Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

How Much Is That Dog Dress in the Window?

By Stan Cox, AlterNet. Posted November 22, 2006.


This Christmas, America's pets will be tearing open $5 billion worth of presents, making them luxury consumers in their own right.
112206story
Advertisement

On a recent evening outside the Trixie + Peanut pet boutique in Manhattan's exclusive Gramercy Park neighborhood, a woman dragged her reluctant companion diagonally across 20th Street. "Look! Puppy sweaters! Come on, we have to go in, just for a minute."

The man resisted, but in vain. "Honey," I heard him plead as the store's door closed behind him, "we don't even have a dog!"

As that accidental shopper probably came to realize, the American pet-products market is big -- much, much bigger than the cat and dogs it's built around. In extending its reach, the industry also splitting, with big-box stores led by Petsmart (860 stores), Petco (800+ stores), and, increasingly, Wal-Mart ($2 billion+ in annual pet-product sales) handling a larger share of day-to-day purchases, while smaller stores and online retailers like Trixie + Peanut go after the luxury trade.

This Christmas, America's pets will be tearing open $5 billion worth of presents. But whatever the season, according to the publication Drug Store News, retailers "can encourage multiple purchases, impulse buys, and 'just because' gifts for reasons like one's pet has been home alone all day."

In a recent profile of the "pampered pets consumer," Unity Marketing of Stevens, Pa., explained that "Pet luxuries represent the best opportunity for pet product marketers, retailers and service providers. People spend more -- lots more -- on purchases that are driven by desire and passion, than those bought out of pure need."

Honorary humans

Trixie + Peanut is cashing in big on that desire and passion. Sweaters like those modeled by doggie mannequins in the window average about $50, or $129 for an upgrade to cashmere. Christmas shoppers can find a leash ($69), a monogrammed collar ($54), a leather pet carrier ($170 to $850), booties ($35 for the two pair), "hound hiking boots" ($79), or a "Furrari" bed designed like a sports car (why chase one if you can sleep in one? -- $249).

For the hungry canine, there are frozen steaks, Hannuka carob-chip dog bones, "Pup-pies" (dutch apple, raspberry truffle, and banana creme), and Oreo-style carob cookies (five cookies for $10), all to be followed by Fresh Breath Care drops with peppermint and cinnamon. For other needs, Trixie + Peanut can provide "nail pawlish," hair detangler, and dog-poop pickup gloves made with "Oxo-Biodegradable, d2w technology."

And for that sad day when it's time to say your final farewell, there's the "In Loving Memory Keepsake Urn" ($155 for a small dog's ashes, $175 for a big one's) and a Pet Sympathy Coin ($25).

The password to success in pet marketing these days is "humanization": convincing that demographic group now known as "pet parents" that they should buy the same kinds of products for Buster or Taffy that they'd buy for themselves or their (human) kids.

As part of the humanization trend, says the American Pet Products Manufacturing Association (APPMA), pet-friendly hotels are offering dog massages and "plush doggie robes"; pet boutiques carry faux mink coats, feathered French day beds, botanical fragrances, "cleaning cloths for muddy paws that mimic traditional baby wipes," touch-activated toys, "hipster lumberjack vests," and Halloween costumes; and pet-safe cars are equipped with seat-belt systems and motion-sickness aids. High-tech health care facilities are extending the lives (and driving up the costs) of aging pets, and the pet health insurance market is growing at 25 percent per year.

Pet showers can now be incorporated into the design of upscale bathrooms, for $4,000 tacked onto the price. And, inevitably, there are dog jacuzzis.

In a March press release, APPMA president Bob Vetere said the industry that supplies the nation's 74 million dogs, 90 million cats, and tens of millions of other assorted pets continues to show a 7 percent per-year growth rate -- double the pace of growth in the economy as a whole. He predicted that growth will be sustained by the humanization of four-legged companions by childless baby boomers and young professionals: "With these families' higher-than average disposable incomes, their pets are enjoying elaborate high-end and high-tech products."

