comments_image Comments

Murmuration & Occupation - Why We Shut Down the Ports

Cross-posted from Tikkun Daily. by Rebecca Sang On Monday morning I awoke before dawn and somehow managed to crawl out of bed, fumble my jeans and boots on, and sling my drum and backpack - the one that has become the indefinite home for my first aid kit, a patchwork bag of herbal tinctures, a squirt bottle half-full of milk of magnesia, a bottle of bubbles, and some lavender essential oil - over my shoulder. As I checked my back pocket one more time for my ID and locked the back door, the clock on the microwave read 5:08 AM. By 5:39 AM, I was snaking through the dark streets of West Oakland in what seemed to me to be a much-too-small crowd, mostly quiet except the occasional heartbeat of a lone drum or the sleepy but hopeful cheer that rose up as we passed under the overpass of Mandela Parkway. It was somehow comforting to hear our own voices echoing off the walls - it helped us remember our power. You better believe I was asking myself the same questions that CNN, the Huffington Post, the BBC, and Mayor Quan had that morning: Why on earth are we doing this? Are you absolutely out of your gourd, trying to shut down all of the major ports on the West Coast? It was striking and slightly eerie walking through the streets in the pre-dawn darkness, surrounded by so many folks with faces hidden by in scarves and bandanas to protect them from the cold or worse. Because even the coffee shops are closed that early in Berkeley (where I live) I couldn't even turn to caffeine for energetic inspiration. My feet felt like rocks with each step, and my eyes felt bleary. I found myself wishing, in the dark recesses of my mind, that the cops really would decide to block off all of the streets leading to the ports before we could get there - as many predicted they would - so I could just go home and go back to bed. By the time we made it to the Oakland Port, the sky was getting lighter - and the bricks lining my shoes seemed to, as well. The streets widened, the bay spread out before us to one side like rippling gray slate, and on the other side, the bright floodlights from the port glowed like willow-the-wisps in the misty air. Shorebirds, waking up luxuriously late compared to the rest of us, stretched their wings and rose up into the clouds as we passed Shoreline Park. It felt strangely beautiful, this place of industry and concrete. The cops made no disguise of their presence this time -- when we closed down the port for the General Strike in November, they had been quite conspicuous in their absence. This time, they paraded past us in all of their various modes of transportation: cops in unmarked white vans, already suited up in riot gear; cops driving school buses painted blue, threatening a detention of an entirely different sort; cops on motorcycles blocking freeway on-ramps, cops in the creepy black tank-looking things with the teeny windows, and of course, entire entourages of cop cars. After we began blocking the gates of the port, the cops formed platoons and marched here and there, standing for awhile near this or that and sending our twitter streams into - well, a twitter. But nothing happened. They marched and stood around, and we drummed and chanted and stood around. After three or four hours of this, we finally got the "final final" word that the port had been shut down, joining those in Portland and Longview (ports were also slowed down and partially closed in Seattle, San Diego, Long Beach, and Vancouver). In spite of the insipid media response, stopping the massive machines of commerce all along the West Coast is a big deal. Each day that the port is closed means anywhere from $4-8 million dollars in lost revenue. On average, the port of Oakland makes $8.5 million a day. Not one penny is taxed by the struggling city which pays to maintain the roads, traffic lights, and other infrastructure that make port commerce possible. The ports were theoretically targeted because of a longstanding but difficult to understand labor dispute that involves the firing of truck drivers who sported pro-union T-shirts in LA, longshoremen in Washington, and the EGT grain company. But perhaps more importantly, the ports are the bastions of capitalism on the West Coast: the closest thing we have to Wall Street in terms of being a symbol of concentrated capitalist power. But to many people - in the media, across the internet, and in our own circles -- these reasons felt insubstantial, intangible. By the time the second shift at the port was announced closed, everyone from the Oakland Chamber of Commerce to longtime activists and organizers seemed to be questioning the strategic intention and real-life impact of our actions. How much did shutting down the ports really affect those large corporations, compared to the money lost by truckers and dockworkers? Are we striking back against the 1% or standing in the way of the wellbeing of fellow 