Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Can Obama Really Win?

By Earl Ofari Hutchinson, New America Media. Posted February 6, 2007.


While race is a big X factor in Obama's bid for the top spot, it's hardly the only factor.
Advertisement

Part I

Delaware Senator Joe Biden took much heat and made profuse mea culpas for his clumsy but well-meaning quip that Illinois Senator Barack Obama is "clean."

But Biden also noted that Obama is an African-American and implicit in that is that might make him a tough sell to many voters. While race is a big X factor in Obama's bid for the top spot, it's hardly the only factor. The other crucial factor is his record and views on the issues and how they will play to voting blocs in the Western and Border States, and especially the South.

The South has 144 electoral votes. The Border and Western States hold 60 to 70 more electoral votes. They have been the absolute make or break states for presidential hopefuls since 1972.

When Obama's record and views are separated from the myth-making and rock star rapture he's wrapped in, the problem of his electability looms large. Obama got a perfect 100 rating from the NAACP, National Organization for Women, National Education Association, the Children's Defense Fund, the American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, and the Illinois Environmental Council (during his stint in the Illinois legislature), and a huge plus rating from the ACLU.

He got his perfect rating from them for his Senate votes on labor, education, the environment, choice, civil rights and civil liberties. These are America's top liberal advocacy groups, and they are some of his most ardent cheerleaders.

Meanwhile, Obama bombed badly in the ratings he got from the conservative National Taxpayers Union, National Right to Life, the Gun Owners of America, the NRA, the Federation for Immigration Reform, and the American Conservative Union.

These are some of the nation's top conservative advocacy groups, and they reflect the interests and views of millions of voters on immigration, spending, guns, abortion, and military prowess. These are the voters that will scrutinize his record and his views with a laser eye. They are also the voters that gave Bush Jr. and Republican presidents Bush Sr., Ronald Reagan, and Richard Nixon their decisive margin of victory over their Democrat opponents.

They are not, as myth goes, mostly beer-guzzling gun-toting, Confederate flag-waving rednecks. They are middle to upper income, with a college degree or education, and live in a suburban neighborhood. In surveys, fewer then one in five label themselves liberal. In the South, the number of those that tag themselves conservative soars to seventy percent. And they have been rock solid Republican for nearly four decades.

Bill Clinton did not alter the political thinking or equation in the South. Bush Sr. in 1992 and Republican challenger Bob Dole in 1996, got fewer white male votes than Reagan and Nixon got. But those votes didn't go to Clinton. Insurgent presidential candidate Ross Perot with his anti-government assault in 1992, and 1996 grabbed a big chunk of them. That helped pry four Southern states out of the Republican column, and put them in Clinton's win column. Even then, Clinton bagged only one-third of the Southern white vote.

Eight years of Clinton's centrist political tilt did not make the South more Democratic Party friendly. Pat Buchanan, not Bush Jr., proved that in the 2000 presidential campaign. His freewheeling shoot from the lip, hard right rants appealed to many white males voters when he ran as an independent candidate in 2000.

Republican Presidential contender Barry Goldwater in 1964 set the ugly tone for how campaigns have been waged, or more particularly, the bash and trash of Democrats with code words and wedge issues since the 1960s.

Republicans have artfully stoked voter rage with piles of code words and slogans that tap the gender and racial fears of millions of voters. Republicans have also played hard on the anger, frustration, and hatred that many American voters harbor toward government. Reagan masterfully crafted the get government off your back line into a solid Republican selling point. He targeted the remnants of the Great Society programs. He crippled funding and further eroded public enthusiasm for social spending.

Conservatives took the cue and fixated many Americans on the government as pro-higher taxes, pro-bureaucracy, pro-immigrant and especially pro-welfare and pro-rights of criminals. The Republican's repeated smear of the Democrats as tax and spend, liberal big government proponents has struck and will continue to strike a chord with many.

Then Democratic Presidential candidate Howard Dean's awkward, off-the cuff quip in the early days of the 2004 Democratic presidential primary that the Democrats must grab a bigger share of the Confederate flag waving, pick-up truck gun rack display white male vote brought howls of protest, and charges that Dean was a closet bigot.

