Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

How Microbrew Can Save the World

By Chris O'Brien, Foreign Policy in Focus. Posted October 25, 2006.


Small-scale, homebrew beer production plays a vital role in sustainable development throughout the world.
Advertisement

The world's cup runneth over with living beer traditions. But this vast repository of cultural brewing capital is under attack by global corporations. The top five brewing companies, all of which are American- or European-owned, control 41 percent of the world market. Perversely, economists and politicians calculate the conquest by industrial breweries as economic growth while the value of small-scale traditional brewing goes uncounted. Much will be lost if this global "beerodiversity" is lost to the forces of corporate-led homogenization.

The globalization of beer not only destroys the social, spiritual, and health-related benefits of small-scale home beer production. It also undercuts the vital role that home brewing plays in sustainable development throughout the world. For 10,000 years, brewing has been conducted at home, primarily by women, who were entrusted with safeguarding traditions that strengthen social bonds and build community identity. As an important component of diet, beer was distributed by female household heads according to the values of the community, which moderated consumption to socially acceptable levels. As an inherently small-scale and local endeavor, brewing also has had a low impact on environmental resources, relying on renewable energy sources and requiring little or no packaging or shipping.

African Traditions

Despite the seemingly inexorable march of the global corporate beer industry, many African brewing traditions persist in the hands of rural women who brew at home. Throughout Africa, most brewing and drinking still occurs in the home, among family, and within the boundaries of community standards. Four times more homebrew than commercial-industrial brews is sold in Africa, which doesn't even include the great volumes of homebrewed beer consumed outside the cash economy. Women across sub-Saharan Africa use native grains like sorghum, millet, and teff, to brew drinks like rammoora, farsi, changaa, tella, and countless other uniquely African beer styles, often using homegrown and hand-malted brewing grains and handpicked herbs and spices.

This brewing provides a degree of economic empowerment to millions of African women. A study conducted in Uganda and Kenya found that 80 percent of the women included in the survey brewed beer, and about half of them had brewed beer for sale at some point in their lives. According to the survey, very few men brewed, and virtually none of them ever brewed beer for sale. Yet, men were found to account for a majority of the consumption. In this way, home-brewing beer accords women a degree of social and economic influence, helping to maintain a peaceful balance of power between the genders, providing women with a source of income and respect within the household.

Unfortunately, brewing traditions like these mostly go unnoticed and undervalued by scholars, economists, and policymakers. The little attention traditional drinks do attract tends to be negative. The development community typically regards traditional drinks as distasteful novelties at best and as destructive distractions at worst. Aid workers in Kenya, for example, have called for the prosecution of women who brew changaa, for reasons of public health and sanitation. Meanwhile, Kenya's main industrial brewing company has become part-owned by Diageo, the world's largest beer, wine, and spirits company, and SABMiller, the world's third largest brewing concern.

Africans, especially men, are fleeing the countryside in large numbers, seeking opportunity in cities. Those who find small success in the cash economy reach for a gleaming bottle of industrial beer as a low-cost symbol of their participation in the modern economy. Many more, though, find grinding poverty in Africa's megalopolises. Even the relatively inexpensive bottle of lager is out of reach for the many who resort to cheaper, highly potent modern versions of traditional drinks in desperate attempts to escape urban misery. Scenes of pre-Prohibition America and gin-soaked 18 th -century London are today being replayed in urbanizing Africa. Hard drinking is on the increase, while community and family disintegrate under the pressures of globalization.

Such scenes are found around the developing world. In South America, chicha, a traditional corn-based beer brewed by women, has become relatively scarce as industrial beers produced by global brewing companies fill the market created by the same urbanizing and modernization pressures felt in Africa. Traditional rice beers in Asia are only hanging on as western-owned brewing corporations move into the market. China in particular is at risk of losing its brewing traditions as foreign companies such as InBev buy up local breweries, temporarily making industrial beers cheaper and more attractive than traditional beers.

Regulations are necessary to prevent the predatory practices of corporate brewers and to preserve the role that indigenous brews play in sustainable development. Indeed, there is a long and noble tradition of just such regulatory practices that stretches back into the very origins of human society.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: beer, economy, globalization

Chris O'Brien combines two favorite things: drinking beer and saving the world. He is author of the new book Fermenting Revolution: How to Drink Beer and Save the World, and serves as director of the Responsible Purchasing Network at the Center for a New American Dream.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
California microbrews and fuel ethanol production
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Oct 25, 2006 12:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These two topics are a world apart, but they do have some interesting connections, and they involve the same process - converting sugars to alcohol via the action of yeasts.

California microbrewers followed the small winery model, and often started off selling their products at local restaurants before moving up to commercial bottled production. It is one of the relatively few areas where an independent businessperson can start from scratch and build a decent small business. There's alot of art and skill involved in a) making a tasty and distinctive brew and b) having it taste the same each time (beer consumers like to know what they are getting).

However, on a larger scale the issue is making ethanol for fuel to blend in with gasoline or to use as a stand-alone fuel. Here, you find that efficiencies of scale matter a lot. A well-designed high tech ethanol distillery can be run off of wind or solar or natural gas (all far better choices than coal!), and good design matters a lot. By recapturing waste heat energy use can be decreased by as much as 50% - this takes good engineering, and the total investment for such a refinery might be on the order of $100 million - not a project for the small businessperson, unless there's serious cooperation involved.

Good examples of how to do this exist in Brazil and Canada. For the Brazilian sugarcane method, see: http://www.choicesmagazine.org/2006-2/tilling/2006-2-10.htm. Notice that the US is only a little behind Brazil in terms of ethanol production per year.

In Canada, Iogen Corp. is the leader. In California, rice farmers have also begun to realize that they can turn rice straw into ethanol; the center of the effort is in California's Central Valley:

(excerpt)
"`It's a new industry, and if California doesn't get off its butt and get going with it, the Midwest is going to have the market,'' said Butte County rice farmer Ken Collin, president of the Rice Straw Cooperative.

The cooperative's members will sell agricultural waste to a $100 million ethanol refinery near the small farm town of Gridley after its planned opening in early 2003. The city has agreed to help buy the land and build the refinery. It will team with BC International Corp. of Dedham, Mass., to run the facility, which will produce about 30 million gallons of ethanol a year, said Tom Sanford, Gridley's energy commissioner."

Of course, the many oil companies (such as Chevron) that are headquartered in California aren't too pleased with the idea (notice how they've been fighting tooth and nail against prop 87, the clean energy initiative). Nevertheless, getting this going will be a great boost to California's farmers.

The intial use will simply be as an oxygenate blending stock for gasoline (ethanol serves the same purpose at MTBE or tetraethyl lead - make the fuel burn more smoothly and completely, reducing engine knock and reducing hydrocarbon emissions). Eventually, we can expect to see E85 fuel widely available in California (an 85% ethanol - 15% gasoline blend).

Whether you're going big or small, keep on brewing!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Danger, Will Robinson, Danger Posted by: eddie torres
Labels
Posted by: edith on Oct 25, 2006 1:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the various colorful and creative labels of microbrews made in the USA provide a little cheer to consumers(like me) who like to "buy American". Aside from a local brew and a car(many of which parts are from outside the USA), I don't know that I buy much that is made in America besides food(and my fish swims off Chile I think!). I used to take special pride in buying American made clothing and even toys for the kids. Now, aside from handcrafts, there isn't even a choice. So here's to our wine and beer industries.

And yes, Mr. Hemp, I know you're out there waiting to save the US economy. and maybe you will!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Labels Posted by: willymack
» RE: Labels Posted by: edith
excellent
Posted by: rsaxto on Oct 25, 2006 3:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am not a beer drinker but the basic idea is excellent: cut back on globally and nationally distributed products to increase local employment, choice and variety and to keep more women/men employed locally. The whole pattern would help prevent global warming and other nasty pollutions. Shipping stuff (and people) internationally on a large scale is doing a maximum amount of harm to the environment. Do stop.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Quality is important
Posted by: colinmeister on Oct 25, 2006 4:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While I appreciate a blog about beer in general, and especially one which attacks the companies who make the nasty drinks sold as "Beer" in America, I found little about the quality of beer.

I used to drink a lot of beer. I enjoyed beer which was not filtered, pasturised, or chilled, and I would go out to drink this beer. Unfortunately, "Micro" breweries, some of which are now approaching "Macro", do not produce the quality of beer I like. I can buy cans or bottles of imported beer from England or Belgium, but these are still filtered and pasturised, and served much too cold if served anywhere but at home.

Until Americans start brewing good beer, or I have the good fortune to move back to the UK or somewhere else where they make good beer, I will continue to favour imported wine from France and hard liquor from Scotland, England, or France as my preferred beverages. I see no point in buying anything American as long as I have the choice to buy an import.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Quality is important Posted by: reinhold
» RE: Quality is important Posted by: taxidave
» LOCAL is the key Posted by: hotar
» RE: Quality is important Posted by: laoma
» RE: Quality is important Posted by: willymack
Send it here
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Oct 25, 2006 4:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If 3rd world beer drinkers are switching to watery, big-label swill, tell those African women to keep brewing and send it all here. We'll send their husbands all the Bud they want...Or easier yet, just fill an empty beer can with parasite-infested river water; the taste is the same.

