Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

10 Reasons for Democrats to Think Positive Despite the McCain Sleazathon

By Don Hazen, AlterNet. Posted October 20, 2008.


McCain's campaign is throwing in everything but the kitchen sink, but Obama is still in a fabulously good position to get elected.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Nobel Laureate Slams the Bible, Calls It "A Catalogue of Cruelties"
Mario de Queiroz

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
As Foreclosure Nightmares Increase, Will More Homeowners Pay Off Their Bankers in Violence?
Scott Thill

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Despite Censorship By Beef Magnate, Michael Pollan Spreads Message About the Real Price of Cheap Food

Health and Wellness:
Do We Really Want to Enshrine Insurance Monopoly into Law? This and 5 Other Complaints About the Health Bill
John Nichols

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
How Biased Media Can Brainwash You
Melinda Burns

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
4 Ways the Stupak Amendment Deprives Women of Access to Abortion
Jessica Arons

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Fetus-Shaped Potatoes? Going Undercover Inside the Weird World of Right-Wing Abortion Foes
Ann Neumann

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
Instant Sex: Has the Digital Age Destroyed Relationships or Made Them Better?
Vanessa Richmond

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
With Unemployment at 40 Percent, Afghan Teens Enlist in Army, Police
Lal Aqa Sherin

More stories by Don Hazen

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Obama is doing fabulously well on many levels. But the Democrats still need to be wary, as the desperate McCain campaign seems ready to do "whatever it takes" to try to bring Obama down in the last two weeks before the election.

By virtually every measure, Barack Obama is in a highly favorable position to get elected President on November 4th. Based upon organization, money, endorsements, performance in the debates, advertising dominance, the overwhelming influence of the economic meltdown, and the fact that Obama has run an incredibly effective and mostly errorless campaign, Democrats should be feeling good. But many appear to still have some serious insecurities, and rightly so.

The fact that some polls tightened a bit after the third debate, and because the desperate McCain campaign is throwing everything but the kitchen sink at Obama, some people are on the verge of panicking. Of course, the corporate media has every incentive to make the race seem closer than it is, tempted as they are by the come-from-behind narrative. And the coverage of McCain's sleazy campaign tactics has the effect of repeating their messages over and over again and keeping those ideas in the news and in people's discussions. That is a hard one to overcome, when part of the big news is the extent of the negative campaigning.

Then there are the deeper fears: Josh Marshall writing on TPM says, "McCain's final strategy relies on two pillars. The first is aggressively playing to voters' fears of electing a black president ... banking on the residual racism in a changing America to get them over the finish line. The second is an aggressive use of innuendo to convince casual voters that Obama is in league with Islamic terrorists bent on killing Americans."

Marshall continues: "So far, all this stuff just hasn't worked. But the truth is that the really corrupt and vicious part of McCain's effort only comes now ... it's only in the last couple weeks that you can pull stuff that the press won't get to call you on before election day -- after which it doesn't matter ... So far McCain's gutter campaign has hurt him more than helped. But there's no reason to be sure it will continue that way. And many Obama supporters, sure the election is basically wrapped up, appear ready to slack in the stretch and let McCain smear and cheat his way into office."

So for obvious reasons, including the fact that their candidate is potentially the first African-American to have a shot at becoming President, Democrats are counseling each other to avoid overconfidence and complacency, and get out there, as Reed Hunt writes, to "knock on every door in those key states; (Florida, Ohio, Colorado, and Virginia), respond to every charge, no matter how crazy, in every media forum that can be found; stay on the air; stay on the offense. And remember the essential voters in those key states won't finally decide until the weekend before that Tuesday."

Nevertheless, many are shocked at just how well Obama has done, and continues to do every day. Here is a list of ten Obama positives that should provide a baseline of confidence as millions gear up for the last two weeks of campaigning.

1. Obama shatters all fund-raising records in extraordinary September outpouring of $150 million.

According to the AP:

Barack Obama raised more than $150 million in September, a stunning and unprecedented eruption of political giving that has given him a wide spending advantage ... fueling a vast campaign operation in an expanding field of competitive states and underwriting a wave of both national and targeted video advertising unseen before in a presidential contest ... The campaign had added 632,000 new donors in September, for a total of 3.1 million contributors to the campaign; the average donation was $86.
2. Obama has a massive lead in newspaper endorsements: 94-28 including 18 that endorsed Bush in '04.

According to Dexter Hill and Greg Mitchell at Editor and Publisher, "The Obama-Biden ticket now leads in newspaper endorsements by 94 to 28, a better than 3-1 margin" ... "The readership of the newspapers backing Obama now stands at over 10 million vs. McCain's just under 2.5 million." Many endorsing papers are in key battleground states. "Obama's lopsided margin ... is in stark contrast to John Kerry barely edging George W. Bush in endorsements in 2004 by 213 to 205."
The Denver Post, which had backed George W. Bush in 2004 , endorsed Obama as did the Chicago Sun-Times, Kansas City Star, The NY Daily News and the Atlanta Journal-Constitution. At this point 18 papers who endorsed Bush in '04 , now favor Obama including The Salt Lake Tribune, The Houston Chronicle, and Las Cruces (N.M) Sun-News. On Saturday, the Chicago Tribune which has never in 150 years endorsed a Democrat, backed Obama, as did its fellow Tribune paper, the Los Angeles Times -- which had endorsed no one in more than 30 years. It seems like a dam broke yesterday with the unexpectedly early choice of Obama by the Washington Post. New additions for him include the Miami Herald, the Philadelphia Inquirer and The Oregonian of Portland, Cleveland's Plain Dealer, Palm Beach (Fla.)

3. Sarah Palin is a major drag on McCain.

According the Huffington Post:
The more voters learn about Sarah Palin, the more wary they become ... the Alaska Governor is now viewed as a serious liability to the McCain campaign. Palin's polling numbers are daunting: with the unfolding economic crisis, her favorable to unfavorable ratings have switched from a positive 40-30, according to a September 12-16 New York Times survey, to a negative 32-41 in an October 10-13 survey.
Palin is, additionally, costing McCain newspaper endorsements [See above ] Many of the endorsements cited Palin as a factor in their rejection of McCain. The Salt Lake Tribune, which supported George W. Bush in 2004, commented that "out of nowhere, and without proper vetting, the impetuous McCain picked Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as his running mate. She quickly proved grievously under-equipped to step into the presidency should McCain, at 72 and with a history of health problems, die in office. More than any single factor, McCain's bad judgment in choosing the inarticulate, insular and ethically challenged Palin disqualifies him for the presidency." The Kansas City Star, in turn, described Palin as "unqualified."
4. Obama is still strong in the polls -- despite a temporary softening, Obama hasn't really lost any ground.

