comments_image -

"Taxi to the Dark Side" on HBO Tonight; What Have We Learned Since its Release?

For starters, Condi Rice admitted last week that the Bush administration knew about "harsh interrogations" as early as 2002.
September 29, 2008  |  
 
Advertisement
 

The Bush administration will go down in history as the Torture Team. In recently revealed written testimony for the Senate Armed Services Committee, Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice confirmed that the National Security Council discussed employing special interrogation techniques for the CIA. These techniques were based on methods used in the SERE school (Survival, Evasion, Resistance and Escape) -- which include waterboarding, a form of slow-motion drowning -- which trains Americans on how to resist torture in the event that they are captured by unscrupulous authoritarian regimes. Ultimately, the U.S. Armed Forces and the CIA did employ these techniques, many of which are clearly torture by our own definition, going back to the Nuremburg trials, and by any objective reading of the Geneva Conventions. Of course, the Bush administration spent its time trying to rewrite its own legal definition of torture so that it could use the techniques without having to use the "t word" (Donald Rumsfeld's phrase) which doesn't poll well.

What is staggering is that, despite all the time spent by the Bush administration trying to find legal loopholes to avoid being prosecuted as war criminals, no one in the administration seems to have looked at the origins of these techniques. The SERE school was formed, in part, in response to American soldiers who had been brainwashed by Communist Chinese during the Korean War. These techniques were also used by the Soviets who liked them because they were psychologically brutal but didn't leave any lasting physical marks. But the purpose of these techniques was never to get good "actionable" intelligence -- ie, the truth. The purpose was to obtain false confessions -- either from dissidents or captured soldiers -- that could be used for propaganda purposes. Does that cast the Bush administration's war on terror in a slightly different light?

submit to reddit

-
Email
Print
Share
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Advertisement
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading most read content ..
Advertisement
Activists Speak Out Against Lack of Access to Bradley Manning

By Agence France Presse

 
 
NYPD Catches Sexual Assailant, Then Lets Him Go Free Because He Didn't Feel Like Being Questioned

By Jill F | Feministe

 
 
Gov. Scott Orders Purging of Florida’s Voter Rolls - Just in Time For Prez Election

By Adele Stan | Washington Monthly

 
 
Abortion Clinics Across Country Put On Alert In Wake of Georgia Clinic Arson Cases

By Robin Marty | RH Reality Check

 
 
Former GOP Congresswoman Blasts New GOP Women’s Caucus: ‘They’re Not Voting In Best Interest Of All Women’

By Josh Israel | ThinkProgress

 
 
Debbie Wasserman Schulz is Wrong on Wisconsin

By LaFeminista | DailyKos

 
 
Pro-Coal Group Pays People to Wear Its Shirts at EPA Hearing

By Heather Moyer | Sierra Club

 
 
Kids Inundate NY Governor With Concerns About Fracking

By Seth Gladstone | Food and Water Watch

 
 
Shareholders, Top Doctors Demand McDonald's Assess its Health Impacts

By Sara Deon | Civil Eats

 
 
Republicans Block NY Minimum Wage Increase That Would Give 880,000 Workers a Raise

By Laura Clawson | Daily Kos

 
 
 
 
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
 
[ page served from web 2 ]