comments_image -

How to Avoid Being Audited

Audit rates for the taxpayers with the lowest incomes have increased by a third since 1988, while falling 90% for the wealthiest Americans. Obviously, the more money you earn, the better equipped you are to deal with the IRS.
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.

 
 
 
 

Gather unto you all your W-2's, your 1040's, your Schedule C's, D's and SE's, depreciations, amortizations, and profit and loss statements, for the Day of Reckoning is close at hand. That special day when we render unto Caesar a percentage of our incomes, minus charitable contributions, IRA's, work related travel expenses, and unreimbursed photocopying at Kinko's.

By and large, the majority of Americans pay their taxes, if not eagerly, at least on time and with a minimum of complaint. Our motivation stems in equal part from our willingness to fulfill our civic responsibilities and an abject fear of being audited. We are all terrified of the Internal Revenue Service, and with justification.

In 1997, in testimony before the Senate Finance Committee, former IRS Agent Jennifer Long spoke of the "egregious" methods used by IRS Revenue Agents and "encouraged" by IRS Management. "These tactics", she stated, "are used to extract unfairly assessed taxes from taxpayers, literally ruining families, lives, and businesses, all unnecessarily and sometimes illegally."

In response to the barrage of injustices revealed at those hearings, Congress passed the IRS Reform and Restructuring Act in 1998, the most extensive revision of the agency's structure in history. The Act created an IRS Governance Oversight Board to eliminate abuses, established the position of National Taxpayer Advocate, and limited the powers of the IRS' Examination and Collection Division. With regard to collection procedures, taxpayers were, for the first time, granted specific due process rights. Congress also restricted the use of the draconian examination techniques so familiar to those of us who have been audited, and granted taxpayers specific rights to sue the IRS when it exceeded its mandate. So for some Americans, the promise of a kinder, gentler IRS was fulfilled.

But not for all of us.

Audit rates for the taxpayers with the lowest incomes have increased by a third since 1988, while falling 90% for the wealthiest Americans. You might suppose that the tax returns of highest wage earners would be the most vigilantly scrutinized by the IRS, but the reverse is true. The less money you make, the more likely it is that you will be audited.

According to an ongoing study conducted by Syracuse University, the overall chances of your tax return being audited fell to 1 in 200 last year, down from 1 in 60 in 1996. But those statistics belie the new strategy of the Internal Revenue Service, which is now focused disproportionately on the working poor, who are now more than 5 times as likely to be audited as anyone else.

If you earn more than $100,000, your chances of being audited fell to a new low of 1 in 100 last year. On the other hand, if you were one of the roughly 20 million Americans who applied for the Earned Income Credit, you chances of being audited were 1 in 75. 1999 marked the first year in which the poor were more likely than the rich to be subjected to an IRS audit.

We can thank former House Speaker Newt Gingrich for the intensified focus of the Internal Revenue Service on those taxpayers who earn the least. Gingrich, together with a group House Republicans, was outraged by tax fraud. Not the kind of loophole you can drive a Mercedes through, but potential misuse of the Earned Income Credit, a program that returns government money to low income working families with children. As a result, taxpayers who apply for the Earned Income Credit now constitute 44% of all IRS audits.

I've said this before, and it bears repeating. According to a former IRS Agent Jennifer Long: "The IRS will often pursue a taxpayer who is viewed to be vulnerable. To the IRS, vulnerabilities can be based on a perception that the taxpayer has limited formal education, has suffered a personal tragedy, is having a financial crisis, or may not necessarily have a solid grasp of their legal rights."

submit to reddit

-
Email
Print
Share
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Advertisement
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading most read content ..
Advertisement
Students at Stuyvesant Take Issue With Sexist Dress Code

By Jill F | Feministe

 
 
Chris Hayes on Memorial Day: Glamorizing and Justifying War with the Term "Hero"

By Julianne Escobedo Shepherd | AlterNet

 
 
Cory Booker vs. Philly Mayor Michael Nutter on Mitt Romney

By BooMan | Booman Tribune

 
 
How Florida Governor Rick Scott Could Steal The Election For Mitt Romney

By Judd Legum | ThinkProgress

 
 
Renowned Economist Simon Johnson Calls for a National Safety Board for Finance Ticking Time Bomb

By Lynn Parramore | AlterNet

 
 
Veterans' Gap

By Ed Kilgore | Washington Monthly

 
 
"Hero of War"–Rise Against Song Captures Iraq War Veteran’s Tragic Experience

By Amy Goodman | Democracy Now

 
 
Japan Govt Bears Most Blame for Fukushima: ex-PM

By Agence France Presse

 
 
The Stunning Truth About Health Care Pricing

By Deep Harm | DailyKos

 
 
AlterNet Radio: What's At Stake in Wisconsin; Real "Defense" Budget Is $1 Trillion; the Right's Phony Race War

By Staff | AlterNet

 
 
 
 
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
 
[ page served from web 2 ]