Mon, 11/03/2008 - 21:05 — Anonymous (not verified)
866-OUR-VOTE/888-VE-Y-VOTE http://www.866ourvote.com Please publicize this number - volunteers are standing by there to give information, help clarify election laws and empower voters to vindicate their rights, and in some cases, to send mobile field units directly to the polls or to contact election officials to address problems.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sarah Palin is a Know Nothing
Posted by: US Citizen on Nov 3, 2008 2:01 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and she's proud not to know anything.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Best Part about Palin...
Posted by: LeaderofMen on Nov 3, 2008 4:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... is this. We now have tons of video and audio of her in stump speeches, with a limited number of journalists, and in impromptu talks with people.

We have more stuff to prove her abject stupidity than we could have ever hoped for. So, when she runs for Prez in 2012, all we have to do is trot out her stupid viewpoints, her hate-filled speeches, her rejection of reality, e.g. science, her total ignorance of not only the Bible but the Constitution, the fact that she ran while being indicted in an ethics scandal, her daughter pregnant out of wedlock, and more AD NAUSEUM.

We have all we need to shove her moronic/neocon viewpoints back into her face. And after 4 years of refreshing politics and new hope in America her campaign will be seen as stupid and somewhat quaint.

She won't make it past the primaries.

Guaranteed

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

THERE WILL BE THE BIGGEST VOTER FRAUD YET.
Posted by: cori on Nov 3, 2008 5:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is ample cause for general alarm and for the measures we've recommended, in what has emerged from the ongoing court action in Ohio. If evidence of electronic-voting manipulation follows the election tomorrow, it must be pursued regardless of who wins. And if the campaigns involved do not challenge the results where this evidence emerges, or if local and state authorities do not cooperate to resolve these questions, it is certain that a tidal wave of protest will develop. Nonviolent resistance was used successfully by African-Americans to win their civil rights in the 1960s, and earlier by American women to win the right to vote. Millions would not hesitate to use it again, if there is evidence of a stolen presidential election. The first Democratic president, Thomas Jefferson, said that "eternal vigilance is the price of liberty." The failure of the Bush administration to permit systematic reform of this nation's elections infrastructure so as to make it impossible for these manipulations to occur is bad enough. Even worse would be to refuse to take seriously the possibility that these abuses could alter or adulterate the results of what may well be the most important presidential election of our lifetimes. gO TO THRUTHOUT.ORG FOR MORE INFO

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

THERE IS SOMETHING ROTTEN IN THE USA
Posted by: cori on Nov 3, 2008 5:09 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The current legal action will obviously not be resolved in time to determine the possible extent of any effort to manipulate electronic voting in 2008. But poll workers, campaign activists and local supporters of Senator Obama can do a number of practical things in order to identify and compile evidence of anomalies which may signal digital manipulation of election returns:

1. Local activists and lawyers in any state where the vote appears close should demand that county voting officials where electronic voting systems are used should, if possible, unplug their servers from the Internet and phone in their results, and otherwise never permit external IT consultants to have unsupervised physical access to hard drives after vote counting commences.

2. Screen captures of all television-reported exit poll numbers on all networks should be obtained for every state for which they are reported, to later compare them to actual vote tallies when they are reported - and the networks should assign a staff person to perform such checks. Any significant deviations from statewide exit polls in counties that don't have demographic factors to account for such differences should be flagged for later investigation.

3. Vote totals for presidential and down-ballot candidates should be compared, precinct-by-precinct and county-by-county, to see if there are strange disparities. In 2004, a Democratic candidate for a judgeship in Ohio mysteriously received tens of thousands more votes than John Kerry (even though many voters never bother to vote for down-ballot candidates). This was a statistical improbability of enormous magnitude (no disrespect meant to the judge).

4. Vote totals in safe Republican counties should be compared to the past two election cycles, to see whether any sky-high turnout is historically unprecedented and therefore cause for suspicion. That is what happened in several Republican-dominated counties in Florida in 2004. Election monitors should also watch the traffic at the polling places in Republican precincts, and maintain careful records, as a way to gauge the honesty of later claims about the turnout there.

These steps are necessary to facilitate the discovery of any circumstantial or direct evidence of possible manipulation of electronic-voting returns, which would be sufficient to enable immediate legal action to prevent certification of election results. In turn, that would permit time for a full forensic investigation. Additionally, many citizens' groups are preparing calls to action should legal remedies to any attempted vote interference falter or be obstructed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

laarmstron@yahoo.com
Posted by: laarmstron@yahoo.com on Nov 3, 2008 8:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i gave it a five, it was absolutly to the point, and sooo true. thanks, lance armstrong

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

For those interested in learning more about the Know-Nothings...
Posted by: rclord on Nov 3, 2008 10:57 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In my native Louisville, Kentucky, there was a riot called Bloody Monday on August 6, 1855. It started as a result of tensions between immigrants and native-born Americans; (not to be confused with American Indians); many of them Know-Nothing members.

