Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Labor Head Andy Stern Has Some Unusual Corporate Bedfellows

By Liza Featherstone, The Nation. Posted July 2, 2007.


SEIU President Andy Stern heads one of the strongest unions in the country, yet he's stood on stage to campaign with anti-union CEOs like Wal-Mart's Lee Scott. Why is he so cozy with corporations?
Advertisement

When Andy Stern, president of the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), and Lee Scott, CEO of Wal-Mart, appeared onstage together in early May, the pairing drew attention. The occasion was a lunchtime meeting of Better Health Care Together, a coalition of business, labor and political leaders, at a Hilton hotel in New York City. Stern had initiated the coalition with a letter to all the Fortune 500 CEOs inviting them to work with him on a solution to the nation's healthcare crisis. He says he was surprised that Wal-Mart -- and so many other companies -- responded. "When I write letters to CEOs," he explains matter-of-factly, "I usually don't get a response."

Outside the Hilton, several hundred men and women wearing United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW) T-shirts, some of whom had come all the way from Maine and Pennsylvania, picketed the event, objecting to the "hypocrisy" of Wal-Mart CEO Lee Scott's appearance. Scott is accustomed to dodging protesters; his company has been engaged in a bitter public relations battle with the UFCW for years, with the union charging that Wal-Mart routinely violates the right to organize and offers stingy health benefits.

But the Wal-Mart boss wasn't the only target of righteous ire that day. The union activists were also upset about the presence of Andy Stern. "People feel he has sacrificed some of the basic principles of the labor movement" by appearing onstage with the Wal-Mart CEO, said Pat Purcell, an organizer of the Hilton picket. One of those principles is solidarity. "Our union is losing members every single day because of Wal-Mart," explains Purcell, director of special projects for UFCW Local 1500. "When we ask for help from other unions, we don't mean, You can have lunch with them but not dinner!" Though Purcell says he has "great respect" for Stern, he and other unionists feel that Stern enabled a public relations stunt by Wal-Mart, aimed at making the company look socially responsible.

Inside the Hilton, Stern was more popular. Over a dry repast of chicken, Pennsylvania Governor Ed Rendell hailed Andy Stern and Lee Scott as "the odd couple of healthcare." Stern beamed when Arnold Schwarzenegger, who spoke by satellite, thanked him for his "great leadership."

To be fair, this moment aside, Stern's relationship with Wal-Mart is hardly chummy. SEIU continues to fund Wal-Mart Watch, an organization dedicated to relentless criticism of the retailer's practices, and this year the union will allocate more funding than ever to such efforts. In March Stern gave a speech at a Bank of America gathering blasting Wal-Mart for undermining "fair competition" and adopting practices that were "bad for business overall."

But many in the labor movement view Stern's overtures to Scott as typical manifestations of his business-friendly unionism, more focused on partnering with employers than on joining other progressives in a struggle against corporate power. Stern's 2006 book, A Country That Works, is full of statements like "employees and employers need organizations that solve problems, not create them" and "all parties want a mutually beneficial relationship based on teamwork." (Sometimes the business-speak in this book reaches comic proportions; at one point Stern praises civil rights icon Jackie Robinson as "a change agent who endured indignities as a pathbreaker.") Stern has unsettled many of his staff by publicly suggesting that he might not be against Social Security privatization or school vouchers (one organizer in the Midwest probably speaks for nearly everyone in SEIU in calling such statements "a bunch of horseshit ... in fact we are against those things"). Paul Krehbiel, an organizer who until recently worked for SEIU Local 660 in Southern California, points out that Stern briefly attended the Wharton business school before becoming a social worker: "Andy's just doing what he started out doing. He loves the business community!" Rose Ann DeMoro, executive director of the California Nurses Association (which competes with SEIU to organize nurses), bluntly calls Stern "the neocon of the labor movement."

Many progressives would be startled by DeMoro's characterization of Andy Stern. His union is the employer of choice for many idealistic college graduates. That's only in part because the membership of SEIU -- African-Americans and immigrants toiling in underpaid jobs -- inspires a natural solidarity from the left. It's also because Stern's personal style is agreeable to middle-class progressives. The 1960s-generation, University of Pennsylvania-educated former social worker is reflective and contemporary, not macho or swaggering like many old-school union leaders. He's also willing to try new things, and like many of his generation harbors a profound contempt for stagnant bureaucracy. These attitudes can be refreshing in a labor leader. Even photo ops with Scott can be attributed to this aspect of his temperament: When Stern is asked about his perceived coziness with business, he is quick to insist that he is pragmatic, often using phrases like "it's not academic" or "these are real-life choices" to suggest that critics are ideologues or pie-in-the-sky idealists.

