Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

'Plaid-Collar' Crime on the Rise in the Rural U.S.

By Patrik Jonsson, Christian Science Monitor. Posted October 24, 2006.


Heists are growing problem for America's farm belt, where artichoke absconders, nut nappers, tree thieves, and even cattle rustlers are stealing commodities at impressive rates.
Advertisement

ATLANTA -- At the end of a dirt road in rural South Carolina, a lonely truck careered up through the red-clay ruts and into the woods.

The man, wearing chaps and wielding a chain saw, who emerged from the cab worked for himself, state foresters say. But the trees weren't his. Nor were the small profits he made selling the hauled timber to sawyers in the valley. Despite the whine of his saw, for years no one heard these trees fall.

The man, arrested earlier this year, was ax-cut-deep in a growing problem for America's farm belt: rural commodity theft, or "plaid-collar crime." From lush Hawaii to the Carolina plains, artichoke absconders, nut nappers, tree thieves, and even cattle rustlers are plucking, picking, hauling, and siphoning commodities from diesel to mangosteens at impressive rates. Loss is a familiar concept to a farmer. But such audacious heists have prompted many to go on the offensive to police America's wide-open spaces.

"The vulnerability of farms is legendary," says Bill Yoshimoto, the supervising attorney for a rural crimes task force in Tulare County, Calif. "They're just wide- open places for crooks to come. And crooks are going to go where the pickings are easy and where the prices are favorable."

Several commodities are particularly in demand because their prices are increasing. Almond prices jumped 70 cents a pound this summer, and beef prices remain high. Prices for high-grade lumber continue to climb. And rural backwoods areas have been hit by the copper theft epidemic across the country after prices peaked at $2.80 a pound this summer.

"If somebody can get [a commodity] for nothing, then it's a real good deal," says Ken Cabe, a senior forester with the South Carolina Forestry Commission in Columbia.

The losses from farm thefts in California, Mississippi, and South Carolina run into the hundreds of millions of dollars, according to estimates from law enforcement officers. But since only one of 10 farm crimes is reported, some say total annual losses are about $1 billion nationwide.

These days it's relatively easy to steal commodities without getting caught, Mr. Yoshimoto says. For one, farms are bumping up against suburbs, shortening the time it takes potential crooks to get their hands on freestanding tanks of diesel, barrels of expensive fungicides, and rolls of copper wire. Oftentimes, thieves can operate in plain view since the heavy equipment and tractor-trailers they use to carry out their crimes are common in these parts. Internet trading has also cut down on paperwork, making scofflaws tougher to track down.

Farm-thief profiles run the gamut from a 24-year-old mother of two arrested last month for timber theft in Mt. Croghan, S.C., to the most common farm thief: a 40-year-old white male, investigators say. The motives are as varied as the crimes.

"Somebody who is stealing copper wire to make a quick buck for a quick fix is very different from somebody who is masterminding a plot to steal hundreds of thousands of pounds of nuts across county lines," says Danielle Rau, a rural-crime prevention specialist at the California Farm Bureau in Sacramento.

In Alabama, where pine forests cover an area nearly equivalent to all of New England timber losses can be staggering, Mr. Yoshimoto says. Last year, Texas investigators recovered more than 5,000 stolen cattle worth more than $3.5 million. Twelve tractor-trailers carrying almonds have been stolen in California this year, the latest heist taking place in San Joaquin County Monday.

"You've got crews coming in and knocking down 10 acres of timber or 40 acres of prime plums, and then you have some on the other end receiving this timber and fruit and injecting it into the commercial stream somewhere," says Yoshimoto. "This level of sophistication has only become prominent in the last 10 years, and we've noticed it tremendously in the last five years."

Historically, farmers and growers have shoved their hands in their pockets and privately fumed. "We don't feel like we have a lot of protection in the first place," says Scott Phippens, a San Joaquin Valley almond grower who had 88,000 pounds of almonds stolen from him this summer. "We're defeated the minute theft happens. The problem is society; there's just far more hideous crimes being committed, and so this is nothing."

That's changing, with influential politicians such as Jeff Denham, a Republican state senator from the Central Valley. He wrote "our food supply is under attack in a recent op-ed article in Ag Alert, a newsletter published by the California Farm Bureau.

The 14-county Agricultural Crime Technology Information and Operations Network (ACTION) in Visalia, Calif., has a collection of motion detectors and low-light cameras that farmers can borrow at no expense to try to catch thieves.