APPMA also sees a boom in pet services, partly because "it is becoming socially unacceptable in some areas to leave your dog home alone during the day or your cat alone for the weekend." PetsMart, for example, now offers "PetsHotels" and "Doggie Day Camps" to ease pet parents' minds on that score.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: pets

Stan Cox is a plant breeder and writer in Salina, Kan.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
pathetic
Posted by: rsaxto on Nov 22, 2006 12:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Americans are becoming more pathetic every day. If we get wiped off the face of the earth by terrorists or other means our planet would have a much better chance of its biosphere surviving intact. Now, don't you feel really good about yourself?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: pathetic Posted by: Scientz
» RE: pathetic Posted by: JCR
» RE: pathetic Posted by: Scientz
» RE: pathetic Posted by: rsaxto
» RE: pathetic Posted by: rsaxto
» RE: pathetic Posted by: redjenny
» RE: pathetic Posted by: CB in MN
» Fabulous reply Posted by: ISlamIslam
» RE: Fabulous reply Posted by: rsaxto
» RE: pathetic Posted by: ethanay
» RE: pathetic Posted by: rsaxto
All I wanted was a kitten
Posted by: Lizmv on Nov 22, 2006 2:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So when I heard that a local cat rescue group had a litter up for adoption I stopped by and chose a sweet little black long hair. Then I had to fill out an application. 3 personal references complete with phone numbers and addresses, my landlord's phone and address, my vet's phone and address, my social security number (for a criminal backround check), what food did I plan to feed the cat, would I allow the cat to go outside, what kind of kitty litter would I use, is my home large enough to allow for exercise and so on. In the end, I was turned down! Which is really funny because I was investigated by social services a few months ago to qualify as guardian of my niece and passed with flying colors! I'm good enough for a child, but not good enough for a cat?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: All I wanted was a kitten Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma
» RE: All I wanted was a kitten Posted by: SekhmetsatRa
» RE: All I wanted was a kitten Posted by: YogiBear
So surreal.
Posted by: equidave on Nov 22, 2006 2:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oh woe is man at this stage in the game; worse yet the fate of those awakening from the sleepy grip of the narcotized masses and their doomed motivations to have to witness (with open heart and full planetary information access) the iceberg towards which the happy club crowd down in ballroom 7 have ordered us towards.

These neonatal, pan-globally maladaptive, egocentric, emotionally retarded, anitsynergistic, ape descended, dominator-male primate fated, Gian raping, auto-carcinogenic bipedal lunatics are ruining a incomprehensibly rare planetary ecology and taking countless magical unique species of life with them.

My only personal thought-hedge staving-off total insanity at the sight of such madness and unnecessary suffering, is to remember that all that appears, to my personal preferences, as totally dark, dumb and self-destructive here, is itself given to be (is allowed the formality of actually occurring) by the same set of cosmic dynamics (physics, chemistry, biology,...) that also gives rise to such ineffable beauty as a butterfly, sunset, sea anemone, rainbow, children at play, a garden growing, a whale breaching, a new day given in which one can still find a little hope that we could still turn it all around.

*sigh*

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: So surreal. Posted by: Poe
» RE: So surreal. Posted by: yolanda
Hilarious
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Nov 22, 2006 3:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The irony is that most dogs would rather wander around the neighborhood and eat unidentifiable crap off the ground than spend a day in a dog spa, or shopping for foo-foo accessories. To them, it's the simple things in life...Have we ever stopped to ask our dogs what THEY want?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hilarious Posted by: Wacre
» Nature shows Posted by: kepstein7777
Better a pet than a baby
Posted by: grim ripper on Nov 22, 2006 3:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hey as long as all these kitties and doggies continue to perform their roles as surrogate babies who appease maternal and paternal instincts, they'll stave off appearances of the the real monster consumer--the american baby.

Meow

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Good point Posted by: kepstein7777
» RE: Good point Posted by: seltzer
» RE: Better a pet than a baby Posted by: candara
doggy clothes
Posted by: SekhmetsatRa on Nov 22, 2006 3:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
if the people have the money, let them buy stupid clothes for their dogs. they probably wear stupid clothes on themselves as well.

me, i am happy just buying a new collar whenever they chew up the old ones. of course, i have BIG dogs, not tiny frou-frou dogs. though one desires to be frou-frou. ;)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: doggy clothes Posted by: YogiBear
» RE: doggy clothes Posted by: SekhmetsatRa
attacking and lecturing the "normals" on their lifestyles.... Same Old FakeLeft
Posted by: not_the_preferred_nomenclature on Nov 22, 2006 5:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yeah, instead of planning how to unite working class Americans, the fakeLefties like to get together and diss the lifestyles of the "other side". It helps them feel part of a group. Attack the auslander, the outsider. Same-same a bunch of kids who torment and tease a crippled kid, a kid of another race. Group solidarity against the outsider.

Yeah, your FakeLeft "two-minute hating" on the "other side" lifestyles are REALLY gonna help us Americans get progressive taxation, universal healthcare, a european-style welfare state.....

Divide and rule. And the fakeleft, the overclass tool, goes right along with the overclass game....


oh, and YOU'RE the intelligent and knowledgeable ones, right. Atheism, all that. No god. Ok, fine. But you're still just another variety of animal from my perspective.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What a bunch of self indulgent turds
Posted by: Intraspecto on Nov 22, 2006 5:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am really impressed with the intelligence of Americans today. What a bunch of fucking idiots. Hope they have enough sweaters and spas for fido when TSHTF

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pet pastries
Posted by: mat38 on Nov 22, 2006 5:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I gotta say this article is a great way to make a case for how fucked the elitist yuppification has made our nation.
I went to a locas Farm Co-0p yesterday to by some delicious pies for Thanksgiving. It's a pretty big place and I was wandering around after getting my pies nd having failed snatching a special ppular creamy bomastic treat at the bakery section. I approahed the checkout and saw more pastires and they looked sweeter and more dangeriously delicious than the ones at the bakery so I grabbed a bag and snatched une up. Just before I paid for it I looked over at the section of treats thinking, hmmm, maybe I'll get one for my girlfriend. I walked back to the display and it was then that I noticed the pastries were for animals. They were dog pastries, creamy, with sprinkles, colors, what I assume was cake. Yeah, we live in a land of plenty - if you have plenty of money to waste you have anything.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Pet pastries Posted by: psyopswatcher
» Pastry takes a practiced hand --n/t Posted by: psyopswatcher
Slow News Day?
Posted by: Bab5nutz on Nov 22, 2006 6:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is it a slow news day or something? Do people really buy these things for their pets.

That said, I have five cats myself - it wasn't planned, it sort of happened over time. They get the best food that I can afford to buy them. For a treat they might get the odd bit of mince [when I am having mince], cheese or cold meat.
They do have toys - ping-pong balls, stuffed mice, and catnip balls. They also like to play with clothes pegs, pens, and screwed up pieces of paper. Or anything that can be chased across the floor.
I have thought about buying them petbeds. But I am not sure that they would use them - a quiet place on a bed, or in a pile of clothes, or in the wardrobe seems to do fine for sleeping places. In the middle of winter, they love to curl up and go to sleep on an old polar fleece sweater.
I don't think that my cats would appreciate being shoved into human clothes. I have occasionally brought them such exotic foods as venison and chickenmince. They don't have that much interest in it - they much prefer mince leftover from our meals. Mostly, they get food that is meant for cats, a mixture of wet or dry. I try to vary the flavours and brands to give them some variety.
They are happy and healthy for the most part - the oldest cat is going on for 15, and she still drives us nuts with her antics.
In short, animals don't care about all those fancy products. All they need is good nourishing food, a warm place to sleep, and someone to treat them well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Slow News Day? Posted by: quitecontrary
» RE: Slow News Day? Posted by: chomsky
What's more pathetic?
Posted by: culprit on Nov 22, 2006 7:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
buying silly sweaters for your created miniature chihuahua or spending $100,000 to create a baby? And that's only the start...$900 strollers (that's the standard now, not the "luxury")....$20,000 birthday partys....$600 games....at least the dogs only live 10-15 years and don't grow up to be obnoxious breeding yuppies