But Dean got it right. A solid white male vote in the South puts any Democrat in a deep hole before the first ballot is punched. Obama's moderate to liberal views and voting record won't change that. And that doesn't even count the X factor of race.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: barack obama, election08, race, south

Earl Ofari Hutchinson is a political analyst and social issues commentator, and the author of the book, The Emerging Black GOP Majority (Middle Passage Press, September 2006), a hard-hitting look at Bush and the GOP's court of black voters.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Politics Make My Head Hurt
Posted by: hole11 on Feb 6, 2007 6:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am not convinced by any speculation that race is an issue or anything else but spending more money in the US and taxing everyone less. Everything else is conjecture about how political groups want in their next candidate.

If an idiot can be a president then so can anyone else. Obviously race isn't a factor.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Its not about "gun control"; its about "control".
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Feb 6, 2007 7:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm always wondering why so many people don't get it. Some of the first 'Jim Crow' laws were no negro can have a firearm and no negro can travel/associate. Then came (in some instances months/years later) the no vote, etc laws. All oppressive systems/governments take away first the right to defend oneself and the right to move about.

Oddly, (maybe a 'jap play' to use unpolitically correct football parlance) this administration has decided to take away Habeus Corpus, Free Speech, Trial by Jury of One's Peers, and Posse Commitatus, first. New technique. Will it work? Probably cause the Democrats just approved everything again and now, no doubt, they'll try to ban guns, 'hate' speech, dissent, etc.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

X=Catholic for Kennedy in 60
Posted by: dancerkc on Feb 7, 2007 1:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I still remember serious claims in 1960 that Kennedy would take orders from the pope. That was his X factor. Imagine, bringing religion into government! Kennedy was "clean" enough, good-looking enough and articulate enough that he squeaked through. I would mention the Daley machine's connections but Nixon was not without resources (or the infamous no-makeup, five-o-clock shadow).

Hard to imagine the papal worry for today's gen but think for a minute about Northern Ireland where they still kill a few for their religious separations, although that has been toned down a good deal of late. Actually religion or "race" doesn't matter, they are just ways of having good-olde un-reasoned, hated-filled ugly crimes as a regular part of belonging to your group and feeling all self-important.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Where are they?
Posted by: bassman on Feb 7, 2007 7:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I love it. So many articles about how Obama is just another DLC politician, now one about how he's too liberal to win. I guess any attempt to smear Obama is acceptable on this website, whichever method works. Of course, Earl has always been an idiot and, for a black man, has the worst grasp of racial issues I've seen in years. Where are RWA and Albrechtkrausse? I think it's time we are all reminded that Obama is just another DLC sellout and that Obama needs to apologise and distance himself from his grandfathers name (who's distant namesake was in a radical muslim battle, don't you know). Come on boys, stay on message, keep repeating your talking points, the Republican party's biggest fear in '08 is being discussed here.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Illogical premise... Posted by: aebartle
» I'm sorry aebartle... Posted by: bassman
The perfect candidate
Posted by: ImSwiss on Feb 7, 2007 9:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I always laugh at how we talk about how we need to scuplt the perfect democrat who will be loved be the right. It ain't gonna happen. Bill Clinton and John Kerry were not flawed they made the mistake of being Democrats. It doesn't matter if the democrat is a saint, the right will find a way to smear him/her. If Bush was a Democrat he would be doing time by now. Don't try to please the right wing sheep. Talk to the base and the thinking middle and hope for the best.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

x factor?
Posted by: peacemom on Feb 7, 2007 10:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What do you mean x factor? Don't people of color vote?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Research: who is whispering in Obama's ear...
Posted by: american on Feb 7, 2007 12:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First, I believe that any American sheould be able to run for the presidency. The reality is that a lot of the better folks don't run because they can't: they have virtually no chance not being insiders. I am not completely clear on Obama's policy stances, but from the article, I think he may be a little "left" of my personal viewpoint. He seems like an impressive person, however, and I would vote for him on the merits of his views in any case. That said: you know, I really don't think America overall will elect a black president. To have him (or Hillary for that matter) be the Democratic nominee would ruin the chances for a Democratic presidency. A republican presidency would not be good for the greater portion of Americans (see evidence), albeit it would be good for the connected few. The people that run in these circles are far more sophisticated than I - they should know this. (Or DO they know and are claiming otherwise) Who is telling Obama he can win? Who is supporting him, moneywise? This is what we need to know.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This question isn't relevant, Earl
Posted by: DaBear on Feb 7, 2007 12:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The question isn't whether he can win, it should be whether he should deserve progressives' votes. His voting record is hardly "liberal" and when his meteoric rise was made possible by whacked out frackups by opponents and competitors and not solid consistent wins in the polls, he's hardly worth looking at other than his skin color, which begs the "other" question Dr. Earl would never dare ask, should we vote for a guy just because he's not white?