Some farmers are working on ways to brand individual vegetables such as artichokes to thwart theft.

Others are finding that the ticket to stopping theft is through having a paper trail. In Hawaii, a law enacted this year requires that receipts be issued for all commodities that are purchased. And coffee buyers must pay by check instead of cash.

Thefts have quickly gone down as a result. "We took a proactive approach and so far it's worked," says Mitch Roth, a Hawaii County prosecutor.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: crime, rural, agriculture

Patrik Jonsson is a staff writer at the Christian Science Monitor.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
You've got to be kidding!
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Oct 24, 2006 12:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the era of giant government-corporate 'partnerships', where huge sums of money are daily funneled into the pockets of politically connected 'contractors' in the arms, pharmaceutical, engineering, and public relations businesses, somone is so concerned about people stealing artichokes and walnuts that they feel the need to write a long piece about it?

Let's take another crime of somewhat more importance - the Bush Administration's push to 'rebuild our nuclear arsenal'. Lawrence Livermore and Los Alamos scientists are "thrilled" at the opportunity to design a new hydrogen bomb.

Lab teams deliver new H-bomb designs; Lawrence Livermore, Los Alamos in competition

This is sure to be huge financial boost to the companies that are vying to manage the labs: Battelle Memorial Insititute/Battelle Energy Alliance, Bechtel, BWXT and the Washington Group. You can expect another round of $5,000 toilet seats and pork-bloated defense budgets - but hey! it's all legal, it's all been approved, everyone is behaving splendidly, and no 'crime' has been committed here!

Would you like some artichokes with a walnut cream dip to go with that juicy government contract? Remember to donate to your local Republican candidate - Rove will give you the specifics.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: You've got to be kidding! Posted by: cinattra
» A brief list of Bush's crimes: Posted by: thoughtcriminal
» RE: A brief list of Bush's crimes: Posted by: Conservasaurus
the good the bad the walnut
Posted by: edith on Oct 24, 2006 1:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
hang em high

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

crooks
Posted by: rsaxto on Oct 24, 2006 2:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With crooks at the top of the Federal government stealing oil and other commodities it is no wonder that folks lower down the money chain will be stealing a bunch of stuff too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: crooks Posted by: cinattra
» RE: crooks Posted by: symcokid
» RE: crooks Posted by: Conservasaurus
something new
Posted by: anothername on Oct 24, 2006 3:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you, Alternet, for including an article that is not about Iraq, politics, or the angst of the workplace or students. What is happening in those spheres is important, but there is a whole world out there not revolving around those topics. Some of us find it much more interesting than the 100th telling of the same story.

I am left with questions, such as who is buying the product, are the thefts against large and small farms, on public timber lands, and what type of percentages are crimes of opportunities and organized thefts.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: something new Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma
» RE: something new Posted by: AdamG
Hello Alternet, if HEMP were legalized, tree cutting wouldn't be needed in the first place !!!
Posted by: NDnative on Oct 24, 2006 4:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With hemp, you wouldn't have to cut down trees AND

On an annual basis, 1 acre of hemp will produce as much paper as 2 to 4 acres of trees. From tissue paper to cardboard, all types of paper products can be produced from hemp. Global demand for paper will double within 25 years. Unless tree-free sources of paper are developed, there is no way to meet future demand without causing massive deforestation and environmental damage. Hemp is the world's most promising source of tree-free paper.

The quality of hemp paper is superior to tree-based paper. Hemp paper will last hundreds of years without degrading, can be recycled many more times than tree-based paper, and requires less toxic chemicals in the manufacturing process than does paper made from trees.


Instead of crying over spilt milk AGAIN worrying about a rural thief who was forced to be one thanks to ILLEGALIZING hemp in America, why not Alternet SHUT THE FUCK UP and alert readers to true alternatives.

They might want to learn from the Amish folks who actually donated to the kids of the killer in hopes of getting those kids on the right track instead of violently reacting. Likewise, instead of crying or reacting about the environment getting murdered, why not post more worthwhile articles that will actually educate readers better and help STOP THE BLEEDING !

