Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Sex and Relationships

Art and Porn: An Interview with Editor Dian Hanson

By Liz Langley, AlterNet. Posted August 5, 2008.


Porn editor Dian Hanson on art and porn, censorship, the mainstreaming of pornography and her experience as a woman working in adult entertainment.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

When you get your hands on something called The Big Penis Book, a 384-page hardcover featuring 400 artfully photographed, supersized phalluses, you have certain expectations. You expect that it will be a great book but not one that you will actually read. You expect that there are friends you'll have to forbid from taking it into the bathroom with them. You expect it to be hot.

You do not expect one of its most intriguing features to be the woman who put it together.

Dian Hanson is the editor whose rich, informative prose and unusual background as a porn publisher nearly upstaged The Big Penis Book for me (it was, by the way, better than I expected).

"I always loved pornography," Hanson says in the documentary Crumb, (1994) about cartoonist R. Crumb, who Hanson once dated. "I took my birthday money when I turned 18 and went to the adult bookstore and bought pornography."

At the time the film was shot she was the editor of Leg Show, a men's fetish magazine concentrating on great gams and the men who love them. She has also been at the helm of Juggs, which featured super DDDuper large-breasted women and founded Big Butt magazine, in which she'd planned to showcase girls with small waists and disproportionately large cabooses (cabeese?), but which has since focused on bigger women. I never saw any of these during Hanson's tenure but I did use Big Butt magazine as an all-purpose punch line for years never imagining that I'd be so curious about its originator.

In a phone interview from her LA office, we discussed the relationship between art and porn, new censorship issues rearing up in the porn industry, the health of the actors, and her experience as a woman working in porn. (we don't talk about how I can get a life like hers; that is between me and my fairy godmother).

Hanson was a respiratory therapist when a chance opportunity came to her in 1976 to go to New York City and help launch a porn magazine. The combination of a natural aesthetic, an intense interest in sexuality and the will to please her readers was an excellent combination for an editor of porn.

"I wanted to make (the readers) happy," she says. "I didn't want to change their views on things ... what I really wanted was something that would absolutely and precisely meet their needs. It's a very commercial instinct that I have." Reading their letters was as if "I were looking inside their minds," which is really the greatest intimacy of all.

"We're simple creatures. Everything we're attracted to (we're attracted to) in the same way, bright colors and the flow of shapes," she says, when I ask her about an interview (Folio magazine, 1996) where she compared food photography to porn, both being about appetite, sensuousness and desire. That flowing, fluid sensuality is usually thought of as feminine, but Hanson been working on another book, The Complete Tom of Finland, that has made her see that roundness in men as well.

"His men were considered the ultimate in masculinity ... but they're absolutely feminine in that they're composed of rounded shapes. Their buttocks are round as melons," she says. "We're attracted to round, buoyant things, be it a hamburger or a breast."

In November 2001, Hanson came to Taschen, a company known for their hip, elegant books. The UK Guardian described them with: "Only at the house of Taschen would homoerotica sit side by side with horticulture, Fetish Girls next to French Impressionism."

Hanson worried that at Taschen she "was going to somehow have to change my aesthetic and learn to look at pictures and see something that was arty and different than pornography." Then she realized she was hired because she already had the ability to showcase sexuality in a certain way. "It's the same thing ... you're looking for curves. Everything sexually appealing has curves," she says, including the penis. "It's not a spike. It's not the Washington Monument."

The Big Penis Book seems destined to be another huge winner (Sorry. There is no way around the puns).

"It was even more fun than I thought it was going to be," Hanson says when I ask her if it was the funnest project ever.

"All my career in magazines was working with female imagery, and I always enjoyed it ... but I am heterosexual and so when I started working on (The Big Penis Book) I really discovered what male photographers and editors had known all along and that is there are just going to be some images that grab you, that get you, in a way that is not simply aesthetic," Hanson laughs. "It helped to keep me going when I had to, say ... look at 300,000 images that were all in negative form from one man's archive."

300,000. Negatives. From one source.

No. She never got dicked out.