99% folks? I took these questions to my community, curious about what they would say. The most articulate and beautiful response was from writer Adriana Camarena:"I define the Occupy movement as a social movement that simulates a startling murmuration in which participants tug and pull in different directions - even in opposition to each other - but under a principled commitment to question the economic and political structures that have institutionalized a devastating inequality between a top elite percent and the rest of us." Murmuration as a phenomenon is something that took the social media sphere by storm in the last few weeks, after two young Irish women happened across a flock of thousands of starlings swirling over the River Shannon and posted the handspun video on the internet (a flock of starlings is called a murmuration, much the same as geese are a gaggle and crows are a murder). The starlings seem to move as one organism, twisting and dancing in the sky, smooth and flawless as liquid. It is one of nature's most wondrous sights, and how it works remains mysterious for those of us born without wings. We know that each bird is actually following one other bird - the one closest to it - the same way that schools of billions of herring migrate hundreds of miles in warm coastal waters and still manage to evade predators. But knowing that one small fact explains relatively little. "It's easy for a starling to turn when its neighbor turns - but what physiological mechanisms allow it to happen almost simultaneously in two birds separated by hundreds of feet and hundreds of other birds?" asks Wired writer Brandon Keim. "That remains to be discovered, and the implications extend beyond birds. Starlings may simply be the most visible and beautiful example of a biological criticality that also seems to operate in proteins and neurons, hinting at universal principles yet to be understood." There is a lot that we can learn from starlings and sardines about collective movement - what we know in this moment is that it begins with relating to just one neighbor even as we hold a much larger collective intention. The neighbor, in this case, could be the longshoremen of Longview, the truckers in LA, the Occupiers in Seattle who were gassed by police officers, or the other protesters within Occupy Oakland who chose this action over countless others that we may have attempted. All of us in relation, moving together, even when it isn't obvious how it will work out or if we agree on everything. I know what some of you are thinking: that sounds a little cult-like. What if someone makes a wrong turn? What if we end up being lemmings instead of starlings? Well, it turns out that lemming mass suicide is a myth, which, I'm quite sorry to say, comes from a 1958 Disney documentary that used staged footage showing the poor beasts being launched off of a cliff with a turntable. In other words, I don't think we have anything to fear when we can tune into our deepest, most instinctual ways of knowing and communicating with one another. When we move, dream, and organize in ways built out of our relationships with one another and have faith that we can navigate the complexity and the distance. When we tap into an intelligence greater than our own and more magnificent than a simple sum of its parts. This intelligence allows for infinite variation and subtlety, and if somehow we begin to go in a direction that is not the right way, we can trust that there will be others among us who from their different vantage point will be able to see the right path forward - even if that path is invisible, like navigating the chilly gray sky above river and wood. Thinking back to that morning -- the crowd weaving through the dark streets of one of the most impoverished neighborhoods in the state, the spontaneous drum jams with people I've known for years and those I've never met before in my life, the Food Not Bombs team that showed up with coffee and polenta just when I thought I'd drop from exhaustion, the friends that I never managed to meet up with but who tweeted me with updates every ten or fifteen minutes from a different gate - I can feel that the shutdown of the West Coast ports, in spite of its imperfections, came from a deep instinctual place of our collective understanding about where we want to go and how we want to get there. Just as with so many things about the Occupy movement, it's more complicated than a simple soundbite or facebook update can articulate, because it's a transformation of the entire paradigm into one that honors our interdependent and interconnected nature. And the next step? I'm not sure. What I do know is that in the murmuration of starlings and the silver swirl of herrings in the shoals, we may finally have found a map. To read more pieces like this, sign up for Tikkun Daily’s free newsletter, sign up for Tikkun Magazine emails or visit us online. You can also like Tikkunon Facebook and follow us on Twitter.