Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Sex and Relationships

Does "Working Girls" Still Work?

By Ariel Dougherty , On The Issues Magazine. Posted September 5, 2008.


Is a film about prostitution made in 1986 relevant to the realities of sex work today?
Advertisement

Working Girls is a classic film on sex work, which many professors report using in college courses for discussion purposes. The narrative of the 1986 award-winning feature by Lizzie Borden holds up well twenty-some years after its release, but perhaps it's also time to rethink its feminist applications.

In the movie, the central character, Molly (played by Louise Smith), is established in a series of quick opening shots as she awakens in the lesbian household where she lives with her partner and her partner's daughter. She is shown in her darkroom, portraying her aspirations as a photographer. But the bulk of the movie is formed around her income-producing work as a brothel prostitute. (See 1986 trailer here)

In a tight script written by Borden and Sandra Kay, Working Girls intertwines the interaction among a half-dozen prostitutes, their madam and a stream of clients into a challenging and provocative "day-at-the-bordello." Borden said that she wanted to explore "the idea of women choosing prostitution as a economic choice," according to an interview in Canada after completion of the film.

Money and Strings

On one level, the film is about financial autonomy acquired through the "good" income earned in such high paying work. But as viewers see as the day's activities and intricacies unfold, clearly there is no autonomy. Many strings are attached.

The madam sets a controlling overtone. When she is absent for a period, Molly and another prostitute allocate client fees to their own liking. They log into the house black-book a lower amount, for less costly sex acts, keeping the difference for themselves. A sisterly rapport between the working women takes the form of advice they give to one another -- how to handle certain clients, systems within the house, and, most prominently, safety.

Conversations among the women address the huge challenges they encounter with openness to loved ones on the outside about sharing the nature of their work. Molly, for one, has not informed her lesbian lover about how she earns her income. She worries because, as a college-educated woman who can interact about literary and cultural issues, some clients are enticed to want a "relationship" with her outside the brothel.

When the women discuss terminology for their work, Molly bristles at the word "whore," displaying her own ambivalence for this work. Borden confronts viewers with the high emotional stakes of this day-in and day-out sex work. Are the monetary rewards really a benefit?


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: media, prostitution, sex work, working girls

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Sex and Relationships! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Release Work, Not Work Release
Posted by: ranchero42 on Sep 5, 2008 9:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lucrative work if you can get it. Problem is, most can't generate cash flow from appropriately motivated sex partners. By most, I mean ME. Seriously, I think it's best to not make those who have imperfections, real or imagined feel ookie. Not me, you know, I mean I feel GREAT, it's those other poor bastards I'm worried about.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Are you SURE there's more sex trafficking nowadays?
Posted by: Uriahz on Sep 5, 2008 10:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Talking about the rise in sex trafficking that way seems a little dubious. Is there a rise in sex trafficking or is there a rise in TALKING about sex trafficking? The two aren't the same. We need some real information to go with the chaff.

All of the conditions that existed in 1986 regarding prostitution still exist today: brutal pimps, violent cops, inconsiderate and sometimes dangerous clients, international sex tourism, both the overt and oblique disenfranchisement of some portion of the many women and types of women involved. None of that has changed. However, today women have more opportunity to act as independent providers by using the internet to solicit work. They have more opportunity to share their stories and support each other by way of virtual communities and organizations such as SWOP. The film is no rosier a picture today than it ever was-- conditions are largely the same as 20 years ago.

Meanwhile, anti-prostitution efforts have refocused their arguments away from the act of prostitution and towards increasingly nebulous definitions of so-called sex trafficking, that under new legislation would include many activities as harmless as driving someone to meet a client as a federal crime, one with severe penalties. Sex trafficking is largely a buzzword, a lobbyist's nefarious concoction to skew public sentiment as much as it is a threat to women around the globe. It attempts to subvert the decriminalization and legalization of safe, respectful, consensual sex work. While such practices certainly exist and are wholly reprehensible, as with all forms of coercive labor, sex trafficking is no worse today than it has ever been in recorded history, inasmuch as recorded history is largely the history of female oppression.

It is well known that many of the current right-wing-led efforts to curb sex trafficking and the spread of HIV do much to block scientifically supported harm-reduction programs, and further needlessly criminalizing women around the globe.

Singling out sex trafficking when evidence supports the fact that coercive sexual labor represents only a small but significant percentage of all human trafficking practices does a disservice to the labor rights movement as well as the sex workers' rights movement. Anti-trafficking efforts should address this fact, as should the discussion of methods of harm reduction for sex workers both in this country and around the globe.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Caution against 'trafficking'
Posted by: laurag on Sep 6, 2008 6:21 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Commentators who want to distinguish between voluntary and 'free' sex workers often contrast them with totally unfree Others known as victims of trafficking. There is, however, as much diversity and complexity of motive and experience amongst migrants who sell sex as anyone else. Lots of information can be found in my book Sex at the Margins:Migration, Labour Markets and the Rescue Industry, and on my website.

Laura María Agustín
http://www.nodo50.org/Laura_Agustin/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]