Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Sex and Relationships

How My 7-Year-Old Learned About Pre-Marital Sex from John McCain

By Karen Dolan, AlterNet. Posted September 3, 2008.


I wholly believe in educating my child about contraception. But given that he is 7, I could have waited a few years for that particular talk.
Advertisement

Ok, yes, you can credit or fault me as a mother for allowing my 7- year-old to suffer under the blissful ignorance of believing that one needs to be married before one gets pregnant. Or you can credit or fault me for answering my child's matter-of-fact questions about how babies are made even though he is only 7. But all credit and fault goes to John McCain and Sarah Palin for exposing all children who have a TV to the news that Palin's unmarried teenage daughter is indeed 5 months pregnant.

Seeing this "Breaking News" on TV when trying to catch news of Gustav and the Republican Convention, my son immediately asks me "But how can she be pregnant if she isn't married?" and "Does a girl get pregnant every time she has sex with a boy?" Thus ensues the revelation that sex is possible before marriage, and how condoms and birth control pills can prevent pregnancy and HIV. I wholly believe in educating my child about contraception. But given that he is indeed 7, I could easily have waited another year or two for him to be older for that particular conversation. I sorta liked the sweet illusion of the "sex is for grown-ups in committed relationships" thing ... don't most parents of elementary-age children?

I don't judge the Palins for having a pregnant teen daughter. I do think that it reinforces the need for frank sex education and the distribution of condoms in middle and high schools. I do think that the "Breaking News" of this unfortunate pregnancy points to the need of options for teens beyond the highly un-contraceptive "promise ring" that is the rage with certain Christian families these days, promising God the purity of their children until after that ring is replaced with a wedding ring. But I don't judge the child or her parents for the current situation, all too familiar to many families nation-wide. Each year a million girls under the age of 20 become pregnant in the U.S.

But the hypocrisy of so-called Conservatives in touting this circumstance as proof of family values, of conservative values, really roils me. The AP recently reported that John McCain not only has opposed federal spending on teen-prevention programs, he has also voted to oppose education and federal spending on contraceptives. Palin's own record shows the same at the state level. The idea that once a teenager, deprived of an education which teaches contraception, finds herself pregnant, is then expected to allow the embryo to come to term, to then either give it away or marry the father regardless of who, what or how he is doesn't rank among my values. To celebrate such practices as values to which we all should aspire, strikes me as worse than Palin's corruption charges and her petition to sue the government in order to keep polar bears off of the endangered species list.

How many times have we heard the likes of Rush Limbaugh or Bill O'Reilly decrying the flash of a bra-strap from 15-year-old Mylie Cyrus or the danger that sex education in Middle School will expose our children to too much information about sex too young? Well, Senator McCain and Governor Palin, I just wanted you to know that this particular mother would have preferred to wait a bit before having to explain to my 7-year-old that a latex covering over a penis should be worn to keep the semen from fertilizing the egg during sex if teenagers, such as the one broadcast all over the news yesterday, decide to engage in such activity before being mature enough to actually parent a baby.

In a way though, McCain and Palin have done us all a favor as they now have removed the chastity belt which hampered honest discussion on sex education in schools and realistic, effective ways to prevent teen-pregnancy and STDs. Maybe my 7-year-old could have held on a bit longer to his innocent notions of Trojans simply as Greek Warriors; but the McCain/Palin ticket has only reinforced the idea that pre-pubescent children and teens here and around the globe deserve nothing less than a government-provided box of the wonderful little things, complete with classroom sex-education courses.

Now we're talking values.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: sex, abstinence, mccain, contraceptives, sex ed, palin