In Louisville, many immigrants were also outspokenly against slavery, and that got them in trouble with the slaveowners; since Kentucky was a slave state.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

madmax
Posted by: mikmojo06 on Nov 4, 2008 11:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Palin is a dangerous bigot. Why SNL has glossed over that in their skits is perplexing. SNL puts bigots in soft light, humanizing them, where Charlie Chaplin put bigots and racism to the sword. Chaplin portrayed Adolph and Il Duce as bumbling, dangerous, mad-men. There were no skits where Adolph is doing his water colors, or Benito is shinning his boots. There was no attempt to humanize them. Peter sellers especially in Dr, Strangeglove also wielded this sword.

Perhaps Peter Sellers or even John Belushi, would have done Sarah in drag, looking here and there to whip and slay the "lesser" Americans, you betcha. And Chaplin, what could he have done to GW Bush and his abu-Ghraib torture chamber. The homo-erotic sadistic WH would certainly have been dressed down, no pun. Putting bigots in soft light is not my cup of tea. SNL, bring back the the terrible swift swords of Chaplin, Sellers, and Belushi.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

madmax
Posted by: mikmojo06 on Nov 4, 2008 11:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Palin is a dangerous bigot. Why SNL has glossed over that in their skits is perplexing. SNL puts bigots in soft light, humanizing them, where Charlie Chaplin put bigots and racism to the sword. Chaplin portrayed Adolph and Il Duce as bumbling, dangerous, mad-men. There were no skits where Adolph is doing his water colors, or Benito is shinning his boots. There was no attempt to humanize them. Peter sellers especially in Dr, Strangeglove also wielded this sword.

Perhaps Peter Sellers or even John Belushi, would have done Sarah in drag, looking here and there to whip and slay the "lesser" Americans, you betcha. And Chaplin, what could he have done to GW Bush and his abu-Ghraib torture chamber. The homo-erotic sadistic WH would certainly have been dressed down, no pun. Putting bigots in soft light is not my cup of tea. SNL, bring back the the terrible swift swords of Chaplin, Sellers, and Belushi.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Does Beinhart see himself in Palin?
Posted by: chriscrosscomment on Nov 5, 2008 3:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wish Obama well, but the thing that shocked me with the campaign was the continual mocking of Palin in the media, and McCain as much as they dared. And I really dislike Larry Beinhart's cynical twist on Jesus' teaching about loving one's enenmy. On election night Obama, McCain and Bush were all gracious and big hearted. Many in the media talk of Republicans' nastiness, but I see much more nastiness from some Democrat supporters, Beinhart included. Maybe what he thinks he sees in Palin is a reflection of himself - but then, do I see in him a reflection of myself?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Never Have I Seen Nuremburg Style Rallies Like Palen's Where Hate is Openly Expressed. It's Over Now
Posted by: yellow on Nov 5, 2008 10:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
John McCain could barely constrain the hateful jeers of his supporters during his admittedly moving concession speech to Obama. McCain supporters were not just disappointed; they were visibly outraged at Obama's stunning victory and its beautiful messege. But the long nightmare is over!!

This election's story actually has its roots in 1980. Ronald Reagan's political strategists advised him to bring hard core southern Baptist Fundies on board. Bubba, he was told, was going to respond to Dr. Friedman's supply-side, trickle down arguments but he would respond to the idea that "The Lord Jesus" blessed the USA, The GOP, Guns, Guts, unborn fetus's and US military might. It worked!!

But something happened. The fundie energy that helped Reagan into the White House in 1980 fizzled out in a couple of years. By 1982, the Reagan Administration lost its taste for theocracy and just "regressed" into being your basic tax cutting, deregulating, budget cutting, war mongering far right wing administration. By 1984, we even saw incredible bipartisanship with Reagan reaching across the aisle to House Speaker Tip O'Niell to save the Social Security Trust Fund!! Great! But where was Jesus?

By 1990, the peak of the business cycle which began in 1980, a recession began and the economy bottomed out by 1991. It then began to cycle back upwards but the "recovery" was a jobless one; unemployment didn't drop to below pre-1990 levels. Economists were just beginning to realize that we had entered a new epoch of chronically high average annual unemployment; a structural feature of late capitalism. In less academic jargon, "it's the economy, stupid."