Stern is also an internationalist. He's assigned SEIU staff to Australia, Poland, England, India, France, Switzerland, Germany, the Netherlands and South America, with an eye to running global campaigns pressuring multinational employers. As Stern explains in his book, "Imagine simultaneous protests on service contractors' global clients, or outsourcing strikes to countries where strikes are legal and will not provoke government retaliation." When SEIU was having trouble organizing American security guards employed by the Swedish firm Securitas, it sought help from the Swedish Transport Workers Union, which had a good relationship with the company. Securitas agreed to drop its opposition to the union drive.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: wal-mart, seiu, corporations, andy stern

Liza Featherstone is a New York City-based journalist. She is the author, most recently, of "Selling Women Short: The Landmark Battle for Workers' Rights At Wal-Mart" (Basic).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
War profiteering ,war mongering collaboration is not a 'Change'
Posted by: ekipnrut on Jul 2, 2007 1:59 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[Following is excerpt from}:
Steve Zeltzer 23 Ağustos 2006 -
US Union Tops: Complicity By Silence In Israel-US War Crimes
by Steve Zeltzer lvpsf@labornet.org
.......While the AFL-CIO has formally opposed the war on Iraq in resolutions it has not lifted a finger to organize any mass labor protests against the war. In fact, it continues to support the same politicians who support the war including Senator Joseph Lieberman. Andy Stern, president of the SEIU and SEIU Secretary-Treasurer Anna Berger who is also the President of the new coalition Change To Win have argued that Change to Win can¹t take a position of war and peace since it must focus on organizing...............
Andy Stern is not only for labor-management collaboration in the US but internationally. He actually went to Puerto Rico to support the Democratic governor¹s privatization of the healthcare system as long as the governor supported pushing the healthcare workers into the SEIU in Puerto Rico in return for Stern¹s support for privatization.This is what is called supporting US labor imperialism. These unions have collaborated and continue to collaborate with US imperial schemes and they actually want a "piece" of the pie in this collaboration. They know they wont¹ get it, if they speak out and organize against the war crimes that are now going on in Iraq, Palestine and Lebanon.It is time that US trade unionists begin to challenge these criminal policies. Do you want your union supporting war crimes in Palestine, Lebanon and Iraq? Do you want your union to continue to support politicians who have voted for hundreds of billions of dollars to support these wars while workers cannot afford healthcare, housing and education for their children.
The most striking example of this is the failure of the trade unions to mobilize to rebuild New Orleans. It is now nearly the one year anniversary of the Katrina hurricane and yet hundreds of thousands of people are still homeless and their home still are wrecks. The Bush administration has closed the public schools and is only funding charters or private schools and tried to permanently end prevailing wages.
NOTE:
The situation for the 300,000 or so displaced-mainly Black-
former residents of New Orleans hasn't changed..if anything it has deteriorated since this 2006 article. For the entire article:
Google advanced search with exact phrase: 'Complicity By Silence In Israel-US War Crimes'. The point isn't that Zeltzer
is some particularly prominent reference..he isn't...but the issues and FACTS he states are........

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Andy Stern, Democrats and "universal" healthcare
Posted by: sausage on Jul 2, 2007 6:25 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This story from Corporate Crime Reporter, California Nurses’ DeMoro Says SEIU on the Side of the Bosses, was posted At CommonDreams.org, June 26. It reads in part:
We asked Dawn Lee, a spokesperson for SEIU, whether SEIU supported HR 676 – the single payer bill in the House.

She said SEIU takes no position on that bill.

SEIU – does not support single payer.

At the SEIU rally, all spoke in favor of “universal health care.”


The report implies that leading Democrats and top SEIU functionaries, this is were Andy Stern comes in, are deliberately misinforming rank and file union members and the general public on the nature of so-called "universal healthcare,"i.e. the insurance companies still make a profit and dictate coverage, and single-payer healthcare, the Canadian/Western European model.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Is Alternet now a Chamber of Commerce House Organ?
Posted by: edith on Jul 2, 2007 6:49 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The labor movement needs more Andy Sterns, not fewer. Labor unionism in the US will die if there is not private sector growth. This is a shameful effort to discredit one of the few creative and successful national labor leaders left.

What was especially ludicrous in the article was the attack on card check organizing which for the author's information is the number one labor priority in Congress today. Alternet has already covered the Employee Free Choice Act, and it has been held up by probusiness Republicans in the Senate, despite the Democratic majority. How ridiculous-Alternet publishing an attack on card checks, the one method that may save unions in this country.

What would you expect from a website that treats the reader to a banner from the Harvard Business Review as one opens the page? The HBR, house organ for the corporate elite.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Correction Posted by: edith
» Two sentences... Posted by: sausage
The problem with the left...
Posted by: suprmark on Jul 2, 2007 10:37 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is that as soon as someone achieves some success, up pop people who complain it isn't progressive enough, isn't radical enough, isn't sustainable enough, ignores *insert personal issue here*, isn't relevant to *insert group here*, distracts attention from *insert crisis here*, et cetera. Andy Stern clearly thinks the best way to improve the labour situation in America is to increase participation. And from what I've read in the article, doing a pretty decent job at that. Yeah, it sucks that he isn't providing much leadership in the currently sexy topic of health care, but part of the job description of a leader is stick to a plan even if it isn't the most popular one at the moment.

And as for his meeting with Lee Scott (leaving aside my personal opinion more progressives should go into business and improve things from the inside), do you think his anti-labour buddies are giving him props for a great PR move or are also complaining he is meeting with the 'enemy?'

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Stern is not organizing... Posted by: logansafi
» Yeah.....He's organizing ... Posted by: ekipnrut
Stern dem man
Posted by: uncleeddie on Jul 2, 2007 12:35 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What's the problem with Stern. He sounds like a new age democrat to me. You know, the guy who quietly supports all things big business while lamenting about injustice and inequities to everyone he meets. You know, like Bill and Hillary. Someday he probably will run for the Democrats so that he can help implement new so called free trade deals (secretly and with fast track legislation of course) and really screw labor. You know, like a real democrat.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Stern Cred Posted by: edith
Trilateral Commission?
Posted by: justaguy on Jul 2, 2007 2:32 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are usually 3 or 4 union heads on the Trilateral Commission. I suspect he'd be one.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Joe McCarthy? Posted by: edith
According to this article
Posted by: UnEasyOne on Jul 2, 2007 11:18 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just 7% of private sector employees are organized.

Seven percent!

I think we need to bring that number back up a tad before we worry too much about the purity of the only union leader actually organizing new members.

I heard a lot of criticism of the new contract for janitors here in Houston too. WOW! Janitors in Houston have a union contract! Amazing! That is the first new group to get a union contract here in decades! The contract needs work, true. But it is a foot in the door - and that's why the businesses involved fought tooth and nail to keep the union out.

I don't think Stern (or anybody else) should be immune from criticism - but let's keep it in perspective, ok? I'm hoping somebody will come up with a viable plan to organize office workers. But I'm willing to give Stern a pass on a lot of things - as long as he keeps organizing.

One thing I didn't see in this article - statistics on how fast the SEIU is growing (I just scanned - did I miss it?). I know this - union representation overall has shrunken to the point that even Democrats are comfortable thumbing their noses at labor.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The NEOCONS have infiltrated the Labor Unions
Posted by: halg on Jul 3, 2007 12:56 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is news? What do we think has been happening since 1979 when real wages began their long, cruel decline?

I would say that the weakening of Unions and organizing rights has everything to do with it. And much of that compromise has been the work of the neocons in their lusty pursuit of that every last dollar of workers' labor.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Francis
Posted by: Francis on Jul 3, 2007 8:33 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What is Stern's position on the problem of jobs leaking out of the country via NAFTA, CAFTA, etc.? Does he have proposals to counter the trend? What is his position on globalization in general? These are grander topics than health care.

This seems to be a classic political battle between compromise and visionary idealism. There does seem to be quite a bit of evidence that compromise of the type Stern promotes would lead nowhere for anyone other than Stern himself. We see where the compromise of the Democrats has led, and what was actually behind it. Free rides for the compromisers, hell to pay for America.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Old Story
Posted by: DRosen on Jul 3, 2007 6:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The history of the labor movement is for the most part a history of betrayal of the rank and file by their union officials and executives.

This betrayal by corruption is practically guaranteed by the level of technology at which society currently functions. Now new technology invites us to create systems in which rank and file actually control their union officials and executives.

No union official should ever be elected without committing to be bound, without waiver or recourse, by the will of the majority of members, as measured objectively by fair and secure open-source online and telephone voting systems.

I am working toward this end at Vox Populi Systems. But anybody can easily do what I have done for themselves, using free downloadable software customized to their own needs.

Get with it and stop blaming leaders, whose corruption is merely a reflection of our own willingness to be hamstrung by outmoded horse-and-buggy political technology. The fault lies not in corrupt others, but in ourselves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Where is the SEIU member defense of Stern?
Posted by: logansafi on Jul 4, 2007 1:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The SEIU has a major presence in American politics and Alternet is one of the major liberal-Left blogs. So why is the SEIU unable to speak out and defend this big shot running their union?

Out of hundreds of thousands of members, thousands of paid staff, and yet no one is here commenting on his behalf! What gives? Stern split the already mortally wounded US labor movement, so where are his great defenders?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Proud Andy Stern constituent
Posted by: toggleone on Jul 6, 2007 8:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Although this lengthy, tiresome article attempts to hatchet Andy Stern’s presidency, it leaves me feeling proud to be a part of a Union that puts members first. After getting through the Liza Featherstone’s bull crap, Andy Stern emerges as a leader who knows how to move the progressive agenda forward. I too feel that we need to work more with corporations and not against them— at least initially. When we work together—rather than in conflict—we can create practical solutions and get beyond a failing status quo. Also, I feel that a single payer Insurance system is the only real way to resolve the Health Insurance problems—and I know that SEIU is working to help shape that agenda. Andy Stern, you make us proud in the north country of New York state. Rock on!!!!



Patrick Sullivan

SEIU local 1199 NY community organizer

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Constance Votraw Sullivan
Posted by: toggleone on Jul 8, 2007 12:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Without a doubt the most progressive and effective labor leader........ever. Andrew L. Stern.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]