As Talking Points Memo Track Composite shows, Obama is ahead by six points:
Here's our daily (Sunday) composite of the five major national tracking polls. Barack Obama is holding a sizable lead over John McCain, and has slightly expanded it after a momentary dip yesterday:

  • Gallup: Obama 51%, McCain 44%

  • Rasmussen: Obama 51%, McCain 45%

  • Hotline/Diageo: Obama 48%, McCain 41%

  • Research 2000: Obama 50%, McCain 43%

  • Zogby: Obama 48%, McCain 45
Adding these polls together and weighting them by the square roots of their sample sizes, Obama is ahead 49.9%-43.9%, a lead of six points, compared to the 49.5%-44.3% Obama lead from yesterday. Note that this is the first day of polling taken entirely after Wednesday's debate. The pre-debate baseline was an Obama lead of 50.3%-43.7%, meaning that McCain has barely made a dent since then.
According to the very popular Fivethirtyeight.com, which aggregates many polls:
While McCain has gained, the candidates' approval ratings over that period are completely unmoved. In the Gallup tracker, while McCain has gained ground among likely voters since the debate, he has lost ground among registered voters. Lastly, every poll conducted on the debate itself suggested that Obama won the event.
McCain is not likely to be:
... persuading very many voters, and particularly not independents or registered Democrats. McCain's other problem is that the polls in battleground states have not really tightened at all. Obama gets good numbers today, for instance, in North Carolina, Wisconsin, and Florida. Obama presently has something like a 3:1 advantage in advertising, and most of that advertising is concentrated in battleground states. As such, this may serve as a hedge against any improvements that McCain is able to make elsewhere in the country.
5. Obama is out-advertising McCain 4 -1.

From the New York Times:
With advertisements running repeatedly day and night, on local stations and on the major broadcast networks, on niche cable networks and even on video games and his own dedicated satellite channels, Mr. Obama is now out-advertising Senator John McCain nationwide by a ratio of at least four to one, according to CMAG, a service that monitors political advertising. That difference is even larger in several closely contested states.
While Mr. Obama has held a spending advantage throughout the general election campaign, his television dominance has become most apparent in the last few weeks. He has gone on a buying binge of television time that has allowed him to swamp Mr. McCain's campaign with concurrent lines of positive and negative messages. Mr. Obama's advertisements come as Republicans have begun a blitz of automated telephone calls attacking him.

6. Conservatives and Republicans are bailing on McCain.

We all know about the major endorsement by Colin Powell, but a growing gaggle of very conservative columnists have abandoned McCain for Obama. As Patricia Cohen, writing in the New York Times, notes:
In recent weeks, some prominent conservative intellectuals seem to have discovered they have two hands after all ... Syndicated columnist Kathleen Parker wrote in the National Review on Sept. 26 that Palin is "clearly out of her league" and should bow out of the campaign. On Oct. 4, influential conservative pundit and Washington Post columnist Charles Krauthammer, rapped McCain for his "frenetic improvisation" and, in what some interpreted as an endorsement of Democrat Barack Obama, praised his "first-class intellect and a first-class temperament," adding that these strengths "will likely be enough to make him president."
This came after another conservative beacon, George F. Will, compared the "Palin bubble" to the irrational exuberance of the deflated high-tech and housing bubbles and said McCain was "behaving like a flustered rookie playing in a league too high" in the way he responded to the financial crisis. He all but pronounced the Republican ticket finished after the final presidential debate Wednesday night.
And then, to top it off, novelist and humorist Christopher Buckley endorsed Obama. This decision, coming from the son of William F. Buckley Jr., one of the intellectual founders of the modern conservative movement, was the climax of what seemed to be a mood of growing discomfort on the right.
7. The sleaze isn't working so well.

Here is Frank Rich in Sunday's New York Times:
Now McCain is trying to distract us from his humiliating managerial ineptitude by cranking up the politics of fear -- another trademark Bush-Rove strategy. But the McCain camp's quixotic effort to turn an "old washed-up terrorist" into a wedge issue as divisive as same-sex marriage is too little, too late and too tone-deaf at a time when Americans are suffering too much to indulge in 1960s culture wars. Voters want policies that might actually work rather than another pandering, cynical leader who operates mainly on the basis of his "gut" and political self-interest.
The former Bush speechwriter David Frum has facetiously written that McCain could be rescued by "a 5,000-point rise in the Dow and a 20 percent jump in home prices." But the economy, stupid, can't be blamed for McCain's own failures, any more than Bush can be. Even before the housing bubble burst and Wall Street tumbled, voters could see that the seething, impulsive nominee isn't temperamentally fit to be president.
8. Major Latino vote for Obama.

From the report "Power of the Vote" by Americas Voices Online:
The Republicans hateful anti immigration messaging, partially embraced by McCain in the primaries, has come back to haunt the McCain campaign and its chances for victory on November 4th. It's now becoming evident that they woke a sleeping giant.
The passion of the immigration debate has galvanized immigrants and motivated them to apply for citizenship in record numbers. As a result, millions of new voters are preparing to cast their first ballots in November. Combined with the U.S.-born children and grand-children of immigrants who are coming into voting age, this wave has created a formidable force of Latino voters in 2008. Political scientist and Latino voting expert Matt Barreto of the University of Washington predicts turnout of over 9 million Latino voters in 2008, compared with 7.6 million Latino voters in 2004 In 2004, George W. Bush won approximately 40% of the Latino vote nationwide, but The Pew Hispanic Center recently found that Latinos favor Senator Obama over Senator McCain 66% to 23%. In their research, 76% of Latino registered voters rated Senator Obama favorably, in comparison to a 44% favorability rating for Senator McCain.xi Obama leads among Latinos in the Gallup daily tracking poll by an average of 59% to 30% over the past month. And a Wall Street Journal poll shows Latino voters favoring Obama over McCain 63% to 30%, while the poll shows the candidates tied with the general electorate.
9. Early voting increases dramatically.

According to the AP's Stephen Ohlemachrr:
Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama is busily banking every early vote he can get in key states.
Voters in every state can now cast ballots through early voting or absentee voting programs ... a look at those who have voted shows the Democrats have been aggressive. In Georgia, Iowa, North Carolina and Ohio, Democrats, or at least those living in heavily Democratic areas, are requesting and submitting ballots in large numbers. In Florida, Republicans hold an edge, while in Indiana, absentee voting has been split among Republican and Democratic areas.
President Bush won all six states in 2004, and McCain probably needs to win them all to claim the White House this year. The early voting snapshot, taken more than two weeks before Election Day, illustrates the strategies and strengths of both presidential campaigns.
Obama is pushing early voting on a grand scale, in speeches, e-mails, a Web site and even ads placed inside video games. Eighteen video games, including the extremely popular "Guitar Hero" and "Madden 09," will feature in-game ads from the Obama campaign.
In addition to efforts by the Obama campaign, there are broader reasons for the spike in mail-in voting, which range from anxiety over voting machines involving their technical reliability to campaigns by voting officials with advertising and mailings, hoping to avoid the long lines that plagued polling places in 2004 and 2006.

10. Obama's amazing grassroots, on-the-ground campaign to register and get voters to the polls.

Obama has built the strongest grassroots campaign in history. As Jeff Zeleny writes in the New York Times:
In a half-dozen states where polling suggests the candidates are deadlocked, Mr. Obama, the Democratic presidential nominee, is seeking to capitalize on a grass-roots enthusiasm and an unprecedented investment of money to push the get-out-the-vote effort to a new level. His campaign is hoping to gain that edge in perennial battlegrounds like Ohio and Pennsylvania.
The campaign is also seeking to use its army of employees and volunteers to help shift the electoral map by putting in play states like Indiana, North Carolina and Virginia, where changing demographics combined with the challenging political environment for Republicans nationwide have given Democrats hope.
What started out organically -- campaign officials saw organizational promise in Virginia last year, when 20,000 signatures were gathered to make Mr. Obama the first candidate to qualify for the primary ballot -- has come full circle. Now, people driving by the storefront offices are drawn in by their visibility and put to work.
The Obama campaign has broken the country into a collection of battleground states, which are dissected into precincts that are parceled one more time into neighborhood teams. (Ohio, for example, is divided into 1,231 neighborhoods.) And each of these teams, if the recruiting is up to speed, has a leader who, ideally, lives just down the block from all those doors that need to be knocked on.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: barack obama, john mccain

Don Hazen is the executive editor of AlterNet.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
I don't get it.
Posted by: douglashoyt on Oct 20, 2008 1:45 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama is very popular, but his policies are very right wing. He played a progressive on TV once then got nominated. Now he is just right wing.

As we know his voting record has exposed his true political standing.

Just a few:

Obama voted for FISA, the bailout of corrupt Wall Street Banksters, and the continued war and illegal occupations of Afganistan and Iraq.

Yet, the public does not see the danger in his presidency, but sees the danger in Mr. McCain. I don't get it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I do and don't get it. Posted by: americansheep
» it wouldn't matter... Posted by: undrgrndgirl
» Scary: And Palin Could Become President Posted by: ProgressiveManiac
» LOL: Quite a Plan Posted by: ProgressiveManiac
» Slow Down. Think About This. Posted by: ProgressiveManiac
» States Choose Electors Posted by: ProgressiveManiac
» RE: I don't get it. Posted by: disfasia
» How can you not get it? Posted by: ProgressiveManiac
» I get it Posted by: hms2004
» RE: You still don't get it... Posted by: ProgressiveManiac
» RE: I don't get it. Posted by: Von
» Why Obama? Posted by: thinks4herself2008
» RE: Why Obama? Posted by: Von
#10
Posted by: Mercury46 on Oct 20, 2008 1:48 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It looks like that community organizing experience was good for something after all, huh Sarah?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Now, 5 reasons you should temper your positivity when Obama is elected
Posted by: 6399 on Oct 20, 2008 2:17 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1. He's just another corporate shill who's made an untold number of promises to thousands of corporate donors who will expect the reach around later in his term.

2. I know many of you are expecting Obama's truly progressive spirit to emerge from the corporate body he currently inhabits. Don't count on it - the way he has cowed to the Wall Street elite confirms that he's firmly in the Rubin/Paulson camp. Sit back and watch as he embraces free market fundamentals like never before. Expecting him to reform NAFTA? Bwaaaahaaaaahaaaaa

3. If it walks, talks and flies like a hawk, then it must be a hawk. I don't know about you, but I'm growing increasingly tired of hearing the same, tired AIPAC/Israeli-directed palliatives: "Iran must not be permitted to obtain nuclear weapons - bla, bla, bla". I shudder when I hear that kind of macho bullshit. His stance on Pakistan is criminal and the Obama camp's attitude towards Russia is ALL WRONG.

4. Obama seems to have drifted (as in any which way the wind blows) into the "Drill, Drill, Drill" camp. Soon, your favorite aquatic wildlife will be all the more visible on family sightseeing outings because of their beautiful "Quaker State Sheen" that tends to reflect sunlight.

5. He stated in his last debate that he'll move ahead with missile defense, but give him a week and I'm sure he'll change his mind. I mean, he's only done so about a dozen times. Hate to say it folks, but the McCain camp had a point when they stated that Obama says one thing to one group and something different to another. When he's on a layover in Tel Aviv, he dons the Yamaka and declares his willingness to expand missile defense. When he's in California, he deplores it.

It's truly sad that Americans are so utterly brainwashed that truly progressive candidates like Kucinich or Nader are deemed unelectable because they don't fall into neatly prescribed categories that make Americans feel like they're running safely with the herd. God forbid you think for yourselves.

Is it because Kucinich is too short and unattractive? I suspect it is. Do we continue to ignore Nader because he's "one of them Ayrabs"? Or is it because he spoiled it for Gore? God, grow up. The only one who spoiled it for Gore was Gore and the millions of idiots who voted for Bush - TWICE. Want to blame someone? Blame your stupid goddamn inbred yokel neighbors!!

Don't worry - the cult of personality shall prevail and you'll get Obama. Just don't bitch and moan when he turns out to be a huge disappointment. Make sure you write him those letters expressing your disappointment though. I'm sure he'll get right back to you LMAO!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Hey Sour Grapes! You need to grow up! Posted by: thinks4herself2008
» Noam Chomski Posted by: ProgressiveManiac
The Power of Positive Thinking
Posted by: Tom Degan on Oct 20, 2008 3:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This should be a landslide in Obama's favor. As Johnny Mercer wrote,

"You've got to accentuate the positive. Eliminate the negative. Latch on to the affirmative. Don't mess with Mr. In betweem."

Why am I not-at-all optomistic? Because these hideous bastards have already stolen two presidential elections. Why should we assume they won't be successful this year? Keep your eues wide, your fingers crossed and your hands folded.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
George and Osama's October "Surprises"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

anxiety x 10
Posted by: jsheeler on Oct 20, 2008 3:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i appreciated the positivity in this article, but i share the fear of another theft. i actually woke up in a cold sweat last night after dreaming that mccain won. if he did, it would really be the end of america -- george bush did 80% of the job, and mcpalin is in some ways even worse than W.

sigh. VOTE!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: anxiety x 10 Posted by: georgiaorwell
Don't Do It !!!
Posted by: Last Chance on Oct 20, 2008 3:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If the Republicans fix this election there will be extremely serious trouble in this country!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I hope you're right. Posted by: Last Chance
» RE: I hope you're right. Posted by: willymack
» RE: I hope you're right. Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: I hope you're right. Posted by: EncinoM
all thinking people should vote for Obama because he understands we've had enough reckless freedom
Posted by: Suzon on Oct 20, 2008 3:47 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Freedom and democracy are either discussed separately or presented as being one and the same. In fact, there are two kinds of freedom: reckless and responsible. McCain (a risk taker from his West Point days) and Palin (if it moves, take a shot at it) are attractive to many Americans, the ones who vicariously enjoy irresponsibility because their own lives are circumscribed in various ways.

Obama is a change from biff-boff politics, in spite of his establishment connections. He understands that we must thoughtfully move from the bad place we're in due to the utter irresponsibility of the last eight years and to do so we cannot immediately swim against the current.

I understand the temptation to demonstrate our disapproval of destructive policies by rejecting Obama as tainted. But I say that inclusivity is a better way to move forward than rejecting everything and everyone except those without power.

Obama's like Androcles. He understands that you have to get close to the lion in order to disarm him and win him over. I am on record as being sceptical in regard to Obama and I hope to remain so. But Chomsky reminds us that even CEOs can have aspirations for a better world for themselves and posterity.

We are capable of altruism and rationality and it's about time that we got together and made the most of those qualities.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Songbird McCain, the phony patriot
Posted by: USAFVeteran1966 on Oct 20, 2008 4:14 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Once an ardent admirer of John McCain, I now consider him a phony patriot who put politics ahead of country by selecting Pathetic Palin for his running mate.

What the hell was John thinking, anyway?

I know what the pundits say, that he wanted to attract Hillary supporters but assume the worst -- that McCain won the election and then died in office. Didn't he consider that possibility?

Obviously not.

Any military person on active duty, discharged or retired with average IQ knows full well that Palin would be a laughing stock to our armed forces, with no chance of receiving the respect a commander-in-chief deserves. Quite clearly, as General Colin Powell said on "Meet The Press" yesterday, McCain had a lapse in judgement which, in my humble opinion, disqualified him from being president.

Powell left open the only reason Barack could lose next month: bigotry. If that happens, America's fate will be sealed as a racist society with no hope for redemption.

Vietnam vet/Obama supporter
Say NO to Songbird McCain

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Powell the bigot! Posted by: Karl.Ben
» RE: Powell the bigot! Posted by: Von
Letter to a Nader supporter
Posted by: chorton on Oct 20, 2008 4:44 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We can take nothing for granted; the Republicans aren't done with their dirty tricks, both before election day and at the polls. I agree with "6399" that the movement we're building behind Obama will have to confront him sharply on many issues. But nevertheless we urgently need him to win. And it's not just about Obama or about stopping McCain and the proto-fascists; it's about building a movement!

A friend of mine, an older labor activist in Western Pennsylvania, put it this way in a letter to a Nader supporter in California:

"How does it advance the broader progressive movement to work for Obama in a 'safe' state, assuming there are such things? That's a big mushball of a question, but the answer rests of knowing that casting the ballot is the LEAST important thing to do regarding the election.

" Here's my short list of things I've accomplished here in Western PA because I'm working for Obama, as an independent 'Progressives for Obama' and as a PDA activist, also an independent inside-outside group, things I couldn't have done very well otherwise:

" 1) I've met with and got to know a number of low-to-middle income Black activists in the area, set up voter reg tables with them at their churches, and together with them, circulated petitions for the 'million door knocker for peace' campaign. No way to do this if I was anti-Obama.

" 2) I've met with dozens of the Obama youth volunteers, had long positive discussions with them on everthing under the sun, now they're coming to our PDA events, and several have come to our weekly antiwar vigils. No way I could have none this as anti-Obama.

" 3) I meet every Saturday morning with 50-100 blue collar white guys--steelworkers, elecctrial workers, SEIU service workers. We work in teams visiting every union family in the County, getting their views on everything, but spend a good amount of time knocking down the racist attacts on Obama, from white workers to white workers. We meet and sum thing up and talk wider politics after each round of canvassing. A bunch of these guys are now coming to our PDA meetings. If I was anti-Obama, I'd be shown the door.

" 4) I've worked to have the community-based Blacks, the Obama youth, the the union workers in the same room, getting to know each other and working on the same projects. Again, no way as anti-Obama.

" 5) Finally, if and when our local Dem incumbents do show up at these things, we shake the hands of those who oppose the war, tell them to do more, since we've got their back, and get on the case of those who don't, but we do it in a context where they pay much more attention to it than otherwise. As a Green of third party, even if their was one around here, I'd be ignored.

"And I've done all this without going to a single meeting of the local Dems. In fact, I don't even know if they've had one. That means all the gains, contacts, allies, new members, and lists we've gained belong to us, not them. I could go on and on, but you should have the idea by now. In brief, look at the election as an ORGANIZER, not just as a VOTER."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What about the other Republican strategy of stealing elections?
Posted by: masthead on Oct 20, 2008 4:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It worked in 2004 and so far it's working again since tens of thousands of foreclosed home owners cannot vote. 150 thousands letters were sent out to Democratic voters in New Jersey disqualifiing them for various reasons. It goes on and on across the 50 states. With enough leverage like this they could win.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: stealing elections? We need a response. Posted by: Cardinal Spellman
Reason 11?- Obama Embraces War Criminal's Endorsement
Posted by: chlamor on Oct 20, 2008 5:05 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Bagman Cometh: Obama Embraces War Criminal's Endorsement
Written by Chris Floyd


Democratic Party circles are in raptures over Colin Powell's endorsement of Barack Obama. One can see the heavily-blinkered logic behind their elation; now that our national politics has been reduced to a petty squabble over spoils among shifting factions in the imperial court, a nod from a consummate courtier like Powell is indeed a glittering prize for an ambitious prince.

But out in the real world, where the operations of imperial power have left smoking trails of murder and ruin across the globe, the "endorsement" of a man who played an indispensable role in the slaughter of more than a million innocent people in a war of Hitlerian aggression should be regarded as a thing of shame, and vociferously rejected by anyone with a scintilla of honor or morality.