I'll keep hounding Alternet as long as their DISGUSTING IGNORANCE on the issue of the need to legalize hemp goes on and on !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hemp and stuff. Posted by: Pathman
» And ... Posted by: Joshua Holland
» Reefer madness... Posted by: Wesley69
» Try again Posted by: Joshua Holland
» Hello North Dakota Posted by: eddie torres
Give them protection
Posted by: Intraspecto on Oct 24, 2006 5:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why don't we just arm them? I myself am from the central Cal, and I say arm the farmers and the farmhands. (I also worked on a family farm in Oregon.) Give them 12ga. shotguns loaded with rocksalt. Nothing lethal mind you, but something to let the common thief know that those kinds of behaviors wont be tolerated.
We are talking about these peoples livelyhoods, and criminals don't give a damn about laws, so show them force. Hell, in my opinion, the theft issue is just about as bad as the people who break into homes and then get shot and flee, only to sue the homeowner. It is completely asinine. These people need to use force and take action. On my family farm, I certainly did, against predatory wildlife and the drug user who came into my fields looking for shrooms. I didnt shoot them like I did wildlife, but when I stepped out of my truck with a gun, they left. They did so because they knew they were pursuing illegal activities, and they were on private property. And yes, I would have been legally justified under state law to shoot them, and they knew it.
In essence, the force of deterence worked.

These farmers need rights to protect themselves, I know we have them here, they should be nationwide.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Give them protection Posted by: drmflorida
» RE: Give them protection Posted by: Intraspecto
CMiner
Posted by: CMiner on Oct 24, 2006 7:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The variety of comments to this story are instructive. There's no simple solution to this problem; it will take a different approach to solve it.

For those who believe this is not as important as the new nuclear dangers emerging, I'd say you have to remember these thefts affect farmers' ability to put food on the table. So to them and their families it is serious, too. It certainly feels more immediate to them than a nuclear holocaust.

For those who believe we simply arm the farmers, I'd ask if the current levels of violence in the world (Iraq, Afghanistan, Darfur, among others) are solving those problems.

I think we should all acknowledge the rise of rural theft outlines the depth of economic problems in this country, as well as our society's changing ideas about honesty. Is it OK to steal if we can't find honest work at a living wage?

And as a resident of a rural area, I'd like to thank Alternet for covering this story. Huge portions of our country are rural, and though we have fewer people, we are out here. I think the rest of the world views life in rural America as idyllic. But we have a unique set of problems that need answers, too. It's not all the pastoral peace shown in a pharmaceutical commercial.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The whole system is wrong.
Posted by: WitchyNy on Oct 24, 2006 8:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with the writer above...the letters are more interesting than the article.
A lot of us for a long time have have been fustrated with Alternet...it seems to be more middle of the road -Democrat--- than truly alternative.
We need an alternative-Alternet!

For example...who cares if people are stealing cows? We should not be eating cows anyway. Cattle are not good for our lands, our economy or our health. The rich ranchers and developers want to privatize our public owned lands...cattle are a BIG part of the problem. Heavily subsidized, corrupt, polluting, unhealthy...where is the article about this?

WHY are these people stealing...are they poor, on drugs?
What has lead to this situation? Why do some people have so much while others are driven to stealing? What can we do about this?
Isn't that the issue here for progressives?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The whole system is wrong. Posted by: WitchyNy
» RE: The whole system is wrong. Posted by: WitchyNy
Why don't you folks ask the right questions?
Posted by: ReallyBearish on Oct 24, 2006 10:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There's something missing from this discourse. Something really big.

Why is the theft of commodities suddenly a growing problem? Evil times? Bush Corruption? Failing moral values?

The real issue is inflation. Yes economic illiterates, INFLATION. Inflation makes the value of commodities go up, while the value of money goes down. Remember the stories from post WWI Germany. Inflation was so bad that when thieves stole a suitcase full of money, they threw the money away and ran off with the suitcase!

So what we're seeing is the theft of things with real value, as opposed to money with declining value.

And yes, inflation is out of control. If you use the OLD method of calculating the CPI, the present CPI numbers would be around 7 percent and not that crap number of 3 percent coming out of the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The price of commodities are going up, while purchasing power is declining.

That old CPI number correlated nicely with the growth of the money supply, the underlying cause of inflation. The present number correlates with nothing but the low IQ numbers of the people who think it means something.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Deeply Impressed, I am. Posted by: Pathman
BE AFRAID! FOOD STOLEN IN RAID!
Posted by: eddie torres on Oct 24, 2006 12:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How much fear is enough?