Good grief, this nation truly needs an enema.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"x-factor" -SCHMACTOR
Posted by: ibemee on Feb 7, 2007 1:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What drivel it is to babble about things like race, gender, religion...!!! Yet, it's usually the people who whine most about the lack of 'Equality' in our society who pick all the feathers out of that bird!

umhummmm... for those of you looking for something to b---- about, Obama is half WHITE, too... Now we could have a national debate about which of his "X-factor" halfs are the most unelectable????
OR we could look at it as a "+factor", and call him the candidate to suit us all....

pick pick pick pick only ignores the desperately serious issues that face our country and our Constitution today - JUST what the PNAC's want! PLEASE, let's just UNITE and FIX the mess Bush/Cheney have got us in!!!


http://pledgetoimpeach.org/ThePlan.html
http://pledgetoimpeach.org/signpledgetoimpeach.html
What's a PNAC? href=http://www.newamericancentury.org/statementofprinciples.htm>PNAC

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: "x-factor" -SCHMACTOR Posted by: DeeOhGee
Skeletons in the closet
Posted by: Praxis on Feb 7, 2007 2:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've got a buddy who is one of Obama's Chicago foot soldiers and has known him for years. Though he really admires Barak Obama, he thinks he could never beat any of his potential Republican opponents because, while now Obama is a moderate Christian, in his youth he hung out with a bunch of radical black nationalists and Marxists (like my friend, for instance), plus he used cocaine and pot, like most people of his generation.

The right has taken a few stupid random pot shots at Obama for attending a Madrasa as a little child, but they are saving their heavy artillery for when he becomes the Democratic candidate. Reactionary moneybags do their homework, remember the millions spent by Mellon Scaife on the Arkansas Project dredging up any hint of sleaze in Clinton's past. Though they never found much of any substance, it was enough to keep Clinton on the defensive for most of his presidency and even impeach him. The vast right wing conspiracy knows all about Obama's past, but doesn't want to let the cat out of the bag too soon because then he could never win the Democratic primary. However if he does win, with the cooperation of a compliant corporate media (remember the Swift Boat story), releasing this information would be devastating to Obama's candidacy, and probably even tar the DLC Dems running for Congress, allowing the hard right to recapture both houses.

I think if this information does not come out in the next 14 months Obama could very easily win the Democratic primary because he is very charismatic and most of the core of the party dislikes DLC triangulating DINOs (Democrats In Name Only) like Hilary Clinton & John Kerry.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Skeletons in the closet Posted by: poppop_schell
I believe Hillary and Obama should be OUT !
Posted by: SALLY EVANS on Feb 7, 2007 2:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
HILLARY SHOULD KNOW THE FACTS ABOUT BUSH'S LIES, TORTURE AND MURDER YET SHE HAS BEEN SUPPORTING THIS NIGHTMARE! BARACK OBAMA IS FINE EXCEPT FOR ONE MAJOR FLAW. HE IS A MUSLIM THAT DOESN'T TELL THE TRUTH ABOUT IT. WE DON'T NEED MORE LIARS IN GOVERNMENT ; WE HAVE THE IDIOT, BUSH.IN ADDITION, MUSLIMS BELIEVE THEIR RELIGIOM SUPERIOR TO OTHER FAITHS/ IN AMERICA, EACH INDIVIDUAL CHOOSES HIS OWN FAITH. NO MUSLIM SHOULD EVER BE PRESIDENT.!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

