Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Sarah Palin Is the Pet Rock of Politics

By Marie Cocco, Washington Post Writers Group. Posted October 2, 2008.


Palin is a cultural oddity that many Americans value little except as an object -- one that absorbs every projection of the national imagination.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Marie Cocco

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

WASHINGTON -- There is something about Sarah Palin that gnaws at me, and it isn't that the Republican vice presidential nominee has wilted under the soft light shined upon her by CBS' Katie Couric. It isn't that I disagree with Palin on just about every single substantive issue I can think of, and probably some I haven't thought about.

What's bothering me about Palin isn't even Palin. It is that she's been made into the novelty act -- even the freak show -- of the presidential campaign.

Her mark in history may well turn out to be like that of the Pet Rock, one of those artifacts that has little value except as an object that is dissected for its cultural significance. During the brief but happy life of the Pet Rock in the 1970s, millions of Americans shelled out $3.95 to purchase an ordinary gray stone, packaged in a small cardboard box complete with an official Pet Rock training manual. The fad petered out in six months, but not before the promoter got rich and thousands of backyards became Pet Rock graveyards.

Now we prepare to watch Palin in today's vice presidential debate, compelled more by a cult-like curiosity than a call to civic duty.

Certainly some undecided voters may watch because they want to be convinced that the Alaska governor is qualified to be vice president or to determine, once and for all, that she is not. Republicans already attracted to her social conservatism and her family story will be cheering her on and will defend her against any slip or slight, real or imagined. Just as surely, some liberals will be itching to see what material Palin manages to serve up as fodder for Tina Fey and the writers at "Saturday Night Live."

Palin has become a sideshow: See Sarah stumble through the Couric interviews. Watch clips of Sarah's beauty-pageant swimsuit competition on YouTube. Laugh uproariously as Tina does a better Sarah than Sarah herself.

This is a terrible predicament not only for Palin but for all American women.

For decades women have protested the way we are objectified, only to have a governor running for vice president turned into an object. She is an object of over-the-top partisan projections, from the left and right. She is an object of scorn. And in some quarters, an object of sympathy.

I do not blame Palin for this. Which young, ambitious male governor, upon getting the call to join the national ticket from his party's presidential nominee, would humbly say, "No thanks, I'm not ready"? Yet some have laid Palin's failure to turn down the chance at promotion at her feet, as if it were her responsibility -- and not John McCain's -- to have chosen more wisely. Some conservatives who just a few weeks ago took delight in skewering liberal feminists with the rhetorical equivalent of Palin's moose-gutting knife now are aghast at the gaping holes in her knowledge.

McCain and his campaign bear full responsibility. Palin's initial introduction as one tough reformer turned quickly into a sales pitch for one tough hockey mom, capable of nursing an infant and nudging legislation to passage at the same time. Palin wasn't expected to know anything about throw-weights. She was there to ease the worries the Republican right harbors about McCain and, it was implausibly suggested, to attract Hillary Clinton supporters to the Republican ticket.

The way Palin was sequestered from the media helped transform her into a calcified figure to be seen but not heard, at least not heard speaking from anything but a script. Like a Pet Rock, she wasn't supposed to escape from the yard or require genuine training. She only had to stand and absorb every odd projection of the national imagination, however awkward and demeaning a task that might be.

Now Palin goes live alongside Democrat Joe Biden, and an odder couple has rarely shared a political stage. I do not expect Biden to be anything but superior in his knowledge and in the stature he is able to project to a worried public. He will be on guard against condescension. I do not expect Palin to collapse in utter confusion or do anything less than survive -- even if she barely survives. But surviving a debate and the post-debate spin isn't qualification for the vice presidency. That is the nub of it.

Palin's candidacy isn't shattering the glass ceiling for her or any other woman. It is killing us with a thousand cuts.

Marie Cocco's e-mail address is mariecocco(at)washpost.com.

(c) 2008, Washington Post Writers Group

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: women in politics, female politicians, sarah palin, palin, pet rock, glass ceiling

Marie Cocco is a prize-winning syndicated columnist on political and cultural topics for The Washington Post Writers Group. She is a frequent commentator on national TV and radio shows.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Was Palin McCain's choice?
Posted by: kiwijohn on Oct 2, 2008 12:48 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You are making an assumption that McCain was given an option in the choice of his VP by the right wing of his party. There is more than anecdotal evidence out there to suggest that McCain himself is a puppet in the hands of the scoundrels that have brought this country to its knees.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Was Palin McCain's choice? Posted by: Karl.Ben
» RE: Was Palin McCain's choice? Posted by: Amolibri
Sarah Palin - The Candidate of God
Posted by: eskit on Oct 2, 2008 12:56 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Palin represents nobody but the radical fringe that delights in fantasy and mythology. I suspect most women are unimpressed by the reality of her past, just as most Christians are hesitant to follow her into the realm of witch doctors.
(By the way, there a funny music video of Palin at http://www.youtube.com/Eskit99.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Stupid Sarah proves what many Vietnam War vets believe -- that Songbird McCain is a traitor.
Posted by: NoMcCainPalin on Oct 2, 2008 1:00 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If John really loved America, he would've picked the BEST possible candidate for his running mate, not the worst.

