Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

King's "Promised Land" Is Still Far Off

By Amy Goodman, King Features Syndicate. Posted April 3, 2008.


40 years ago Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. pointed to the link between war abroad and poverty at home. Sadly, his observation is just as true today.
Advertisement

It has been 40 years since Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was assassinated in Memphis, Tenn., while standing on the balcony outside his room at the Lorraine Motel. King was there to support striking sanitation workers, African-American men who endured horrible working conditions for poverty wages. While King's staff was opposed to him going, as they were scrambling to organize King's new initiative, the Poor People's Campaign, King himself knew that the sanitation workers were at the front lines of fighting poverty.

I went to Memphis on Dr. King's birthday. There I interviewed Taylor Rogers, one of the striking sanitation workers who marched with King. He told me:

"Back in 1968, 1,300 sanitation workers -- we were tired of being mistreated, overworked and underpaid. We decided that we were just going to stand up and be men and do something about our condition. And that's what we did. We stood up, and we told [Mayor] Henry Loeb in the city of Memphis that 'I am a man.'"

While he was organizing against poverty, King also came out forcefully against the Vietnam War, alienating his erstwhile ally, President Lyndon Johnson. Exactly one year before his assassination, on April 4, 1967, King gave his "Beyond Vietnam" speech at Riverside Church in New York City. He said: "A few years ago, there was a shining moment in that struggle. It seemed as if there was a real promise of hope for the poor, both black and white, through the poverty program. There were experiments, hopes, new beginnings. Then came the buildup in Vietnam, and I watched this program broken and eviscerated as if it were some idle political plaything of a society gone mad on war. And I knew that America would never invest the necessary funds or energies in rehabilitation of its poor so long as adventures like Vietnam continued to draw men and skills and money like some demonic, destructive suction tube. So I was increasingly compelled to see the war as an enemy of the poor and to attack it as such."

He went on, "I could never again raise my voice against the violence of the oppressed in the ghettos without having first spoken clearly to the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today: my own government."

Time magazine called the speech "demagogic slander that sounded like a script for Radio Hanoi." The Washington Post declared that King had "diminished his usefulness to his cause, his country, his people."

King made an essential link between poverty at home and war-making abroad. The connection, sadly, is as relevant today as it was the last year of King's life. A new report from the Institute for Policy Studies, "40 Years Later: The Unrealized American Dream," lays out key elements of the inequality that African-Americans experience in the United States around education, employment and wealth accumulation.

On education, the IPS report states that African-American college graduation rates will not be on par with white graduation rates for another 80 years. The income gap between blacks and whites will not disappear for more than 500 years at current rates. More than one-third of African-Americans earn less than $20,000 annually, before taxes.

African-Americans are also far behind in the accumulation of wealth. Add to all this higher incarceration, less access to health insurance and shorter life expectancy. King's Poor People's Campaign went beyond race, as he reached out to poor whites in places like Appalachia. Today, one in five residents of West Virginia is on food stamps, as is one in 10 Ohioans, and, according Jim Weill, president of the Food Research and Action Center, one in three children in Oklahoma has been on food stamps at some point in the past year. It is clear that Dr. King's goal of bringing people "to the promised land" is still far off.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: dr. martin luther king, jr., poverty, war, race, wealth

Amy Goodman is the host of the nationally syndicated radio news program, Democracy Now!

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
johnny hempseed
Posted by: Johnny Hempseed on Apr 4, 2008 11:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Amy ,thanks for your good work speaking truth to power.There is an excerpt from the Rev Dr.Kings last speech at the Riverside church posted on Common Dreams .org.Forty years later and much has changed,much has not.Martin L.King 111 said this morning that he thought his dad would be encouraged that there was an african american and a woman candidate on the ticket for president.I think however he would be discouraged by the growth of the military industrial complex,prison population and tremendous poverty that still defer the dream.
peace

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Presidential Poverty
Posted by: mberg on Apr 4, 2008 2:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I do not think Dr. King had in mind that it would take hundreds of millions of dollars to support the presidential campaign of an African-American. Obama had a great opportunity to be a progressive, but decided he would rather consume corporate money and influence than actually stand up for transformative change in this country and the world. He is not brave for he does not represent the citizens, but the immoral super-wealthy who are directly responsible for the unneccessary poverty on the planet. Dr. King's message was not superficial but a comprehensive vision. He remains a hero to this day for he was willing to stand in the way of injustice and bring not only a voice, but a body of ideas and action. It cost him his life, but it says as much about his strength as the depravity of those in power.

The liberal dream has failed for it always embraced the military machine. Despite the corruption and greed of this current time, we are at the beginning of an era that will see the people taking back the planet to create sustainable forms of living. The peak of power is also its beginning of decay.

I want to add that Amy Goodman is easily labeled as a left wing radical by the Establishment for she works hard to inform the public of the truth. She does not sacrifice her moral and ethical integrity in the process. However, in this era of Corporatism, her speaking the truth becomes a brave act and I have the utmost respect for her. She is my hero.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]