COMMENTS: 6
Sex Worker Rights Are Human Rights
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Sex & Relationships headlines via email.
What Human Rights?
Feminists and advocates of all stripes have argued that they want to work for the human rights of sex workers, often without an analysis of what human rights for sex workers might look like.
While many people would agree that access to human rights includes the right to be free from harm, to have access to health care and housing, and to seek safe employment that pays a living wage, there is fierce debate as to what any of this actually means. Some feminists argue that sex work is inherently harmful and that the very act of trading sex for money is a violation of a person's sanctity or dignity, and is, in and of itself, an act of violence. For these feminists, the story ends there, even when sex workers all over the world speak out, not to ask to be pulled out of sex work, but to demand that their rights be protected as they work.
Others, like the Sex Workers Project, believe that a human rights framework includes active participation of sex workers from different backgrounds and experiences; efforts to combat violence, whether it is at the hands of customers or of the police; advocate for public health programs that promote the autonomy of sex workers, and work to empower sex workers so that they can make the best choices for themselves and their families, assessing their life circumstances as best as they can. These elements are key to any effort to respect the human rights and health needs of sex workers; to properly assist those who want to leave sex work for other work, and to protect the rights and safety of those who continue in sex work.
Another key issue that gets less attention is the fight over the role of the criminal justice system. Some feminists view prosecution and punishment through the criminal justice system as the cornerstone for helping victims of violence. Others view rule of law as one of many important keys toward guaranteeing human rights, but argue that an excessive focus on the criminal justice system is detrimental to many marginalized groups, including sex workers, who have been victimized by the police. There are fundamental clashes between the needs of a criminal justice prosecution, and the needs of a human being who would most benefit from a rights-based approach.
Feminists Line Up Differently on Law Revision
These debates, often centered on agency and autonomy, might seem theoretical and unimportant in the realm of people's daily lives. However, the debate often plays itself out in concrete policy terms, especially around the issue of human trafficking.
While human trafficking involves the experience of force, fraud, or coercion in any type of labor, such as domestic work, agricultural labor or sex work, it has been salaciously painted as being synonymous with prostitution. The idea that prostitution equals trafficking has been burned into the public mind by lurid headlines that scream of victims rescued from their captors, often without follow-up news items that might explain that the reality is more complicated, and that any number of prostitutes decided to go into that work because it was a way to make enough money to live on and also support their families, who are often in other countries.
Feminists who wish to abolish prostitution entirely have found strong allies in the Christian right and in the Bush administration. The efforts to incorrectly equate prostitution and trafficking as the same have culminated in recent efforts around the federal anti-trafficking law that Congress has been considering for reauthorization in 2008 (final vote still pending in early July).
The House version of the legislation includes a dangerous and unnecessary change to the Mann Act, a federal law that prohibits interstate travel for the purpose of prostitution. This change has nothing to do with human trafficking, and thus far, the Senate has bravely withstood pressure from some feminists and have not included this expansion in their version of the bill, SB 3061.
The federal anti-trafficking law, enacted in 2000, already defines anyone under 18 who is involved in commercial sex acts, and anyone in prostitution who experiences force, fraud or coercion as a victim of human trafficking. Changing the definition of trafficking so that law enforcement does not need to look at a person's age or experience of coercion (the heart of the trafficking crime) will put the focus squarely on prostitution, rather than on labor and prostitution situations in which people are living under a climate of fear and experiencing genuine human rights abuses.
Are We Listening?
As law enforcement look for more victims, they will inevitably arrest more sex workers, and will lessen their focus on people who are trafficked into sectors other than prostitution. This will lead to untold harms to people who have been trafficked into other labor sectors and who cannot receive the help and attention they deserve; and to those who work in prostitution for reasons as diverse and complicated as any that go into deciding how to make money and build a life. At the Sex Workers Project, we find that most of our clients go into sex work because they can make more money and work more flexible hours than in other industries. In our 2005 study, 67 percent of the sex workers we interviewed did not make a living wage in other jobs such as waitressing, administrative work, or retail. For many, sex work was not their only form of work -- 46 percent supplemented their income from mainstream jobs with sex work.
The people we see every day at the Sex Workers Project are just like everyone else -- they want to know that if they are a victim of a crime, that they will receive the same attention as anyone else. What they do not want is to be classified as a victim of human trafficking as they go about the complicated business of living their lives and supporting their families as best as they can.
All feminists need to agree that when we hear the voices of sex workers advocating for their human rights, we need to really listen, rather than impose our own views of what life decisions we might deem acceptable.
Stay up to date with the latest Sex & Relationships headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Love Me, I'm a Liberal on Aug 29, 2008 9:59 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: IndyCA on Aug 29, 2008 5:27 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Toby on Aug 30, 2008 8:28 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: AlexLawyer on Aug 31, 2008 3:45 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: laurag on Sep 1, 2008 8:08 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Laura Agustín
http://www.nodo50.org/Laura_Agustin/
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Andrew_S on Sep 3, 2008 5:51 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The issue is not whether sex workers have rights, it is the commodatization of primarily the vaginal tract that is the problem. The leaders of NOW are in themselves afficiados of this commodity, and would look at this as just developing dumb freshmeat. Like all business, the states usurption of the womb is an exceptionally good money earner as well as it's product.
In the world of classification, we have the honor of being the best in terms of sex marketing and revenue generation. So the article basically is of interest but misses the point, a US citizen is product and of monetized interest.
As for rights, use the lowest common denominator and that becomes the price. Rectums are freely available, the current crop of newer indoctrinated go either way, it's the self gratification that counts. I believe those who have intact ones should be looking to subsidize a few more hare brained economic decisions before the era see's itself out. State approved Sodom and Gomarrah here we go.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Love Me, I'm a Liberal on Aug 29, 2008 9:59 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: IndyCA on Aug 29, 2008 5:27 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Toby on Aug 30, 2008 8:28 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: AlexLawyer on Aug 31, 2008 3:45 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: laurag on Sep 1, 2008 8:08 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Laura Agustín
http://www.nodo50.org/Laura_Agustin/
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Andrew_S on Sep 3, 2008 5:51 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The issue is not whether sex workers have rights, it is the commodatization of primarily the vaginal tract that is the problem. The leaders of NOW are in themselves afficiados of this commodity, and would look at this as just developing dumb freshmeat. Like all business, the states usurption of the womb is an exceptionally good money earner as well as it's product.
In the world of classification, we have the honor of being the best in terms of sex marketing and revenue generation. So the article basically is of interest but misses the point, a US citizen is product and of monetized interest.
As for rights, use the lowest common denominator and that becomes the price. Rectums are freely available, the current crop of newer indoctrinated go either way, it's the self gratification that counts. I believe those who have intact ones should be looking to subsidize a few more hare brained economic decisions before the era see's itself out. State approved Sodom and Gomarrah here we go.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
'Reality' Show Lets You Decide If Women Get Abortions?
Sex Addiction: A B.S. Excuse for Not Thinking
Why Do People Want to Have Sex with the 9-Foot Tall Natives in 'Avatar'?