By definition, that deliberate act of betrayal makes him a traitor -- period!

One more thing for NEW AlterNet visitors. If you are an undecided voter and want to learn the truth about Songbird McCain's so-called "heroic" war record, click on: Vote Against McCain (one of the HOTTEST anti-McCain sites on the Web)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Songbird McCain Posted by: eskit
Biden bits....
Posted by: Karl.Ben on Oct 2, 2008 5:38 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Forget Sarah, I can't wait to hear Biden recreate history.. Next he'll have FDR giving fireside chats over the net!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Karl (Rove) Ben ? Posted by: zipper696
People will gawk at a bloody highway wreck...
Posted by: recyclefreak on Oct 2, 2008 6:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...the same way they view Palen; as the author suggested, like a freak show, something so loud and strange that you absolutely can't NOT look, especially as you're only just just passing by...

You might despise the media for highlighting the panty-less exploits of Paris and Brittany, but you know who they are, and you just can't help yourself from watching.

Hopefully, our interests will not have to be riveted to her like an oncoming train wreck for more than the 4 weeks left 'til showtime.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thanks Marie
Posted by: weathered on Oct 2, 2008 6:14 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sarah is a media gimmick, a distraction that diverts the gravity of post 9/11 America from confronting our darkest truth - ever!

Arrest Silverstein/Bushcon and heal or stay stuck in the Lies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» more 9/11 Posted by: weathered
PALIN IS A HUGE MARKETING TOOL
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Oct 2, 2008 6:43 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It amazes me that Americans can't see this for what it is. A huge gamble that just might work. It's the work of the Christian Right once again trying to complete the highjacking of our country. Palin is enjoying every minute of it and gives new meaning to egocentric. She is uninformed and likes it that way. What you see, is what you 'git'. For the guys who think she's hot and the women who think he's just an adorable hockey mom, you're right. But that does not qualify her for the White House. The fact that she's still in the race speaks poorly of the American people. We objected strongly to the original bailout, guess what. It failed and went back to the drawing board. We do have clout, but we have to use it. Sarah Palin is debating Joe Biden tonight we allowed it. It's an insult to all of us. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: PALIN IS A HUGE MARKETING TOOL Posted by: QuestionAuthority
First an apology to all you pet rocks out there
Posted by: mdwoade on Oct 2, 2008 7:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think that you are completely correct when you say that making Sarah Palin candidate for the Vice Presidency raises the glass ceiling for all other women. In the future, an intelligent woman running for office will need to prove that she is not like Sarah Palin.

I had always thought that women were just like men only a little more subtle, now I will always wonder if that woman candidate can even name one supreme court decision, has ever read a newspaper, or can form a complete English sentence. The more people criticize her, the more "adorable" she becomes. God forbid anyone would ever criticize a politician, I mean what has this country come to.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» oh God, my ears are BLEEDING! Posted by: foreverhope
Palin's Fireside Blog
Posted by: Raymuz on Oct 2, 2008 8:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
palinsfiresideblog.blogspot.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Who picked Palin?
Posted by: MTguy on Oct 2, 2008 9:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Excuse me, but it doesn't seem to me that Sarah Palin was selected by John McCain. It's more like she's the product of a process: "Let's see... the GOP brand is in the dirt, none of the former candidates for Prez really jump starts anybody, Joe Lieberman is a non-starter for adding life to the campaign, and Hillary has a lot of disappointed supporters out there... so let's find a gal with a big positive approval rating and pick her."

They forgot to add, "Qualifications be damned."

When I look around at other strong women in the GOP ranks, Sarah Palin does indeed come off as the Pet Rock of the group.

Similar to said rock, Ms. Palin's communication skills with regard to conveying facts are nil. She gives a nice speech but there's nothing behind it.

So let's say the worst happens... twice - McCain is elected and dies in office. Can you picture Sarah Palin in a room with Dmitry Medvedev and Vladimir Putin and trying to hold her own with those guys?

I'm sorry, but I think the rock has a better chance.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Who picked Palin? Posted by: Lilly
I disagree
Posted by: fomented on Oct 2, 2008 9:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I disagree. She had a choice, could have declined
and paid her dues by staying in Alaska & getting more experience.

Blaming "the men" for her objectification is lame.

If this is the case they want to make,
then they also need to admit she's not too bright
and does not know how to wield her power.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

GREAT CULTURAL ANALOGY TO PET ROCK!!
Posted by: drricklippin on Oct 2, 2008 9:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But metaphor breaks down when one compares the damage that could occur from a Palin vice-presidency or-heaven forbid-a Palin presidency verses any pet rock.

We have sufferred enough.