Maybe flooding the real beer market in the US with more real beer will drive the cost down, so we can afford it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't forget the enviromental factors
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Oct 25, 2006 6:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It used to be with the small brewers (and even some of the large ones) you could buy a case, drink, return the bottles, and then get a discount on your next case. This was BEFORE so-called enviromentalism. Now none of them do this. Keep in mind all the ENERGY it takes when you drink a foreign or mass-produced beer (brewing, bottling, shipping, trucking, shelving, refrigerating, etc.) Drink Local or brew your own!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

CO microbrews among the best . . .
Posted by: JCR on Oct 25, 2006 8:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I attended college in Fort Collins, CO where New Belgium and Odells reign supreme. Fat Tire is probably the most well known although I prefer Sunshine Wheat. These two companies are models for others - brewers and non-brewers alike. They have both stayed loyal to Fort Collins and have taken a sizable market share from the big boys. Coors is right down the road in Golden while Anheuser-Busch has an enormously grotesque brewery right on I-25 outside of Fort Collins itself.

To be honest I am actually unsure if either company is still independent. As far as I know they both remain "microbreweries" but I have heard many rumors to the effect that they are under threat of being snapped up by Anheuser-Musch or Poors. So long as humans are greedy then successful, small businesses will go the way of the dinosaur. Both companies are privately owned and are under no obligation to shareholders to sell but don't be surprised when they pull a "Rolling Rock" in the near future . . .

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» AMEN!! Posted by: Robba29
Great article!
Posted by: pzzp on Oct 25, 2006 9:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well done. This example can be applied to other goods as well. In an "invasion of the body snatchers" strategy, multinationals buy up local makers of a variety of products. For example in Poland: Nestle and Cadbury Schweppes have bought out almost all local independent confectionery companies. Some high quality venerable brands (example: Wedel) with long histories are either disappeared, (so they don't compete with the Kit Kats or Mars bars) or their product recipies are homogenized or harmonized with company standards that favor mass-production ingredients, so that the product becomes a clone of Western candy. Today's Wedel products bear little resemblance in taste to those before the 1998 takeover. Further, the name recognition of the local brand is exploited to push the standard candy garbage that these multinationals peddle.

To discourage this practice many more people need to buy and consume locally made goods made by independent producers. Stop buying any product made by a multinational.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mmmmmmmmm........beer
Posted by: Smiggsy on Oct 25, 2006 10:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I built my own beer micro-brewery at home about 8 years ago with a little help from friends. In fact I just started a new batch today. Its the most rewarding of all hobbies.

Not to mention the look & amazing responses I get when people see the beer flowing on-tap, out of an old converted fridge.

Long live the humble home brew.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Mmmmmmmmm........beer Posted by: willymack
I prefer wine
Posted by: dstauff on Oct 25, 2006 10:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Excellent history of brewing but I really think there's not a corperate conspiracy behind every social change in the world. Some are simply market driven. I love Alternet but it is a little over the top sometimes on the conspiracy nonsense.

btw I prefer wine.

Dan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Fascinating Article, but It Could Have Gone a Bit Further
Posted by: Jayzer on Oct 25, 2006 10:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I found the article fascinating and informative, especially with its cross-cultural insights and historical background. While I was intrigued by the role of women in brewing, I could have done without the remarks about this role thus allowing women to control drinking and thus, by implication, men's behavior with regard to drunkenness. I mean---come off it!

I don't feel that it's the women's role to control men's behavior and it isn't as if there are no women who ever get drunk either, so that part of the article could have easily been dispensed with. Instead, an examination of just why women took on the role of brewing alcoholic beverages might have been more informative.

At the same time, however, I was a lot more interested in the contrasting roles and results of microbreweries juxtaposed not only against the corporate brewers of watered-down and homogenized fake "beer," but as compared to real, actual home brewers of either gender---and I do believe that there are probably more men involved in home brewing than women right here in the U.S., but that's of no real importance. What I'm more interested in are the variations and the results----not the gender of the brewers.

For example, I once knew someone in Maine who made a nice little home brew that incorporated apple slices into the mix. It was a unique brew and I have never since tasted anything like it. This is the aspect of the piece that I thought was lacking.