Karen Dolan is a fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies in Washington D.C. and a contributor to Foreign Policy In Focus. She directs the Institute's Cities for Progress project.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Sex and Relationships! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Morals?
Posted by: EinMD on Sep 3, 2008 12:40 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bah... Republicans don't need no stinking morals! As long as there are bathrooms to troll for sex in, congressional pages to bed and stupid easily lead people to manipulate and steal money from they'll be just fine.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Morals? Posted by: smaart
A joke
Posted by: Jeanne on Sep 3, 2008 6:11 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But, sad to say, the low-information voter, and those die-hard fundamentalists won't get it. Just explain how you sell the unintended pregnancy of a 17-yr old as "family values" in the same breath that you admit your opposition to sex education (except for abstinence only -- do you see the irony here?) and birth control. Despite the fact that the young father's MySpace page proclaims "no kids in my future," they will be getting married. No pressure there. So, this makes it a wholesome, family values moment because the premarital, pre-adult parents are going to make the baby "legal." All we need now is the expose on the pot-smoking, alcohol drinking, and coke snorting (I'm making that up ... or am I?).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Oh, I doubt that Posted by: Beck
» Pan equals Satan Posted by: bottom-line
» RE: Pan equals Satan Posted by: sbaran
» RE: Pan equals Satan Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: Pan equals Satan Posted by: bottom-line
» RE:Get a Life Posted by: cwilsondrum
» POT KETTLE BLACK! Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: POT KETTLE BLACK! Posted by: bottom-line
» RE: Geez! Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: POT KETTLE BLACK! Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: A joke Posted by: mercury613
» RE: A joke Posted by: OneliaG
down, down, down
Posted by: Spot on Sep 3, 2008 7:49 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
babies=never-ending responsibility=dependence on your job=corporate power.

young mothers don't have the time to grow up, they don't usually have the time to get educated, they don't have the time to know any better before its too late.

and that's just how the republicans want it.

how can you claim to be pro-life if the lives you touch are destroyed?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Actually, "homo-" means Posted by: truthlover
Mike Males
Posted by: mmales on Sep 3, 2008 9:13 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What awful columns and comments in Alternet on Palin's daughter, teens, and pregnancy. The American Left is truly dead on youth issues. Gone. Smugly indulging pre-1960s racism and sexism masked as demeaning teenage girls. First, teenage girls can be perfectly competent parents, as Rosalynn Carter (and millions of others) proved. Frankly, American adults who sport a 60% divorce rate and mammoth rates of unplanned pregnancy are in no position to criticize teens. Second, girls are not so stupid as to suddenly go out and get pregnant because of Palin, McCain, Juno, or other pop-culture junk that seems to obsess commentators (you're the ones who should be protected from pop media). Girls respond to their own lives, including poverty, the need to escape abusive families, rigidly exclusionary education systems, and other ills they know far more about than you do and which the Left no longer talks about. Third, how many adult women would appreciate being vilified and condescended to the way you're demeaning Palin's daughter? Take this example: It's far more sensible for Palin's 17-year-old daughter to have a baby than her 44-year-old mother. Sarah Palin, in middle age, was hundreds of times more likely to give birth to a baby with devastating defects that would condemn it to suffering a tragically short and horribly miserable life. Yet, Palin carelessly got pregnant anyway at a risky age, by all accounts failed to pursue rigorous prenatal care, and defiantly insisted on becoming a mother yet again at huge public cost when she could have used contraception or abstinence to avoid becoming one. Does the previous sentence strike you as cruelly judgmental? Good. That's how ignorant and condescending the rest of you sound to me talking about teenaged mothers and youth in general. http://www.YouthFacts.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Mike Males Posted by: emmas
» RE: Mike Males Posted by: mmales
» The risk is more like 1 in 50 Posted by: ReallyBearish
» RE: The risk is more like 1 in 50 Posted by: bottom-line
» You are making things up. Posted by: crashgrab
» DON'T FEED THE DAMN TROLLS! Posted by: kimbari
» RE: Mike Males Posted by: betsy99
Palin's Private Choices and Public Policy
Posted by: AlexLawyer on Sep 4, 2008 1:28 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One might think that Sarah Palin, having herself been pregnant at the altar, would have understood the need for comprehensive sex education instead of the nonsensical, discredited abstinence-only programs she promotes. Even her daughter's pregnancy doesn't teach her this important lesson. Her decision to bear a Down Syndrome child doesn't give her the right to demand that all women do so, or even have to bear the children of sexual abusers or rapists.

Palin claims to be pro-life, but she's really pro-embryo and fetus. Her neglect of children's healthcare and her gleeful support of our slaughter of children in Iraq and Afghanistan prove that she is not, in any consistent sense, pro-life.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» DON'T FEED THE DAMN TROLLS! Posted by: kimbari
» Well, there's no zero. Posted by: Beck
» Bottom Line makes us smug and lazy Posted by: AdamSelene40
Karen Dolan's 7 yr-old Exposed To Pregnancy
Posted by: ownersedge on Sep 4, 2008 4:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If they're old enough to ask, they're old enough to learn. And it's allllways sooner than the parent expects she is ready for ... The Talk. You were lucky.

