Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Lohan, Hilton, Spears: The Media's Insatiable Appetite for Celebrity Addicts

By Yvonne Scruggs-Leftwich, Women's eNews. Posted September 17, 2007.


Tabloid entertainment media makes young female celebrities with drug problems seem chic while trivializing the depth of the addictions that they, along with thousands of other women, face.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Also in Top Stories

Sleeping Around Craigslist
Anna Reed, Lily Penza, East Bay Express

Bush's Secret Army of Snoops and Snitches
Matthew Rothschild, The Progressive

Michael Pollan on What's Wrong with Environmentalism
Kate Cheney Davidson, Yale Environment 360

A Peak Oil Prophet Imagines Life in America After Wal-Mart
Michelle Nijhuis, Grist.org

Sci-Fi Heroes Take on the System
Roya Rastegar, ColorLines

Billionaires Are Gouging Your Grandparents
Brave New Films, Brave New Films

Online Activists Keep the Pressure on Obama
Ari Melber, TheNation.com

More stories by Yvonne Scruggs-Leftwich

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Lindsay Lohan, Nicole Ritchie, Kate Moss, Paris Hilton, Britney Spears, Whitney Houston, Amy Winehouse and other beautiful young celebrity women have become prime-time poster girls for the fast life.

Court-ordered ankle bracelets that electronically track abusive levels of alcohol in the body are glamorized as fashion statements. People magazine captioned a society party photo: "Lohan wore a bikini -- and her alcohol monitor." The Examiner tag-lined a similar fashion pose: "Lindsay models her alcohol monitoring ankle bracelet." The brutal dehumanization, generated by drunken excesses and promiscuity, is redefined as high-tension energy and overwrought exhaustion.

The cure is an escape into a hospital or upscale rehabilitation retreat. That pit stop is then recalibrated by media spin artists as an experience of reflection, remorse and religious epiphany, which only re-whets the appetite and recharges the batteries so that the penitent can emerge, reborn, to do it all over again.

Hyped publicity and excessive amounts of money cushion the "bottom" hit by the media's glamour girls, and consequently, the depth of their actual addiction illness is trivialized along with the larger problem of female addiction in this country.

The tortured, glorified and over-dramatized celebrity victims live in a world apart from thousands -- maybe millions; no one knows exactly -- of ordinary, demoralized, cast-off women who struggle, from one day to the next, trying to recover their lives from drug and alcohol abuse.

Unemployed, Unskilled, Destitute

I interviewed a reliable sample of these women and I promised to change their names to protect their privacy. But I also assured them that I would tell their stories because they are not suffering from overzealous media attention or public interest. Quite the opposite. Many are impoverished, unemployed, unskilled and destitute. But my interviewees were lucky enough to have found one of the scarce and unglamorous -- but very critical -- group residences and drug recovery locations: my family's nonprofit Still Standing Recovery Ministry, run by "Rev. Ed" Leftwich. Many more such homeless addicts wander the streets in most of America's cities and towns.

No paparazzi are chasing blond 19-year-old Ava as she staggers from the crack house after a four or five-day binge. And that's a good thing because Ava looks like hell and smells worse. She is dirty, battered and bruised. She has lost her struggle with the drug-crack-dope-alcohol habit again. She is penniless. She paid for her drugs with bartered goods, often stolen, or with her battered body. Either form of currency bought her a high that was short and unsatisfactory. Now that she also is homeless again her ritual will soon resume.

Pedestrians hardly notice that the paramedics, once again, are scraping Tracey, a 30-year-old black woman, off the pavement at the edge of a public park near downtown. She has been lying there since early morning, apparently asleep, when in fact she has overdosed on methamphetamine. She will be revived in the emergency room (or maybe not, this time) and then placed in the locked-down detoxification ward for three to seven days. She will be discharged wearing the same clothing in which she arrived, still homeless.