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What's more pathetic? Posted by: jonestown kool-aid
Baffling
Posted by: MAD on Nov 22, 2006 7:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I mentioned this in another post a couple of days ago writing something to the effect that one of the reasons Americans are in such trouble is because they idolize people who buy diamond-studded collars and Gucci bags for their pets. Little did I know it's not just for celebrities anymore - the average idiot has gotten into the game only they are, sigh, resigned to buying knock-offs and zirconium. Why am I not surprised that Alternet picked up this piece?

Of all the tremendously important things going on in the world, including many things that will only serve to further lighten the wallets of these village idiots, and hence their ability to make such utterly stupid purchases, this is the marquee story - front and center.

I'm not sure when Alternet will get around to discussing important economic issues that threaten the integrity of the US. Profligate spending like this certainly needs to be addressed but in this manner? For a supposed progressive site, we aren't we hearing much about the collapse of the dollar, the gutting of industry, NAFTA, and the housing boom/scandal. These are issues that will affect average, working Americans most. The Elite are busy shuffling their money into Euro and Asian bonds and selling their homes. Why is that important? Because they know something most don't.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» read it all Posted by: zelig44
» agreed Posted by: ethanay
» RE: agreed Posted by: MAD
» agreed indeed Posted by: zelig44
» RE: agreed indeed Posted by: MAD
Animals of the World Unite
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Nov 22, 2006 7:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
against your capitalistic exploiters who get to ride around in Mercedes, wear designer outfits, eat dog food as expensive as cavier, and get $100 haircuts.

Street dogs, feral cats, wild dogs, pitbulls abused by Mexican dogfighting gangs, junkdogs dogs beaten by white trash owners, hunting dogs forced into the cold water to retrieve birds, retreivers trained to 'serve' their blind masters, dogs trained by evil police state to sniff out drugs but never allowed to actually use them:
RISE UP AGAINST THE CAPITALIST ANIMALS IN HOLLYWOOD AND NEWYORK!! ALL YOU HAVE TO LOSE IS YOUR LEASH!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

spoiled kitty-kids
Posted by: kerrieland on Nov 22, 2006 7:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have no problem with people spoiling their pets, as long as they spoil their pet and not their children. Better yet, that they don't have any children and just have pets.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

They say pets resemble their humans
Posted by: AdamG on Nov 22, 2006 8:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I guess this means fluffy and fido get to be just as worthless pieces of shit as their owners! Great, now, how else can we turn the Earth to a shitholed waste land?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sigh...
Posted by: badkitty on Nov 22, 2006 9:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sigh...I work for a company that sells some of this dog stuff. From our spring line: Dog Pique Polos in assorted colors (blue, pink, etc.); yellow Rain Jackets, and Bucket Hats in assorted colors (pink/white stripes, etc.), as well as collars and leashes. And just last night I was reading in my Heifer magazine that 16,000 children die of hunger related causes every day, one every five seconds or so... And we got upset over 9/11. Sometimes it's hard to tell what is real.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What about the designer Pets?
Posted by: gjones on Nov 22, 2006 10:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I thought this was a great article. I have been in or around the "pet industry" for over 20 years and have watched as people have become more frivolous and less knowledgeable when it comes to their pets. My biggest "pet" peeve these days is the breeding of "designer" pets. Labradoodles, goldendoodles all of these "hybrid" animals are just adding to the American consumers ability to accessorize themselves with trendy appliances. They are also adding to the burden of Animal Rescue Organizations.

With so many more dogs getting such a big piece of the consumer pie, I find it disturbing that people still aren't training, excersising and socializing their dogs properly.

The fact that in most instances it is much easier to buy a dog (or other animal for that matter) than to rescue one just proves that the consuming public has little or no regard for the animal they want. At least rescue groups and humane societies care about what happens to the animal once it leaves their care. Most breeders and all puppy-mill breeders don't care one way or another that their puppies may end up in a shelter, or tied up in a back yard, just to be ignored after the fashion trend has died.

I have met a few good breeders, but, unfortunately I have encountered more poorly bred dogs, more thrown-away dogs than I care to remember.

If these consumers of trendy pets and their breeders would only work a day euthanizing the unwanted, unloved, untrainable "waste" products of their industry, they might GET A CLUE!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Toygers Posted by: tscox
Poop B Gone, it's no joke..............
Posted by: jonestown kool-aid on Nov 22, 2006 9:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This company (mentioned in the article) is the epitome of long island (american?) retardation. If you can't bring yourself to clean up after your pet DON'T OWN ONE!!!!!! As far as 'doggy day care' is concerned- well now I really have seen everything.......... Basically all of the things mentioned in the article (products, services, waste, excess) are just masking the real issue here: IGNORANCE.

I could go on and on, but the folks who don't think about what they NEED vs. what they WANT will never get it. They don't take the time to question their actions, it's really that simple.
We as a whole (humans) are fucking idiots. Individually some can be smart, but as a whole, or a group (pet owners) we are hopeless.

I've lived on long island my whole life, so I deal with morons of the highest order every day, and while there are many degrees of idiotic behavior I challenge ANYONE to find a place with more brain dead inhabitants than long island. We've turned one of the most ideal places in america into an asphalt covered shopping mall complete with million dollar houses alongside busy highways (no joke). The very fact that businesses like 'poop b gone' and 'doggy day care' exist is a testament to the mindless shit going on here.

By the way, how is it legal that poop b gone just fills up dumpsters with animal shit that gets hauled away just like regular garbage? I've been to their address and there are several dumpsters literally overflowing with shit, one might think this to be a health hazard. Whatever the case may be, seeing and smelling those dumpsters is a valid eye-opener to the extent of the cumulative impact of pet waste and stupidity..........no shit.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Poop B Gone, it's no joke.............. Posted by: stop.making.excuses
Instead
Posted by: darkgrrrl on Nov 22, 2006 11:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would like to think that one reason for spending so much on pet accessories is that people sincerely care for their pets. If that is the case, then I challenge every purchaser of pet sweaters and spa treatments to reallocate those funds to either adopting a homeless pet or donating to no-kill shelters/rescue groups. Millions of homeless dogs and cats are euthanized in the U.S. every year because there are not enough homes for them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Instead Posted by: ethanay
too kind
Posted by: equidave on Nov 22, 2006 1:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks yolanda.
I have a funny advantage in the timing of getting my quirky entries to the top of alternet's articles. Apparently between the often late night hours the Alternet crew gets their articles off "to press" (uploaded) and when east coast progressives log-in for that first morning coffee/news office work break, I wander out of bed here in a sleepy post-soviet Black Sea fishing village and 4-5 hours to "plunder the palace". Admittedly an odd time to take such crazy new entirely seriously, but we all have our ways of coping/shouting back, eh?


Peace to you/yours.
Thanks for the message.
;)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

indicating a deeper problem
Posted by: ethanay on Nov 22, 2006 1:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Treating dogs like this is just another extension of our cultural idiocy in relation to the others we have coevolved with (species and environment). But how much can we really expect out of a society where it is BY FAR the norm and the culturally accepted practice to force energetic youngsters to sit still inside artificially-lit boxes for hours at a time and call it "education"? It's kind of a damned if you do, damned if you don't scenario:

You either accept the idiocy and play along and therefore be "socially acceptable" to others living the delusion, or you acknowledge the idiocy of it all and live a life of cultural and social alienation--wanting instinctually to BELONG--just not to such idiocy.
---------
with that said, dogs don't need tons of toys. But some dogs do need more gear than normal companion pets if they are working dogs and/or have active outdoor lifestyles. In addition to the "normal" stuff, my dog has a high-vis vest, a blinky light, a bell, a very-cold weather coat, and a backpack for him to carry gear. If it's not for backpacking, then it's for SAR training. He has a couple of toys: fetch tennis balls (which I find all over the place and use until he destroys them), a soft durable frisbee, and a durable plush chew doy. With those three and a little imagination, there are an endless number of activities and "games" (FUN training) that we can play. Unless he's working on a KONG to help w/separation anxiety, all of his play is interactive vs toy-object focused. It's anti-social, mean and idiotic to buy something for a dog and just expect the dog to "like it" as an object. Talk about projection of our own psychological-cultural problems!

Recently I'm seeing "softshell" coats for dogs that "breath" (for 2-3x's as much $$)...but dogs don't have any sweat glands where they where the coat, so the coat doesn't need to "breath" anyway! And that's what we call a "sophisticated consumer base"???

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» > > > Posted by: JCR
I-I-I-I-I once had a girl, or should I say, a fake-left-y....
Posted by: not_the_preferred_nomenclature on Nov 22, 2006 2:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that dog shure do have purty lips....
but seriously, is that picture "dog porn"?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» how sweet! I have a fakeleftist bot-drone stalker! Posted by: not_the_preferred_nomenclature
Meanwhile, in China...
Posted by: grim ripper on Nov 22, 2006 3:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...where all this crap is made by human slaves, dogs and cats are stuffed into wire crates to suffocate and claw each other's eyes out on their way to the fur factories, where they are skinned alive because shooting them damages the fur....

But hey, those prices are low low LoW!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WRONG!
Posted by: Cathyc on Nov 22, 2006 4:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
>> on purchases that are driven by desire and passion, than those bought out of pure need."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: WRONG! Posted by: Cathyc
» RE: WRONG! Posted by: Cathyc
Pets pets pets
Posted by: fifthworld on Nov 22, 2006 5:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What a big waste of time and money; and a key piece of American dopiness. I mean, have a friekin' cat or dog, but keep the pet-industrial complex out of my face.
If Mr. and Mrs. Jones cared about people and democracy to the extent that we gloat over domesticated animals, we'd be marvelously better off.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Too much money
Posted by: mazel on Nov 23, 2006 3:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And too few brains.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dogs are Much Easier to Love Than People?
Posted by: drricklippin on Nov 23, 2006 8:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Because people are so stressed that they have given up on human to human relationships which takes some real effort. A human/dog relationship is much simpler- far fewer strings attached.

As far as amount of $ spent on this phenom -true moral depravity.

Nice job Stan Cox on a sign of our bizarre times

Dr. Rick Lippin
Southampton, Pa

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I buy dog clothes and designer treats
Posted by: candara on Nov 24, 2006 2:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, I do. And I have ten dogs right now. All whom I rescued from horrific conditions. And I can tell you people (from a LOT of experience) that these dogs feel very special in their clothes. They LOVE their clothes, and prance around showing off. And they don't like their favorite outfits removed later. Before we had so many dogs, our few dogs went to doggy daycare. They loved that, too. And, every now and then, they get those carob doughnuts/cookies, whatever. They get top of the line salmon/bison food with homemade soup. And they deserve it. No matter how much I buy for the dogs, they will never grow up to destroy and pollute like most human children will (and I'm opting not to have any of those). And they show pure gratitude. On the other hand, I cannot stand the buying of "designer" dogs from petstores, when so many (Like our fosters) desperately need homes. I cannot stand people who dress their dogs up, take them out in public, then ignore them (I see that a lot in CA). Or, who leave them home alone all day. But, I'd never adopt one of our dogs out to someone who thinks they don't deserve the best just because they're "dogs". They're loyal, grateful and loving. Plus, I'm hoping this trend will humanize dogs (and other animals) so people will see how wrong it is to harm and neglect them. We're not millionaires and do without some things, so they can have nice stuff, but it's worth it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]