a good candidate
Posted by: bambino on Feb 7, 2007 6:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
obama is certainly an attractive candidate. what bothers me lately is the excessive commentary by blacks berating white voters for misunderstanding their blackness. it is getting tiresome and may be a factor in dealing with the racial fatigue one feels . noted fox network today with two black educaated women who just were so-o angry at all of us voters for misunderstanding the articulate quote. first rule here , dont berate the voter. the white voter will simply turn away from it all. there are always other candidates that arejust not that difficult to deal with. frankly, how black is obama argument we have seen lately is appaling. hes not one of us argument is appaling. his white mother raised the kid after the father abandoned them both. so how nice does it look for the candidate to reject his mother? she is his mother not his roots for heavens sake. i am a fairly liberal person, but all this display of black anger has turned me off any black candidate for now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: a good candidate Posted by: Dboy
Zippity BOO YAAA!!! Zippity YEA....My Oh My..what a racist troll
Posted by: ekipnrut on Feb 7, 2007 7:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Field Day!!!!!
IF...IF...that which is being represented as
'Barack' from the F"n horse's mouth is accurate,,,,
the accuracy can be easily verified......to wit:
OAD
THEN this man is plainly a stooge of the fascists..a
Harvard miseducated lackey in a delerium of..." I can
play the identity politics race card with these stupid American
niggers based upon my being part Black....then I can run
over to the white power elite and pass myself off as
being comparatively 'acceptable' relative to those crass,
tiresome, violence prone, unsophisticated America slave
descendants. After all I'm (part) original Kenyan as opposed
to slave descendant and 1/2 is..well...1/2"

If they could have gotten around the citizenship thing they
would have come up with some Oxford educated jackanape
from one of the 'better behaving' former colonies rather than Clarence Thomas...
Here with BHO..Voila!! We have the living embodiment of info-
tainment multimedia vetted (definite mega rock star potential)
cult of personality one man warm up band....who can't do any-
thing but serve as our lackey in any event. On the one hand,
If the DEMs are STUPID enough to put him on the ticket...It WILL lose...that much is all but certain. On the other hand,
if he ultimately is not the Canditate..then crucial time is being
wasted and enmity sown on a bunch of divisive BULLSHIT
over a man who ,stripped of ALL race issues is , by his own
words, categorically in opposition to any progressive agenda
He wants to reap the benefits of the civil rights movement
whilst showing thinly veiled or outright contempt and derision
to the foremost leaders and rank and file of that tumultuous
era:FUCK HIM. He lolligags and equivocates on ending NOW
American presence in the horrific bloodbath in IRAQ : FUCK
HIM. He espouses positions that pander to the elitists and
demean and marginalize..impliedly demonizing... those who
have weathered the brunt of the accelerated fascist/racist
post Reagan domestic onslaught..the Blitzkrieg on all but
the most affluent : FUCK HIM.
The Black community needs UNCOMPROMISED representa-
tion by BLACK men and women of determination and
absolute unflagging conviction and belief in the worth an
genius of the American Black diaspora.
America as a whole needs leadership which can realistically
take care of domestic/international business in a nation that
remains essentially white and racist ...in a world that is in
many ways subject to the manipulations of a white and
racist Europe including Russia.
Aside from and beyond Obama... in 2007 you can have one
or the other in any ONE man or woman.....but not both.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama and Clinton are distractions from Truth
Posted by: common intelligence on Feb 8, 2007 9:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama will be out. Because the public are starting to realize that Obama like Hillary are being shoved in our faces as if there are no other candidates. This is being intentionally promoted by the media, and even you Earl.

The Democrates are still fighting amongst themselves. There are so many candidates now I can't keep track of them. Many of them are on target on issues. But as Araian Huffington put it just a couple of days ago, it's about "Image".

Our stupid under-the-radar bigotry of all Americans judges and makes their choices on how someone "Looks" based on their own image and "feelings" instead of the qualities of a peasons heart and soul.

This society holds grudges beyond reasoniblity. Therefore no one is truely forgiven for mistakes or short comings whether or not a person has made restitution. Our society compairs everyone to an idolic image of perfection instead of being a human being such as all of us. We stick people into class levels and no one is allowed to cross that line less he (she) "passes through the valley of shadows".