Victoria, a 24-year-old Latina, works in a fast-food store trying to maintain a routine that might keep her from relapsing into a crack-induced stupor. Yet when she gets her pay, the siren call of her habit is stronger than her resolve and she "drops by" an old haunt to "check things out."


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: rehab, addiction, amy winehouse, whitney houston, britney spears, paris hilton, kate moss, nicole ritchie, lindsay lohan, media

Dr. Yvonne Scruggs-Leftwich chairs the Center for Community and Economic Justice Inc.'s Sojourner Truth Forum for Interactive Justice, headquartered in St. Petersburg, Fla., and is a professor at the National Labor College in the Washington, D.C., area. Her newest book, "Sound Bytes of Protest," will be published this October.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Searching for answers
Posted by: Jbuuty on Sep 17, 2007 2:10 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These are sad stories. They are far from where I live (currently Kenya), so I don't feel competent to comment on these particular stories and women.

However, these stories and others like them show how the political right misses it, when they deny social/political causes to individual and personal problems, such as crime, drug addiction, etc.

However, I also believe that the left, in its otherwise laudable efforts to promote individual freedoms, has often made personal morality a 'bad' word in a sense. Promoting and encouraging individual responsibility is a humanizing enterprise. People, especially poor and marginalized people, are humanized when they take responsibility for their own lives. We've developed a blame society (The Bushies are the best at it, blaming others for their incompetence and treachery.), where we can blame Lindsay Lohan or Britany Spears for our addictions and sexual promiscuity.

I realize that the right jumps on statements like this. The right seems to enjoy blaming the victims. We don't need to blame the victims, but empowering people to avoid victimhood through teaching and demonstrating personal morality, in my view, is something the left needs to do.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Searching for answers Posted by: cordas
» blame Lindsay? Posted by: Iconoclast421
4.5
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Sep 17, 2007 3:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Paragraphs 3-5 sum it up nicely.

For many of these media princesses, their root addiction is to attention, publicity, and personal drama. And the rehab soap opera just feeds it.

I won't be surprized if this encourages many young girls to follow the same patterns, hoping for the same, but ending up in the less glamorous street-level junkie situations described in this article.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A very intresting article
Posted by: cordas on Sep 17, 2007 4:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Initialy I was a bit incensed that article does deal with the problems of male addiction, which are every bit as destroying as female addiction. However this article does a fine job of highlighting the issues that some women suffer sympatheticaly.

What is needed is a grown up debate on the whole drug issue, however that is an old call that still seems to be going unanswered.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

So what's new?
Posted by: colinmeister on Sep 17, 2007 4:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article comes as no supprise. Drug and alcohol abuse among celebrities has been going on for a long time. Anyone here remember Janis Joplin?

Sure, the media hype is probably hotter today, but the music heroes of young people from the '60s onwards have often been strung out on drugs or alcohol, and the fans happily followed the examples set by the stars. Fortunately, the majority of fans stuck to non addictive drugs such as cannabis and LSD, but some always went on to take addictive drugs such as heroin and cocaine.

I see a problem with laws against posession and sale of all drugs. If one wishes to purchase soft drugs, one brings oneself into contact with illegal drug dealers, who are invariably users themselves. The dealers are in business to make money, and introducing soft drug users to hard drugs represents an improvement in the dealers' bottom lines.

I'm not sure that a more liberal policy, especially the legalisation of cannabis, would make a big difference to the number of hard drug addicts, but I know it couldn't make it any worse. Of course, alcohol has always been a problem for some, and prohibition did nothing to improve the situation, it just made Mr. Capone and others very rich.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Mr Capone Posted by: Iconoclast421
There choice
Posted by: Ambrose Pare on Sep 17, 2007 5:16 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Its there choice to be screw up.
Just don't have any kids, drop all your cash on drugs, and die in the gutter alone.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Their choice Posted by: Iconoclast421
Hello, Alternet...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Sep 17, 2007 6:10 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... thanks for calling the kettle black, Alterpot.

How many of YOUR stories have a lead-in based in celebrity trash culture??????

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hello, Alternet... Posted by: Basenjis
» RE: Hello, Alternet... Posted by: mercianomad
Sen. Craig's stall becomes historic site. Placard?
Posted by: cognitorex on Sep 17, 2007 9:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
U.S. voters and celebrity addict mavens are seeking out Senator Craig's hallowed stall in the Minneapolis Airport.
Bring me your huddled masses,...leering to be free...tapping into the roots of celebrity.....BBC News
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6998619.stm

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

hypocrisy
Posted by: marchpet on Sep 17, 2007 10:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The hypocrisy of the Christian Right and most of the media beggars belief. Both use the bogy-man fear factor of the "addict," especially the black addict, to whip the public into line when passing more repressive laws and getting behind the biggest celebrity addict of them all, George W. (unfortunately no relation to Bill W.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How many addicts were lied to as kids about drugs?
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Sep 17, 2007 12:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You don't usually start with crack. Usually, alcohol and tobacco are the first drugs that kids are introduced to - as well as Ritalin and Adderall.

Yeah, Ritalin is a methamphetamine derivative - but its 'medicine'. Desoxyn is pure methamphetamine - for the 'child who stops responding to Ritalin'. Ask any meth addict - they're just as happy with Ritalin - they just grind the pills into powder and snort them.

How many of these kids were told that cannabis was some awful drug, and then they tried it and found out it was less intoxicating than alcohol? How many then distrusted everything adults said about drugs and went on to cocaine, crack, heroin and speed?

When are we going to stop filling kid's heads with obvious lies about drugs? When are we going to stop allowing Big Pharma to market meth and antidepressants to kids? What about all the sweet n' sugary tobacco products - aimed entirely at getting kids to smoke tobacco? What about the advertising by alcohol corporations that deliberately targets teenagers? What about the endless lies about cannabis pumped out over the airwaves by the DEA and Co?

It's no wonder young people end up as drug addicts, especially when you consider the overall consumer culture that says 'more is better'.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I just don't care!
Posted by: raywigton on Sep 17, 2007 10:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I didn't read this story because I just don't care about the private lives of strangers. Just leave them alone and cover the "news" for a change.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why does media only focus on celebrity females?
Posted by: cheressemm on Sep 18, 2007 10:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I must say that I make it a point NOT to keep track of celebrity news, so maybe I just don't know enough about it. But, what strikes me about the mainstream media coverage of the likes of Paris and Britney is that most of it focusses on these young, beautiful, rich "female" celebrities and what they wear or don't wear and do or don't do while they are out partying. Why isn't the same attention paid to the "male" celebrities that are doing the same? Is it because the men aren't easy sex symbol targets and don't dance on poles or go out with their thongs showing? But, I'm sure there are plenty of young, rich male celebrities that are JUST as strung out and party just as hard as their female counterparts. Or, maybe I don't know what I'm talking about, but it sure also points to rampant media sexism to me. In the end, this author is correct ... at least these rich kids have rehabs and money to fall back on ... quite unlike their poor counterparts that end up on the streets and living horrible lives.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Functionalism
Posted by: talkville on Sep 21, 2007 10:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The "Media" can be seen from the perspective of Function. Currently, they are serving a social function: Pedagogy, Therapy, Management, Moral Instruction among others.

Most journalism, especially but not exclusively MSM, is no longer content with reporting. They must Teach, they must Instruct, they must Judge, they must be Counselors and Principals. In olden-times, the functions of the media as evident currently would have fallen under the rubric of 'propaganda' in its very strict religious sense as well as its more political-economic senses to which it was extended.

The so-called 'revolution' that occurred and was hallowed in the 90's especially was not really in Information; it was in Media. Maybe one day (again), our journalists will leave our Monastic Academies and pay attention to the realities of living in a real world. I won't hold my breath, though.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]