USCCB Clarifies: Only Some Lives Worth Saving
Written by Kathleen Reeves for RHRealityCheck.org - News, commentary and community for reproductive health and justice.
In the wake of the " automatic excommunication” of Sister Margaret McBride, a nun who was part of a committee that granted an abortion to a woman whose pregnancy threatened her life, theologians are splitting hairs over excommunication, intention, and conscience. In order to clear things up, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops has released a statement articulating the difference between “direct” and “indirect” abortion.
Direct abortion is a “procedure whose sole immediate effect is the termination of pregnancy,” including when the mother’s life is in danger.
Of course, there’s another effect, which is that the mother’s life is saved. Perhaps it’s not immediate enough?
Indirect abortion happens as follows:
"Operations, treatments and medications that have as their direct purpose the cure of a proportionately serious pathological condition of a pregnant woman” that “cannot be safely postponed until the unborn child is viable” and may “result in the death of the unborn child.”
The second is okay by the Church; the first, no.
Are you confused? If so, it’s because there is NO SUBSTANTIVE DIFFERENCE between these two scenarios. In order for a woman to live, her pregnancy must end. Read more