comments_image -

Can The Net Free Film From Hollywood's Clutches?

Several would-be web moguls are turning the Net into a film distribution apparatus. Will they revolutionize filmmaking or dish up the same old shit?
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.

 
 
 
 

The persistent myth of the Internet, despite its near-complete commercialization, is that it remains a diverse, inexpensive and largely egalitarian creative space. The obverse myth of the film industry is that its preoccupation with profit inhibits all but the most banal forms of creativity, even in the seemingly fertile territory of independent, non-Hollywood cinema.

If we accept that all myths are in some sense true, what are we to make of the recent efforts by would-be Web moguls to turn the Internet into a film distribution apparatus? Should burgeoning auteurs and their potential audiences (the rest of us) prepare for radical innovations in filmmaking and movie-going based on this new business model, or should we just expect the same old thing on a smaller scale?

The answer, unsurprisingly, is a little of both.

More surprising are the ways in which the current batch of Internet film sites mimic the values of their Hollywood brethren — and, increasingly, rely on industry capital and cachet to survive. This troubling relationship has the unfortunate side effect of undermining the diversity, amateur enthusiasm and slapdash spontaneity that make the Web such a promising film venue in the first place.

Because truly independent movies boast a similar enthusiasm and spontaneity, it stands to reason that film and the Internet would be a match made in heaven. For now, though, the two forms don't converge on anything like a large scale. For much of the world, where analog telephone-line connections to computers with slower modems, older processors and limited RAM are the norm, watching even the shortest digitized film on a Web site can be a lesson in tedium. Like other forms of entertainment disseminated over the Internet, movies are best enjoyed by a small, select group of broadband-equipped aficionados — some of whom have the capital and connections to launch filmmaking careers.

What the Web-as-movie-theater lacks in watchability, the theory goes, it makes up for in visibility. On Internet film sites of every stripe, works that might otherwise never be released are given the kind of exposure that could take years — not to mention phenomenally good fortune — to achieve through traditional means. This is particularly true for artists who aren't working in filmmaking meccas like Los Angeles and New York, or who otherwise lack the proximity to career-boosting industry contacts. Indeed, short films from all over Europe make up a significant portion of many U.S. sites, while the English site getoutthere and Ireland's Midnight Pictures bypass the North American bottleneck altogether.

But as any homegrown filmmaker (or Webmaster) can tell you, visibility is effective only when an audience can find your work. That's where film sites have shown the greatest promise. Distribution sites like AtomFilms solicit and post short films and work to secure licensing deals for the shorts they exhibit with U.S. and European cable networks, video distributors, airlines, and other lucrative outlets. Other sites, such as The New Venue, serve primarily as exhibitors and eschew agency functions. The biggest enticement to new talent, perhaps, is that most sites pay for the films they post: the independent-film news service indieWIRE reports that filmmakers can make between $500 and $2000 for each film they sell to a site and anywhere from 20 to 40 percent of ancillary sales.

Coming to a 1-inch by 1-inch Box Near You: AtomFilms

This is also where the process loses some of its "art for art's sake" altruism, however, even without the benefit of Hollywood influence. The more sites pay for the works they exhibit and market, the more creative control artists are likely to have to concede. Many, if not most, sites require filmmakers to sign over all distribution and exhibition rights to their films, provided they agree to buy them at all. Some sites, such as MediaTrip, offer more generous contracts, but none guarantees that the shorts they post will be vigorously marketed or even prominently displayed on their homepages.

submit to reddit

-
Email
Print
Share
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Advertisement
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading most read content ..
Advertisement
AlterNet Radio: What's At Stake in Wisconsin; Real "Defense" Budget Is $1 Trillion; the Right's Phony Race War

By Staff | AlterNet

 
 
Fox, Breitbart, and Ricketts Try to Bring Back D'Souza's Pseudo-Birtherism

By Steve M | No More Mister Nice Blog

 
 
Activists Speak Out Against Lack of Access to Bradley Manning

By Agence France Presse

 
 
NYPD Catches Sexual Assailant, Then Lets Him Go Free Because He Didn't Feel Like Being Questioned

By Jill F | Feministe

 
 
Gov. Scott Orders Purging of Florida’s Voter Rolls - Just in Time For Prez Election

By Adele Stan | AlterNet

 
 
Abortion Clinics Across Country Put On Alert In Wake of Georgia Clinic Arson Cases

By Robin Marty | RH Reality Check

 
 
Former GOP Congresswoman Blasts New GOP Women’s Caucus: ‘They’re Not Voting In Best Interest Of All Women’

By Josh Israel | ThinkProgress

 
 
Debbie Wasserman Schulz is Wrong on Wisconsin

By LaFeminista | DailyKos

 
 
Pro-Coal Group Pays People to Wear Its Shirts at EPA Hearing

By Heather Moyer | Sierra Club

 
 
Kids Inundate NY Governor With Concerns About Fracking

By Seth Gladstone | Food and Water Watch

 
 
 
 
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
 
[ page served from web 2 ]