In fact, it is not too much of a stretch to say that Colin Powell is more responsible for the mass murder spree in Iraq than any other person except George W. Bush, who gave the actual order for the hit. For it was Powell who "made the sale" for the Bush Faction's deceitful warmongering campaign, with his infamous February 2003 presentation to the UN, laying out the false evidence about Iraq's non-existent weapons of mass destruction. After that farrago of artfully delivered lies, the American Establishment -- urged on by the fawning, bloodthirsty commentariat -- lined up solidly behind the war. After all, if Colin Powell -- so "reasonable," so "honorable," so "honest" and "bipartisan" -- stood foursquare behind the Bush case for war, then it must be ironclad.

...

This then is the bloodstained hand that Barack Obama has clasped so warmly, so triumphantly, on his march to power. As for Powell, he has proven himself once more the ultimate courtier. In the latest intramural tussle in the imperial court, his keen and practiced eye has picked out the coming man -- and so he has jettisoned the faction he has served for so long, and latched on to the winning side yet again. (As he did previously for awhile with Bill Clinton.) And why not? Powell has always been a faithful servant of America's militarist empire -- no matter who its temporary manager might be.

LINK

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Agreed. Who is a true patriot?
Posted by: thinks4herself2008 on Oct 20, 2008 8:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Powell is a true patriot...He put country first instead of his party.

McCain chose Palin in order to win (or so he thought this "outsider" would help him with women, Joe Six Pack, and evangelicals). Didn't vet her and doesn't care that if he's 6 feet under we're stuck with her. That's not a patriot;that's an opportunist.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Really??? Is that a "your either with us or a terrorist" comment?
Posted by: Prophit on Oct 20, 2008 9:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
or should I say "your either with us or a racist".

Same thing.... isn't it??? Better take a real serious look in that mirror buddie, you just sounded like Bush and his supporters and that is scary and that just proves Obama attracts the same anti-freedom of speech and voting decisions as those supporting Bush and McInsane.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Change requires action
Posted by: Menopausal Mick on Oct 20, 2008 5:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I saw this sign in Springfield Missouri this week. It is my favorite yard sign to date:

Had enough? Vote Democrat

Rural Missouri is heavily staunch Republican but we are making a difference here. It is changing primarily through our grassroots efforts. Person to person on the phone and door to door.

We need help. I’m not asking for your money. I’m asking for your time. Please do something to help bring about the change we so desperately need. Volunteer.

Sure, I have problems with Obama’s FISA vote and I’ll have a big problem if his administration continues either war. BUT, I have some hope that the constitution will be repaired under an Obama administration and I have zero hope for anything but fascism under McCain.

For me, there is no choice but to work for a return to a constitutionally sound form of government.

The Repugs have obtained a list of foreclosures and intend to use this list to disqualify voters. That is only their most recent venture into stopping the voice of the people. They have a huge play list.

The voting machines are so hackable that I think maybe even I could tamper with them. How do we beat that? Turnout. For instance, if they slant the machines by 5% and we have turnout that beats that slant then we win. Sure, it’s a gamble but we are out of time to demand paper ballots. Our only hope is massive turnout.

So,… what do we need… right now? People who can canvas door to door. People who can man the phone banks. Election day? We need people who can help bring things like water to people standing in very long lines at the polls. Or people to help organize rides for those unable to get to the polling place. Simple tasks, really… but they require a warm body to facilitate. Do you have a warm body? Can we borrow it? Heh.

The days of apathy have to end. We no longer have the luxury of watching history unfold. Believe me, I’d much rather spend my time in my garden or playing music on the back porch. But… we’ve been a nation asleep. If we are ever to awaken, it must start with me. It must begin with action. I have to get off my lazy arse and actually DO something.

Perhaps… you do too.

Menopausal Mick

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sleazathon and Cable News
Posted by: radical53 on Oct 20, 2008 5:47 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Whatever happened to cable news? They are now just tabloid, especially in prime time.

They keep repeating all of the McCain sleaze over and over again. It's kind of like repeating a pornographic '800' number or web address over and over again. "McCain and the RNC are running these robo-calls... listen to this and give me your comment." "McCain has unleashed this attack ad about Bill Ayers. Let's take a look at the ad now." "McCain said that Obama's tax plan is socialist... Let's listen to what he said." It just goes on hour after hour to try to make a horse race out of this election.

Then one tabloid "reporter" said that Obama had started running this really tough, negative ad against McCain that showed McCain saying he had voted with President Bush 90% of the time. McCain said it himself! Was it unfair to use the ad because McCain was just saying it to reassure the neo-con Republican base? So, McCain is allowed to contradict himself for different audiences while Obama's slip-ups are dissected and magnified ad infinitum? Is this really balanced reporting?

It looks like the people have made up their minds and this tabloid stuff won't have much effect, but I have to wonder. Even if Obama wins, a senate or house race could be affected. I've had it with cable "news".

I think it's time for millions of people to boycott CNN, Fox, and MSNBC "news" and move to internet sources of their own choosing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Did You Forget about Hacking and Voter Suppression?
Posted by: 911FalseFlag on Oct 20, 2008 6:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The neo-cons will steal this election In the same way that they stole the last two- hacking the electronic voting machines, manipulating each precincts vote count as it is being transferred to the central tabulators, voter suppression, caging lists etc.. Just like in 2004, neither candidate is expressing any concern about a large percentage of the national vote being counted by electronic voting machines that are completely hackable and everybody knows this.
Go to my website, 911inside job.net. I have many videos and articles on the hacking of past elections and the 2008 election. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is very clear that these people will steal this election also.
Cyber Security Expert: Hackers Planning To Steal Election For McCain

Spoonamore says electronic voting machines represent national security threat, Israel, China and Russia have capability to rig presidential outcome

Paul Joseph Watson
[1] Prison Planet
Tuesday, September 30, 2008

Stephen Spoonamore warns in a new interview that electronic voting machines represent a national security threat and that hackers are already planning to steal the 2008 presidential election for John McCain.

Spoonamore is a GOP member and a lifelong Republican, having worked on election campaigns with Rudy Giuliani and Michael Bloomberg. He also has 20 years worth of experience in encrypted and networked communications systems for banks, TV, telecommunications, EMS, Military and other uses.

In an ten part You Tube interview, Spoonamore warns that hackers are planning to steal the election on behalf of the McCain camp and even predicts the margin of victory, that McCain will make a “shocking recovery” and win 51.2 percent of the vote with three electoral votes over Obama.

“This is a national security threat,” said Spoonamore, “it is very possible for a foreign government to begin manipulating that transmission of code just as they attempt to do fairly often with our financial data….we deal with it every day on the commercial side,” he added, noting that China, and not the American people, has a greater chance of choosing the next U.S. president.
Watch his videos on www.911insidejob.net

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Time to GOTV
Posted by: JohnJlws on Oct 20, 2008 6:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now is the time for all of us who want Obama as our next POTUS to get on the phones, knock on doors, do the trench work to Get Out The Vote.

And, now is the time to start thinking of the possibilities that exist in an Obama Presidency that have no light of day in a maverick's administration. The world could be a dramatically and positively different place if America hires a world leader. We stand on the edge of something so historical as to be not comparable to anything that has come before. The morning of November 5 we are poised to show the world the true power of our democracy. We won't go backwards due to fear.

We hear all the time we live in the greatest nation in the world. This election we can prove it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Change and Positivity is in the air!
Posted by: thinkverybig on Oct 20, 2008 6:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The videos below are about change, inspiration, belief and compassion. I hope you like them and share them with everyone you know. We are headed in a new direction in the world we live and we as a society can embrace this new era with love. I ask for your support in helping spread the world.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EM58nqX1ehE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VN_pGy_1bEg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bD0iAQN7VPY

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YpfHz_WeXHw

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QH9BtZwTyHo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tWVGsuNecYg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UssvnQMn-EM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fdfvQmh3b90

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03Enn5yiY-0



Go to youtube and do a search for "thinkverybig" and watch all of those videos. The one called "We Must Change" would be fitting to recite at Obama's Inauguration.

Here's a community organizer that's reached out to over 20,000 youth and has a goal of touching a million by teaching them the game of life using the game of chess. Click below to watch video.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NLFENGymr34

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Newspaper Endorsements?
Posted by: Lilly on Oct 20, 2008 6:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was looking for a list of which papers have endorsed Obama and which have endorsed McCain but couldn't find it. Has anybody seen one? Obama endorsements are going off like popcorn; I was wondering which, if any, papers are going with McCain?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Comprimise?
Posted by: canadagirl on Oct 20, 2008 7:04 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama has a wider view of issue's and that may appear right wing, but in difficult situations as we are in, comprimise for the sake of helping the economy and safety are also needed to act. Provisions in all of these bills you don't see added, only the headlines. That is why McCain throws so much. Obama will not put himself vulnerable defending every issue the old mans throws at him.

If you take McCain's record you will find he's part of Corporate America and has been collecting donations for yrs with the like of AIG and such. It's hidden, he is the 'real' one with the terrorist link such as G. Gordon Liddy. I think integrity is Obama's only surely not McCain's. He is quite the sleazeball, according as a normal right wing Repub, claiming righteousness. It doesn't work. His Vietnam record is pisspoor and he's made himself a 'hero' while dumping on other vets. He's a freak.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

OBAMA WOKE EVERYBODY UP !
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Oct 20, 2008 7:51 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is no longer a place in this country for complacency. Obama and Hillary Clinton made a historic contribution to the country and all of us when they included everybody in the political process. Despite 8 awful years under Bush/Cheney there were still those who were convinced that they couldn't make a difference. Alone that's true, but enough people can change just about anything. The Republicans grew so accustomed to being the superior race that they still are not sure what's going on. McCain changes strategies twice a week. That means only one thing. The old on isn't working. He's gone from the POW/torture thing to Joe the Plumber and nothing has consistenly worked for him. Palin was a temporary boost. Obama has not changed his game plan because it worked from day one. Most Americans don't expect to agree with a candidate on everything. That's not possible. but Obama's biggest selling point early on was the fact that most of us believed that he simply gave a damn. We haven't seen that in many years. He built on that trust. Most politicians have a one way arrangement with the public. Trust is mutual and scares most of them. He's putting it all on the line and realizes that he has an obligation to us. It's a mutual thing. McCain is not offering that to his people. I think that explains the number of converts to Obama. As for the corporations: they keep most of us employed. For years they have functioned without rules and we find ourselves at their mercy. They need rules and regs like the rest of us, and people to enforce them. They too, have a mutual arrange ment with the American people. an obligation to make a contribution. That doesn't include cheap wages and a mailing address in the Bahamas. 35% tax bracket B.S. Try 2-3 %. They have so many write offs it's a wonder the IRS doesn't owe THEM. Maybe they do. Obama seems prepared to take them on and borrow a page from Harry Truman. Explain how we will do business, remind them that he the President and gets to call the shots. I believe Obama is prepared to take them on. I have nothing against the very rich, we need them. But getting rich by putting people out on the streets or in jail is not the American Way. Some jerk named George Bush turned us into a nation of people that the world fears and dislikes, we don't even like each other anymore. I see that changing. More than anything, the country needs a conscience. I believe that we all liked it better that way. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» watch history made on Nov. 4 Posted by: zooeyhall
» RE: OBAMA WOKE EVERYBODY UP ! Posted by: wagnerrocks@gmail.com
McBush
Posted by: RedFoxOne on Oct 20, 2008 8:05 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I honestly cannot believe anyone with a single ounce of common sense would be considering that liar McBush. Everythign out of his mouth is a lie? Can we afford that for the next four years? We have been LIED to enough for the past 8 years!

Jiff
Privacy Center

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Refuting the GOP smear of Obama's 2006 African trip and meeting with Rada Odinga
Posted by: USAFVeteran1966 on Oct 20, 2008 9:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Refuting the GOP smear of Obama's 2006 African trip and meeting with Rada Odinga

The Letter to the Editor below was written by retired USAF Major-General J. Scott Gration, a former Republican now working as a policy advisor to Senator Obama.

In 2006, Gration accompanied Obama to Africa on a fact-finding tour the GOP has tied to connect with terrorism. Because of the trip, the general later endorsed Obama, saying he had the "judgment, wisdom, courage, experience, and leadership capability that we desperately need.".

The Washington Times
Friday, October 17, 2008

LETTER TO EDITOR: No ties to terrorism

Mark Hyman's "Obama's Kenya ghosts," (Commentary, Sunday), was a disgraceful smear on Sen. Barack Obama. Because I accompanied Mr. Obama on his trip to Kenya, I can say unequivocally that Mr. Hyman's piece was filled with lies and innuendo.

• Mr. Obama's 2006 trip to Kenya was authorized by the Republican chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, who congratulated Mr. Obama on a successful trip when he returned.

• Mr. Obama did not "campaign" on behalf of Raila Odinga, has never endorsed him, and was not "nearly inseparable" from Mr. Odinga during his time in Kenya. Mr. Obama met with a wide range of Kenyan and American officials, including a Nobel Prize winner, human-rights defenders, and President Mwai Kibaki. He did not have a single scheduled meeting with Mr. Odinga.

• Mr. Obama was accompanied throughout his trip by myself and two other active-duty U.S. military officers; and the U.S. ambassador attended meetings and events throughout the trip. The Obama staffer - Mark Lippert - that Mr. Hynes names is a naval reservist and Iraq War veteran whose deployment began several months before the Kenyan elections and continued well past it.

• The Obama speech that Mr. Hyman references was a widely praised effort that condemned corruption and tribalism while urging the promotion of private enterprise and accountable, transparent government.

• Mr. Obama and Mr. Odinga are not cousins, and efforts to assert otherwise have been described as "stretched to the point of ridiculousness" by an independent fact checker.

Mr. Hyman references telephone contacts that Mr. Obama had with Mr. Odinga in January. He fails to mention that those contacts were encouraged by Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and were accompanied by public statements that Mr. Obama made on Voice of America, Kenyan radio, and in a Kenyan newspaper, calling for calm and a peaceful resolution of Kenya's political crisis. Repeatedly, Mr. Obama asserted, "the opposition (led by Mr. Odinga) must turn away from the path of mass protest and violence in seeking participation in government."

Mr. Hyman's piece concludes with an astonishing attempt to tie Mr. Odinga, the sitting prime minister of Kenya, and, by absurd association, Mr. Obama to acts of terrorism committed against the United States of America. This false and outrageous charge says a lot more about Mark Hyman than it says about Barack Obama.

MAJ. GEN. J. SCOTT GRATION
Air Force (retired)
Nutley, N.J.
-----------------------------------------------

Vietnam vet/Obama supporter
Say NO to McCain/Palin

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Jerome Corsi? Posted by: Bliss Doubt
Obama is NOT the government
Posted by: Kym525 on Oct 20, 2008 9:42 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wholeheartedly support Barack Obama for president because of one word he always uses in his speeches and his rallies.

WE!!! Where McCain always says "I".

I am so sick and tired of the asshats who keep talking about he's a corporate clone, he's not "progressive" enough, yadda yadda gabba gabba hey. Obama is only a MAN and he cannot fix overnight this mess we're in. I wasn't happy about the FISA vote, but under Obama that has a chance to be changed. Any bets that under a McCain/Palin ticket FISA not only stays but gets expanded?

I am sick and tired of the "I'm smarter than you so I'm not going to vote" contingent (and most of them are white so they haven't any clue as to what this election means to black people who had to shed blood in order to cast a ballot) who think it's perfectly fine to let the Republicans just walk away with this election like they've done twice before. There's a saying that it's hard to see when your head's stuck up your ass.

I don't expect for Obama to fix everything nor do I expect him to be perfect. That's another thing about him that I admire--he admitted early on that he was going to make mistakes, but that he would also learn from them. That's where the WE comes in. It is up to US as citizens of this country to take it back, and we're being given the chance to do that. It's only the weak and the cowardly who cry about the "corporations" while they sit on their asses and blog. We have to go out and reclaim our communities, get involved in the fixing of our infrastructure, be engaged in the civic process and make our voices heard. That's why Obama has been so successful as a campaigner--he's energized a country and a people tired of the bullshit and the negativity.

Then again, you've all seen the ugliness of the McCain/Palin ticket and the hate-filled folks who attend them. If this is your vision of America, then by all means, stay home and whine. For me and mine, for Fanny Lou and Medgar Evers--I'm casting my ballot and it's going to COUNT!!!

And you haters can kiss my ass!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Obama is NOT the government Posted by: Menopausal Mick
» RE: Obama is NOT the government Posted by: Menopausal Mick
CODEX ALEMINTARIUS
Posted by: Von on Oct 20, 2008 9:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SvYuSfMmDxw

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

American Complicity
Posted by: SEDGFLD on Oct 20, 2008 10:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Many Americans were warned about all of that has gone wrong in this country but chose to ignore the warnings out of selfishness and insistance on living in the fantasy world created to support their dishonesty.
So. it's no surprise that some are buying into the very same ugliness certain political machines, approved by Republicans, have used openly and with a vengeance since Reagan ran for office.
Thw state of hatred and all types of bigotry in this country, along with people thinking they have the right to tell others how to live, says more about the people than the politicans and the corrupt media that support those who enable them to get ridiculous salaries for lying to the public.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Good article; great comments-but
Posted by: willymack on Oct 20, 2008 11:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This forum is composed (mostly) of those capable of critical thinking and sound deductions based on the assimilation of factual information, as well as the willingness to take the time to sift and winnow through truths and lies. That's about 30 or 40% of likely voters. What about the rest? Trying to get to a lot of them is like trying to shinny up a greased flagpole. No amount of factual evidence is likely to sway them as their nasty little "minds" are made up. This is the target market of pallin/mcfool, those easily won over by emotional appeal, devoid of anything resembling inductive or deductive logic, let alone curiousity. Let's face it folks; these zeros have been around, and been given a free ride since G. Washington took the Oath of Office. It's up to those of us who actually participate in democratic activities to somehow turn a large percentage of them around in time to create a fix-proof landslide for Obama. This sure as hell won't be easy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

#11 - He has gobs and gobs of money!
Posted by: MartianBachelor on Oct 20, 2008 1:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Always vote for the candidate which has the clear and enthusiastic backing of Big Money.

They know what's best for everyone.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama kisses Israel's filthy ass...
Posted by: Von on Oct 20, 2008 7:27 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ClNTr-3R_dE&feature=related

while Israel and the US vote in-concert at the UN ..WHILE Israel CONTINUES to violate UN rulings.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"signs..signs...."
Posted by: Von on Oct 21, 2008 12:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VHEIi4XKRmM

Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh Sir Obama is speaking in tongues again.. Its so cute

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

America's OPERATION PAPERCLIP
Posted by: Von on Oct 21, 2008 9:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pxH-xsFEdJ8

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Randall Hansen
Posted by: U.S.citizen on Oct 25, 2008 9:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Forbes magazine Special issue reports there are 400 people that have over one billion. The average is $1.3 Billion. The tax on them is very low and need an adjustment of a larger tax.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

McCain Campaing Interests Spawn MURDER ATTEMPTS UPON OUR FAMILY
Posted by: Cyber198 on Oct 25, 2008 2:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
MCCAINATTACKS.BLOGSPOT.COM MCCAIN CORPORATE GREED Incites Kidnapping/Murder Attempts Upon Our Family To Silence our Online Protest Against Northwest Airlines-the Official Airline Carrier for McCain Campaign, we the victims of a vicious Northwest Airlines profiling attack leaving me hospitalized family friends terrorized years thereafter via covert state persecution:

McCain's Campaign TIES TO NORTHWEST AIRLINES (Official airline Carrier of McCain Campaign) at the Root of Murder attempts upon our We have received email threats from FBI, and by way of phone, including threats from FBI agent Steven Davis referencing McCain as a “Very good friend of his” amidst ongoing kidnapping attempts.

Northwest Airlines has been sued in the past via ACLU, was in bankruptcy protection at the time of the attack, and is now not only in a delicate merger with Delta, but the official carrier of the McCain campaign.


Ties between McCain/Republican Campaign and Northwest Airlines, the official Airline carrier for their campaign, coupled with the fact that McCain’s top executive legal council have Northwest and U.S. Chamber of Commerce as their top two clientele as exposed on the following sites: http://mccainsource.com/corruption?id=0006 and talkingpointsmemo.com
McCain well known for his *volatile temper (according to over 30 civilian and military sources)*Keaing 5 Scanadal, Investment savings and Loan, and his Exxon Oil 4.3 Billion tax relief initiative under the bailout.

Stepping on McCain's Corrupt corporate agenda has precipitated attempts upon our lives:

(CORROBORATIVE MEDIA REPORTS AND REFERENCES ARE ALL FOUND ON THIS SITE BUT FOR SAKE OF COMPLETENESS I PROVIDE CONTACTS HEREIN:
Lesley Hughes Canadian Dimension Magazine Journalist 204 275 5757 e: lesleyhughescanada(at)yahoo(dot)com, Roche Tasse International Civil Liberties Monitoring Group Coordinator 613 241 5298 e: rocht(at)iclmg(dot)ca; Michelle Gross Communities United Against Police Brutality e: mgresist(at)minn.net ph 612 703 1612

Extensive extrajudicial persecution (framed, covert tribunal housing FBI and NORTHWEST AIRLINES Airlines employees on a illegitimate “jury pool”, threats, stalking, sabotaged mail etc) prompted us to expose their crimes on line.

Our protests spawned repeated attempts via cross border collusion towards our kidnapping or murder by *criminally charged local Canadian Winnipeg police (acting covertly without warrant or charges) on behalf of U.S. judicial and corporate factions including FBI CIA and NSA, in attempt to silence us.

FBI Asset Winnipeg Police Chief Keith McCaskill: Local Canadian Winnipeg police remain motivated by a close affiliation with Minneapolis Police: Winnipeg Police Chief Keith Mc Caskill is president of North West Chapter of Associates FBI with Minneapolis Police affiliation and was referenced by police upon the first kidnapping/murder attempt.

Family Friends Associates threatened, terrorized now 3 years ongoing as police use many covert tactics in order to effect attempts at kidnapping, having necessitated my going into hiding in remote locations for extended periods of time. Family and I have been traumatized,

Our Contact Information:
Aaron James 204 296 6497; Linda James 204 509 9144/ 204 889 9134
e: resist1000@usa.com, gmail: jim457986@gmail.com ; Lindajames@mts.net

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

McCain Campaing Interests Spawn MURDER ATTEMPTS UPON OUR FAMILY
Posted by: Cyber198 on Oct 25, 2008 2:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://MCCAINATTACKS.BLOGSPOT.COM MCCAIN CORPORATE GREED Incites Kidnapping/Murder Attempts Upon Our Family To Silence our Online Protest Against Northwest Airlines-the Official Airline Carrier for McCain Campaign, we the victims of a vicious Northwest Airlines profiling attack leaving me hospitalized family friends terrorized years thereafter via covert state persecution:

McCain's Campaign TIES TO NORTHWEST AIRLINES (Official airline Carrier of McCain Campaign) at the Root of Murder attempts upon our We have received email threats from FBI, and by way of phone, including threats from FBI agent Steven Davis referencing McCain as a “Very good friend of his” amidst ongoing kidnapping attempts.

Northwest Airlines has been sued in the past via ACLU, was in bankruptcy protection at the time of the attack, and is now not only in a delicate merger with Delta, but the official carrier of the McCain campaign.


Ties between McCain/Republican Campaign and Northwest Airlines, the official Airline carrier for their campaign, coupled with the fact that McCain’s top executive legal council have Northwest and U.S. Chamber of Commerce as their top two clientele as exposed on the following sites: http://mccainsource.com/corruption?id=0006 and talkingpointsmemo.com
McCain well known for his *volatile temper (according to over 30 civilian and military sources)*Keaing 5 Scanadal, Investment savings and Loan, and his Exxon Oil 4.3 Billion tax relief initiative under the bailout.

Stepping on McCain's Corrupt corporate agenda has precipitated attempts upon our lives:

(CORROBORATIVE MEDIA REPORTS AND REFERENCES ARE ALL FOUND ON THIS SITE BUT FOR SAKE OF COMPLETENESS I PROVIDE CONTACTS HEREIN:
Lesley Hughes Canadian Dimension Magazine Journalist 204 275 5757 e: lesleyhughescanada(at)yahoo(dot)com, Roche Tasse International Civil Liberties Monitoring Group Coordinator 613 241 5298 e: rocht(at)iclmg(dot)ca; Michelle Gross Communities United Against Police Brutality e: mgresist(at)minn.net ph 612 703 1612

Extensive extrajudicial persecution (framed, covert tribunal housing FBI and NORTHWEST AIRLINES Airlines employees on a illegitimate “jury pool”, threats, stalking, sabotaged mail etc) prompted us to expose their crimes on line.

Our protests spawned repeated attempts via cross border collusion towards our kidnapping or murder by *criminally charged local Canadian Winnipeg police (acting covertly without warrant or charges) on behalf of U.S. judicial and corporate factions including FBI CIA and NSA, in attempt to silence us.

FBI Asset Winnipeg Police Chief Keith McCaskill: Local Canadian Winnipeg police remain motivated by a close affiliation with Minneapolis Police: Winnipeg Police Chief Keith Mc Caskill is president of North West Chapter of Associates FBI with Minneapolis Police affiliation and was referenced by police upon the first kidnapping/murder attempt.

Family Friends Associates threatened, terrorized now 3 years ongoing as police use many covert tactics in order to effect attempts at kidnapping, having necessitated my going into hiding in remote locations for extended periods of time. Family and I have been traumatized,

Our Contact Information:
Aaron James 204 296 6497; Linda James 204 509 9144/ 204 889 9134
e: resist1000@usa.com, gmail: jim457986@gmail.com ; Lindajames@mts.net

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement