Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Why Rove Is Cheerleading for Obama

By Earl Ofari Hutchinson, New America Media. Posted December 4, 2007.


Rove thinks Obama is easier prey for the GOP than Clinton.
Advertisement

It's one of the oldest ethnic clichés in the book. The one that says beware of Greeks bearing gifts. But there's nothing ethnically incorrect about saying it when former Bush political guru Karl Rove bears political gifts to a Democrat.

The recipient of the Rove largesse is Democratic presidential contender Barack Obama. In an open memo to Obama, Rove caused a titter when he ticked off six things that Obama should and could do to nail Hillary Clinton. Rove's sage suggestions were that he should mount an all-out no holds barred attack on her personality, record, and demeanor. Rove told Obama to stop sounding wishy-washy on the hot button issues such as immigration, and to tell the voters just who he is and what kind of change they'd expect in an Obama White House.

Since Rove is not a paid or unpaid consultant for Obama, those sound political stratagems he offered Obama on a public platter come with a price, or maybe better to say with Rove, an ulterior motive. It's not hard to figure it out what that is. Rove wants Obama to win. That seems to defy conventional GOP thinking that conservative Republicans are giddy with delight at the prospect of a Hillary nomination. Hillary carries mounds of baggage, being a woman, the Clinton name, the deep and resonant hate Bill residue from ultra rightists and Christian fundamentalists, and polls that consistently show Clinton has the lowest likeability ratings among the major candidates. She's so polarizing, so the thinking goes, that she'll single-handedly drive legions of Republican conservatives and fence leaning independents to storm the polls chanting an anybody but Hillary mantra.

The clinical hate for Clinton in some circles dripped off shock jock Don Imus's lips his first day back on the job. Imus picked up the throw-away line from the late avowed Clinton basher Jerry Falwell who likened Clinton to the great Satan a couple of years back and refused to take it back when he got flack for it.

Rove also knows something else about Hillary. While she bottoms out on the issue of likeability, polls also show that voters like her for her strength and experience. And top gun Democrats will back her to the hilt. Despite a ton of negatives, these are the qualities that ultimately powered Rove's boss back into the White House.

These are also the same qualities that ultimately could prove fatal to Obama's candidacy. Though he scores high on the likeability scale, he's swaps places with Clinton on the crucial issue of experience. He's still widely regarded as too new, too untested, and too inexperienced to win a head to head contest with Giuliani. Rove's Obama ploy, and that what it is, is a slick, sophisticated, reversal of the conservative Republican's Devil tag on Clinton. But it's every bit as cynical, and calculating. Paint Obama as a good guy, a fresh face, and someone who can make a real change for America.

The exact last things that Rove wants to see in a Democrat in the White House. But an on the attack Obama, that dogs Clinton at every step can create havoc in the Democratic Party. It could plunge the Party into an orgy of Clinton-Obama sniping, bashing, and finger pointing. That would fuel dissension, stoke bitter divisions and deflect attacks from Bush policies and the GOP candidates that for better or worse are Siamese twin like welded to him and his policies.

The contest would be reduced to a referendum on Hillary. The sores and wounds would be so deep that countless numbers of Democrats, especially black Democrats, who are torn down the middle between Clinton and Obama, would be lukewarm toward the eventual Democratic nominee, maybe lukewarm enough in the GOP's fondest hopes to stay home on Election Day.

Rove banks that Obama as the Democratic nominee would be even riper for the Republican pickings than Hillary. Though Obama is touted as the post civil rights generation candidate; meaning that he doesn't spew race politics as Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton and doesn't make white voters viscerally cringe, he's still an African-American. And race still matters in politics, and in some places matters a lot, especially as Rove well knows in the crucial battleground states of Ohio, Florida and other must win states.

Obama is tailor made for sneaky, closet reminders that his color and allegiance to race neutral politics is suspect. While white voters swear to interviewers and pollsters that they vote competence not color, after all who wants to come off looking and sounding like a bigot, there's still the ever murky phenomena of election booth conversion.

That's the phenomena where many white voters despite public declarations of color-blindness get sudden 20-20 color vision in the privacy of the voting booth when the race is between a black and a white candidate. Voter duplicity did in black Democrats Harvey Gant and Harold Ford in their respective Senate races against well-heeled white GOP opponents. Rove knows that too.

Rove gave Obama seemingly some priceless advice on beating Clinton. But the advice was not given to put Obama in the White House, but to make sure that he and no other Democrat gets there.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: obama, rove, clinton, hillary, election08

Earl Ofari Hutchinson is an author and political analyst. His new book is The Latino Challenge to Black America: Towards a Conversation between African-Americans and Hispanics (Middle Passage Press and Hispanic Economics New York).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
It's Rove's way of supporting his friend Hillary
Posted by: newtype_alpha on Dec 4, 2007 1:42 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Actually, Rove is trying to nudge Obama into traditional mudslinging against Hillary because he knows that's the easiest way to loose the Iowa Caucus. Most other observers have already figured this out, having noticed Hillary's poll numbers slipping once she spent less time talking about why she was the most qualified and more time trying discredit Obama. In her last round of scattershot attack rhetoric she pulled an essay he wrote in Kindergarten called "I want to be a President" to show that he was dishonest and politically ambitious. Not just to Iowans, this comes off as rather snakelike backstabbish.

Even Clinton's "You need a more experienced candidate!" was only successful insofar as it played up the myth of Hillary Clinton being an experienced politician (as if sleeping with the President makes you an expert; might as well tap Monica for VP). Turning the rhetoric towards trying to discredit Obama's experience only draws more attention on Obama's positions, which seem a lot more sincere and resonate with the voters than Hillary's regimen of political correctness and triangulation. So, if Obama stops talking about himself and starts slamming Hillary, it'll put the focus back on the GOP's favorite Manchurian Candidate.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rove wants Obama to win?
Posted by: karmaburger on Dec 4, 2007 2:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's not hard to figure it out what that is. Rove wants Obama to win.

While I will not question Mr Hutchinson's motives in writing this piece I am having difficulty understanding how anyone could claim to understand the mind of Karl Rove. If having Obama as the Democratic nominee were truly in the best interests of Rove and the Republicans I doubt very much that they would try to help him so publicly. It would seem to me that this only limits Obama's strategic options because he would never want to give even the smallest impression that he is using Rove's tactics on Clinton. I have no way of knowing, nor would I care to know how Rove's brain works but I can tell you that people might think twice about backing anyone getting advice from the devil.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sure, Rove wants the top Dems slugging-it-out!
Posted by: juca on Dec 4, 2007 3:14 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with the first two commenters... I think it is unlikely that Rove would do something so obvious! He knows that with the offer of friendly advice to Obama, we will all immediately think that he wants Obama to win. He was clever enough to offer a few good pieces of advice along with some that would sink Obama like a rock.

Can you imagine Obama going after Hillary aggressively on personal traits after he has talked all along about a new kind of politics? It would be over for him in Iowa. The Republicans would like nothing more than to see a slugfest on the Democratic side.

And they want Hillary, NOT Obama. If Hillary has to go back to kindergarten to find dirt on Obama, then it is very possible that the Republicans have found very little to use against him. What would they be left with? Nasty name-rhyming games, and anti-Muslim innuendos? That could backfire in a big way.

There are a couple of die-hard Republicans in my family who want to vote for Obama... which tells me that just maybe something is going on out there, and R's are worried.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama supporter
Posted by: charliemudcat on Dec 5, 2007 8:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hutchinson's at it again. Trying to insinuate that not only is Obama the wrong candidate at the wrong time, but that he can't win. Aren't you ashamed of yourself yet? When Obama wins the nomination and ultimately, the presidency, I hope you will have the decency to admit when you were wrong. I'll be waiting.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rove Cheering Obama?
Posted by: rmrkj2 on Dec 5, 2007 10:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think this piece is a sad piece of journalism, to put it mildly. The piece essentially a front piece to inform us why Hillary Clinton is so "viable", as opposed to the "he's never going to make it" Obama campaign.
As an African-American, I'm insulted that the author resorts to grade school stereotypes of what Blacks can and can't accomplish in this society. I don't care if he doesn't win, I will vote for Obama because of what he stands for. Rosa Parks, Dr. King and many others had to take the first step in breaking down barriers, and changed hearts and minds doing so. Change happens when we fight for it, not by resigning ourselves to the status quo.
You know that Hillary can win, Mr Hutchinson? Tell us how her policies are better, and not how her skin is whiter.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Antichrist Struggles With Retirement, Irrelevancy
Posted by: Salome on Dec 5, 2007 2:08 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I disagree that Karl Rove's Financial Times piece contained valuable strategic advice. Would Karl Rove use ANY of the tactics contained in his six point plan? Has Karl Rove ever launched an objective by mapping it out in a lengthy news article? If Rove truly wanted to help Obama, he could've written a primer on the true area of his expertise--smearing an enemy without getting caught. A how-to guide for: (1) conducting effective push polls to convince voters that an opponent was, for example, the father of an illegitimate Black child (2) papering an entire church with inflammatory flyers along the same lines; (3) sending a fleet of transients to an opponent's fundraiser; (4) outing a CIA operative in retribution for her husband's insolence; (5) planting a bug in his own office and then demanding an investigation in order to falsely implicate the opponent; and (6) conducting effective whisper campaigns.

I would assert that Rove's motive in writing the piece was merely an attempt to stave off the existential angst that crops up after an abrupt retirement. I felt nothing but pity for Karl Rove when I read the article. His brilliant career is over. He worked for more than 30 years to cultivate an effective GOP brand that would appeal to conservative Christians, whom he cheerfully referred to as "the nuts." He groomed a ne'er-do-well rich kid with a below average IQ and zero political acumen to ascend to the most powerful office in the world. And now his beloved GOP acts as if he were radioactive. For the first time in his adult life, he is not welcome in anyone's campaign office. So he came over to the other side, even though his heart wasn't in it. In a weak attempt to stay involved, he succeeded only in drawing attention to the fact that he is a socially awkward has-been.