For nothing more than the most basic expenses, I'd be happy to go on a nationwide tour and do a little field research, as long as tasting small samples is part of the regimen. Believe me, I would take very good notes until the 4th or 5th stein. After that, all bets are off. Any takers?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Diversity of Beverages has many images
Posted by: TuskerBeer1 on Oct 25, 2006 11:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a Beverage Broker who travels to many far-flung places looking for viable products (often boutique and unique), I must both furrow my brow and only tentatively agree with much of this article.
The diversity of the world's drinks is extraordinary, but it is much less related to chosen cultural "inheritances" than to cosseted and restricted markets. In short, where the global market offers the widest choices, i.e., in the urban metropoles of the West, the largest selling drinks are often simply the most accessible (by taste and price) and the most efficiently distributed (the most complex aspect of the entire endeavor). In short - whether you are in the hills of the Thai-Burmese border, in the jungles of Costa Rica, on the slopes of Kilamanjaro, or in the foothills of the Georgian Caucasus - your choice of drink will depend on a function of cost/efficiency of distribution and taste.

I'm a Foodie, and sometimes a food snob - I was even involved with the original Campaign for Real Ale years ago - and while I love esoteric and eccentric brews, I recognize that most of my friends and relatives simply want a drink, and that they represent the vast majority of the world regardless of their income and market savvy.

A regular feature throughout the world is the gradual displacement of cottage-industry brews with mass-produced local brews. This is both good and bad. In the end, I believe, it leads to greater quality through deliberate diversification because the market demands it, in time - as with wine. The image to have in mind is an hour-glass. In the initial stages, the choices are constrained through the needs for distribution economies of scale. Eventually, however, the distribution network - the costliest aspect of the business - can yield to economies of scope by piling on variegated choices into the network. Whether it is SABMiller in the USA or San Miguel in the Philippines, the better brewery companies all soon realize that their network, and not the brews in it, is the business proposition, and that offering diverse choices often makes economic sense - if they are demanded by the public. A parallel to this would be the infinitely wider availability of music worldwide today than at any time in history - true free markets lead to almost endless choices.

The biggest obstacle to micro-brews is finding a cost-effective means of distribution. Obversely, the biggest challenge for a distributor is finding products that people want. I think we should less bemoan the corporate behemoths in the marketplace than bemoan the almost uniformly dull taste of most humanity who, sadly but true, simply want a drink and don't give three figs as to the taste.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Small is Beautiful: Economics As If People Mattered
Posted by: mom'z the word on Oct 25, 2006 12:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
by E.F. Schmacher is a must read. It provides the formula for curing corporate cancers with home remedies that work. Micro anything is what it is all about. http://www.fguide.org/Bulletin/Schumacher.htm is an overview on Schmacher. Enjoy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

good Seattle microbrews
Posted by: dhardisty on Oct 25, 2006 3:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you are at bars or restaurants in the Northwest, ask if they have Mac 'n Jack's African Amber, or Manny's Pale Ale. These two heavenly concoctions are not available in bottles, and only available locally. Save the environment and enjoy the best quality brews at the same time!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: good Seattle microbrews Posted by: willymack
Someone mentioned New Belgium...
Posted by: Ulfhethner on Oct 25, 2006 4:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I thought some of you might enjoy this story on NPR's Living On Earth:

http://www.loe.org/shows/shows.htm?programID=06-
P13-00039#feature6

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Let's Not Over Do It
Posted by: sofla100 on Oct 25, 2006 5:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article is OK but it strikes one as a continuation of the old sustainable economies by the locals or the "indigenous" type of peoples argument. You know, back to nature, local, friendly and all that. Not bad, I don't want to come across as just being a cynic here, but I do feel it's a bit like trying to say a person could stand alone during a raging hurricane and thereby "change the world." So, OK, some locals might do the home brew thing, but let's not think this is going to "change the world." Budwieser and Busch could care one iota and if the locals get a little much, they will just scoop them up anyway. Meanwhile, the global economy is what it is. Labor outsourced to the cheapest, often led by US corporations using prison labor in China or child labor in India. Millions even in American without health care or a decent paycheck. A nasty US war in the Middle East waged for war profits, oil, and to make others buckle to US demands. The list goes on and on. Now microbrew cannot change this but perhaps microbrew might do some good even here I guess, but I am afraid that is just to help as the inebriated can forget about being miserable for awhile.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Beer is Synonymous
Posted by: jackyD on Oct 25, 2006 8:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
with community and all it represents to the well-being of mankind in this article. The simple making and sharing of any product by a community of locals is a value that many of our ancestors, especially the tribal kind, participated in on a regular basis. It helped maintain harmony, balance and good will.

Let's bring some of that old-time community back into our lives. Passing the peace pipe would be a good start.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]