Ma and Pa Dumbass: Your back 40 is under attack!

Tough to shed a tear for ADM losing $1 billion to theft when you the US taxpayer shells out $350 billion to agri-business every year.

Who's stealing from who?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Oh yeah - invest in methamphetamine
Posted by: eddie torres on Oct 24, 2006 12:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Rural America under attack?

Compare the economic cost of rampant methamphetamine abuse in rural America with a few stolen truckloads of subsidized almonds.

Glad to see the Christian Science Monitor serving the public so well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

urban/suburban ignorance/arrogance is not progressive, or pro-worker
Posted by: burns on Oct 24, 2006 2:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Ma and Pa Dumbass: Your back 40 is under attack!"

This quote is a perfect example. I spent 10 years in Manhattan and then returned to VERY rural America relieved to be apart from the stupidity of people who know nothing of the economics of small and large farms, where the food and products come from that city residents NEED and of the workers who do this work.

"somone is so concerned about people stealing artichokes and walnuts that they feel the need to write a long piece about it?"
"Compare the economic cost of rampant methamphetamine abuse in rural America with a few stolen truckloads of subsidized almonds."

Yes. Now please stop eating both. While your at it, discount the needs of workers and small business owners and then wonder why rural citizens despise the urban radical left. Insults and cluelessness won't win you any support. These writers are entirely incabable of seeing an artichoke as more than just a retail item in the supermarket.

Besides, meth IS A BIG PROBLEM. Why, however, does that make massive farm theft less a problem? Why the comparison?

"Those 'criminals' were doing nothing but picking a fungus that grows on cow shit which you would have thrown away, if you even did that much with it. The cows were doubtlessly in much more danger from you than from any of the shroomers. You are morally infantile."

If someone poached my shiitake mushrooms (more than $6 a pound) I'd feel no moral dilemna about prosecuting or maybe even taking a potshot at them.

Making ignorant jabs at rural life, adhereing to a monolithic vision of farmers as agrobiz giants comparable to the nuke weapons industry, painting farmers as subsidy moochers and dupes of big industry, and refusing or downplaying the right of small farmers to earn a living and get protections that anyother citizen asks is not going to win allies.

There is a huge number of progressive, aware, farming citizens who regularly worry about theft and to find lefties laugh at this concern underscores how much the left can be a as culturally narrow as the right wing.

As long as the left's opinions eminate from NYC, San Fran (two cities that I love) there will always be a sort of backwards, parochial, urban attitude that will alienate the workers. I know enough "dumbass" urbanites to know better, but the everyday worker will see this arrogance and ingnorance as a threat. We need the workers support. If your politics lack compassion it will also lack support.

There are bright spots. Just look at the urban permaculture movement. But as long as the hollywood-constructed image of farmers as stupid and backward is accepted by stupid and backwards urban leftists, the workers will remained divided.

Michael "marxist-and-gun-toting" Burns
cayuta.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» All politics is corporate Posted by: eddie torres
» Oh yeah - 'marxist-and-gun-toting' Posted by: eddie torres
Remember kids....
Posted by: babs on Oct 24, 2006 2:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... NO FARMERS = NO FOOD

It's a hoot reading comments from people who haven't a clue what farmers contribute to society. Imagine what a grocery store would look like if there were no farmers - that's right - it would be empty - and so would flower shops, nurseries, garden centres, butchers, delis, fruit markets...

Also, this is a discussion about thefts from farms - not nuclear weapons or the crimes of Bushco and Alternet is to be applauded for posting this story.

I'm not a farmer - that job is for much tougher folks than me!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» SO TRUE... Posted by: dnvrliz
Judy
Posted by: prairiedog on Oct 24, 2006 3:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Are these thefts mostly from corporate-owned farms or privately owned farms? The article doesn't say explicitly. Most large farms these days are corporately owned....rural folks just manage them. I live in a rural area and we grow our own vegetables to eat....no stealing here.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Judy Posted by: AdamG
» RE: Judy Posted by: WitchyNy
» RE: Judy Posted by: AdamG
stealing fertilizer
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Oct 24, 2006 7:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Up in Eastern Washington and Idaho there have been a lot people who are addicted to Meth who steal fertilizer which they use, by some process, in making Meth. Not only it is a burden to the farmers but the added dangers to their families having this drug-addled individuals, who often have slept in a fortnight and are on edge, creaping about barns at night.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]