Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Enron’s Enablers Go Unpunished

By Robert Scheer, AlterNet. Posted October 25, 2006.


Why were the dots between the Enron swindlers and their government sponsors never connected?
Advertisement

No, I'm not thrilled over Jeffrey Skilling getting 24 years in prison for his role in the Enron scandal. While he and fellow Enron honcho Kenneth Lay were clearly guilty as charged, the handling of this case by the Bush Justice Department is a functional coverup of the Bush family's role in enabling these crimes.

The thousands of Enron employees who lost their jobs, as well as $2 billion in pension money and $60 billion in share value, deserve better. By focusing on narrowly drawn criminal charges and the public's wrath against Skilling and his late partner in crime--"Kenny Boy" Lay, as President Bush referred to his onetime chief campaign benefactor--the culpability of the president's family in this sordid saga is being whitewashed.

How convenient to close the book without considering the ties between the Enron perps and those in two Bush presidencies whose actions enabled these hustlers. The Enron crooks would never have been more than petty thieves were it not for the political support they received from their fellow Texas oil buddies. They knew that, and they paid for it: Over the years, Lay and Enron gave the Bush family politicians $3 million in contributions, as well as lending the campaigning George W. a jet on at least eight occasions.

They did so because, without the deregulation of the energy industry pushed by the first President Bush, Enron would have remained a minor company without the capacity to swindle. At the time, Lay wrote a column supporting the elder Bush's reelection by praising him as "the energy president" because "just six months after George Bush became president, he directed ... the most ambitious and sweeping energy plan ever proposed."

Specifically, Enron benefited mightily from a key ruling by Wendy Gramm, head of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission under George H.W. Bush, permitting Enron to trade in highly profitable energy derivatives. A mere five weeks after rendering that ruling, Gramm, the wife of then-Sen. Phil Gramm (R-Texas), abruptly resigned to join the Enron board of directors, where she served on the company's now-infamous see-no-evil audit committee. Secretary of State James Baker and Commerce Secretary Robert Mosbacher also rushed to work for Enron after their White House tenures.

Dubya first got involved with Enron's Lay when they both worked on his daddy's campaign, and the relationship flowered during his years as the governor of Texas. There is, in fact, a long paper trail of "Dear Ken" and "Dear George" exchanges that have come to light, thanks to Freedom of Information Act requests. The correspondence exposes the active support given by Bush to Enron's expansion into markets ranging from Uzbekistan to Pennsylvania. As Lay wrote to Bush in a letter dated Oct. 7, 1997: "I very much appreciated your call to Gov. Tom Ridge a few days ago. I am certain that will have a positive impact on the way he and others view our proposal."

In payback for Bush's support, Lay became a Bush "pioneer" fundraiser, dumping in more than $2 million in contributions from himself and Enron executive funds. Lay's influence with Bush extended well into the first year of the Bush administration, when Bush stonewalled California while it was being extorted through a manufactured "power crisis" by Enron and other energy companies to buy energy at grossly inflated prices.

The Enron boss also became a principal architect of the new Bush energy policy in the months before his downfall, completely undermining the spirit of democracy. In fact, the public has still been denied access to the six secret conversations Lay had with Vice President Dick Cheney when the vice president was quarterbacking the Bush administration's response to the California energy crisis, which saw the prosperous state preposterously hit by rolling blackouts. Lay provided Cheney with a key memo opposing price caps that would have mightily aided California consumers.

Lay also played a major role in the dismissal of Curtis Hebert Jr. as Federal Energy Commission chairman. Hebert was too independent for Enron's taste, while his replacement was far more amenable to the company's agenda.

Without the specific energy policies pursued through two Bush presidencies, Skilling and Lay would have remained two-bit Texas hustlers going nowhere fast. But thanks to their presidential sponsors, who in turn received lavish campaign contributions, the biggest corporate swindle in U.S. history was allowed to unfold.

Why were the dots between the Enron swindlers and their government sponsors never connected by a Bush Justice Department that seemed more interested in containing the damage than exploring the true ramifications of this case? Getting to the bottom of this story is one compelling reason to hope that the Democrats gain control in this election of at least one branch of Congress, thus permitting a serious investigation of the political machinations behind the Enron swindle.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: lay, skilling, columns, robert scheer, enron

Robert Scheer is the co-author of The Five Biggest Lies Bush Told Us About Iraq. See more of Robert Scheer at TruthDig.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Skilling
Posted by: JSquercia on Oct 26, 2006 6:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I remember several years ago reading an article concerning Jeff Skilling during his time at Harvard business School . I believe it was by Lars Neilson . The gist of it shows what a reprehensible creature Mr Skilling was . The case study involved a Comapany making a product that it KNEW killed
people ( like say Tobacco ) and what the CEO should do about it once he found out . Jeff's answer was "nothing" his job was to maximize profit . It was the Governments job to take care of safety . Of course as we all know Skilling and Lay and their types are constantly crying for Deregulation . Texas under Bush was forever touting voluntary standards for such things as polution . Of course there would be NO consequence for NOT compling with the Voluntary standards

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Kenny Boy Took It With Him
Posted by: cognitorex on Oct 27, 2006 7:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ken Lay, the Houdini of sleight-of-hand accounting performed the Impossible for his last act.
"You can't take it with you" is axiomatic to dying.
Kennie Boy's estate, due to his conviction, owed $45 million right up to the moment he took his last living breath.
But because his appeals had not been granted their day in court his estate's debt to all those Kenny had defrauded was expunged.
The estate keeps the $45 million.
Give credit where credit is due.
(cognitorex blogspot)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

GEE the Clinton Admin had nothing to do with this?
Posted by: punkbuster on Oct 27, 2006 9:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Like it or not Enron rose to greatness in the "house of cards" era of the Clinton internet "Gold Rush" economy. And the Clinton admin was given no money by Enron? And the Clinton officials didnt look the other way when ALL of these companies were lying through their teeth. LETS just face it EVERYTHING is Bushs fault. The fact the world is Fd is because of the Bushes- They are the smartest idiots ever. NO other world leader or group has any hand in it- ONLY the Bush's. Now just get over it and go on.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The new Enron
Posted by: Nheduanna on Oct 28, 2006 7:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Halliburton/KBR is the new Enron, the place where economic criminals pump billions of taxpayers' money for their future lwisure lifestyle. 911 banished Enron to yesterday's news and opened the way for the war machine to make money. The conspiracy theorists sound more sane every day.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

One scam of many
Posted by: ReallyBearish on Oct 28, 2006 12:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Enron fiasco is just one of many scams being helped along by government regulators. We have a group working with the Federal Reserve (nicknamed "The Plunge Protection Team" or PPT) that prevents stock market declines. This is done using loan guarrantees to outfits like Goldman Sachs, who take Fed loans and buy stock and commodities futures. The technical hedge funds (that trade automatically thru program trades) are then tricked into buying (or selling).

Some of these activities (such as those in the energy or precious metals markets) are so obvious that only an idiot or a crooked regulator could miss it. Of course, all of this is has passed over the heads of our brain dead media.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Plan
Posted by: willymack on Oct 28, 2006 7:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is unfolding just as designed, complete with a body and a fall guy, while the shadow men live happily ever after. Who says crime doesn't pay?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Enron 401K
Posted by: dogmeet on Nov 2, 2006 6:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Enron employees were supposed have a paltry percentage of their 401k losses put into a new plan on October 20th 2006. This had to do with the Enron retirement plan being conveniently frozen for a couple of weeks (except for the executives) as the stock dropped to nothing in November of 2001. So far the new Administrator hasn't contacted these new customers as could have been done by now. Just another case of there always being some new company willing to step in and hold on to someone elses' money.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]