And so enter Bill Clinton, the most pro-Wall Street Democrat since Woodrow Wilson. But wait!! What happened to the GOP? Apparently, Jesus seemed to have left the proverbial building. Enter Newt Gingrich. He was leading a "new generation with a new explanation." The GOP didn't lose because of the economy, we were told. They lost because they took the good Lord out of the equation. And so a vicious moral attack commenced against Bill Clinton in order to undermine the Democratic Party and secular, western democracy based on reason and other enlightenment principles on behalf of the GOPs several million Christian Fundies concentrated in southern swing states that could be expected to deliver the vote every time. One rare southern progressive even councilled the Dems that they might just have to "whistle past Dixie" in their national electoral strategizing. And so in 2000 and 2004, it became possible for the GOP to muster sufficient votes to credibly steal the elections in those years. The Fundies got mobilized. Smearing, fanaticism, hatred and hysteria became the order of the day instead of calm "rational" arguments about supply side tax cuts and a strong defense. Such is the nature of theocracy. Just look at Afghanistan!!

And so it was that George W. Bush stole and occupied Washington DC for eight miserable years. By 2008 so many crises, both domestic and foreign built up to threaten the American way of life. We lost trillions in two illegal wars that brought thousands of Americans death and debt with no added national security to show for it. The US middle class went into a steep decline; few households in the lower 80% of the US income strata could possibly afford, at current prices, to replace their homes, investments and other assets with the income they currently earn year over year or with the current price that their homes, investment portfolios and small businesses would get them on the market today. We are a "middle class" en route to the poor house in our new SUVs.

Enter Obama. Let's hope he not only brings us the new America he promised but that we are now, as a nation, steeled against resurgent attacks by the far right fanatics that could threaten that dream.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Bravo!!! Posted by: dbsherri1
You Gotta Love This
Posted by: desidid on Nov 6, 2008 5:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
On election eve I was standing at a PEACE vigil when a woman in a new SUV with a McCain/Palin and Pro-Life sticker pulled up and began yelling "No, no, no, no, no, no!!!" It was so stunning I began laughing uncontrollably. The sheer ignorance and hypocrisy of the religious right, makes them more a joke than a viable movement. I just think SNL should do a skit with Tina Fey driving the SUV and yelling no to peace. Perhaps then the young Republicans or those who might be seduced by the bullshit, would see how irrational and ugly they really are.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: You Gotta Love This Posted by: yellow
That's Just Silly
Posted by: VMRH on Nov 6, 2008 7:57 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Umm, this has got to be one of the silliest articles I have ever read. People in partisan crowds shouting inappropriate things? Have you listened to what people in Obama crowds shout? Have you seen what Obama trolls have done to pro-McCain/Palin websites? I have. There is beast on both sides--always has been, and always will be. Beasts--no matter which side--must be controlled. But there was no greater beastliness on one side than the other in this race.

Red State Gal
Red State Feminists

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Silly? Posted by: dbsherri1
signjay
Posted by: signjay on Nov 8, 2008 6:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is one of the most insightful articles I've read on the topic of the current and future state of the GOP, in that it so succinctly calls historic references into play in a way that even the most casual reader has to have their interest sparked. Our coverage of the political system, so manipulated by the Murdoch empire, has permeated our discourse in a most malignant way, and thanks to sites like Alternet, and Democracy Now, we have managed to dig down and find the still-living taproots of truth. I look forward to reading more from this gifted writer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Palin's words
Posted by: Lupin65 on Nov 8, 2008 10:48 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I stopped being able to listen to Sarah Palin after the terrorist remarks. Before that I kind of liked Mrs Palin, but her terrorist remarks completely soured me for her speechs. I couldn't listen to her after that without almost getting physically ill. I am glad she lost the election and it did cost Mc'Cain one vote mine although I was going to have a hard time voting because I used to actually be a Republican, but switched to the Democratic party about a year ago. Thanks Sarah for making my choice that much easier

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

i soured on Palin with her speech at Republican convention
Posted by: whealeydj on Nov 8, 2008 9:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that showed she was going to be the attack dog in this campaign which is often the role of Republican vice presidential candidates. she has that irritating Republicn split personality, attack the Democrats viciously in speeches and whine constantly abot how unfair the media was. Th article was quite good but I am not so sure Obama would not have won if Paulson had bailed out Lehman Brothers. John McCain showed his unstable nature in response to this economic crisis as well as his inability to bring incompetent Republican ideologues like Boehner on board. 48% will almost always vote Republican and 48% will almost always vote Democrat. I think 4% that switched were influence by Mccain's reactions to crisis vs Obama's. I think jingoism and Know Nothingism is deep seated in American electorate and particlularly in white electorate by racism and xenophobia as well. I hope the trend will be reinforced by changing demographics and four years of good leadership by Obama but it is way too early to declare 2008 a watershed year.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement