comments_image -

MAD DOG: Attention Shoppers

Shopping is serious business. Just ask anyone who's groused because stores don't hold a sale on Martin Luther King's birthday. Yet.
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.

 
 
 
 

Shopping is serious business. Just ask anyone who's woken up at 6 A.M. to be the first in line to get an XFL Barbie for a Christmas present, written a letter to the editor of the newspaper asking why they don't put all the ads in one handy pull-out section instead of hiding them between those icky news articles, or groused because stores don't hold a sale on Martin Luther King's birthday. Yet.

If you're a non-shopper like me it's hard to relate. After all, you don't plan your week around sale days. It's never crossed your mind that a one-week-old cinder block with a lifetime warranty could need replacing because it's "Oh so yesterday." And the idea of driving halfway across the state to save less on a reconditioned Thighmaster than the cost of the gas just doesn't make sense, especially since Suzanne Somers isn't there to give a private demonstration.

But that doesn't mean you shouldn't be supportive of the poor, unfortunate people who break out in a sweat anytime they see a percent sign and the word "off" within two paragraphs of each other. They need love and understanding too. That's why Conde Nast is putting out a new magazine for women about shopping called Lucky. Well, that smells like money. Lots of it.

There's little doubt the magazine will do well, especially on the newsstands where it will be snapped up by single men who read the name but don't notice that the cover is trumpeting articles like "Second mortgages -- the key to your spring wardrobe", "Online shopping, can it fulfill more than just orders?", and "If Nieman Marcus can remember your dress size, why can't hubby?"

Editor Kim France says, "It's not a princess-y, shopaholic magazine." Right, and there will be an Elton John, Jr. any day now. She says it's aimed at those who love to shop as well as those who hate it. How she intends on getting non-shoppers to read a shopping magazine is beyond me, unless she's planning on having centerfolds featuring "The Hunks of Macy's Shoe Department."

The question is, should they be encouraging shopping? After all, like drinking, gambling, and sex, too much shopping can lead to addiction. And like the first two of these, we don't want to get that carried away.

But if it does, there's help available. There's Compulsive Shoppers Anonymous, where people stand up and say, "Hi, my name is Shirley and I found the cutest little monogrammed gold toothpick cleaner at the Galleria the other day and just had to buy four of them." There are debt counselors who take people who are deep in debt, then increase it by charging them to help get them out of debt, a concept only Lewis Carroll, Bonnie and Clyde, or anyone who writes federal tax regulations could appreciate.

And then there are the psychiatrists, who have identified a syndrome they call compulsive-shopping disorder. This isn't to be confused with compulsive-shopping reorder, which is when you get home with something new and decide you simply have to have one in every color so you run back out to buy them even though the house is on fire, the dog is laying on its back with its feet in the air, and Survivor 2 is on. No, this is a bona fide, health-insurance-will-pay-for-it, medical problem.

According to the American Psychiatric Association (motto: "Sometimes a cigar may just be a cigar, but that doesn't mean we can't give it a fancy name and try to cure it."), compulsive-shopping disorder is "a consuming need to buy which often results in debt, personality and relationship disorders, and if we have anything to do with it, a new boat after we have the patient in therapy for a couple of years."

The usual treatment is to have the patient come in twice a week in the hope that the exorbitant fees mean they can't afford to shop as much. This is what's known in psychiatry as transference, though in this case it's more tangible than usual, with the money being transferred directly from the patient to the doctor.

submit to reddit

-
Email
Print
Share
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Advertisement
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading most read content ..
Advertisement
Fox, Breitbart, and Ricketts Try to Bring Back D'Souza's Pseudo-Birtherism

By Steve M | No More Mister Nice Blog

 
 
Activists Speak Out Against Lack of Access to Bradley Manning

By Agence France Presse

 
 
NYPD Catches Sexual Assailant, Then Lets Him Go Free Because He Didn't Feel Like Being Questioned

By Jill F | Feministe

 
 
Gov. Scott Orders Purging of Florida’s Voter Rolls - Just in Time For Prez Election

By Adele Stan | Washington Monthly

 
 
Abortion Clinics Across Country Put On Alert In Wake of Georgia Clinic Arson Cases

By Robin Marty | RH Reality Check

 
 
Former GOP Congresswoman Blasts New GOP Women’s Caucus: ‘They’re Not Voting In Best Interest Of All Women’

By Josh Israel | ThinkProgress

 
 
Debbie Wasserman Schulz is Wrong on Wisconsin

By LaFeminista | DailyKos

 
 
Pro-Coal Group Pays People to Wear Its Shirts at EPA Hearing

By Heather Moyer | Sierra Club

 
 
Kids Inundate NY Governor With Concerns About Fracking

By Seth Gladstone | Food and Water Watch

 
 
Shareholders, Top Doctors Demand McDonald's Assess its Health Impacts

By Sara Deon | Civil Eats

 
 
 
 
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
 
[ page served from web 2 ]