Not to mention the fact that Obama doesn't need any strategy advice. Obama has raised a staggering amount of money from over 350,000 diverse individuals. Obama's field operations are unprecedented in size and scope. There are legions of organized volunteers in all 21 Super Tuesday states, trained to quickly mobilize in January. Our belief in Obama is spreading like a virus; we recruit new supporters every day. Our dedication has made us impervious to the once-deadly attacks of the Carville/Clinton War Room. Over the last two days, Obama has received almost 15,000 donations offered in protest to HRC's overt attacks. Obama has weathered months of attacks by the Clinton media juggernaut which made a valid attempt to pigeonhole him as "inexperienced." Obama pulled ahead in Iowa several weeks ago and will continue to surge ahead in polls coming out this week. We are unstoppable.

Why is Karl Rove unaware of these things? More importantly, why are you? I felt sad when I read your bleak assessment of white voters who would be incapable of suppressing their inner racist at the moment of pulling the lever in the voting booth. Do whites view Tiger Woods as the Black golfer? Is Jimi Hendrix the Black guitarist? No way. Talent transcends race and makes it irrelevant. Barack Obama is the Tiger Woods, the Jimi Hendrix of presidential candidates. Obama is a gifted, experienced leader. Yes, experienced. Eleven years as a legislator and almost thirty years of dedicated community service. Top of his class at Harvard, Editor of the Law Review, gifted constitutional scholar. Squeaky clean past, dedicated family man, gorgeous wife who is wickedly smart and charismatic. Both Obamas have impeccable judgment, Teflon-coated integrity, and hearts as big as their brains. I would be proud to support all but one of the Democratic contenders and would even defect to McCain's camp if need be. But I have been called to serve Barack Obama and will do everything in my power to help him change the world.

We're entering a new era, my friend. I hope that you will join us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If Blacks Don't Make The News
Posted by: hole11 on Dec 5, 2007 6:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hutchinson would write that the blacks are not making the news and the reasons for it. Come on...this is the weakest article yet. So, just come out and say you are for Clinton. Or come out and say you want Obama to win. It would be so much easier without considering what Karl Rove thinks.

Not one person but Hutchinson even cares what Karl Rove thinks on this website. And if they did then their brain has been reduced to the size of a pea.

My question is why isn't there someone other than Hutchinson speaking about the black experience. Do you have to be black to talk about it or as Hutchinson have an education steep in black philosophy?

I want Hutchinson to talk about President Andrew Jackson and his trial and tribulation and how they apply to todays candidates. Or talk about how Bryan Pata should get more media play than a NFL star or John Lennon.

If he can't do the above then just tell me why Condaleeza Rice isn't doing her job.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rovish Gambit
Posted by: Iconoclast421 on Dec 6, 2007 6:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Rove wants Hillary to win, make no mistake about that. I think he is calculating that more people will choose Hillary if he pretends to support Obama.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ovish Gambit Posted by: bassman
Clinton or Obama? YAWN!
Posted by: Rune on Dec 6, 2007 6:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They are both inexperienced Senators who have never run a government or a business. They are both actively whoring themselves to the corporate overlords who have done such a good job of corrupting the current occupant of the White House and his reliable, rubber stamping Congress of both political stripes. For that matter, they are both fixtures of that spineless Congress and the ineffective "opposition" party that can't help but continue the Bush agenda. Which may explain why they have both (quietly) indicated that they will keep the disaster in Iraq as well funded and deadly as the guy they seek to replace--all the while claiming they really want to stop the madness if it wasn't so scary to take responsibility for doing so. You know, scary, as in, "might lose some campaign donations from war profiteers and their faithful followers."

Neither of them will get my vote. Not a chance.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

yeah, I can buy that
Posted by: skydog on Dec 10, 2007 1:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The points about Rove wanting Obama to win make sense.

There's another aspect to this also: whatever damage Obama does to Clinton by following Rove's advice carries forward to the general election even if she does win.

So either way, our porcine prince gets what he wants should Obama be foolish enough to follow his advice.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rove is feeling heat from Obama's positive wave across the US
Posted by: Minutia on Dec 18, 2007 2:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama is the better person in the field of democrats. Obama and his team are gifted, soulful, experienced, compassionate and forward looking people. just what America needs to begin to heal from the Friedmanite-era. Rove knows this. perhaps the author of this piece does as well.

With all due respect, Hillary would not be healthy for US for so many reasons, inc. her "husband" brought NAFTA into play with Brian Mulroney and Carlos Salinas de Gortari. Edwards is interesting for VP role though my preference for VP would be Kucinich. he is clearly articulates his vision for equity, environmental sustainability, labor rights, and corp.soc.resp. he is the only one that tells it like it is re. NAFTA, bad for workers, bad for human rights, bad for the environment, good for the greedy corporate CEOS, right wing legislators, religious fundamentalists, and the boys from the Chicago School of Economics.

also, we need to be much more clear re. when speaking about women in politics. remember: Thatcher and the Falkand Islands?

we need the compassion, creativity and helpfulness of progressive people. we need people that will follow UN declaration of Human Rights to the letter;we need progressive legislators to work hand in hand with trade unions, civil society and general public...

Gandhi “we must be the change we wish to see in the world"

in peace,
M

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]