COMMENTS: 423
The Triumph of Ignorance: How Morons Succeed in U.S. Politics
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.
Like most people on this side of the Atlantic, I have spent my adult life mystified by American politics. The United States has the world's best universities and attracts the world's finest minds. It dominates discoveries in science and medicine. Its wealth and power depend on the application of knowledge. Yet, uniquely among the developed nations (with the possible exception of Australia), learning is a grave political disadvantage.
There have been exceptions over the past century: Franklin Roosevelt, Kennedy and Clinton tempered their intellectualism with the common touch and survived; but Adlai Stevenson, Al Gore and John Kerry were successfully tarred by their opponents as members of a cerebral elite (as if this were not a qualification for the presidency). Perhaps the defining moment in the collapse of intelligent politics was Ronald Reagan's response to Jimmy Carter during the 1980 presidential debate. Carter -- stumbling a little, using long words -- carefully enumerated the benefits of national health insurance. Reagan smiled and said, "There you go again." His own health program would have appalled most Americans, had he explained it as carefully as Carter had done, but he had found a formula for avoiding tough political issues and making his opponents look like wonks.
It wasn't always like this. The founding fathers of the republic -- men like Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, John Adams and Alexander Hamilton -- were among the greatest thinkers of their age. They felt no need to make a secret of it. How did the project they launched degenerate into George W. Bush and Sarah Palin?
On one level, this is easy to answer: Ignorant politicians are elected by ignorant people. U.S. education, like the U.S. health system, is notorious for its failures. In the most powerful nation on Earth, 1 adult in 5 believes the sun revolves around the Earth; only 26 percent accept that evolution takes place by means of natural selection; two-thirds of young adults are unable to find Iraq on a map; two-thirds of U.S. voters cannot name the three branches of government; and the math skills of 15-year-olds in the United States are ranked 24th out of the 29 countries in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
But this merely extends the mystery: How did so many U.S. citizens become so dumb and so suspicious of intelligence? Susan Jacoby's book The Age of American Unreason provides the fullest explanation I have read so far. She shows that the degradation of U.S. politics results from a series of interlocking tragedies.
One theme is both familiar and clear: Religion -- in particular fundamentalist religion -- makes you stupid. The United States is the only rich country in which Christian fundamentalism is vast and growing.
Jacoby shows that there was once a certain logic to its anti-rationalism. During the first few decades after the publication of Origin of Species, for example, Americans had good reason to reject the theory of natural selection and to treat public intellectuals with suspicion. From the beginning, Darwin's theory was mixed up in the United States with the brutal philosophy -- now known as Social Darwinism -- of the British writer Herbert Spencer. Spencer's doctrine, promoted in the popular press with the help of funding from Andrew Carnegie, John D. Rockefeller and Thomas Edison, suggested that millionaires stood at the top of a scala natura established by evolution. By preventing unfit people from being weeded out, government intervention weakened the nation, according to the doctrine; gross economic inequalities were both justifiable and necessary.
Darwinism, in other words, became indistinguishable to the public from the most bestial form of laissez-faire economics. Many Christians responded with revulsion. It is profoundly ironic that the doctrine rejected a century ago by such prominent fundamentalists as William Jennings Bryan is now central to the economic thinking of the Christian Right. Modern fundamentalists reject the science of Darwinian evolution and accept the pseudoscience of Social Darwinism.
But there were other, more powerful reasons for the intellectual isolation of the fundamentalists. The United States is peculiar in devolving the control of education to local authorities. Teaching in the Southern states was dominated by the views of an ignorant aristocracy of planters, and a great educational gulf opened up. "In the South," Jacoby writes, "what can only be described as an intellectual blockade was imposed in order to keep out any ideas that might threaten the social order."
The Southern Baptist Convention, now the biggest Protestant denomination in the United States, was to slavery and segregation what the Dutch Reformed Church was to apartheid in South Africa. It has done more than any other force to keep the South stupid. In the 1960s it tried to stave off desegregation by establishing a system of private Christian schools and universities. A student can now progress from kindergarten to a higher degree without any exposure to secular teaching. Southern Baptist beliefs pass intact through the public school system as well. A survey by researchers at the University of Texas in 1998 found that 1 in 4 of the state's public school biology teachers believed that humans and dinosaurs lived on Earth at the same time.
This tragedy has been assisted by the American fetishization of self-education. Though he greatly regretted his lack of formal teaching, Abraham Lincoln's career is repeatedly cited as evidence that good education, provided by the state, is unnecessary; all that is required to succeed is determination and rugged individualism. This might have served people well when genuine self-education movements, like the one built around the Little Blue Books in the first half of the 20th century, were in vogue. In the age of infotainment, it is a recipe for confusion.
Besides fundamentalist religion, perhaps the most potent reason why intellectuals struggle in elections is that intellectualism has been equated with subversion. The brief flirtation of some thinkers with communism a long time ago has been used to create an impression in the public mind that all intellectuals are communists. Almost every day, men like Rush Limbaugh and Bill O'Reilly rage against the "liberal elites" destroying America.
The specter of pointy-headed alien subversives was crucial to the elections of Reagan and Bush. A genuine intellectual elite -- like the neocons (some of them former communists) surrounding Bush -- has managed to pitch the political conflict as a battle between ordinary Americans and an overeducated pinko establishment. Any attempt to challenge the ideas of the right-wing elite has been successfully branded as elitism.
Obama has a good deal to offer America, but none of this will come to an end if he wins. Until the great failures of the U.S. education system are reversed or religious fundamentalism withers, there will be political opportunities for people, like Bush and Palin, who flaunt their ignorance.
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: trel on Oct 31, 2008 3:44 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Why do you want anti-intellectualism to wither?
Posted by: DawnL
» RE: Why do you want anti-intellectualism to wither?
Posted by: Lauren
» Everything political these days...
Posted by: ABetterFuture
» RE: verything political these days...
Posted by: javajoe
» RE: Why do you want anti-intellectualism to wither?
Posted by: AlexaD
» RE: Priceless!
Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: Priceless!
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Priceless!
Posted by: lisaisalefty
» RE: Priceless!
Posted by: bluepilgrim
» RE: Priceless!
Posted by: john mont
» RE: Why do you want anti-intellectualism to wither?
Posted by: baad
» You Aren't Kidding ! Bravo Jacoby! RE: Why do you want anti-intellectualism to wither?
Posted by: sallyride
» RE: You Aren't Kidding ! Bravo Jacoby! RE: Why do you want anti-intellectualism to wither?
Posted by: Damhnait
» RE: You Aren't Kidding ! Bravo Jacoby! RE: Why do you want anti-intellectualism to wither?*PROVEN*
Posted by: maribelle
» RE: You Aren't Kidding ! Bravo Jacoby! RE: Why do you want anti-intellectualism to wither?*PROVEN*
Posted by: helenwheels
» RE: You Aren't Kidding ! Bravo Jacoby! RE: Why do you want anti-intellectualism to wither?
Posted by: sallyride
» RE: Why do you want anti-intellectualism to wither?**A LIBERAL VOCABULARY PRIMER**
Posted by: maribelle
» RE: Why do you want anti-intellectualism to wither?**A LIBERAL VOCABULARY PRIMER**
Posted by: wal55
» RE: Why do you want anti-intellectualism to wither?
Posted by: babs
» RE: Why do you want anti-intellectualism to wither?
Posted by: RPJ
» RE: Why do you want anti-intellectualism to wither?
Posted by: macdon1
» RE: Why do you want anti-intellectualism to wither?
Posted by: zeek2
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lilykins on Oct 31, 2008 4:54 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Being a child of fundamentalist parents I have been forced to leave public school at 12 because my parents believed girls should be housewives and having an education would tempt them away from that god-given duty. Later, I went against their will to take a couple of college courses at a community college. I got great grades and won a full scholarship. My entire family then banded together and threaten to never speak to me or my son again if I took the scholarship. I chose my family and have regretted it ever since. At 40, after struggling through horribly abusive relationships with religious fanatical men who believed men owned their wives, I finally escaped from Christianity and now I am living alone and putting myself through school. I've never been happier in my life.
Not a day goes by that I don't think about all the children born to those "proud to ignorant" jerks and the way their children's minds are discarded like trash so the parents can feel better about their own faith in magic. American children are a laughing stock to the rest of the world because instead of science they are taught about magic, instead of learning about the wonders of the human body, they are taught about how "evil" their minds and bodies are. Instead of being loved for who they are, they are hated and told they were born "bad" and have to spend their lives denying and hating themselves. Instead of being told that the world is full of potentials and opportunities, they are told it's evil and scary.
It sickens me. I would never judge a janitor or garbage collector; you never know what hell they may have had to suffer in their lives.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Good for you!
Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: Good for you! **SHOW NOTHING BUT RESPECT FOR THE PERSON WHO SCRUBS YOUR TOILET**
Posted by: maribelle
» RE: I’ve never meet someone who took a thankless job to benefit others.
Posted by: maribelle
» RE: I’ve met plenty who took a thankless job to benefit others.
Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: I’ve never meet someone who took a thankless job to benefit others.
Posted by: desidid
» RE: I’ve never meet someone who took a thankless job to benefit others.
Posted by: blitzmesser
» RE: Good for you! **SHOW NOTHING BUT RESPECT FOR THE PERSON WHO SCRUBS YOUR TOILET**
Posted by: sallyride
» RE: Good for you! **SHOW NOTHING BUT RESPECT FOR THE PERSON WHO SCRUBS YOUR TOILET**
Posted by: john mont
» RE: Good for you! - You're an pbnoxious elitist
Posted by: fluffmuffinmom
» Oops - I meant OBNOXIOUS
Posted by: fluffmuffinmom
» RE: Why do you want anti-intellectualism to wither?**LILYKINS**
Posted by: maribelle
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Fishbone Soldier on Oct 31, 2008 4:57 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: johnthetreehugger on Oct 31, 2008 5:27 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
you are a lazy motherfucker. physical laziness is just as bad as mental laziness. Monbiot should have addressed that as well. The avoidance of physical and mental work has been the age old project of the ruling classes and their camp followers in the middle classes. Too lazy to do real work and too lazy to do some real thinking.
you lazy jack asses sit around feeling superior 'cause you shuffle paperwork or stare at a computer screen all day and call that work, and look down your noses at the folks cleaning your toilets and taking out the trash? fuck you. you are lazy, unamerican scum. can't wait till your vaunted economy collapses and you find that have to get your precious little hands dirty just so that you can eat!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» You're the kind of person raging serfs in China, or furious workers in Russia, enjoyed mutilating
Posted by: andabottleof_rum
» Swords don't need ammo
Posted by: Damhnait
» RE: HAHA Would You suggest I take up Kumdo?
Posted by: pangolin
» RE: Somehow, that doesn't surprise me.
Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: Somehow, that doesn't surprise me.
Posted by: helenwheels
» Careful Helen
Posted by: marid
» RE: Somehow, that doesn't surprise me.
Posted by: sallyride
» RE: DON'T YOU MEAN 'WRETCHED' MASSES? - MORON!!
Posted by: blurider
» RE: MY APOLOGIES IF YOUR POSTS ARE INTENDED AS SATIRE...
Posted by: blurider
» RE: Not satire at all.
Posted by: sallyride
» RE: DON'T YOU MEAN 'WRETCHED' MASSES? - MORON!!
Posted by: babs
» RE: That is way I am a lifetime member of the NRA.***GUNS + MONEY + UGLINESS = GOP***
Posted by: maribelle
» RE: So you have a problem with the heroes of the LA riots.
Posted by: helenwheels
» RE: So you have a problem with the heroes of the LA riots.
Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: You're the kind of person raging serfs in China, or furious workers in Russia, enjoyed mutilating
Posted by: hilaryuk
» RE: You're the kind of person raging serfs in China, or furious workers in Russia, enjoyed mutilating
Posted by: john mont
» RE: What Dreams May Come.
Posted by: fluffmuffinmom
» RE: What Dreams May Come.
