Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Bottled Water Industry on the Defensive with Bogus Attack Campaign

By Tara Lohan, AlterNet. Posted October 21, 2008.


The bottled water industry is feeling the pressure from discerning consumers who aren't buying their hype any more.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Is Blind Faith in God and the Bible a Modern Invention?
Devilstower

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
Who's Paying for the Recession Most of All? Young Workers
Lizzy Ratner

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Soda Helps Make Americans Unhealthy and Fat -- Will Soda Tax Prevail Despite Pushback by Beverage Industry?
Christine Spolar, Joseph Eaton

Health and Wellness:
Do We Really Want to Enshrine Insurance Monopoly into Law? This and 5 Other Complaints About the Health Bill
John Nichols

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
How Biased Media Can Brainwash You
Melinda Burns

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
4 Ways the Stupak Amendment Deprives Women of Access to Abortion
Jessica Arons

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
How the Stupak Amendment Radically Undermines Abortion Rights
Rachel Morris

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
9 Silly Things People Say When They Hear You Don't Want Kids (And Ways to Counter Them)
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
10 Suicides a Month at Ft. Hood -- War Stress Is Taking Soldiers to the Brink
Dahr Jamail

More stories by Tara Lohan

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

A group promoting the website EnjoyBottleWater.org is trying to handle the pressure put by consumer groups on bottled water companies by resorting to fear tactics. Their ploys are predictable and as easy to see through as their product.

A video by the group claims that politicians are trying to take away people's rights to bottled water and shows headlines from newspapers where U.S. mayors have ended bottled water contracts for city buildings. The video juxtaposes these shots with folks in developing countries drinking dirty water, claiming that these actions are taking away water "from those in need."

Their campaign is nothing short of a sham. The city officials in San Francisco where bottled water contracts were ended are hardly people in need of clean water. San Francisco's tap, which comes from Yosemite, is some of the best in the country. And their action saves taxpayers thousands of dollars each year by switching from bottled to tap.

One of the reasons this bottled water front group is trying to defend themselves is because last week Environmental Working Group issued a damning report on bottled water companies.

Here's what they had to say:

The bottled water industry promotes an image of purity, but comprehensive testing by the Environmental Working Group (EWG) reveals a surprising array of chemical contaminants in every bottled water brand analyzed, including toxic byproducts of chlorination in Walmart's Sam's Choice and Giant Supermarket's Acadia brands, at levels no different than routinely found in tap water. Several Sam's Choice samples purchased in California exceeded legal limits for bottled water contaminants in that state. Cancer-causing contaminants in bottled water purchased in 5 states (North Carolina, California, Virginia, Delaware and Maryland) and the District of Columbia substantially exceeded the voluntary standards established by the bottled water industry.
While the bottled water companies have attempted to dismiss this report, there is one very easy way for bottling companies to prove their worth: disclosure.

The bottled water industry has little oversight right now and bottling companies don't have to disclose their source (including whether it is spring or tap) or whether it is treated. If these companies have nothing to hide and their water is as safe as they say, why don't they agree to some transparency and industry standards for safety and testing?

The irony is that this bottled water group believes they are under attack (from people worried about protecting the health of consumers and the environment, it would seem) and they say, "The threat to consumers is real." Of course they are indeed right, it is just that they are the threat to consumers and not the folks working to educate consumers about the reality of bottled water.

Here are the facts from the Union of Concerned Scientists:


  • Bottled water can cost up to 10,000 times more per gallon than tap water.


  • Tap water is actually held to higher standards than bottled water, and some brands of bottled water are just tap water in disguise.


  • Approximately 1.5 million barrels of oil are used to make plastic water bottles, while transporting these bottles burns even more oil.


  • The growth in bottled water production has increased water extraction in areas near bottling plants, leading to water shortages that affect nearby consumers and farmers.


  • In addition to the millions of gallons of water used in the plastic-making process, two gallons of water are wasted in the purification process for every gallon that goes into the bottles.


  • Nearly 90 percent of water bottles are not recycled and wind up in landfills where it takes thousands of years for the plastic to decompose.



It is time to get our priorities straight so we can be spending all our efforts making sure tap water in the U.S. is the best it can be and making sure the real people in need in developing countries have access to clean and safe water sources.







Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: water, bottled water, water privatization

Tara Lohan is a managing editor at AlterNet.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Exactly who is the CEI?
Posted by: TCWriter on Oct 21, 2008 6:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
CEI and the enjoybottledwater.org Web site has always sought to cast the bottled water wars in terms of "environmentalists" (an all-inclusive term used like an epithet on the site) vs consumer choice, even in those instances where taxpayer money was being wasted in the purchase of bottled water where it simply wasn't needed.

It's not particularly credible, and CEI has never disclosed who's paying for their interest and their enjoyedbottledwater.org blog site, which went up only days after we launched StopNestleWaters.org.

If there isn't some kind of bottled water industry money behind them - and their attacks on bottled water foes - I'd be very surprised indeed.

The enjoybottledwater.org site also "invites" comments to their news stories, but several posted by me - critical of their perspective but not rude or personal - have never seen the light of day.

Overall, their attacks on the EWG have been crude, but this industry is clearly regrouping after being caught off-balance.

The bottled water industry association (IBWA) hired former Tobacco Institute spokesperson and heavy hitter Tom Lauria, whose first predictably glib comment eerily echoed those of the main character in "Thank You for Smoking."

"I've got no problem with tap water," he said. "I showered in it this morning."

Fighting a multinational that wants to build a monstrous bottling plant in your town is no mean feat, though small communities are turning Nestle's advances away, though not without some risk; the tiny town of Fryeburg, ME has been sued by Nestle five times in an attempt to force a water loading station on the town, even after the town's populace and planning commission said "no."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

CEI's No Shill
Posted by: davidzet on Oct 23, 2008 9:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I know the CEI folks. They are ideologically committed to free markets and stopping government intervention. They are donor supported (and WILL take donations from bottled water companies), but that doesn't mean they are not running the site as part of their main mission.

Your conspiracies are unfounded, IMO. They are just as ideological as the anti-bottled water people.

(For the record, I don't care if people drink bottled water, but I don't.)

David (aguanomics.com)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

CanoeBlue
Posted by: CanoeBlue on Oct 23, 2008 6:40 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I do not see bottled water as a threat to our municipal water systems. When at home I drink tap water as, I suspect, do most people who consume bottled water. When away from home I view bottled water as an alternative to the vast arrays of other sugar and/or caffeine rich beverages commonly hawked to quench thirst that are also expensive and contain more health compromising ingredients than even bottled tap water.

A waste of water? I am not sure that I consider putting water in to bottles for human consumption particularly wasteful. I do consider the spraying of perfectly good drinking water on my lawn a waste (and my lawn shows it - just ask my neighbours). I also consider the Billions of gallons of water sprayed on golf courses every day to be wasteful, and a myriad of other common and wasteful uses to which we give little thought.

I also question whether the waste of plastic argument really holds water (pun intended) Weigh the bottles. Because a water bottle does not need to withstand the pressure of carbonation commonly found in soft drinks it will weigh approximately 1/3 of the weight of a soft drink bottle of the same volume.

Banning the use of bottled water only inceases the consumption of more wasteful and more health compromising beverges packaged in bottles that require three times the packaging content.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bottled Water Sucks
Posted by: Hankbrilliant on Oct 24, 2008 6:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
..because it's phonier than a $3 dollar bill. I couldn't believe it when someone who had a cart fillled with bottled water at the supermarket said, "It has more nutrient value than tap water." Give me a break. I have never bought bottled water, and never will! When I found out that some of the brands actually add sodium (salt) to their products...that did it for me. Why? Because I watch the amount of salt I use, and I don't need to drink it. Bottled Water Sucks!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Please investigate plastics a little more ....
Posted by: Milton on Oct 30, 2008 7:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In 2006, 56 million tons of plastic were produced in the USA, more than double the amount produced in 2000. These non-biodegradable materials are accumulating in landfills, in our waterways, and in our bodies. Due to the carcinogenic and hormone-disrupting effects of many of their chemical constituents, plastics threaten ecological integrity and the survival of our species.
Plastics pose a real and present threat to the ecology. Plastic particles are accumulating in ever greater amounts in the tissues of animals at all levels of the food chain, including filter-feeders, fish, birds, and marine mammals. The growing body burden of plastics in our air, food, and water is contributing to the rise of reproductive dysfunction, neural toxicity, cancer, asthma, diabetes, and obesity. Plastics litter our streets, parks, and waterways, and contribute more and more of the trash in our shrinking landfill space. Plastics drive global warming by creating the illusion of cheap and disposable products and packaging.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement