Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Will Republicans Use Contested Voter Registration Lists to Scare New Voters?

By Steven Rosenfeld, AlterNet. Posted October 18, 2008.


The GOP push for lists of voters whose registrations don't match state and federal databases may be prelude to a big intimidation campaign.
intimidationflyer
2008 voter intimidation flier from Philadelphia.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Is Blind Faith in God and the Bible a Modern Invention?
Devilstower

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
What Can the Morass of the 1970s Tell Us About the Current Economic Crisis?
Alejandro Reuss

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Soda Helps Make Americans Unhealthy and Fat -- Will Soda Tax Prevail Despite Pushback by Beverage Industry?
Christine Spolar, Joseph Eaton

Health and Wellness:
Does the House Bill's Public Option Kill Off the Senate's?
Booman

Immigration:
Recent Democratic Victories May Grease the Wheels for Immigration Reform in Congress
Marcelo Balive

Media and Technology:
Focusing on Fort Hood Killer's Beliefs Is an Easy Out to Avoid the Deeper Reasons for the Massacre
Mark Ames

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Obama Is Up Against in His Own Branch of Government
Russ Baker

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
How the Stupak Amendment Radically Undermines Women's Rights
Rachel Morris

Rights and Liberties:
"Women Are Being Killed All Over the World": One Reporter's Fight Against So-Called "Honor Killings"
Robert S. Eshelman

Sex and Relationships:
9 Silly Things People Say When They Hear You Don't Want Kids (And Ways to Counter Them)
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Radioactive Wastewater in New York Raises More Concerns About Oil Drilling
Abrahm Lustgarten

World:
Egyptian Marine: Soldiers Often 'Racialize' the Enemy to Cope With Stress
Aaron Glantz

More stories by Steven Rosenfeld

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

On Friday, the U.S. Supreme Court told Ohio's Republican Party it was not entitled to a list of 200,000-plus Ohioans whose voter registration information did not match Social Security and state drivers' license databases. What did the Ohio party do? It went judge shopping, filing a closely related suit before Ohio's Supreme Court. Pennsylvania's GOP filed a similar suit on Friday. In Wisconsin, litigation on this issue is ongoing.

Why are Republicans so intent on obtaining this information?

So far, most of the analysis by election law experts have focused on Election Day scenarios. They posit that Republicans could use the lists to legally challenge the credentials of new voters or a close vote count. Such challenges would cause delays at polling places. They could result in voters being given provisional ballots, which must be verified before they are counted. Fights over provisional ballots could be the 2008 version of the Florida presidential recount.

The Ohio Republican Party threw a curious wrench into this thinking on Wednesday when a spokesman said his party would not pursue voter challenges. But two days later, the state party went to Ohio's Supreme Court seeking the same lists. (It already had asked all of Ohio's 88 county election boards for the data.) This posturing would seem contradictory unless there were other plans for those lists before Election Day.

In recent weeks, the McCain-Palin campaign and Republican Party have embarked on a major media and litigation strategy to cast as much doubt as possible on the veracity of the 2008 vote. A look at the campaign's recent messaging and GOP tactics from Ohio's 2004 election suggest another use for the non-match lists: to target voters for mass phone calls, mailings, or other messaging to deter them from voting on Nov. 4.

The New York Times reported Saturday that as the Obama campaign was outspending McCain by a four-to-one ratio on television ads, the McCain campaign was making "hundreds of thousands of automated telephone calls -- uniformly negative and sometimes misleading" to voters in 10 battleground states. In these calls, the GOP linked Obama to former 1960s radicals and wealthy Hollywood politicos.

There is no reason why GOP could not use the 'no-match' voter registration lists to make similar calls to hundreds of thousands of newly registered voters in Ohio -- and other battleground states -- that call into question the legality of those voter registrations.

During the final presidential debate, McCain signaled his campaign would continue to raise this issue. Speaking of ACORN, the low-income advocacy group, he accused it of perpetuating "one of the greatest frauds of voter history in this country, maybe destroying the fabric of democracy in this country" because some ACORN employees turned in fabricated registrations among the 1.3 million submitted by the group.

If the Ohio Republican Party obtains the lists of 200,000-plus Ohio voters where the information on registration forms did not match state and federal databases -- even as Social Security officials have said their data could be wrong up to 28.5 percent of the time when used this way -- it could program computers to call those voters and say their registrations potentially violate laws, a deliberate exaggeration to deter turnout.

There are precedents for this tactic from the 2008 campaign as well as from Ohio in 2004.

In Philadelphia, the Daily News reported earlier this month that flyers were distributed in minority neighborhoods telling prospective voters they could be arrested while voting for outstanding traffic tickets. In 2004, members of the "Texas Strike Force," a group of GOP volunteers, used hotel pay phones in downtown Columbus, Ohio, to call likely Democratic voters and tell them that they could be arrested if they voted.

Moreover, in 2004 in Lake County, Ohio, a fabricated post card was sent to likely Democratic voters with the title "Urgent Advisory" from the "Lake County Board of Elections." Dated October 22, 2004, it said:

"The voter registration deadline passed on October 4, 2004 and we registered a record number of new voters. The demand on our office has been great and we appreciate your cooperation. Unfortunately, independent efforts by the NAACP, Americans Coming Together, John Kerry for President and the Capri Cafaro for Congress campaigns have been illegally registering people to vote and to apply for absentee ballots. This is a terrible occurrence that will undermine the process of democracy. If you have been registered by any of these entities then you may run the risk of being illegally registered to vote. Please be advised that if you were registered in this capacity that you will not be able to vote until the next election. We apologize for these problems and we will pursue these entities to the fullest extent. Please notify the Lake County Sheriff's office if you have any questions."
It is not difficult to see how the GOP could substitute ACORN for the 2004 Democratic campaigns cited in this card.

On Friday, the Obama campaign formally asked the U.S. Attorney General Michael B. Mukasey to expand the Justice Department's inquiry into the administration's firing of federal prosecutors who did not pursue "voter fraud" cases to include a leak by the FBI on Thursday revealing ACORN was under investigation. That disclosure violated the Justice Department's rules prohibiting statements that could have political consequences in an election.

The McCain campaign's response, apart from scoffing at the Obama campaign, was to reaffirm its commitment to raising "voter registration fraud" issues between now and Election Day.

"Rest assured that, despite these threats, the McCain-Palin campaign will continue to address the serious issue of voter registration fraud by ACORN and other partisan groups, and compliance by states with the Help America Vote Act's requirement of matching new voter registrations with state data bases to prevent voter fraud," Rick Davis, the McCain-Palin 2008 Campaign Manager, said in a media teleconference late Friday.

According to the Social Security Administration, between January and September 2008, there were 289,603 non-matches in Ohio, 72,137 non-matches in Pennsylvania, 4,546 non-matches in Wisconsin, and 716,252 non-matches in Nevada, 265,691 non-matches in Georgia, and 57,887 non-matches in Indiana.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: voter suppression, acorn, philadelphia, u.s. supreme court, ohio supreme court, ohio rrpublican party, voter intimidation, voter registration no mat, campaign misinformation, voter registration fraud

Steven Rosenfeld is a senior fellow at Alternet.org and author of Count My Vote: A Citizen's Guide to Voting (AlterNet Books, 2008).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
pleasepleasepleaseplease
Posted by: hurricane hugo on Oct 19, 2008 2:33 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
come challenge me at my local polling place, you fascist fucktards.

jdfu!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: pleasepleasepleaseplease Posted by: flatlanddogs3
Voter "challenging" by the Republics
Posted by: Quannah on Oct 19, 2008 3:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is yet another indicator of the naked desperation of that most despicable Party!

Because I have moved in the past month, and because in my state you can register and vote the same day, I fully expect someone to challenge my vote.

As with hurricane hugo above, I hope to gawd that someone has the balls to challenge my vote!

Oh... and by the way, I plan on wearing my bright red ACORN hat to the polls on Nov. 4th! And I hope someone says something to me about it... (There are no laws here saying you can't wear political clothing, etc. when you go to vote.)