Posted by: babs
» RE: Sounds like a Personals advertisment
Posted by: Plexius2
» RE: What Dreams May Come.
Posted by: blitzmesser
» Comfortable employment is the fruit of imperialism.
Posted by: andabottleof_rum
» RE: Comfortable employment is the fruit of imperialism.
Posted by: sallyride
Comments are closed-
Posted by: keubel on Oct 31, 2008 6:23 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: blurider on Oct 31, 2008 8:08 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Self-labeled 'elite'! - HA!!
Nobody called you charming, intelligent or seductive either!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Y'all called me an elitest
Posted by: Knot_Rich
» RE: Y'all called me an elitest
Posted by: lthompson94
» RE: Y'all called me an elitest
Posted by: blitzmesser
» RE: Y'all called me an elitest [Tut, tut, Honky, the deficiencies of
Posted by: Squarehead
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Quannah on Oct 31, 2008 8:16 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: To those that would call me an elitist: Thank you.
Posted by: lthompson94
» RE: Maybe not a .357...
Posted by: Quannah
Comments are closed-
Posted by: helenwheels on Oct 31, 2008 9:39 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why are you up here bragging about yourself? People who are truly secure just don't do that. Your I.Q. is in the "triple digits"? So it could be a lower-than-average 100? That would be my guess.
You come off as one disgusting, hateful person who deep down thinks that only looks matter. Good luck with that, shallow moran.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: To those that would call me an elitist: Thank you.
Posted by: lthompson94
» RE: To those that would call me an elitist: Thank you.
Posted by: blitzmesser
Comments are closed-
Posted by: fluffmuffinmom on Oct 31, 2008 2:52 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Squarehead on Nov 1, 2008 6:50 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You know, the average IQ being 100.
Of course, the arrogance you have boasted of earlier, is partly explained by your years; BUT that same attitude seems too general in USA today. People like you are part of a program, whether you realise it or not.
Check out Montesquieu, for basic wisdom on what it is to be human. I mean his comment on 'Fool! Do you not know that you lived, and that that is the greatest of your achievements?" Think about it.
IQ is a fatally flawed concept, unless you treat it with the weight it deserves. (i.e., not too much)
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: blitzmesser on Nov 1, 2008 2:36 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I bed beautiful young college aged girls.
Right out of Dostoevsky.... LOL
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: X-POLYGAMIST WIFE on Oct 31, 2008 7:59 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.bankingonheaven.com
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: PandaBear on Oct 31, 2008 8:39 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: donl51 on Oct 31, 2008 9:10 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: willymack on Oct 31, 2008 9:23 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Ignatz deFyre on Oct 31, 2008 9:28 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
More worrisome are the more resourceful among the idiots. As A.B. defines in the Devil's Dictionary:
IDIOT, n.
A member of a large and powerful tribe whose influence in human affairs has always been dominant and controlling. The Idiot's activity is not confined to any special field of thought or action, but "pervades and regulates the whole." He has the last word in everything; his decision is unappealable. He sets the fashions and opinion of taste, dictates the limitations of speech and circumscribes conduct with a dead-line.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Oct 31, 2008 11:34 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: desidid on Nov 1, 2008 12:25 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Jbuuty on Oct 31, 2008 1:58 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The other problem is the amount of money in US politics. The wealthy buy politicians.
If we could improve the educational system and get rid of the corporate sponsorship of politicians, we might actually become a democracy worthy of the name.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Two Problems in American Political System
Posted by: pure_genius
» RE: Two Problems in American Political System
Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: Two Problems in American Political System
Posted by: sallyride
» RE: Two Problems in American Political System
Posted by: citizen y
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Col. Jackleg on Oct 31, 2008 2:23 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: It transcends politics
Posted by: georgiaorwell
» Amen
Posted by: Col. Jackleg
» Wait up! RE: Amen
Posted by: sallyride
» UT got one thing right
Posted by: Col. Jackleg
» RE: UT got one thing right
Posted by: sallyride
» RE: There was Nothing Wrong with the Idea of American Republic
Posted by: edgar_michel
» Heading to Santa Fe in April!
Posted by: NoKidding
» RE: Heading to Santa Fe in April!
Posted by: sallyride
» RE: Heading to Santa Fe in April!
Posted by: NoKidding
» RE: Heading to Santa Fe in April!
Posted by: sallyride
» RE: Secession
Posted by: oregoncharles
» RE: Secession
Posted by: icgodnu
» RE: It transcends politics
Posted by: walterik
» RE: Religion isn't the problem, really.
Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: eligion isn't the problem, really.
Posted by: sallyride
» Huh?
Posted by: Col. Jackleg
» RE: Don't 'Bogart' that thing!
Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: Don't 'Bogart' that thing!
Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: Don't 'Bogart' that thing!
Posted by: Squarehead
» RE: Don't 'Bogart' that thing!
Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: eligion isn't the problem, really.
Posted by: ConnecttheDots
» RE: It transcends politics
Posted by: Knot_Rich
» You make my case
Posted by: Col. Jackleg
» RE: It transcends politics
Posted by: grethart
Comments are closed-
Posted by: notabilia on Oct 31, 2008 2:37 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Accurate, of course, but what about Europe?
Posted by: hilaryuk
» RE: Accurate, of course, but what about Europe?
Posted by: willymack
» Consider if you will, the Socialist (gasp!) nations of Scandinavia, The Netherlands, and France. Uni
Posted by: Physiocrat
Comments are closed-
Posted by: georgiaorwell on Oct 31, 2008 2:42 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All one has to really do to seriously understand the ignorance surrounding the general American public is to read John Taylor Gatto's The Underground History of American Education.
When I first read this book, I was shocked into utter disbelief as to how disingenious and calculating some of our early American industrialists were in introducing the zombie factor into the schools: teaching children to become future obedient workers for industry was the goal. Certainly not teaching critical thinking nor encouraging independent thought was the process. The educational system wanted and was used to shamefully promote their future workers into not questioning anything but to mindlessly obey. This had an added bonus in dampening labor union support. I encourage all who have not read this book to read it and weep. Most of us will recognize our own schooling backgrounds in the horrifying facts that Gatto presents. After having taught for many years, I found most of my students unable to even imagine creative endeavor, let alone able to practice it, as it had been seriously stomped out of them by the time they reached middle school on up.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» You are right: Gatto's Book is a MUST READ
Posted by: James W. Harris
» RE: You are right: Gatto's Book is a MUST READ
Posted by: georgiaorwell
» RE: You are right: Gatto's Book is a MUST READ
Posted by: sallyride
» RE: The schooling system is the same in all cultures dominated by "Christianity"
Posted by: georgiaorwell
» RE: The schooling system is the same in all cultures dominated by "Christianity"
Posted by: sallyride
» RE: "I've never taught and you've never thought" - Renaissance Man
Posted by: Knot_Rich
» RE: "I've never taught and you've never thought" - Renaissance Man
Posted by: georgiaorwell
» RE: "I've never taught and you've never thought" - Renaissance Man
Posted by: jackyD
» RE: "I've never taught and you've never thought" - Renaissance Man
Posted by: georgiaorwell
Comments are closed-
Posted by: basil10 on Oct 31, 2008 3:03 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The only people who eats genetically engineered foods
Posted by: Lilykins
» RE: The only people who eats genetically engineered foods
Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
» RE: The only people who eats genetically engineered foods
Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: The only people who eats genetically engineered foods
Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
» RE: The only people who eats genetically engineered foods
Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: The only people who eats genetically engineered foods
Posted by: willymack
» Monsanto et al are TAMPERING with Nature, not working with it
Posted by: Cathyc
» RE: Monsanto et al are TAMPERING with Nature, not working with it
Posted by: georgiaorwell
» RE: Monsanto et al are TAMPERING with Nature, not working with it
Posted by: ajagert
» RE: Monsanto et al are TAMPERING with Nature, not working with it
Posted by: ConnecttheDots
» RE: The only people who eats genetically engineered foods
Posted by: Lilykins
» RE: The only people who eats genetically engineered foods
Posted by: grethart
» RE: The only people who eats genetically engineered foods
Posted by: bugbear
Comments are closed-
Posted by: helenahanbasquet on Oct 31, 2008 3:35 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Great photo
Posted by: Ivann
» RE: Great photo
Posted by: redbird30328
» RE: Great photo
Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: Great photo
Posted by: rinthy
» RE: But...but...
Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: But...but...
Posted by: rinthy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bryangalt on Oct 31, 2008 3:42 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yep, you read that correctly: UN-AMERICAN.
If these religious folks were true American's, then they would be keeping religion in the church house and stop trying so damn hard to bring it to the State House.
The fact that Church and State were seperated by the Founders is a testiment to their genious. They knew that religion couldn't become part of the State because religion doesn't get along well with others. Religion, despite what it says, always has its own agenda in mind, talking up their story of how things should be while they act like they didn't hear their own propoganda (doesn't that sound alot like the Republicans).
All of you good church folk out their may consider this: if you don't help put the genie back in the bottle, we are doomed to mediocre leaders, loss of world respect (if we have any left after your selection of Bush 2x) and we will pay dearly as we watch our loved ones die from global warming's side effects (war, starvation, etc).
One more thing, in a letter from my Representative, he said I could move to North Korea if I didn't like the way things are going here (read it at Bryan Galt which is an appalling attitude from a US Congressman. He is a side effect of the conservative movement too.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Sad But True
Posted by: grethart
Comments are closed-
Posted by: blogoffanddie on Oct 31, 2008 3:45 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Orwellian nightmare has arrived. We have become a circus and a nation of voyeurs and peeping Toms. We have become that mindless freak show that millions of simpletons watch every night on their TV's. As a result, we as a people are too distracted, confused or lazy to look up from our TV sets to see or do anything about the destruction that is taking place.
http://blogoffanddie.wordpress.com
Politicians are like diapers, change them often and for the same reason.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The Orwellian nightmare has arrived.
Posted by: freelyb
» RE: The Orwellian nightmare has arrived.
Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: The Orwellian nightmare has arrived.
Posted by: bettyn
» True, and it's in the form of Main Street fighting against itself and letting Wall $treet
Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: The Orwellian nightmare has arrived.
Posted by: ConnecttheDots
» RE: The Orwellian nightmare has arrived.
Posted by: grethart
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Karl.Ben on Oct 31, 2008 3:46 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree that voters are mostly uninformed about the issues, intellectuals included. This is why Candidates get $400 haircuts, wear $2,000 suits and spend enormous sums of looking good. Not much else matters.
This may also explain why most blacks are voting for Obama when Hillary was a better candidate and known to them - Obama was and is pretty much an unknown.
Intellectuals have it so hard. Most can't fit the definition!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The problem with intellectuals - they think they are smarter than the farmer!
Posted by: mainspark
» Maybe if you went to a good school, you wouldn't vote for a cult member for VP.
Posted by: Jasonix
» RE: The problem with intellectuals - they think they are smarter than the farmer!*BECAUSE THEY ARE*
Posted by: maribelle
» That means whites who can afford advanced degrees are smarter than the world's majority
Posted by: andabottleof_rum
» RE: I assume you mean "who can't" afford an advanced education
Posted by: Jasonix
» RE: I assume you mean "who can't" afford an advanced education
Posted by: melloe
» RE: That means whites who can afford advanced degrees are smarter than the world's majority
Posted by: maribelle
» You didn't say anything about privilege in the above post,
Posted by: andabottleof_rum
» RE: That means whites who can afford advanced degrees are smarter than the world's majority
Posted by: sallyride
» RE: The problem with intellectuals - they think they are smarter than the farmer!*BECAUSE THEY ARE*
Posted by: Karl.Ben
» RE: The problem with intellectuals - they think they are smarter than the farmer!*SEEKING EDUCATION*
Posted by: maribelle
» RE: The problem with intellectuals - they think they are smarter than the farmer!*SEEKING EDUCATION*
Posted by: Karl.Ben
» RE: The problem with intellectuals - they think they are smarter than the farmer!*SEEKING EDUCATION*
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: The problem with intellectuals - they think they are smarter than the farmer!*BECAUSE THEY ARE*
Posted by: sallyride
» Balderdash!
