Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Sex and Relationships

Should Prostitution Be Legalized?

By Amelia , The Frisky. Posted July 30, 2008.


The pros and cons of decriminalization and legalization.
Advertisement

After last week's post about proposed legislation in San Francisco that would decriminalize prostitution and our poll that indicated that 73% of you not only supported decriminalization but legalization as well, we decided to take a more in-depth look at both. After the jump, we break down the differences and the pros and cons of both. There may be a soap box moment from yours truly as well.

Decriminalization does not legalize sex-for-hire work, but it does instruct local police departments to treat these cases as a low priority, similar to the way in which marijuana laws are enforced in the State of California. Essentially, law enforcement looks the other way, allowing prostitutes to have the peace of mind to report crimes against them, or other crimes they've witnessed, without fear of arrest. In some decriminalization proposals, the money spent on enforcing prostitution laws is redirected to social service organizations.

  • Proponents of decriminalization say doing so gives sex workers rights they wouldn't have otherwise (rights that are impossible to have when your workplace is "illegal") and offers prostitutes regular STD tests and pelvic exams, without fear of being turned in. When Berkeley, California, considered decriminalization a few years ago, Carol Leigh, a spokesperson for COYOTE (Call Off Your Old Tired Ethics), a San Francisco-based sex workers rights organization, said, "Generally, there is a distrust of the police among prostitutes. If you are raped, you don't go to the police." The theory is that decriminalization would make sex work safer -- for sex workers.
  • Opponents of decriminalization say that it would increase crime and attract sex workers and johns from other areas where sex work is criminalized. As a result, law enforcement in these areas would be under an even greater burden. Additionally, opponents say decriminalization might as well be legalization, since the laws are not actually actively enforced.

Legalization is what it sounds like. A few counties in Nevada have legalized prostitution -- primarily, prostitutes work in brothels with managers or madams. The brothels pay taxes, are regulated by the local government, and are an integral part of the local economy. In addition, brothels require monthly blood tests of sex workers, so as to safeguard against the spread of HIV and other STDs.

  • Proponents of legalization ultimately believe that outlawing prostitution violates an individual's civil liberties and one's freedom to do what one chooses with one's body. Like those in favor of legalizing drugs, proponents of legalization of sex-for-money argue that everyone benefits when sex work, which will go on regardless of legality, is monitored and regulated by the government. As a consequence, the spread of STD's would lessen, as would violent crimes against sex workers. Proponents point to Nevada's relatively successful bordello system as evidence legal prostitution can work.
  • Opponents of legalization believe prostitution contributes to high crime rates, rates that would only increase if prostitution were legalized. Many opponents believe sex work is amoral, a so-called profession that shouldn't be on a par with CEOs or school teachers. Legalization, in opponents' eyes, will lead to the downfall of American morality.

Since prostitutes must engage in sex work in a clandestine fashion, identifying the number of American women who engage in prostitution isn't easy. Most calculations range between 230,000 and 350,000, but some estimates run as high as 1.3 million. Some women who go into prostitution do so out of desperation. Some women do so for reasons that have nothing to do with victimization.

When I was in college, I wrote an article for my school paper about sex workers. One of the women I interviewed, who worked in a Nevada brothel, came from an upper-middle-class family, was a graduate of a prestigious university, and became a prostitute because she liked sex and found the profession empowering. That's not always the case for women who prostitute themselves, but the fact of the matter is that making sex work illegal has done nothing to deter men from soliciting or paying for sex.

The focus should be on keeping prostitutes safe, from abuse, assault, rape, and murder, as well as from sexually transmitted diseases. And if sex workers should be required to get regular blood and STD tests, so should the clients who see them. Whether these two protections -- against violence and against disease -- come about through decriminalization or legalization depend upon the letter of the law. Ultimately, I believe sex workers shouldn't be treated like drug dealers, violent criminals, or pimps who exploit women for monetary gain.

Do you think prostitution should be decriminalized? Legalized? Should a woman have a right to sell her body for sex if that's her choice? We want to hear your thoughts in the comments!

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: legalization, prostitution, sex work, decriminalization

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Sex and Relationships! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
OG
Posted by: OneliaG on Aug 2, 2008 7:42 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I definitely think prositution should be legalized according to this article, It would take the trash off the street and reform them to a different class of people who do drugs for sex... Can I hear your opinion Ladies????

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Prostitution should be legal
Posted by: vasumurti on Aug 2, 2008 9:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Prostitution should be legal. Someone once commented that using attractive women in advertising--magazines, billboards, etc. (what to speak of stripping, working in topless bars or merely posing nude!) is a subtle form of prostitution--women using their bodies for income.

Tracy Clark-Flory writes in Salon.com:

"At $25-$30 per hour, prostitutes make approximately four times what they likely would outside of the sex industry. Of course, that doesn't take into consideration on-the-job risks like contracting an STD (condoms were used in only a quarter of dealings) or being assaulted; researchers estimate that sex workers are assaulted an average of once a month. There's also the threat of being arrested, but according to the Economist, 'Prostitutes are more likely to have sex with a police officer than to be arrested by one.'"

Problems such as contracting STDs, being assaulted, pimp violence, etc. would not exist if prostitution were legal. Prostitution was legal in ancient India for the same reason the Prohibition of alcohol failed in the United States.

Commenting on Srimad Bhagavatam 1.11.19, A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami writes:

"By tricks of chance, one may be obliged to adopt a profession which is not very adorable in society...even in those days, about five thousand years ago, there were prostitutes in a city like Dwarka...This means that prostitutes are necessary citizens for the proper upkeep of society. The government opens wine shops, but this does not mean that the government encourages the drinking of wine. The idea is that there is a class of men who will drink at any cost, and it has been experienced that prohibition in great cities encouraged illicit smuggling of wine.

"Similarly, men who are not satisfied at home require such concessions...It is better that prostitutes be available in the marketplace so that the sanctity of society can be maintained."

Even some conservatives concede that prostitution can be victimless. In a 1995 column entitled "Prostitution as a Privacy Right," Robert Craig Paul, a syndicated columnist for the Washington Times, wrote:

"If a woman's right to control the use of her reproductive organs permits her to enter into a cash transaction with an abortionist, then how can this fundamental right of privacy not apply to other transactions involving her use of her body?

"...abortion has been against the law and restricted with greater intensity for more of our history than prostitution, reflecting social norms that abortion, viewed as infanticide, is more immoral than prostitution...

"In contrast (to abortion), prostitution is entirely an act between consenting parties that does not affect the bodily integrity, identity and destiny of a third party (the unborn)...

"It is legal nonsense that privacy conveys the right to abort, but not the right to ingest drugs or engage in sodomy...

"It will be interesting to watch the court sort out on the basis of Roe v. Wade why it is legal for a woman to contract for abortion but not prostitution."

Again, prostitution should be legal.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Of course
Posted by: Truth2 on Aug 2, 2008 5:17 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Any two consenting adults should be able to do what they like -- have sex, watch a movie, argue with one another, throw spit balls, smoke a joint or, for that matter, shoot up.

It should not be anyone else's business. The thought that the State --- be it the feds, the state, the county or any other taxing authority -- should have the power to decide what people should do, who agree to do it together, is just plain wrong.

Truth 2

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Prostitution should be decriminalized, not legalized
Posted by: slava222 on Aug 2, 2008 7:54 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Legalization favors big brothel owners. In Nevada, it costs almost $1 million to open a brothel, and brothel owners can set up whatever system they want. In some cases in Nevada, workers are on lockdown. They cannot leave, and they have to be available to work 24 hours per day.

Decriminalization means that workers can go to the authorities if they are a victim of abuse or violence.

New Zealand decriminalized prostitution in 2003, and they just came out with a report, saying that conditions for sex workers have improved over the last five years (although the stigma is still there). They found that coercion is not widespread.

Decrim is the way to go, and San Francisco is going to make it happen!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Which is best?
Posted by: luckypuck on Aug 2, 2008 11:14 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Decriminalizing leads to selective enforcement. A racist policeman might select, harass or arrest an ethnic prostitute for any picky reason. Still others can make the ladies pay them off to stop the threat of this kind of intimidation.

With decriminalization, there also is little authorities can do when a policeman acts this way. And, of course, it does nothing to protect the women from abuse by pimps and/or clients, nor does it remove the stigma of the profession.

Legalization sets up an enforcement process that makes it harder for a rogue cop to intimidate the ladies and sets penalties for this kind of harassment. Legalization also opens the door that, over time, the women might get more respect and possibly be more socially accepted. It could happen.

Legalization is the way to go.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

minor's and prostitution
Posted by: amithist on Aug 13, 2008 10:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In my opinion it should be legalized in brothels but not on the streets. If those women 18 and older choose to work in a brothel that is fine. it will reduce the number of pimps and the abuse that these women go threw.

My main reason for legalizing brothel is to keep it illegal on the streets. I think this would be a huge help in identifying and getting minors out of prostitution. Adults have more of a chance to walk away from life on the streets if they so chose. Children don't they are easily intimidated and controlled by pimps who use drugs and destroy what little self esteem they may have.

It may not be a popular opinion but in my heart i truly believe that it will help the children more then anything and please forgive me for caring more about getting the kids out of this lifestyle then the adults.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]