Simple answers will suffice at age 7, but keep the conversation open as he encounters more exposure.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» My 1st asked at 3. Posted by: MamaPantz
Short memory
Posted by: sgauntt on Sep 4, 2008 11:16 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
haha, you're a trip.

What about Jamie Lynn Spears or the "pregnancy pact" just a few short months ago up in Massachusetts that was all over the news? You've got to try harder than this...

Stephen

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Whats new
Posted by: Andrew_S on Sep 4, 2008 5:00 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have 4 and 5 year old's practicing felatio. It is OK though it's family court approved since the Mother is gold. yet it's my fault, even with minimal contact. My goodness what this nation values as acceptable. But then again since feminism has the primary role in raising children or not, as an option, we males are kind of left wondering. I actually should restate that as I realize that children are only a means to an end, especially with the newer 'no childs behind left intact' for education. You go girlz.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Drunk? Troll? Whaaaa? Posted by: leighsure
» he'a a forced birther troll Posted by: goatini
» Yeah, Your Government Loves You. Posted by: bottom-line
» claire Posted by: brer
» What a sense of humor!!! LOL!!! Posted by: countingdaisies
How can she be pregnant if she ain't married?
Posted by: LouisLouis on Sep 5, 2008 1:45 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If your child asks, how one could be pregnant and not being married - then you better hurrry and explain: There's no connection between the two. Easy as that. Oh my god, America..... If there's a God he will shake his head in unbelief for centuries. Seems very bad luck being born in the states, these days.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Never Too Soon
Posted by: Naoma on Sep 5, 2008 2:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My daughter is now 40. At 3 she asked me
questions and I answered them truthfully. So,
she knew the "facts of life" at that age. Big
deal.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

My Sympathies to this Mom
Posted by: FilmDog on Sep 5, 2008 3:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The author's discomfort with telling her 7 year old the facts of life is understandable. And it is indeed an irony that the Republican Party, the party of prudery and denial of human sexuality, is responsible for her having to give her child an earlier than anticipated lesson in separating sex from love and/or marriage.

However, another irony of American society is that the puritan prudes have so successfully suppressed portrayal of mature sexuality in the media and mature sexual development throughout our culture that we live in a state of perpetual teasing and arousal.

Our culture engages in constant "heavy petting" while denying the necessity of sexual release. The corporate owners of the mass media make a bundle off of tits-n-ass titillation, and the hypocritical censorship that limits exactly what they can show keeps their audience constyantly juiced up and hungry for more.

The ridiculous notion of the virtue in virginity is just one way the prudes make sure that much of that audience stays in that jacked-up state. And let's not forget that Joycelyn Elders, MD, the Surgeon General under Pres Clinton, got fired for suggesting publicly that kids would be a lot better off if we worked to remove the stigma from masturbation. Nope, nothing drives consumption of immature sexual images better than keeping everyone perpetually aroused with as little relief as possible.

A little rule of thumb is that the more sexually repressive a society is the more everything becomes sexual. The orthodox of every major religion are caught in a trap of their own making. The more they cover women from head to toe the more they sexualize the few centimeters that remain visible.

Add commercial motives to that kind of system and you've got a society that's flooded with images that satisfy the law but nevertheless arouse the viewer.

Good luck to our young mother, the article's author. She's fighting an uphill battle to let her kid grow up on a timetable that is based on normal developmental pressures and capabilities. Our prudish and sex-obsessed society "hurries" our children into forms of excitement for which they are ill-designed.

A scientific orientation toward sex combined with a simple ethic based on the "Golden Rule" would set us and our children free from a kind of enslavement. That's the last thing we might expect from a political party that is proud of its ignorance, that treats scientific principles and facts as optional elements in decision-making, that is free to ignore the evidence of the catastrophic effects that their position on all things sexual has had on families, whom they to "value" so much.

Good Luck to this mom, and all mothers and fathers, and God help us all if we get another 4 years of these fascists in power.

FilmDog

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]