Posted by: moflard
» RE: Balderdash! **SMARTS DOES NOT EQUAL WORTH**
Posted by: maribelle
» RE: Balderdash! **SMARTS DOES NOT EQUAL WORTH**
Posted by: moflard
» RE: The problem with intellectuals - they think they are smarter than the farmer!*BECAUSE THEY ARE*
Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
» RE: The problem with intellectuals - they think they are smarter than the farmer!*BECAUSE THEY ARE*
Posted by: moflard
» RE: The problem with intellectuals - they think they are smarter than the farmer!
Posted by: hms2004
» RE: The problem with intellectuals - they think they are smarter than the farmer!
Posted by: Karl.Ben
» The ultimate oxymoron: Karl.Rove.KKK.Ben talking about intellectualism. Pardon me while I puke.
Posted by: USAFVeteran1966
» USAFVETHEROFIGHTERPILOT..... I don't mean to be rude..
Posted by: Karl.Ben
» RE: The problem with intellectuals - they think they are smarter than the farmer!
Posted by: DHopper
» RE: The problem with intellectuals - they think they are smarter than the farmer!
Posted by: Karl.Ben
» RE: The problem with intellectuals - they think they are smarter than the farmer!
Posted by: Spiritgirl
» Not all farmers think like you, MISTER ! You're the one on Main Street stopping the good guys from
Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Not all farmers think like you, MISTER ! You're the one on Main Street stopping the good guys fr
Posted by: Karl.Ben
» RE: Not all farmers think like you, MISTER ! You're the one on Main Street stopping the good guys fr
Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Not all farmers think like you, MISTER ! You're the one on Main Street stopping the good guys fr
Posted by: Karl.Ben
» RE: The problem with intellectuals!
Posted by: peskyfly1
» RE: The problem with intellectuals!
Posted by: Karl.Ben
» I agree, Karl.Rove.Ben. Calling you an "ignorant s.o.b." is inappropriate. Stupid bastard is better.
Posted by: USAFVeteran1966
» RE: I agree, Karl.Rove.Ben. Calling you an "ignorant s.o.b." is inappropriate. Stupid bastard is better.
Posted by: peskyfly1
» RE: The problem with intellectuals!
Posted by: peskyfly1
» RE: The problem with intellectuals - they think they are smarter than the farmer!
Posted by: desidid
» RE: The problem with intellectuals - they think they are smarter than the farmer!
Posted by: 2thepoint
» RE: One Thing Is For Sure
Posted by: desidid
» Uh, have you MET an american farmer?
Posted by: pangolin
Comments are closed-
Posted by: lorenbliss on Oct 31, 2008 3:48 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This essay should also be reprinted as an eighth-grade civics class handout in every public school -- and handed out again in the 9th, 10th, 11th and 12th grades. But it won't be, not just because the public schools are run by the same ruling class that runs the mass media, but because the U.S. suffers from the most viciously anti-intellectual, maliciously lazy "teachers" the human race has ever produced.
For both these reasons and many more, Moron Nation is forever, no matter the outcome of the election, no matter whether it is legitimate, subverted or cancelled. But at least now somebody has joined Susan Jacoby in protesting induced ignorance -- the savage cult of Stupidity Is Superior that rules us at all levels, whether we are in the schoolyard or in the graveyard.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Moron Nation: Monbiot Doesn't Go Far Enough
Posted by: aussidawg
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Tom Degan on Oct 31, 2008 3:59 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The rogue's gallery of idiots is long and impressive - in a matter of speaking. In no particular order of importance, stupidity or incompetence:
Phil Gramm
Heather Wilson
Dan Quayle
Jesse Helmes
Michelle Bachman
GEORGE W. BUSH
Strom Thurmond
Trent Lott
Katherine Harris
GEORGE H.W.BUSH
John Ashcroft
You could go on all day compiling a list from the last decade alone.
What the hell is wrong with the American people? In 2000 Weeda Peeple chose the half-witted frat boy, Bush, over the far more qualified Al Gore simply because more people said they would like to have a beer with the jackass from Crawford, Texas.
In other words, Al Gore is a smarty pants policy wonk. I can't relate to him. George W. Bush is a fucking idiot - just like me!
We have the leaders we deserve.
Tom Degan
Five Days
Dan Qayle
Ronald Reagan
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: That last sentence...
Posted by: ZPaul
» RE: That last sentence...
Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: That last sentence...
Posted by: rinthy
» RE: You're Preaching to the Choir, Reverend Monbiot
Posted by: TagsNOLA
» Neo-fascist Nobel Peace Prize Winner?
Posted by: Col. of Truth
» RE: Neo-fascist Nobel Peace Prize Winner?
Posted by: TagsNOLA
» Typical Moron - Bush/Cheney are the killers here
Posted by: FoonTheElder
» RE: Typical Moron - Bush/Cheney are the killers here
Posted by: TagsNOLA
» Ok, not a moron but you sound more deluded.
Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Neo-fascist Nobel Peace Prize Winner?
Posted by: Ivann
» RE: You're Preaching to the Choir, Reverend Monbiot
Posted by: bsdone
» RE: You're Preaching to the Choir, Reverend Monbiot
Posted by: TagsNOLA
» Gore, a radical environmentalist? No way dude.
Posted by: maxpayne
Comments are closed-
Posted by: nemonemini on Oct 31, 2008 4:05 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Analysis today at:
http://darwiniana.com
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Darwinism = Social Darwinism
Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: Darwin wasn't omniscient
Posted by: greenknight
Comments are closed-
Posted by: shill on Oct 31, 2008 4:12 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kegbot1 on Oct 31, 2008 4:18 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This line from Morpheus to Neo in "The Matrix" is especially important:
"You have to understand, most of these people are not ready to be unplugged. And many of them are so inert, so hopelessly dependent on the system, that they will fight to protect it."
And let me second Jacoby's book - it is an indispensable read to understand how we got to this point in American history.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: A Good Summation
Posted by: peskyfly1
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JPHickey on Oct 31, 2008 4:25 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The breadth of knowledge is limited in order to simplify the conditioning process. Advertising involves repetition of the talking points that lead up to the sale usually with the intention of limiting and narrowing the range of human decisionion-making capabilities, to prevent thoughtfulness and lead to an emotionally-based decision to buy.
Since the media depends on advertisers who depent on sales, often the buyers are sold a "pig in a poke".
Only a year or two ago, though knowledge to the contrary was readily available, Ford's F100 big gas hog truck was the #1 seller in this country, along with millions of gas guzzling SUVs. Talk about stupidity!
Today, GM is losing billions and crying for a bailout from the government, yet, their main TV ad is for this Cadillac hybrid Escallade that gets a mere 20 miles per gallon. What a crock! My 1990 Honda Civic Wagon gets 38. The citizens of the U.S. are supposed to bail out GM. I suppose we're so dumbed-down that they'll get away with it. Certainly the mainstream media won't be clueing us in about what's going on here.
Selling is easier when the buyers are developmentally retarded, I suppose.
It's the same with politics. I can't go very far into it, but the confidence artists who originated the financial meltdown are in charge of dealing with it. Talk about the fox in charge of the chicken coop.
Letting these greedy miscreants get away with the biggest ripoff in the history of the world, following the failed trickle-down approach, is beyond the pale. Let's hope most of us aren't dumbed-down enough to fall for this, this time.
Especially when so much knowledge is alredy available that will work successfully, from the botton up -- like the "Green New Deal" approach.
Okay, so I haven't given up, despite the grinding "low life" influences of big business, politicans, and stunted religious zealots. So, despite his compromising and diplomatic presentations, I sincerely urge everyone to vote this Tuesday for Barak Obama! We've got to get busy doing something worthwhile ASAP!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Nodarse on Oct 31, 2008 4:29 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Another effective tool is to pit one group of people against another. Thereby diminishing the possibility of grassroot efforts to break the the status quo and demand real progress from our government.
Does anyone honestly believe that the U.S. was LESS fundamentally Christian in the past than it is today? And yet, I'm suppose to believe that this group is responsible for the intellectual dumbing down of our nation?
An ignorant population is NECESSARY for the few to control the many. This has happened throughout recorded history. And the "Land of the Free" does not enjoy any special immunity.
If your concerned about lackluster government imposed education standards in the U.S., then STOP SENDING YOUR KIDS TO GOVERNMENT SCHOOLS!
By the way, it's a fact that "Fundy Christians" are taking their children out of Government Schools in droves.
Isn't it a coincidence that they are now being blamed for our declining collective intellectual capacity?
Divide and Conquer!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Elurby on Oct 31, 2008 4:32 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
#######
Blame both Marxism and capitalism
for this steep moral/cultural/
political/financial decline of
America:
Public Education: What Went Wrong?
http://publiceducationwhatwentwrong.blogspot.com/
Corporate America: What Went Wrong?
http://corporateamericawhatwentwrong.blogspot.com/
#######
#######
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Public Education: What Went Wrong? // Corporate America: What Went Wrong?
Posted by: sallyride
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maxpayne on Oct 31, 2008 5:18 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And it's no different on social/culture issues. Like the economy, they think they'll fly above God and be all powerful by engaging in authoritative madness in the forms of supporting pols who would much rather legislate morality rather than let God do the judging. These same bible thumping LOSERS will even give in to supporting "free" trade, wars for oil, war on drugs even while allowing poison pills such as Viagra and corn-fed shit to further POISON their brains into even more delusions of grandeur, giving bailouts to Wall $treet all the while crying "socialism" just like lying losers such as "Joe the Plumber" now campaigning with Mccain like crazy, wrecking the environment and the public infrastructure which kept them alive in the first place, etc ... It's hard to feel sorry for these self-deluded die-hards who would much rather shoot themselves in the feet or even the head and drag the rest of us down with them but the best way to deal with these shenanigans is to say "Take it or keep drowning but don't cry about it !" When will these self-deluded "conservatives" quit sucking up to special interests on the "right" such as NRA and Big Religion which are big time sellouts guarding Wall $treet against Main Street? God knows !
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Iconoclast421 on Oct 31, 2008 5:19 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How is it not moronic to sit there in a debate with McCain about tax policy, and allow the same old lies to pervade? Right now, there are at least 20 million people who think that Bush's tax cuts resulted in increased tax revenue! And they accept this as proof that Bush's tax cuts were a success.
Do they understand that it wasnt Bush's tax cuts that increased tax revenues, but it was actually Greenspan's inflation of the monetary supply? Do they understand that Greenspan created a huge bubble which resulted in hundreds of billions in home equity loans that contributed to GDP? Money borrowed into existence, from a contrived bubble, infecting and temporarily inflating GDP! And these people have the nerve to be surprised when GDP fizzles out? Ha! That was the plan all along. The last 5 years have been contrived, specifically by design. But even now, most McBama supporters do not understand this. And they likely never will, because they are too busy following the pied piper of the media.
You can bet Obama understands all this. I should not have called him a moron. He is pretty smart. Smart enough to know that he'd be lynched if he talked about any of this stuff. So he aint talkin about it.
And that means he is no different from another Bush or Clinton. He will follow the globalist gameplan. If he was a real candidate, he would be talking about immediately auditing and nationalizing the Fed. Opening a new investigation into 9/11. Declassifying all black projects dating back more than 5 years. And for god sake, he'd be doing something about the prison system, which is extremely discriminatory.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Make Up Your Mind, Iconoclast
Posted by: Carol Burns
» The Fed just cut the Federal Funds rate to 1% while 30 year mortgage rate;10 year Bond rate stay put
Posted by: yellow
» Icono...U never cease to keep me awake to truth. DOn't get too cocky!
Posted by: common intelligence
Comments are closed-
Posted by: RedFoxOne on Oct 31, 2008 5:20 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Jiff
Privacy Center
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dipconsult on Oct 31, 2008 5:22 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Both the US and British electorate had to be deceived into support of the war. Cheney & co. to a great extent succeeded in the US. In the UK the "march of a million" through London showed that Blair and the Murdoch press had not had as much success - but they went ahead anyway and protest evaporated ("now we must back our brave soldiers").
To this day many of us Cassandras who tried to stop the catastrophe still cannot get across our assessment of the new world scene that resulted from the Iraq war. The war supporters in politics and media cannot allow themselves to admit to so great and so obvious a folly and so deny us a hearing.
Yes, Obama too will have the utmost difficulty in getting America back on the track of cooperation from the catastrophic track of confrontation and the vain attempt to establish American global hegemony.
So it's not only the ill-educated and the religious fundamentalists that need to have their eyes opened, but almost all the "Anglo-Saxon" political/media class! Tall order - but surely we must try! I believe use of the internet in innovative ways could force at least part of the "traditional" media and thus the politicians to pay attention to world reality.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: dipconsult - Tony Blair
Posted by: Carol Burns
Comments are closed-
Posted by: vade_dyset on Oct 31, 2008 5:39 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: vade D
Posted by: igancedo
Comments are closed-
Posted by: scheherezade on Oct 31, 2008 5:42 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, almost is the key -- recall that whenever he spies a tiny opening, O'Reilly departs from bashing "secular-progressive" (?) intellectuals to remind his "moran" fan base that he "went to Harvard" too.
Like most anti-intellectuals, Bill is feeling left out and overlooked by his "elite" colleagues, and life in general. Venting to his grotesquely stupid audience (as evidenced by the nightly email readoff) no doubt reassures him he's not the dullest knife in the drawer, by a long shot. This appears to be a symbiotic (or perhaps mutually enabling) relationship -- the fans are also feeling good about themselves after a Two-Minutes Hate session with Mr. Goebbles/O'Reilly.
As an earlier poster alluded, America's decline towards the lowest common denominator has happened in Europe and other places, throughout history -- reaching a tipping point most notably just as Weimar Germany was moving towards turning things to the positive.
The problem appears to be an inherently human one and begs a structural/biological solution that thus far, nobody seems in any danger of uncovering.
People are stupid and crave authority.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» The Fascist Propagandists
Posted by: FoonTheElder
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bryangalt on Oct 31, 2008 6:10 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This seems to be an effect of the religious zealouts in the US because of their self-righteous belief that they can help bring on Armegeddon and thus the return of Jesus.
In the meantime, the moderate and left wing folks are in denial that anyone would purposely jeopardize their future and the future of the human race on a story from Revelations.
Thus, this allows the religious zealots to move their agenda forward. If anyone does attempt to challenge the religious agenda, they are attacked immediately as being a communist, an athiest, un-American, etc. which is ironic considering those same people are the ones that are truly un-American.
Check these quotes out and tell me if they have some bearing on today's situations:
"The loud little handful will shout for war. The pulpit will warily and cautiously protest at first…The great mass of the nation will rub its sleepy eyes, and will try to make out why there should be a war, and they will say earnestly and indignantly: ‘It is unjust and dishonorable and there is no need for war.’
Then the few will shout even louder…Before long you will see a curious thing: anti-war speakers will be stoned from the platform, and free speech will be strangled by hordes of furious men who still agree with the speakers but dare not admit it.
Next, statesmen will invent cheap lies, putting blame upon the nation that is attacked, and every man will be glad of those conscience-soothing falsities, and will diligently study them, and refuse to examine any refutations of them; and thus he will by and by convince himself that the war is just, and will thank God for the better sleep he enjoys after this process of grotesque self-deception.”
--Mark Twain
“Conceit, arrogance and egotism are the essentials of patriotism…Patriotism assumes that our globe is divided into little spots, each one surrounded by an iron gate.
Those who had the fortune of being born on some particular spot, consider themselves better, nobler, grander, more intelligent than the living beings inhabiting any other spot.
It is, therefore, the duty of everyone living on that chosen spot to fight, kill, and die in the attempt to impose his superiority upon all others”.
— Emma Goldman
“Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it.”
--Adolf Hitler
“I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies…if the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of currency...the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent that their fathers conquered.”
— Thomas Jefferson
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: QuestionAuthority on Oct 31, 2008 6:44 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The problem with the 'Armageddonists' is that they indeed are capable of setting off WW III in pursuit of their Millennial Kingdom. ANd that is one thing that no amount of intelligence can survive.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: nfamous on Oct 31, 2008 6:57 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Parents are the ones who 'train' their children to be subservient
Posted by: Cathyc
Comments are closed-
Posted by: 6399 on Oct 31, 2008 7:05 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just spend a few minutes thinking about all the times you've seen a video wherein:
Some dipshit pointed to Australia thinking he's really pointed to Iran.
Some redneck couldn't locate Canada on a map.
Some blonde trophy wife, arms laden with Gucci bags, didn't have the vaguest notion who our sitting vice president is.
Some goofy hiptard with eight facial piercings has no idea where we are currently engaged in one of our two imperial landgrabs.
Ask 100 high school seniors if they know who our sitting Secretary of State is and my guess is only 10% would get it right.
Put plainly - Americans are inbred degenerates who have limited futures in ditch digging.
Just look at the guy in the article photo for crying out loud. He's no different than the guy at the GOP convention who was holding the "Mavrick" sign over his head in a display of intellectual self-flagellation.
My wife is Brazilian and even she noticed that it was misspelled.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I'll tell you why our leaders are 'morans'
Posted by: helenwheels
» RE: I'll tell you why our leaders are 'morans' - Obama's not, but he isn't our leader yet.
Posted by: symcokid
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ebishirl on Oct 31, 2008 7:06 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The first time I saw "Idiocracy," my only thought was, "Mike Judge is a genius, only he got the timing wrong. It didn't take 200 years -- we're there now."
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Idiocracy
Posted by: madmac10
» RE: Idiocracy
Posted by: helenwheels
» RE: Idiocracy
Posted by: babs
» Yep, libs need to stop thinking so much and start breeding
Posted by: MartianBachelor
» Quit dividing the states like that and show some respect man !
Posted by: maxpayne
» Brilliant
Posted by: kepstein7777
» RE: Idiocracy
Posted by: berserkr1979
Comments are closed-
Posted by: archives@uwyo.edu on Oct 31, 2008 7:07 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Moral snobs and spoiled morons.
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: Moral snobs and spoiled morons.
Posted by: helenwheels
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Kathryn54 on Oct 31, 2008 7:07 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
History always repeats itself, but only the educated get the warning.
Kate
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Dark Ages
Posted by: sallyride
» RE: Dark Ages U ARE SO RIGHT- AMERICA A NEW THIRD WORLD
Posted by: stopthemaddness2
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Bushmaster on Oct 31, 2008 7:27 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Overall Christian fundamentalism was a soul destroying experience for me and I am sick at heart to see people in positions of influence promoting the ideas, 'values'? that I know have the ability to sicken and bring out the worst in the human personality.
One thing that stands out clearly to me is that if a person fervently believes in a God who will burn people alive until they are dead, then their view of morality and ethics can easily morph into Social Darwinism. The Puritans, early fundamentalists in this nation, believed it. If you were wealthy, God had blessed you. If you were poor the opposite was true. American political and cultural values seemed to have been extrapolated from this point of view.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Hang in there pal, we've got a lot of cleanup work to do.
Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: I am a recovered Christian Fundamentalist
Posted by: WyrdSister
» RE: I am a recovered Christian Fundamentalist
Posted by: Bushmaster
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sallyride on Oct 31, 2008 7:35 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Have a great day - if you can.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Terrific Topic and Discussion - thanks all!
Posted by: Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Quasar on Oct 31, 2008 7:35 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Learning is tough. Thinking is tougher. And there is a fine line between education and indoctrination.
All successful politicians know this even if they know little else. Ignorance is power.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: liberallibrarian on Oct 31, 2008 7:36 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Religion IS a Monolith, To The Believers
Posted by: johnyradio
» think about what you're saying
Posted by: inverse_agonist
Comments are closed-
Posted by: l_double_e on Oct 31, 2008 7:45 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Jesus was a socialist
Posted by: hurricane hugo
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sliver on Oct 31, 2008 7:46 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Much of the country believes in this credo so fervently that they think they should be able to match wits with the president.
Why do you think Joe the Plumber walked up to Obama? He was thinking "If I could just talk to that Obama, I could tell him some things he hasn't thought about yet, and I could change his mind."
Joe thinks his senior year in high school is roughly equal to Obama's Harvard Law School degree, which he wouldn't want anyway. If he dabbled with a community college, he probably found out that he doesn't need that kind of education. "You don't learn nothin' there," he might say. "They don't know what it's like in the real world."
So this philosophy of people thinking they are equal, no matter their experience or capacity, has actually led to people who are not curious and don't want to learn from others, because they think they know enough already. They are trained to not look up to people, but rather to look at them on an equal footing. If someone has has improved themselves greatly, it is easy to undercut their accomplishments by pointing out that they are now different.
So why would they vote for John Kerry or Barack Obama, who clearly have had different life experiences? They feel more comfortable with Bush and McCain, because they know guys like that down at the bar or coffee shop. They don't want to learn something new or even have to face someone with new ideas.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: What about "all men created equal?"
Posted by: tjg1984
Comments are closed-
Posted by: counterpoint on Oct 31, 2008 7:47 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
McCAIN/PALAN...
Too bad I can't embed it.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: speaking of "moran" protesters...
Posted by: sallyride
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Mamarianne on Oct 31, 2008 7:47 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Don't blame the teachers
Posted by: tjg1984
» RE: Don't blame the teachers
Posted by: bobtr900
Comments are closed-
Posted by: gabbyone on Oct 31, 2008 7:54 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
you would all be sitting outside of your closed Starbucks weeping because you can't get your morning fix. The people you so denigrate are America. They build your roads, fix your plumbing, pick up your garbage, produce your food, and manufacture the goods you need. They give you all the leisure time to sit and make fun of them. They also have something that none of you have and that is common sense and
I can tell from what you have all written you don't have it. Common sense would tell you that trashing people who hold your future in their hands may make you feel intelligent but
it is far from smart. It is your attitude and the attitude of your candidates that brings about their defeat every cycle. I guess these people are a whole lot smarter than you think because they defeat you every time.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Who is the smartest?
Posted by: madmac10
» RE: Who is the smartest?
Posted by: maxpayne
» You didn't even read the article or the comments. Typical self-deluded "conservative" playing the
Posted by: maxpayne
» The stupid are denigrating the educated
Posted by: scheherezade
» RE: Who is the smartest?
Posted by: redbird30328
» RE: Who is the smartest?
Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Who is the smartest?
Posted by: helenahanbasquet
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mountainmama on Oct 31, 2008 7:57 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: USAFVeteran1966 on Oct 31, 2008 8:07 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Vietnam vet/Obama supporter
Eight reasons to vote against John McCain
PS: Hugh Scott asked me to thank the many AlterNet readers who visited his NONPROFIT website, www.UnfitMcCain.com, which received nearly two million hits since being launched in May 2008. As Scotty emailed me about his AlterNet promotional efforts, "Mission Accomplished!"
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: National IQ test
Posted by: sallyride
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Oct 31, 2008 8:11 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Come to mind.
Lol, try this one for your next poster: "The morons is us for beliving in free lunchs"
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kmarx on Oct 31, 2008 8:13 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Easy answer: the American people want to see their own reflection in the leaders they elect. Hence they elect morons, jackasses, fools, demagogues, imbeciles, and a host of other losers! You see, I told you the answer was an easy one!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kmarx on Oct 31, 2008 8:38 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What you say George is changing as we speak. For example, when a moron like jackass jr (Georgie boy) can get accepted at Yale and Harvard it tells us that nepotism is alive and well.
Some of the best work in science and medicine is taking place overseas. This is due in part to a economically-based cultural environment in America which brainwashes its people, especially the young, into believing they too can become rich while sitting on their duffs and investing in the global market. So why work? So why pursue an education in some of the more difficult disciplines like math and science?