"It's my nature to be maddeningly thorough," she says. "It would have been easy at the beginning of the third day ... to say "Oh, I've probably got enough." However "there may be that wonderful one, that perfect one, that best one that I'm going to miss."

Her tenacity seems to have paid off. When she brought "the book" (as it's now known in my circle) to the Taschen American sales conference, "the women just fell on it like beasts and actually tore it up from grabbing it back and forth from each other." The straight men, she says, were in the corner saying 'I didn't think you girls liked that sort of thing! Every woman I ever met said she didn't care!' she laughs, "and I'd think 'Relax guys, it's not like they demand it. They're just interested."


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: porn, censorship, art, dian hanson

Liz Langley is a freelance writer in Orlando, FL.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Sex and Relationships! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Please . . .
Posted by: countingdaisies on Aug 5, 2008 4:34 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
do not use the words art and porn in the same sentence.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Please . . . Posted by: Crazy H
» RE: Please . . . Posted by: countingdaisies
» RE: Please . . . Posted by: Crazy H
» RE: Please . . . Posted by: countingdaisies
Art and Pornography
Posted by: mclemens on Aug 6, 2008 5:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I want to preface my comments by stating categorically that I am in no wise advocating outlawing or censorship of pornography, including the kind of material that consists of overtly violent or degrading content. I am a strong proponent, though, for a much wider and more available range of public discussion of the nature of human sexuality and the social value of its commidification.

Because ultimately, of course, it is commodifying sexuality which characterizes whatever one chooses to call pornography and distinguishes it from aestheticized erotica, if such a distinction is valuable. I believe it is. There’s a significant qualitative difference between Molly Bloom’s soliloquy in Chapter 18 of Ulysses, Henry Miller, or William Burroughs and Big Butt Magazine. Nagisa Oshima, Pier Paolo Pasolini, and Bernardo Bertolucci have all made X-Rated films which could not be more different in intent and execution from anything by Gerard Damiano.

The difference, I would propose, is implicit in the word “pornography” itself – from the Greek: πορνη (whore) and γράφω (to inscribe, record) plus the suffix ία (condition or state of). Hence, the etymology of “pornography” implies “a recording of the state or condition of whores.” Art is the technical application of skill in the production of an artifact or activity which appeals to a person’s sense of beauty or intellectual delectation.

The difference between the two definitions seems pretty clear cut. In a sense, pornography is a graphic embodiment of the Marxist concept of abstracting and exploiting surplus value, in this case rendering human sexuality into a commodity through the agency of a pre-existing articulation of power. This process is depicted and viscerally condemned with shocking and brutal poetry by the coprophilia and sexual torture in Pasolini’s Salò o le 120 giornate di Sodome.

I recall seeing the Robert Mapplethorpe exhibition in Washington, D.C. in the late 1980s, the same one that got Jesse Helms’ panties in a bind and sparked one of the first big funding debacles over the National Endowment for the Arts. In retrospect, that ballyhoo over the distinction between “art” and “pornography” was probably no more contentious than the one which surrounded, say, the exhibition of Manet’s Olympia in 1865, and just as empty of any genuine controversy. It’s pretty obvious to any honest, thinking person: art humanizes and expands the experience of the subject; pornography objectifies and exploits it. "It's a very commercial instinct that I have," Hanson says here. Indeed. In Supreme Court Justice’s Potter Stewart’s well-known phrase, you know it when you see it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Art and Pornography Posted by: mr. joshua
» RE: Art and Pornography Posted by: davmills
Long Live Dian Hanson who is Liberated Enough to Enjoy Pornography!!
Posted by: yellow on Aug 7, 2008 8:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's not all about subjugation, degradation and sexism. It's about our desires!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Welcome to the site
Posted by: Cattylion on Aug 9, 2008 6:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The rich people have such a hard time finding dates, the ***Millionaire4me.com***--This dating site guarantees complete anonymity so you can be sure that your potential mate likes you for your personality and not your status in life.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Welcome to the site
Posted by: Cattylion on Aug 9, 2008 6:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The rich people have such a hard time finding dates, the ***Millionaire4me.com***--This dating site guarantees complete anonymity so you can be sure that your potential mate likes you for your personality and not your status in life.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]