Dr. Rick Lippin
Southampton,Pa
ralippin@aol.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lilly
Posted by: Lilly on Oct 2, 2008 9:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sarah Palin's language is Duckspeak, a term attributed to Orwell but (according to Wikipedia) not coined until after his death. To Duckspeak means "to make articulate speech issue from the larynx without involving the higher brain centres at all... Opinion which is quacked out is the orthodox one, implying nothing but praise...The highest praise for a duckspeaker is to call him/her a Doubleplusgood Duckspeaker.".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Lilly Posted by: blitzmesser
Why do feminists agonize over Palin???
Posted by: Kym525 on Oct 2, 2008 10:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
She's nothing more than a travesty.

Every time I see or hear her, I get angry. She spits in the face and on the graves of all the women who fought for the right to vote and for equality. She's a tool who's happy being used by men. Why should we as feminists care if a bunch of dirty old conservative men think she's "hot"? We expect for those guys to behave like neanderthals. So what that she's a working mom--so was MY mom, my grandmother and my great-grandmother. So are and were a LOT of women. Palin's stances on women's issues are in lock-step with her far-right credentials. She doesn't give a damn about us, so why should we shed any tears or feel "bad" because she's getting what she deserves?

Everything Hillary Clinton was--savvy, intelligent, knowledgeable, engaged--Sarah Palin IS NOT and she revels in her stupidity. Of course she's judged by her looks, compared to us "hirsute, birkenstock-wearing feminists" (quote from Kathleen Parker on her opposition to Sarah Palin); it's safer. She's "accessible". It makes men comfortable that she's not competing with them. When she's "attacked", the men come to her rescue. She was squirreled away from the press because the republicans knew she'd shoot herself in the foot--so much for the pit bull with lipstick.

I've said it before--not every woman is going to have the best interests of all women at heart. Personally, I hope Joe Biden verbally tears her a new one!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Very well put my dear Posted by: Grandma Crabby
Hardly
Posted by: MartianBachelor on Oct 2, 2008 10:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The problem with the pet rock analogy is that it suggests a frivolous and passing fad, which is a dead wrong read IME.

I think a large part of Palin's appeal, however misplaced it may be, is that she taps into the ever-present populist and anti-establishment sentiment for real change - that recurring myth about how "one day the people will rise up and take back their government" - which boils up about every second or third election among the citizenry, and which threatens the business-as-usual way the two parties like to run things.

In 1968 George Wallace represented one aspect of this, in 1980 it was John Anderson, in 1992 it was Ross Perot, in 2000 it was Ralph Nader. This time it happens to be the VP pick for one on the major parties, which has the problem of trying to distance itself from an incumbent administration from its own party.

Reaction to the bailout bill really makes this clear: just about the entire political and economic establishment was for it (certainly all the leaders were), while regular people all over the country smelled a rat and were strongly enough against it to call their members of congress in significant numbers and stop it, for now at least.

Maybe this is incomprehensible to some, just like people going crazy buying rocks was back in the day, and that's about the only similarity for those who have rocks for brains.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Palin claims to the the candidate for "Joe Sixpack"...
Posted by: jimidee on Oct 2, 2008 12:00 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and while it is true that there are a lot of hard working Americans, uh, white Americans, who would like to have a beer with her, and then another, and then another, in the end they would all try to DO her.
Such is the life of Joe Sixpack. It ain't complicated...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Yeah, screw the hold on condescention...
Posted by: jimidee on Oct 2, 2008 12:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
why not make her look dumber than she even is? I think that every tough question that Biden gets, that he should answer it and then say, "I'd love to hear what Sarah Palin thinks about this."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Yeah, screw the hold on condescention...
Posted by: jimidee on Oct 2, 2008 12:03 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
why not make her look dumber than she even is? I think that every tough question that Biden gets, that he should answer it and then say, "I'd love to hear what Sarah Palin thinks about this."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The neocons wanted a neocon puppet and a warmonger in one and for them Palin is the one. What's the
Posted by: maxpayne on Oct 2, 2008 1:48 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
point of getting obsessed about Palin anyway when she's nothing more than a VP candidate? If Obama and Biden were pro-populist Democrats from the days each of them campaigned to their legislating years, Palin would have looked more ordinary than Ferraro because people would have had found a lot more from Obama and even Biden to look forward to. Instead, all this silly fear about Palin because Obama and Biden gave the progressive/liberal base the middle finger while the GOP still gave its social "conservative" base a bone at the very least and attended to its real base, Wall $treet. Since Obama and Biden show no real intention of standing up to rightwing bullies, no wonder there are more articles obsessing about Palin.

For anyone who's sick and tired of Palin vs. Obama,

VOTENADER.ORG !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Picking Palin was the most sexist act of this political year
Posted by: Jdog on Oct 2, 2008 2:30 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Think about it...

1. McCain picked Palin simply because she has ovaries. There was no other reason.

2. McCain essentially called all women stupid, simple fools when he calculated that they would flock to Palin regardless of her stand on the issues.

3. Palin was briefly put on display and then immediately sequestered, only to make periodic, extremely controlled forays outside of the little box McCain has placed her in. She is to be seen and not heard.

If McCain really believed that Palin was the best out there, wouldn't he allow her to speak for herself?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]