If this election has done anything to me, it has made me furious! Furious that certain assholes DARE to question my patriotism, my Americanism, my right to my own political views, my right to vote! Exactly who do they think they are? Those people who love to throw their political weight around are going to wake up on Nov. 5th and find themselves OUTNUMBERED! They are going to wake up finding themselves OUT OF POWER! I can't wait to wake up on Nov. 5th!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Stolen again !
Posted by: sirios on Oct 19, 2008 5:13 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have warned in the past that this election is not a done deal for obama. That supposed 10 point lead has dwindled over the weekend. Do you really think that there will be less dirty tactics than we saw for both of the Bush robberies? If anything there will be more.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Stolen again ! Posted by: FLMom
» RE: Stolen again ! Posted by: flatlanddogs3
» RE: Stolen again ! Posted by: sirios
Time to Start Talking About It...
Posted by: madmac10 on Oct 20, 2008 6:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Like a friend told me this weekend: if they are not gonna accept Obama, then who the hell will they accept?
Look folks, we know that it is going to be up to us to save our republic. We know that we are going to be marching to the voting booth in huge numbers to elect the only reasonable alternative for America's future. We know that may not be the end of it.
We all know that Obama has a massive majority of support. The media has been calling it a close race all year because they are priming the pumps for the kleptocrats who own their voice. They need to know one thing: we are not going to accept it this time.
The last time, we all thought, "How much damage can they do?" and let the baby keep his bottle. Now, after losing the World Trade Center, New Orleans, thousands of children to Iraq and an economy, we know better. Now it is their turn to realize something: this time we are not going to let it go.
We all need to be prepared to take that extra step: to march to Washington DC and camp out on the front steps of our (that's right: OUR) government.
If they want to steal our election this time, the had better be prepared to deal with the consequences. They had better be prepared to handle a complete closure of our infrastructure and our economy as millions of us march on Washington. They had better be prepared for what happens when they order our sons and daughters to turn weapons against their parents. They had better be prepared for the eyes of the world turning on them.
Look, I love Al Gore a lot. But, as my friend also said this weekend: "This time they ain't gonna be dealing with Al Gore. They are gonna have to deal with ALL of us..." You might think about what you are gonna pack.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Time to Start Talking About It... Posted by: flatlanddogs3
Fair play?
Posted by: sirios on Oct 20, 2008 7:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
here's a little addition to my above comment. I vote by mail and noticed on the ballot instructions that, the envelope must be signed in order for the ballot to be valid. Now ,here is the catch, the ballot can be thrown out if the signature does not resemble the one that is on file at the county govt. office. I questioned the staff when handing in my ballot about this and the reply was, "don't worry your signature is read by a computer, and the computer is very accurate". If there is a discrepancy noted by the computer then "humans" make the determination of it's accuracy, which of course is highly subjective. When i mentioned this to the clerk, she looked insulted , like "how dare you even insinuate foul play".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

To avoid losing your vote, may I suggest...
Posted by: flatlanddogs3 on Oct 20, 2008 12:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I came up with this idea after the 2004 elections and I talked about this with a lawyer friend of mine. It's legal. But check with your state in case.

Request as early as possible an Absentee Ballot. When you receive it fill it out, but DON'T SIGN IT YET. Make a photo copy of it, and then take original and photo copy to a notary public and sign original and copy in front of the notary public and witness. Have copy only signed by witness and stamped by the notary public.

Hand Deliver original to where it's supposed to go and tell person in charge what you did and that you are going to hand deliver the notarize copy to your candidate's local headquarters.

If more people in the red states did that the gop would be hard pressed to not count your votes with the evidence against them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I Got One Of McCain's Robo-calls
Posted by: gradioc on Oct 20, 2008 4:09 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sen. McCain did me the honor of having his machine call me here in NC. I would say it was no more (or less) deceptive than the TV ads we've all seen. Yeah, there was a lot of Bill Ayers, though not by name. They just refered to him as "AN ADMITTED DOMESTIC TERRORIST!" to try to play on the Muslim smear. That might still be effective on the people who buy the "HE'S NOT A CHRISTIAN!" crap, but to me it really just smelled of desperation. But do not doubt that the Muslim smear has worked. My boss told me today that his father-in-law, a life-long Democrat, didn't think he could vote for Obama because he's not a Christian. It amazed me that that is still out there working its evil magic, but it is. I suspect a lot of it comes from the pulpit, but I need to ask the man in question where he got it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

All Patriotic Americans.......
Posted by: gellero1 on Oct 20, 2008 6:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
would consider it proper to contest 'Mickey Mouse' and their dead Auntie Em.

If you don't feel this is the correct thing to do, most Americans would regard you as a traitor.

Any objections?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Voter suppression is never good strategy, but the Dems employ it as well.
Posted by: MuddPi on Oct 22, 2008 11:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In 2004 the Democratic Party machine attempted to throw a monkey wrench in the campaign of one of its feared rivals. It amassed an army of lawyers and graphologists and went to work paring away at the signatures that promised to get one Ralph Nader on the ballot. I watched some of the court proceedings in Albuquerque, NM even though Nader was not running as the Green Party candidate that year. Later I heard that the owners of some of the contested "fake" signatures were contacted and were livid that their crooked t's and undotted i's were leading to their electoral intents being erased by party politic.
Then I was shocked to learn that the same machinery was in play as Carl Romanelli, Green candidate for Congress in PA, was tossed off the ballot because fearful and arrogant Dems were using the same tactics. These days those funny and suspicious signatures and voter registrations are carefully defended by Dems as they fight off Rep efforts to label ACORN the same fraudulent menace that the Dems considered the PA Green effort. I'll be curious to see who prevails in this fight and whether ACORN, like Romanelli and Nader, end up paying their accuser's court costs. Note the judge in the PA case was found to have a blatant conflict of interest as well.

Until we have fair and completely non-partisan electoral rules, third parties cannot realistically compete against prejudiced power-hungry machines with well-stocked coffers. Hence our democracy remains a joke.

If it's wrong for the Republicans to play dirty pool with our election, then it's equally as criminal when the Democrats do it.

Funny how it looks so different though when you find yourself at the wrong end of the stick.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement