Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Prop 5: California Has a Chance to Treat Young People Struggling with Drug Problems the Right Way

By Marsha Rosenbaum, AlterNet. Posted October 29, 2008.


The NORA initiative would invest $65 million annually into developingdrug treatment programs for at-risk California youth under 18.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Marsha Rosenbaum

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

California's policies have failed our youth. The state currently offers almost no help to young people struggling with drug problems. Without early intervention, too many get tied up in the juvenile justice system only to graduate to the adult criminal justice system. Next week California voters have the rare opportunity to support a measure that would simultaneously transform youth treatment, reduce adult prison overcrowding and significantly cut costs to taxpayers.

Prop. 5, the Nonviolent Offender Rehabilitation Act, invests $65 million per year into developing the first system of drug treatment programs for at-risk California youth under 18. No such system exists now, leaving all but the wealthiest families to navigate through the turbulence of adolescent drug abuse on their own. Low-income youths are generally first arrested and processed into the juvenile justice system before receiving any form of treatment; even then, programs are inadequate. According to the California Legislative Analyst's Office, only 10 percent of youth who needed treatment actually receive it. Prop. 5 proposes building a system of preventative, on-demand treatment for all of California's youth.

The potential rewards are clear. Untreated drug problems can have lasting impacts far beyond the adolescent years. Investing in treatment and support services is essential to empowering youth to become productive citizens. Under Prop. 5, parents, teachers and doctors could all refer young people directly to these life-saving health services without the need for a criminal justice intervention. Research shows that adolescent treatment is effective in reducing arrests, improving academic performance and keeping youth in school.

Prop. 5 ensures that the new system of care meets the full spectrum of youth needs, including family therapy, educational and employment stipends and more. These services seek to address the roots of the problem, and not just the symptoms. Prop. 5 also provides smarter interventions for young people. Young people found in possession of small amounts of marijuana would be required to complete science-based educational programs and counseling instead of being handed a misdemeanor conviction that can severely limit their potential. Prop. 5 is institutional reform. It starts by establishing an early intervention system to save lives and stop crimes before they happen. Going further, Prop. 5 expands access to court-supervised treatment and increases accountability for offenders in those programs. It puts rehabilitation back in our prisons. Meanwhile, it improves public safety by increasing parole supervision of serious and violent offenders.

These smart reforms will significantly cut costs to taxpayers -- something no other measure on the November ballot can promise or attain. According to the independent Legislative Analyst's Office, Prop. 5 will reduce incarceration costs by $1 billion each year and prison construction costs by $2.5 billion over its first several years.

The League of Women Voters of California, California Nurses Association, California Federation of Teachers, Consumer Federation of California, California State Conference of the NAACP and National Council of La Raza all agree: A "yes" on Prop. 5 is a "yes" to our young people's futures.

AlterNet is a nonprofit organization and does not make political endorsements. The opinions expressed by its writers are their own.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: nora, nonviolent offender rehab

Marsha Rosenbaum, PhD, directs the San Francisco office of the Drug Policy Alliance. She is the author of Safety First: A Reality-Based Approach to Teens, Drugs and Drug Education.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
How dare California
Posted by: willymack on Oct 29, 2008 10:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Go against the "war on drugs" or any other war, including Iraq and Afghanistan? Don't they know they're challenging drug lords, the crooked officials paid to keep them in check, and the war profiteers? Do they think they can actually get away with it without getting burned? Lots of luck!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Andrew says "It means a temporary - but potentially permanent - rift between libertarianism and Repu
Posted by: Lauren on Oct 30, 2008 11:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
a temporary - but potentially permanent - rift between libertarianism and Republicanism.

How The Libertarian Intelligentsia Votes

Of course they are going to split, we are ending the drug war. The drug war was an issue these two groups strongly disagreed about, so to end it would naturally split them asunder. They had a fundamental religious difference on the topic, I always wondered how Libertarians didn't see it.

Libertarian, Nick Gillespie "What Would a Sensible Drug Policy Look Like"

Plus there is that whole prison industry thing. Pure libertarianism would be ideologically all for that, screw the convicts and the townships for as much as you can. The right to make money.

See, Libertarians, just like Republicans, do not address the fundamental philosophical flaws of their ideologies, in this case the liberty to enslave others. They are very culturally similar in that regard, I wonder if it is a guy thing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

YES on Prop 5
Posted by: koifish83 on Nov 3, 2008 2:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
YES on Prop 5.
Most drug dealers sell drugs to support their own habbit and have no intent to hurt anyone. The real threat to society are the violent offenders such as: murderers, rapists, child molesters, and robbers. The more chances we give a drug addict to rehabilitate is the more room we save for the real threats to society. Yes only about 4 out of 10 drug offenders make it through rehab; however, the 4 that make it go back to school and end up as tax paying citizens who put back in our society. When non violent offenders get institutionalized in the prison system, they have an extremely higher chance of becoming repeat offenders. Prop 5 is common sense. It use money on rehab, but saves money for not having to be incarcerated for 40,000 a year. It helps overcrowding. It gives a chance to people with much potential and ambition. It gives a chance for ex cons to put back into society. it stops the prison sysyem from institutionalizing inmates. Of course every law inforcement agency and district attorneys office would stand against Prop 5, but that is because that their stuck living in a career that involved nothing but taking away freedom from people any chance they get. These drug offenders are not murderers, give them a chance. Vote YES on prop 5. It's for the better.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]