A major problem is with Corporate America and our crooked government, a wholly owned subsidiary of Corporate America. This cabal loves sending the best jobs overseas and importing cheap overseas labor to replace those with the greatest abilities here. What can one expect under these circumstances? America is a has-been society and deserves to be as the public has elected some of the dumbest people on two feet!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» I must disagree. Me too
Posted by: Cathyc
Comments are closed-
Posted by: zooeyhall on Oct 31, 2008 8:53 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Then maybe America would have been spared the importation of the religious crazies from Europe.
Any chance that Europe might take them back?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» "Any chance Europe might take them back?" ...
Posted by: Cathyc
Comments are closed-
Posted by: gjones on Oct 31, 2008 8:54 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If there were truly a seperation of church and state in this country, then churches would have to PAY TAXES and be HELD ACCOUNTABLE for the damage they do. Spewing hatred is just as bad for the citizens of this country as spewing toxic waste. They are the same thing. Churches have gotten a free ride on our shoulders for far too long and I don't see any way to stop the downhill spiraling that we are doing until we realize that giving a religion, ANY religion, tax-free status elevates them beyond that of free Americans.
Please, lets call for a REAL seperation of church and state. Take the word 'god' off of our currency, take the word 'god' out of our pledge of allegiance, and take back our country for the people.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: A New Cultural Identity
Posted by: Cathyc
» RE: A New Cultural Identity
Posted by: Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Bob Doublin on Oct 31, 2008 8:57 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: symcokid on Oct 31, 2008 8:58 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: aonghus36 on Oct 31, 2008 9:02 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Religious fundamentalism can make one stupid, I agree. It seems to overemphasize one area of the brain, the right side(feeling, intuition). The heart would rule the head. Overemphasis on intellectualism gives too much prominence to the left(logic, reason) side of the brain. This can lead to imperception of intangibles. The head would rule the heart. Either way, those who would rule over us, though they disagree with each other, on the face of it, would have us emphasize the one side of the brain, at the expense of the other. I think we should listen to neither of these factions, but rather temper reason with intuition, and balance logic, with feeling. I beleive we should read, but we should meditate, too. This would lead us to that which is true, or even True, not that which is dogmatic. The Goddess Themis is often depicted holding a balance scale. The balance is better when it exists inside us, otherwise it will never be external to us.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ezstevey on Oct 31, 2008 9:28 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Religious Right Hypocrisy: Social Restriction and Economic Freedom
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: johnyradio on Oct 31, 2008 9:44 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Your attack on self-education is, in fact, in-agreement with right-wing attacks on intellectualism. A broken public education system is one of their weapons against intellectual progress.
While it may be true that home-schooling is used by Christian fundamentalists to isolate their kids from secular education, home-schooling is an alternative for progressive, pro-intellectual parents to circumvent the damaging influence of mainstream American education-- particularly parents who cannot afford to send their kids to private school.
It's not uncommon for home-schooled adolescents to study college-level material; some even enroll in college.
"college sophomore Moshe Kai Cavalin is cramming for final exams in classes such as advanced mathematics, foreign languages and music. But Cavalin is only 10 years old. 'I'm studying statistics,' says the alternately precocious and shy Cavalin, his textbook lying open on the living room desk of his parents' apartment in this quiet suburb east of Los Angeles. His parents home-schooled him."
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24612730?GT1=43001
"My own homeschooled children entered college at the ages of 13, 12, and 13. They were finished with Calculus III and all college general requirements by the age of 15."
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2017802/posts
Abraham Lincoln was not the last great self-taught success. Many heroes in science, business, and the arts were self-taught, home-schooled, didn't go to college, or simply dropped out, including Richard Avedon, Alexander Graham Bell, David Ben-Gurion, Carl Bernstein, Ray Bradbury, Richard Branson, Art Buchwald, Andrew Carnegie, Agatha Christie, Arthur C. Clarke, Mark Twain, Joseph Conrad, Maya Angelou, Woody Allen, Bill Gates... the list goes on.
http://www.autodidactic.com/profiles/profiles.htm
Personally, when I was flunking out of high-school algebra, I was also teaching myself computer programming and electronic circuit design, composing music, reading college-level books, and engineering sound in a professional theater. I stopped making an effort in the classroom, because that classroom was an insult to my intelligence.
Conventional education is irrelevant to, even damaging to, many gifted kids, partly because the system is designed to accommodate the lowest-common-denominator. Classes are geared to the least-advanced students in the room, so the smartest kids lose out. It's based, partly, on the left-wing, idealistic, politically-correct, but wrong view that everyone is intellectual equal, and therefor should receive an identical education. Gifted kids, this nation's promise, are thus abandoned.
In addition, conventional American education, like the Chinese system, emphasizes rote memorization, not creativity. Rote memorization is important, but without creativity, it produces intellectual conformity, and thus social conformity. Social progress, scientific advancement, and political fairness need a healthy dose of non-conformity.
Until the American public education system delivers a world-class education, my kids will be home-schooled, or private-schooled if I can afford it, or schooled in another country.
-Johny Radio
http://inyourear.org
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Home-Schooling Is The Only Option For Many Gifted Kids
Posted by: Lilly
» Homeschooling Does Not Produce Sex Fiends and Drug Addicts
Posted by: johnyradio
» RE: Home-Schooling Is The Only Option For Many Gifted Kids
Posted by: LeeAnnG
» RE: Home-Schooling Is The Only Option For Many Gifted Kids
Posted by: Bushmaster
» Home-Schooling Is The Only Option For Many Gifted Kids
Posted by: Cathyc
» Home-Schooling: Johnny Radio
Posted by: Cathyc
Comments are closed-
Posted by: LeeAnnG on Oct 31, 2008 9:50 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unfortunately one problem is that, in many ways, American schools are not doing a particularly good job. I've been working for a school system for 22 years, and I was married to a teacher for 25 years in PA and WV, so I have a pretty close association with public schools.
In general, I've found a significant lack of intellect among school administrators. I do editing for all the county's handbooks, and it's just amazing how dreadful the writing of administators is from principals up to the superintendent. They can't spell, misuse punctuation, and have no idea which nouns are proper and which are not. The majority of them think "high school" is a proper noun.
The head of one English department took down the schedule of BBC Shakespeare plays from the bulletin board in the English office because he didn't think anyone would be interested. He did not know that Nick Adams was a Hemingway character and thought Antigone (which he pronounced Antigoan) was written by Shakespeare.
One principal "corrected" my sentence, "This misbehavior results in the student's having to stay after school." He didn't know that gerunds get a possessive.
Yet another principal wanted me to put the following sentence in his handbook, "If a student needs to go home, they must report to the office and wait for their parent." When I told him that was grammatically incorrect, his answer was that English was never his strong subject. Wow! I never would have guessed.
An elementary school principal came into my office and complimented me on my always having a book to read at lunchtime because, as he told me, he never reads. How can a person encourage children to read if he never reads?
If I had a dollar for every time I heard an "educator" use a subject pronoun as the object in a sentence just because it followed the word "and," I'd be wealthy. My boss, who used to be a school principal, consistently starts sentences with phrases like, "The trouble between she and the secretary..." or says, "Come into the office and talk to Mary and I."
If schools were doing their job, people like Goldwater's granddaughter wouldn't write sentences that start with, "Myself, and some of my cousins..." as if "I" isn't a word you use in the beginning of a sentence. "Myself" used to have a real meaning - it indicated that one was doing something alone or was actually alone, as in "I will do it myself" or "I was sitting by myself." Now people use "I" as the object of the sentence when "and" is present and "myself" as the subject when "and" is present. How did that happen?
It's not surprising that so many posters think "it's" is a possessive, that "Clinton's" and "American's" are plurals, that people feel "badly" (one wouldn't say "I feel terribly" or "I feel happily"), and that "alot" is a word.
I realize that there is more to communication and education than grammar. If schools were actually encouraging creativity and critical thinking, or if administrators displayed an understanding of history and current events, an evolving language that assumes "if you know what I mean it's good enough" might not be an issue. In reality, it's just one more indication of poor education.
Yes, religion does play a part in dumbing down the population, but until we get actual scholars to administrate our schools, we will continue to get citizens who are illiterate and unable to speak or write the language.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Teaching is the worst-paid, least-respected job in education.
Posted by: redceres
» RE: Teaching is the worst-paid, least-respected job in education.
Posted by: LeeAnnG
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lilly on Oct 31, 2008 9:54 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Lilly
Posted by: wal55
» RE: Lilly
Posted by: tjg1984
» RE: Lilly
Posted by: Lilly
» RE: Lilly
Posted by: redbird30328
» RE: Lilly
Posted by: Lilly
Comments are closed-
Posted by: EncinoM on Oct 31, 2008 10:20 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The real cause is that many are wedded to one outlook on the world and view the world only through those lenses.
Many posts here attack religon and explain things in marxist terms and class warfare. They are so blinded by their faith in one set of belief, that those so don;t share their opinions become the unkept masses.
The problem has nothing to do with educations and everything to do with the inability to see the merit in the other side and debate the pros and cons.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Its not as if the Progressives don;t have their share of Morons
Posted by: redbird30328
» RE: Its not as if the Progressives don;t have their share of Morons
Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: I haven't a clue WTF you are talking about, but
Posted by: bitsfick
» RE: I haven't a clue WTF you are talking about, but
Posted by: EncinoM
» But "capitalism" has proven no better than marxism. Each has their pluses and minuses.
Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: But "capitalism" has proven no better than marxism. Each has their pluses and minuses.
Posted by: EncinoM
» Modern-day "Marxism" isn't Marxism
Posted by: GuitarBill
» No one's a moron ! There may be wackies who think they can fly richie but not morons !
Posted by: maxpayne
» eh...
Posted by: inverse_agonist
» RE: eh...
Posted by: EncinoM
» Oh, the irony
Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: Oh, the irony
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: Oh, the irony
Posted by: GuitarBill
» The "truthiness" movement?
Posted by: Jeanne
» RE: The "truthiness" movement?
Posted by: EncinoM
» You have no business calling anyone an idiot, EncinoM
Posted by: GuitarBill
» >plop< (the sound of your joke hitting the ground an inch away from your mouth)
Posted by: realtruther
Comments are closed-
Posted by: taxidriver on Oct 31, 2008 10:27 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's another reason why I hope Obama wins next week. He's a thoughtful, intelligent, well-informed person who does not mangle his syllables. Nor does he talk down to the American people.
Words do matter. So does intelligence, class, and dignity. Let's hope they win out on Nov. 4th.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Importance of Role Models
Posted by: redbird30328
» RE: Importance of Role Models
Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Importance of Role Models
Posted by: redbird30328
» RE: Importance of Role Models oh puhleez
Posted by: DaBear
» RE: Importance of Role Models
Posted by: DaBear
Comments are closed-
Posted by: marid on Oct 31, 2008 10:36 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Tim Chadron on Oct 31, 2008 10:35 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's also true that ego creates major issues. Our collective ego as a country keeps us from seeing solutions to problems that have been implemented by others around the world, simply because we believe ourselves superior to these people so they could not possibly have any ideas that would benefit us.
It's also true that being intellectual doesn't necessarily make you more wise than the person with little education but vast life experiences.
It's true too that it's difficult, or so it seems anyway, to find people to run for public office that are intellectual, wise, and possess a sense of caring for the "common man".
The world is complex as hell and I'm not sure there are answers to these questions on a large scale save one. Education that teaches us that we are all linked together.... The intellectual and the uneducated laborer. The politician and the person he/she is supposed to serve. The rich and the poor. The secular and the religious.
Rugged individualism is a myth to a large extent today. Where did you get the food you ate today? Or the clothes you wear? Or the fuel for your vehicle? Or your vehicle for that matter? The list is endless, even for those who really come the closest to being rugged individualists. WE HAVE TO RELY ON EACH OTHER!!
Right now, it is the richest of this nation who seem to understand this the least, and eventually, they too will pay a price for their ignorance.
I am 47 years old and in relatively good health. I like to thing positively for the most part about life. I try to see the good where ever I can. But something in me tells me that I will not die a natural death, and that I will see a true revolution in this country within my lifetime. And I believe those things simply because we do not understand yet how interconnected we are and how the time for being divisive has to end, and soon.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jlowelld on Oct 31, 2008 10:48 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The mystery of how the U.S. can simultaneously have some of the most respected institutes of higher-learning in the world, and yet somehow that body of knowledge is repudiated in the general public (or at least in the political realm), can be partly explained by political/economic structure of the institutions. One element of that structure is the evolution of the "management system" of universities, where instead of the academics heading the university, and taking stipends to off-set the additional hours required by administration, full-time managers are hired to administrate the universities. These managers are typically gleaned from non-academic sources or "disciplines" (such as business colleges) and are paid salaries 2 - 5X their academic counterparts. In essence, these full-time administrators are "owned" by the regents. The regents are invariably business owners who in most cases are conservative, under-educated, and whose financial/political interests would not be served by universities with a powerful voice in the culture.
These factors are just part of an overall system where wealth is concentrated in the hands of a few individuals; who in turn own the political system from top to bottom, and whose interest are served by maintaining the 'mythology of democracy', but are in fact absolutely opposed to the reality of democracy--which, if it came into being would [of course] be the end to their way of life.
The end of democracy and the defeat of the American Revolution will occur when government falls into the hands of [private cartel] lending institutions and moneyed incorporations.--President Thomas Jefferson
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» The end of democracy..
Posted by: Cathyc
» RE: jlowell
Posted by: charlesp210
Comments are closed-
Posted by: willymack on Oct 31, 2008 10:53 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: It'd be funny if it weren't so sad
Posted by: redbird30328
» RE: It'd be funny if it weren't so sad
Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: It'd be funny if it weren't so sad
Posted by: Dboy
» RE: It'd be funny if it weren't so sad
Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: It'd be funny if it weren't so sad
Posted by: Dboy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jimswanson on Oct 31, 2008 10:59 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
www.bushleagueofnations.com [for FREE downloads of entire book]
Thank you George Monbiot for your passionate article. I wish I had written it myself.
I’m a very active progressive Christian who is appalled at the rise of the Christian Reich’s upside-down version of Christ and Christianity—Pro-Rich and Pro-War—and the GOP’s War on Iraq and War on America.
Thanks to America’s warmongering Christian Reich, being “a Christian” has understandably become a negative in the eyes of most of the world, and I can empathize with the rapidly increasing number of Americans—especially our younger citizens—who have no use for Christianity.
As for me, I have chosen to stay and fight to reclaim my faith from those who use it to support a rightwing imperial power structure.
Christianity will remain a powerful weapon in American politics for at least another generation, and we abandon this weapon to “the morons” at our peril.
Engaging and exposing the Religious Reich without using the Bible is like hunting rats at the city dump without using your best ammo.
In any major battle you must know your enemy.
This and much more is discussed in, "The Bush League of Nations: The Coalition of the Unwilling, the Bullied and the Bribed – the GOP’s War on Iraq and America," by James A. Swanson (2008, CreateSpace Publishing, 448 pages).
As a gift to patriots everywhere, the entire book can be downloaded for FREE at www.bushleagueofnations.com. Please pass along the good news.
I ask for nothing in return, except that you consider using my book to help kick out America’s worst political party ever.
Jim Swanson
www.bushleagueofnations.com
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: A Christian Replies to Mr. Monbiot
Posted by: Jeanne
» A Christian Replies to Mr. Monbiot. What's wrong with being a Normal Human Being?
Posted by: Cathyc
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Dboy on Oct 31, 2008 11:28 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
dboy
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: WyrdSister on Oct 31, 2008 11:50 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The new common sense now has one believing that God is a Bigot and Discrimination is the new Rule of the Land. It has us believing that W was elected twice and that the majority of the country shares in his Delusions of Grandure, and are rewarded by calling them Patriotic. The new Common Sense says that if enough people believe the Lie, it will become the truth.
I am happy to be in the Underground with those who have, now, the Uncommon Sense. The sense that allows us the Freedom of Thought that results in Truth.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Common Sense no longer common
Posted by: willymack
Comments are closed-
Posted by: drp on Oct 31, 2008 12:19 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Outside the major urban centers on the coasts and greatlakes, being on the "wrong" (i.e. prohibitionist) side automatically swings 3-7% of the vote againt you, no matter how much the same voters may agree with you on other matters.
Personally, I agree with Obama on most social issues and disagree with Palin on almost everything but her support for the right to keep and bear arms. But that single point of agreement is sufficient for me. There are a lot of other who feel the same way.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Since when did Obama call for "gun control" ? You wanna delude yourself with the sellout NRA?
Posted by: maxpayne
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Ahimsa on Oct 31, 2008 12:26 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have been getting a very strange reaction from educated people, mostly intellectuals, actually. I am not talking about "morans" here.
During social introductions, when I say that I am a college professor, the reaction is, "OK, but what do you DO" (this is after I mention my double affiliation, my double interest as a professional and academic.)
I guess being a college professor is not enough, It doesn't count.
I find this disturbing, and not because I expect to be celebrated. Teaching tends to be considered an honorable occupation in other cultures...
What is up with this?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» America ain't no India. Respecting intellectuals is somehow looked down upon here in America.
Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Another face of the disease
Posted by: bessie
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dburress on Oct 31, 2008 1:41 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The leaders of the radical right are clever and effective politicians who have outtalked us and outmaneuvered us to accomplish damage all out of proportion to the popularity of their true positions. We are winning this year not so much because we have learned more effective responses, but rather because this is a year when almost any white male average Joe Democrat could have beaten the Republicans handily. It is truly a miracle that we had the candidate we do have positioned to take advantage of these times.
But little will have been accomplished other than laying some shibboleths of racism to rest if we continue to underestimate the enemy and overestimate our own capabilities. If for example Obama's health care plan fails then judging from 1994 there will be a substantial and rapid Republican resurgence. And it is quite likely that it will fail, because Obama has proposed nothing that will can reduce the money and political power of the main enemy of adequate health coverage, which is the insurance companies. Also, Obama shows every sign of getting himself mired in an unwinnable war in Afghanistan. The left needs a powerful movement on the ground immediate to resist these twin mistakes.
Moreover, we still have a lot to learn from the right about strategy, discipline, and rhetoric. I don't mean that we can copy their tactics, but we can learn the supreme importance of developing better tactics of our own, and I see only limited progress on that score.
For example, many of seem to see Obama as the natural leader of the progressive movement. Presidents rarely play that role, with Lincoln and FDR being partial exceptions. Obama in particular has set himself up as an honest broker who can translate the power we generate on the ground into policy. We desperately need independent organizations and leaders and a disciplined movement that can generate that power.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: opmoc on Oct 31, 2008 2:06 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
» thanks Tony, and here are some details
Posted by: realtruther
Comments are closed-
Posted by: penobscotdziekuje@yahoo.com on Oct 31, 2008 2:27 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But then again, we are a nation of "morans." However, I know there are plenty of intelligent and bright people in the U.S.A. but I wonder where they are to lead us in a better direction. Education no longer provides us with equal opportunities to make it. Some people may graduate, but learning HOW to USE intelligence isn't universally applied directly from our minds to society. What's INTELLIGENT about the CIA?
The way we use "intelligence" varies from one person to the next. You can detect it in speech, tone and mannerisms.
Lastly, in order for us to move beyond a national consesus of Dummkopf stage we must invest in educating ourselves of the pitfalls of ignorance.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jvaljon1 on Oct 31, 2008 2:37 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If every citizen who could have voted in the year 2000, did vote--it would not have been possible for Katharine Harris to get away with tossing enough votes away so that her boy Bush could "win". Harris only had to throw 3000 votes away. 300,000--and that would have been NOTICED.
There was an article in a London paper, in 2004, which headline read: (I paraphrase) "How can 59,000,000 people, be so dumb?"
That figure was about 53% of the vote. Think about it, people-- only half the eligible voters, voted! What happened to the rest of them?
A people too stupid to keep what they have, is destined to lose what they have. As a former Republican who lost out during Bush #1--then recouped everything and then some, during the Clinton years--of COURSE I have voted Democrat ever since!
Only to find that it doesn't matter. The only thing that matters is what Corporate America wants. That is--unless C.A. is overwhelmed by a tsunami of individual voters! And it could have happened in 2000; Al Gore was a shoo-in, only nobody cared whether he got in or not. Of course, everyone was flush at the time. So nobody but a few patriotic die-hards, bothered to go guarantee their future security.
And now here we are. Yeah. We get what we deserve. If/when Obama wins, I sure hope that people won't let the vote get away from them ever again. That they teach their kids to vote by taking them to the voting booth. Republicans, I know, do this. Why don't the Democrats?
It's too much even for them to bother to vote--much less to teach their own kids, how to preserve their precious liberty, I guess....
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Proving once again, that... U ARE RIGHT 59,000,000 PEOPLE VOTED AGAINST BUSH 2004 & LOST VOTES!
Posted by: stopthemaddness2
» RE: Proving once again, that...
Posted by: macdon1
» RE: I entertained that idea myself...
Posted by: Cybershaman
Comments are closed-
Posted by: centure7 on Oct 31, 2008 2:40 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
However, the the concept that being a religious fundamentalist equates to being ignorant, is offensive and disgusting bigotry on the part of Alternet. Alternet is so quick to call religious fundamentalists bigots when they mistreat gay people, a rare thing as far as I know, yet Alternet has the hypocricy to call all religious fundamentalists ignorant and pretend they are some kind of pond scum without realizing that is the same bigotry they spend a good fraction of their articles blabbering about.
I have every right to be both an intellectual and a religious fundamentalist, and any other kind of extremist under the sun without Alternet badmouthing me just for the fact. At least some extremes are good and possibly some religious fundamentals are good as well. But for Alternet to go around parading the possibly five fake Christians who mistreat gay people and then claim religious fundamentalists are ignorant, is a highly ignorant thing to claim itself!
I find it strange that I said this same exact thing a couple weeks ago and my post was rated a 1, yet when Alternet says the same thing and the only difference is they add in bigotry, they suddenly get rave reviews. If I were a bigot too by badmouthing fundamentalists knowledge of facts I'm sure my post would have scored a five. This unfounded assumption is based on their lack of ability to see that religion is just another one of the infinite philosophies out there and if religion didn't exist it would simply be replaced by something they would find equally disturbing.
And I should add (since Alternet likes that loser Obama who voted for the "patriot ACT", and yes I will mention that in every single Alternet post I make) that just because Obama sounds great does not make him an intellectual at all. In fact anyone who sounds that smooth is the kind of person I trust the very least. But anyways I'm sure there will be someone who has lots of evidence that Obama is an intelligent individual and they won't leave Alternet embarrassed. I remember however that Obama said there were something like 57 states and so very much question his intelligence, though look forward to be given evidence otherwise.
The third party candidates on the other hand are all clearly very smart people, and why an intellectual would support the big-two oligarchy (Republics or Democrats) is beyond my comprehension.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Bush signed the US Patriot Act into law on October 26, 2001. Obama entered the Senate in 2004
Posted by: David Baker
» from his own website, of course...
Posted by: inverse_agonist
» RE: from his own website, of course...
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: from his own website, of course...
Posted by: David Baker
» RE: from his own website, of course...
Posted by: inverse_agonist
Comments are closed-
Posted by: yellow on Oct 31, 2008 2:55 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Did Sarah Palin deliberately mispronounce Rashid Khalidi's name to play to GOP's uneducated base?
Posted by: Quannah
» Smearing Khalidi's PLO connections is stupid. The US and Israel recognize the PLO. Oslo Accords?
Posted by: yellow
» RE: Smearing Khalidi's PLO connections is stupid. The US and Israel recognize the PLO. Oslo Accords?
Posted by: Quannah
» CALLING OUT YELLOW'S ANTI-WHITE RACISM
Posted by: Physiocrat
» RE: CALLING OUT YELLOW'S ANTI-WHITE RACISM
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: CALLING OUT YELLOW'S ANTI-WHITE RACISM
Posted by: laoma
Comments are closed-
Posted by: opmoc on Oct 31, 2008 3:06 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hollywood, TV across the World and Journalists
Is ALL Recorded
And Easily Analysed
And so it is extremely EASY
To IDENTIFY ALL THE CRIMINALS in GOVERNMENTS Across The World
But The Politicians Are Usually Just The Puppets
The Trail Now Goes Right To The Top
And The Guy at The Top
Is
Michael Palin
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DaBear on Oct 31, 2008 3:56 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Therein lies the crux. A group of narcisisstic, delusional, arrogant, triumphalistic, Orwellian, totalitarian, violent, savage and emotionally bankrupt people clustered in one giant cult. Those of us who escaped that craptasm know all about it. I think it's funny that it takes a Brit to point it out and make people listen... but then again 90% of the commentary here never deals with Monbiot's premise... gotta luv 'merkuh.
If we can find a way to sequester the whackos from public and civic life, help them grow up and stop sucking the Jayzis tit, we'll all be the better for it. Until then, it's fuckin' armageddon this and that.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: opmoc on Oct 31, 2008 3:57 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And got what I thought was a reasonable response complete with link to a suitable video in what was it 11 minutes?
I must admit to something
There was this band playing live completely representing the most completey Brilliant Performance of Led Zeppelin since I saw them at Knebworth in 1979 (Twice)
In our Local Pub
And there was this little bloke looking through the Pub's Window...
And I gestured for him to COME IN
The Pub didn't Charge
It Was and Still Is FREE to come in
So he wouldn't come in
And so the gig finished
And the band dismantled all their kit
And he was still standing there
And so we asked him back to our home with all our friends
And he hardly spoke a word of English and hardly any of us spoke a Word of Spanish
But it didn't matter
There was Electric Guitars and Acoustic Guitars and Drums in our Kitchen
And so he stayed the night - and we welcomed him back to stay again
And Barry said - he was on The BBC 6 'O' Clcok News Playing Live at This South American Festival In The Centre of London
So he came back again for a second night very late - and we said you are sleeping here downstairs
And my Wife's best oldest Schoolfriend was sleeping naked alone in ths spare bedroom
And a about 5:00 am
He crept into her bed
And she said hello
Get out of my bedroom please Now
So he retired Gracefully
(And I Thought She Was Completely Insane - Probably Would Have Got The Best Sex in Her Life - But She Said No - and He Respected her Wishes Gracefully)
And so He invited us to visit his Mum and Dad and Entire Family high up in the Mountains in Peru...
He Said Tony & Julie - You Are Very Welcome - This is My Address
Tony
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: David Baker on Oct 31, 2008 4:46 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Yet, uniquely among the developed nations (with the possible exception of Australia), learning is a grave political disadvantage [in the US]."
This is very unfair on Australia. The Australian Parliamentary Library actually publishes information on the qualification of Australian parliamentarians. Here is the breakdown of the current parliament:
More than three-quarters of the members of the current parliament have post-secondary school qualifications. In total, 177 of the 226 politicians (78 per cent) have such qualifications. (Fellowships, memberships, and associates of professional or other bodies are not counted.)
http://www.aph.gov.au/library/pubs/RN/2005-06/06rn24.htm
Admittedly the Conservative party (paradoxically called the Liberal Party) ran a very anti-intellectual and negative campaign in last year's election (very similar to, in fact strongly influenced by the sort of campaign the Republicans have run since at least Reagan). The Conservatives were soundly defeated.
I believe the percentage of Australian Parliamentarians with post-secondary school degrees would stand up well against most other developed nations. I challenge Monbiot to prove otherwise.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Comparison unfair to Australia
Posted by: rugby
Comments are closed-
Posted by: billklinton on Oct 31, 2008 6:02 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama/Biden vs McCain/Palin, what if things were switched around?…..think about it.
Would the country’s collective point of view be different?
Ponder the following:
What if the Obamas had paraded five children across the stage, including a three month old infant and an unwed, pregnant teenage daughter?
What if John McCain was a former president of the Harvard Law Review?
What if Barack Obama finished fifth from the bottom of his graduating class?
What if McCain had only married once, and Obama was a divorcee?
What if Obama was the candidate who left his first wife after a severe disfiguring car accident, when she no longer measured up to his standards?
What if Obama had met his second wife in a bar and had a long affair while he was still married?
What if Michelle Obama was the wife who not only became addicted to pain killers but also acquired them illegally through her charitable organization?
What if Cindy McCain graduated from Harvard?
What if Obama had been a member of the Keating Five?
(The Keating Five were five United States Senators accused of corruption in 1989, igniting a major political scandal as part of the larger Savings and Loan crisis of the late 1980s and early 1990s.)
What if McCain was a charismatic, eloquent speaker?
What if Obama couldn’t read from a teleprompter?
What if Obama was the one who had military experience that included discipline problems and a record of crashing seven planes?
What if Obama was the one who was known to display publicly, on many occasions, a serious anger management problem?
What if Michelle Obama’s family had made their money from beer distribution?
What if the Obamas had adopted a white child?
You could easily add to this list. If these questions reflected reality, do you really believe the election numbers would be as close as they are?
This is what racism does. It covers up, rationalizes and minimizes positive qualities in one candidate and emphasizes negative qualities in another when there is a color difference.
Educational Background:
Barack Obama:
Columbia University - B.A. Political Science with a Specialization in International Relations.
Harvard - Juris Doctor (J.D.) Magna Cum Laude
Joseph Biden:
University of Delaware - B.A. in History and B.A. in Political Science.
Syracuse University College of Law - Juris Doctor (J.D.)
vs.
John McCain:
United States Naval Academy - Class rank: 894 of 899
Sarah Palin:
Hawaii Pacific University - 1 semester
North Idaho College - 2 semesters - general study
University of Idaho - 2 semesters - journalism
Matanuska-Susitna College - 1 semester
University of Idaho - 3 semesters - B.A. in Journalism
Education isn’t everything, but this is about the two highest offices in the land as well as our standing in the world. You make the call."
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: just think OBAMA WOULD WIN LANDSLIDE WITHOUT EVEN HOLDIN AN ELECTION
Posted by: stopthemaddness2
» RE: just think YOUR POST WAS SO RIGHT AND SO NICE I HAD TO READ IT TWICE!! OBAMA 08
Posted by: stopthemaddness2
» "What if Obama couldn’t read from a teleprompter?"
Posted by: Physiocrat
Comments are closed-
Posted by: common intelligence on Oct 31, 2008 6:20 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'll play it safe and bow out of this one!
The Buddha would not challenge to a debate with a moron because winning would be meaningless.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: opmoc on Oct 31, 2008 7:05 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Cos the minute You Have Left
Your Home Belongs To The BANK
And The Bank Can't Sell It
Your Home is Completely Worthless To The Bank
So Just Spend a Night Outside in a Tent
And The Next Morning
Move Right Back In To Your HOME
It's Yours
You Are Paying The True Rent To The Mortgage Company
NOTHING
The Repo Men Will Be Doing Their Same Trick a Few Streets Away
They Have Done You
They Won't Be Coming Back
So you are back in your home - but possibly without water, electricty and gas...
Fresh Clean Water is Really Important
Get a Big Water Butt To Collect The Rain From Your Roof
Collect FUEL - Wood, Coal if you Can Find it - To Keep Warm
Buy some tin food - sure it won't last - but if you have got enough to maybe start a soup kitchen - then your neighbours will help
No One Starves or Freezes To Death
The Crisis Will Only Last a Short While
The Food is Still Growing and The Farmers Still Want To Distribute It
It is The Farmers Who Are Keeping Us Alive
Tony
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: stopthemaddness2 on Oct 31, 2008 8:58 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This type of upgrade of standards raising the bar high, the quality of education and our students would soar to where it should be now in this technology age, the age of nano-technology, but instead this does not happen. The TV shows, such as Family GUY, and stupid dumb-down disrespectable gags, the video games, the ipods, the DVD's, all the celebrity hype shows and non substantive media all add to this overall dumbness. So it spawns a Sarah Palin, type it spawns and spread this stupidity and its acceptance of being DUMB.
Most young folks in our society do not read anymore. That alone makes a huge educational decline our culture.
You want to see something really scary, watch at Jay Leno show when he goes out in the community to interview folks on the street asking them simple questions they should know, such as who is the Secretary of State, how does the Constitution begin, all of them, young folks, can not answer this question. Sad, and scary. It is as if there is a plan to try to keep us all dumb down. Thus the need for alternative news. Where is the hope, where is the change. American Slaves in a new Third World America. What a nightmare!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: stopthemaddness2 on Oct 31, 2008 9:11 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This type of upgrade of standards raising the bar high, the quality of education and our students would soar to where it should be now in this technology age, the age of Nano-technology, but instead this does not happen. The TV shows, such as Family GUY, and stupid dumb-down dis-respectable stupid gags, the video games, the i-pods, the DVD's, all the celebrity hype shows and non substantive media all add to this overall dumbness. S
So, it spawns a Sarah Palin type, that incorrectly tells a third grader what the 1st Amendment in the Constitution states, and talks in circles, and is totally ill-educated about every subject she talks about. It spawns and spreads this stupidity and its acceptance of being DUMB. Dumb is just accepted as normal intelligence. Thus an actor who goes from reading scripts is now in charge of a huge state and reads public policy. Amazing!
Most young folks in our society do not read anymore. That alone makes a huge educational decline our culture.
You want to see something really scary, watch at Jay Leno show when he goes out in the community to interview folks on the street asking them simple questions they should know, such as who is the Secretary of State, how does the Constitution begin, all of them, young folks, can not answer this question. Sad, and scary. It is as if there is a plan to try to keep us all dumb down. Thus the need for alternative news. Where is the hope, where is the change. American Slaves in a new Third World America. What a nightmare!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: stopthemaddness2 on Oct 31, 2008 9:36 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: macdon1 on Oct 31, 2008 10:21 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Going Over to the Dark Side
Posted by: laoma
Comments are closed-
Posted by: charlesp210 on Oct 31, 2008 10:36 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Natural Selection has nothing to do with explaining how a small number of people become super rich, then use their power to take away the rights of others even to earn a decent living, with the result being that everyone suffers as the economy collapses as the economy collapses from too much inequality.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: wireup on Oct 31, 2008 10:42 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The parents would come to the reference desk asking for materials necessary to accomplish the homework. Whenever I asked where their children were and why they (the parents) were doing the homework instead of their children, I was invariably informed that the children had jobs and couldn't do their homework!!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I'm a retired librarian
Posted by: Lilly
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bessie on Oct 31, 2008 11:35 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: RossB on Nov 1, 2008 6:54 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What would happen, in the reddest of any red state, if the coach was asked about the upcoming game, and simply replied, "They're a bunch of jerks. We're going to hand it to them because they're jerks, and little girls like Broadway Joe Namath."
"But what can your quarterback do against their scrambling defense?"
"Well, he's 'the Boxcar', you know, I think he'll be totally awesome because he's the Boxcar."
The guy would be busted down to washing jockstraps for JV in no time. The fans want to be violent, screaming and insensitive, but they want someone with a brain behind the wheel. So there's hope.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: SkeeterVT1 on Nov 1, 2008 10:05 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He confuses "anti-intellectualism" with anti-elitism. Americans are anti-elitist by nature; after all, we fought the American Revolution against the elitist snobbery of British royal society. It's in our country's DNA.
Barack Obama is proof of this. He is perhaps the most highly intellectual presidential candidate since John F. Kennedy. But unlike Kennedy, Obama was never part of the elite; he grew up with very modest means, whereas Kennedy was raised in one of the the wealthiest families in America.
His campaign is succeeding because he has appeals directly to the vast middle-class mainstream of America as no Democratic presidential candidate has be able to do since Bill Clinton -- another high intellect who was never part of the elite.
The hysterical attacks by his opponent, John McCain, that Obama is an "elitist" have largely failed, because the American people know from having observed McCain over the years that he and his Republican Party represent the elite -- a fact which was made plainly clear by McCain's response to the economic crisis -- and thus his attacks ring hypocritically hollow.
Americans don't have a problem with people who are intellectual. Rather, they have a problem with people of high intellect who put down others who are less intellectual than themselves. That's elitism.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: desidid on Nov 1, 2008 12:41 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» IGNORANCE
Posted by: Jest2007
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ubaguba on Nov 1, 2008 5:13 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Listen till the end!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: billwald on Nov 1, 2008 6:50 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» THE REAL DUFUS IS
Posted by: reelman
» RE: THE REAL DUFUS IS... REELMAN!!!
Posted by: Quannah
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sherman on Nov 1, 2008 9:56 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lilly on Nov 1, 2008 10:10 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Opinion Uber Alles
Posted by: realtruther
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Ian MacLeod on Nov 2, 2008 12:28 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Failure, my ass! The RadRight spent more than three decades spending our money in ever-increasing amounts on things that not only didn't improve the system, they DISimproved it, and they got exactly what they wanted! From "peer group" passing to the culmination in NCLB with so much time, money and effort totally wasted in teaching kids to pass specific (and inadequate, of course) tests instead of actually educating them, to wasted resources forcing already underpaid teachers to gain useless "specialization" credits and certs and better teachers having their hands tied, then being fired because of the predictable results: a nation of fucking idiots who have no idea of how to use their own minds, and totally susceptible to propaganda from the Right and from religious (read here "superstitious" or even "fantacist") fanatics. People who think the sun revolves around the earth and is 5,000 years old, who don't believe in evolution or climate change, who believe that "Left Behind" series is accurate biblical teaching, who are sure that all the destruction of the environment will be repaired or replaced after Jesus shows up and kicks all those "other people" (and never try to tell them that Jesus was a long-haired radical Jew and not a blue-eyed blond or a brown haired, hazel-eyed WASP!) into Hell so none of it matters anyway, who are totally paranoid about any different skin color, religion, culture or even cultural heritage other than their own, and on and on it goes.
The bastards got EXACTLY what they paid for!
Ian
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: aberdeen on Nov 2, 2008 9:42 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have believed since high school that there is much fundamentally wrong with the U.S. education system and much more wrong with Christianity in general and conservative fundamentalism in particular.
However, many modern progressives continue to display a severe lack of consistence in logic by taking the cheap shot road of blaming our problems on religion, rather than on the overwhelming evidence that our problems are based on human greed and thus, caused by our own selves, organized religion being only one of many byproducts of such greed created to enhance and protect wealth.
So-called "enlightened" thinkers of the 18th Century indulged in much violence, including the extremely violent French and far too violent American Revolutions. How is one supposed to blame this and other violence on religion as being the root problem, when some of our most educated people in the 21st Century, many of them agnostics and atheists, continue to design biological, nuclear and worse weaponry?
I am no fan of religion myself, but it would seem that most modern progressives who contribute to AlterNet fail to understand that there just might be a significant and fundamental difference between God and religions supposedly based on God and likewise, that modern Darwinism is one of the most superstitious, dogmatic and myopic of all religions, as it's fundamental assumption that the universe is a product of self-design not only is not based on any evidence, it completely contradicts all known evidence and human experience.
For example, nobody knows for certain how the pyramids of Egypt came to be as we can observe and touch them today; it is just assumed by every rational human being that someone designed them. There is no evidence that anything has ever designed itself from the top down, while ALL known evidence suggests otherwise. And likewise, there is no evidence that anything ever came to be in motion by itself, while ALL known evidence suggests that nothing can be in motion unless somewhere up the chain, first being put in motion by an external force.
It is therefore, scientifically accurate to conclude that the universe is a product of design until someone can definitively prove, based on evidence, otherwise. No other conclusion is scientific for the fundamental reason that it is not based on evidence.
And getting back to education, this author says the following regarding our rather violence-prone and quick to exclude slaves, women and the working class and poor from the spoils founding fathers: "...men like Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, John Adams and Alexander Hamilton -- were among the greatest thinkers of their age."
I have noticed that many who write for AlterNet use similar "cherry-picked" historically innacurate and false claims regarding our founding fathers to back up inaccurate positions and rather shallow conclusions, conveniently leaving out the following:
Jefferson explicitly stated and seems to have strongly believed that human rights were "endowed" by our Creator, which agrees with the Bible, which incidentally, Jefferson began re-writing while a sitting president and, while still a sitting president, began attempting to make his version of the New Testament the officially recognized government version, thus ensuring that it would be taught in every public classroom.
Madison stated that he believed the first amendment would aid in the spread of Christianity.
And Franklin openly vocally complained that those assembled at the Constitutional convention were not seeking guidance from God nearly enough.
Richard Aberdeen
Free 20-Song CD
WHO WOULD JESUS BOMB?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: aberdeen on Nov 2, 2008 9:44 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And finally, what is clearly wrong with American education is that knowledge is divided up into convenient non-connect "disciplines", where God is pretended to not be a question for science and morality is not a question allowed at all. And thus, many of our brightest children become designers of star war machines, rather than Jonas Salks and Albert Schweitzers.
It is perhaps accurate to blame the lack of political and moral vision on American education, but it is even more fair to blame it on the ACLU and modern progressives, who refuse to allow the teachings of Jesus, the founder of human rights, to be taught in our public classrooms.
Someone like Socrates or Aristotle might fairly conclude, that modern progressives have made their own shallow bed of godless education and now, they get to lie in it with G. W., Dick Cheney, global pollution and morally bankrupt Americans, who go right on shopping at the mall and purchasing SUV's in the middle of a Middle East war, accordingly.
Sincerely,
Richard Aberdeen
Freedom Tracks Records
Free 20-Song CD
WHO WOULD JESUS BOMB?
Freedom Tracks Records
www.FreedomTracks.com
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jtroane on Nov 3, 2008 7:13 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
moreover,there are ways in which collective mobilization has been historically demonized and cut off, channeling resent of power into different channels. white people in Southwest Virginia have a good reason to be extremely critical of "modernity and progress". their land and their bodies have been bled by northern and euro capitalists. that their resistances have often been colored by racism is a matter of history and hegemony, not as simple as dumbness and backwardness.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Jest2007 on Nov 3, 2008 7:45 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: atritium on Nov 6, 2008 11:44 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The current housing & credit crunch is due to materialistic Boomer wasting their money on lottery tickets, electronic junk, houses and cars above their means contrary to the teachings of religion instead of saving.
It was decided that a central committee of smart people (The Federal Reserve) knew better what interest rates should be, and they were set at 1%, luring an immoral population even further into self-indulgenece.
None of this is due to following religious beliefs, but the opposite. As society has become more secular, problems have multiplied.
The success of the west is based on a specific set of beliefs: that the world can be understood and is worth understanding (leading to science), that humans were made in the spiritual image of God, thus have intrinsic worth (human rights), but voluntarily corrupted themselves (requiring representative, decentralized government).
If one thinks humans are bags of chemicals that randomly developed over time, then human power and yourself become the measure of all things. Economics eventually arrives at centralized control by those who pursued power (socialism, communism, etc.). But since no one can know enough to control anything all the time, this will always fail.
The history of the 20th century since Darwin has been mass-murder: Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Pol Pot all sought to create modern scientific states free from religion as you want. 80 million+ were killed and the states still failed.
Instead of recognizing your world view has always failed and is continuing to fail, you point the blame at precisely those people who have nothing to do with it and have been warning and teaching against these problems. They were right all along.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» You might want to re-read your history books
Posted by: moflard
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sicntired on Nov 10, 2008 12:59 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: trel on Oct 31, 2008 3:44 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Why do you want anti-intellectualism to wither?
Posted by: DawnL
» RE: Why do you want anti-intellectualism to wither?
Posted by: Lauren
» Everything political these days...
Posted by: ABetterFuture
» RE: verything political these days...
Posted by: javajoe
» RE: Why do you want anti-intellectualism to wither?
Posted by: AlexaD
» RE: Priceless!
Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: Priceless!
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Priceless!
Posted by: lisaisalefty
» RE: Priceless!
Posted by: bluepilgrim
» RE: Priceless!
Posted by: john mont
» RE: Why do you want anti-intellectualism to wither?
Posted by: baad
» You Aren't Kidding ! Bravo Jacoby! RE: Why do you want anti-intellectualism to wither?
Posted by: sallyride
» RE: You Aren't Kidding ! Bravo Jacoby! RE: Why do you want anti-intellectualism to wither?
Posted by: Damhnait
» RE: You Aren't Kidding ! Bravo Jacoby! RE: Why do you want anti-intellectualism to wither?*PROVEN*
Posted by: maribelle
» RE: You Aren't Kidding ! Bravo Jacoby! RE: Why do you want anti-intellectualism to wither?*PROVEN*
Posted by: helenwheels
» RE: You Aren't Kidding ! Bravo Jacoby! RE: Why do you want anti-intellectualism to wither?
Posted by: sallyride
» RE: Why do you want anti-intellectualism to wither?**A LIBERAL VOCABULARY PRIMER**
Posted by: maribelle
» RE: Why do you want anti-intellectualism to wither?**A LIBERAL VOCABULARY PRIMER**
Posted by: wal55
» RE: Why do you want anti-intellectualism to wither?
Posted by: babs
» RE: Why do you want anti-intellectualism to wither?
Posted by: RPJ
» RE: Why do you want anti-intellectualism to wither?
Posted by: macdon1
» RE: Why do you want anti-intellectualism to wither?
Posted by: zeek2
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lilykins on Oct 31, 2008 4:54 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Being a child of fundamentalist parents I have been forced to leave public school at 12 because my parents believed girls should be housewives and having an education would tempt them away from that god-given duty. Later, I went against their will to take a couple of college courses at a community college. I got great grades and won a full scholarship. My entire family then banded together and threaten to never speak to me or my son again if I took the scholarship. I chose my family and have regretted it ever since. At 40, after struggling through horribly abusive relationships with religious fanatical men who believed men owned their wives, I finally escaped from Christianity and now I am living alone and putting myself through school. I've never been happier in my life.
Not a day goes by that I don't think about all the children born to those "proud to ignorant" jerks and the way their children's minds are discarded like trash so the parents can feel better about their own faith in magic. American children are a laughing stock to the rest of the world because instead of science they are taught about magic, instead of learning about the wonders of the human body, they are taught about how "evil" their minds and bodies are. Instead of being loved for who they are, they are hated and told they were born "bad" and have to spend their lives denying and hating themselves. Instead of being told that the world is full of potentials and opportunities, they are told it's evil and scary.
It sickens me. I would never judge a janitor or garbage collector; you never know what hell they may have had to suffer in their lives.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Good for you!
Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: Good for you! **SHOW NOTHING BUT RESPECT FOR THE PERSON WHO SCRUBS YOUR TOILET**
Posted by: maribelle
» RE: I’ve never meet someone who took a thankless job to benefit others.
Posted by: maribelle
» RE: I’ve met plenty who took a thankless job to benefit others.
Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: I’ve never meet someone who took a thankless job to benefit others.
Posted by: desidid
» RE: I’ve never meet someone who took a thankless job to benefit others.
Posted by: blitzmesser
» RE: Good for you! **SHOW NOTHING BUT RESPECT FOR THE PERSON WHO SCRUBS YOUR TOILET**
Posted by: sallyride
» RE: Good for you! **SHOW NOTHING BUT RESPECT FOR THE PERSON WHO SCRUBS YOUR TOILET**
Posted by: john mont
» RE: Good for you! - You're an pbnoxious elitist
Posted by: fluffmuffinmom
» Oops - I meant OBNOXIOUS
Posted by: fluffmuffinmom
» RE: Why do you want anti-intellectualism to wither?**LILYKINS**
Posted by: maribelle
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Fishbone Soldier on Oct 31, 2008 4:57 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