The biggest problem with all the candidates are their avoiding telling the truth about the underclings of the United States and how it really is. Like:
It's not democratic, it's corrupt to the core.
Iraq is about empire and oil and control,
Iran is about domination
Health Care and social security are about morals and ethics but are being played as they are to perptuate a failed capitalistic model that the people and corporate world refuse to accept.
The most pertainent one facing the truth of the 911 cover up and making the pirates in Washington personally accountable.

So stop shoving Obama in our face.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama Cannot Win!!!
Posted by: Kym525 on Feb 8, 2007 9:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's face it. This country came a long way in regards to race but then stopped and has started regressing. We're simply not enlightened enough to take this man on his own merits. Between being "articulate and clean" and having the middle name of a late and slightly-unlamented dictator, Obama's got a lot of baggage and none of it is his fault.

What really gets me though is how the conservatives will spin it if a black person chooses Obama over Hilary. They'll say we're voting for him out of racial solidarity. I guess rednecks who voted for Bush did so for the same reason (because he's white), but hey--no one brings that up, do they? Better yet, because I'm female and I choose Hilary over Obama--well, draw your own conclusions.

The double-standard sucks.

We all know that racist whites haven't stopped being racist--they've just started cloaking their hate in code words and three-piece suits. Hate is respectable these days (i.e. Pat Buchanan, Ann Coulter, Michael Savage--who truly lives up to his last name). Pardon my un-PCness, but there's no way in hell some bubba in the South is willing to pull the lever for a black candidate, no matter how much they may agree on the fundamental issues.

Alan Keyes anyone?

Now who could be more far-right wacko than Mr. Keyes. Who not only towed the party line for all that is reactionary about conservatives, bit pretty much created it? And yet when the final tallies were posted, Keyes' numbers were abysmal.

The bottom line is that for a lot of folks, race supercedes anything else which is why poor whites overwhelmingly vote republican even though they're getting screwed, blued and tattooed all the way to the bank. Why? Because it seems to me at least if poor white folks get screwed, they can at least go to bed secure in the knowledge that at least it was another white person who did it.

Sweet dreams...

By the way, if Obama's views on the ISSUES mesh with MY own and he proves to me that he's willing to stick by his beliefs, damn skippy he gets my vote and if people don't like it, they all can royally kiss my ass.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Obama Cannot Win!!! Posted by: poppop_schell
» RE: Obama Cannot Win!!! Posted by: n_saneone
Any Democrat will Win
Posted by: herbal on Feb 8, 2007 10:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The debate about nominee for 2008 should be most productively limited to the issues at hand; policy leader who will effect the most neglected, needed and radical changes that have been neglected for too long.

The Republican Party continues to alienate itself from voters and any Democrat nominee will win. It is most appropriate to concentrate on finding the most effective leader rather than the most electable. The onus of future mistakes lies with Democratic choices now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Any Democrat will Win Posted by: inclement
I resent the implication that no black could win southern white votes!!!
Posted by: poppop_schell on Feb 8, 2007 10:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The issue with Obama is NOT his race but his political stands. Yes, some in the south will vote against him simply because he is a black but that is NOT will kill his chances of election. He is NOT moderate but 100% liberal. That is what will kill him in the South, Mountain States and much of the MidWest.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

X2: Blacks Won't Vote For Obama
Posted by: hole11 on Feb 10, 2007 6:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Blacks won't vote for him because he hasn't earned his victim status. The real civil rights activist that are much older than Obama paved the way for people like Obama who lived in non-racist Hawaii and other countries where color isn't an issue.

So what will Obama do for them? He can't identify with the common black man or woman who struggled trying to find jobs, food or shelter.

The struggle just isn't there.

But whites will vote for him because he is clean. He went to Harvard. He lived in paradise (Hawaii). And whites are tired of hearing that blacks will never be president.

Isn't that the x factor in part II of this article Mr. Hutchinson? Sorry to steal your thunder.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

REPUBLICAN HACK WARNING
Posted by: Jeffersonista on Feb 11, 2007 8:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This guy is no Democrat, and he has no place in a liberal web site. Get rid of him and let him go shill for the right wing fascists.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]