Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Sex and Relationships

Racist Myths About African Sexuality Persist in AIDS Prevention Efforts

By Gbemisola Olujobi, Truthdig. Posted July 24, 2008.


The colonialist myth of the oversexed African has resurfaced as an explanation for Africa's high AIDS transmission rate.
Advertisement

Conventional wisdom insists that habits die hard. Stereotypes die even harder. Ever since journalist/adventurer Henry Stanley Morton's account of Lord Napier's 1868 Ethiopian campaign was published by The New York Herald, Africa has remained, in the minds of Americans, an ungovernable jungle where half-naked pygmies, polygamists and pagans roam around, negotiating their existence in the midst of exotic primitive chaos.

And if you think these are tales of bygone years, the Homo ancestralis thesis, which was propounded as recently as 1987 by John and Pat Caldwell, states that Africans are so distinct and different from Eurasians that they need a separate species classification apart from Homo sapiens, which would be Homo ancestralis -- the ancestral man for whom life is about ancestors, lineage organization, descent, procreation and, by extension, sex.

The notion of Homo ancestralis spun the African sexuality thesis (Caldwell et al., 1989), which treats African culture as a homogenous whole and states that because Africa is fertility-oriented, morality and religion are secondary to sexual relations on the continent. Characterized by a general lack of guilt or moral codes, therefore, sex in Africa, according to these authors, is an activity like working, eating or drinking and is transacted in very much the same matter-of-fact manner as these other activities.

Africa's case has not been helped by the emergence of AIDS, and the insistence of the HIV/AIDS orthodoxy that its primary mode of transmission among Africans is heterosexual sex. To compound an already complex situation, the African green monkey hypothesis also traces the origin of AIDS to Africa. Many spirited efforts have been made to debunk the green monkey theory, but it continues to hang around like a bad smell.

It was therefore inevitable that the historically touted myth of the oversexed Africans would resurface to explain Africa's heterosexual AIDS transmission rate. It was also inevitable that practices such as polygamy, concubinage, widow-inheritance, widow-cleansing, and female circumcision would be taken out of cultural context, held up for new scrutiny and used as a standard for confirming the world's worst fears about Africa.

Against this background, it's no major surprise that AIDS in Africa has been understood and fought along "behavior and behavioral change" lines. Sound bites from HIV/AIDS strategists and commentators confirm this.

"If you ask me why is there more AIDS in Africa and I say because Africans f--- more, what's your reaction?" -- Elizabeth Pisani, epidemiologist, quoted in "Why we are losing the war on AIDS," The Sunday Herald. May 4, 2008.

"AIDS would be brought under control only if Africans restrain their sexual cravings." -- Dr. Yuichi Shiokawa, speaking at the 10th International AIDS Conference, Yokohama. August 1994.

"Let me be very blunt: the heterosexual transmission of AIDS is, in Africa, a function of truly pathological promiscuity. So this is really a violence issue -- not the same violence we deal with in Boston, where teenagers stab and shoot each other, but the violence of African men who are killing themselves, and killing African women and children, with pathological promiscuity." -- The Rev. Eugene Rivers, quoted in "Silence is death," The Boston Review. April/May 1999.

"Sex, love, and disease do not mean the same thing to Africans as they do to West Europeans [because] the notion of guilt doesn't exist in the same way as it does in the Judeo Christian culture of the West." -- Professor Nathan Clumeck of the Universite Libre in Brussels, quoted in Le Monde section of The Manchester Guardian Weekly. Dec. 14, 1993.

"Many men in Africa take their women in a brutal way, so that some heterosexual activity regarded as normal by them would be closer to rape by our standards and therefore be likely to cause vaginal lacerations through which the AIDS virus could gain entry into the bloodstream." -- "Reassuring News About AIDS: A Doctor Tells Why You May Not Be at Risk." Cosmopolitan magazine. January 1988.

"Many African men prefer 'dry sex,' a practice whereby women, particularly prostitutes, are said to insert substances, such as household detergents or antiseptics, in their vagina prior to intercourse in order to prevent wetness. This practice allegedly produces a 'hot, tight, and dry' environment, which their men find more pleasurable but which may 'increase the risk of HIV-1 transmission, since the substances could cause the disruption of the membranes lining the vaginal and uterine wall." -- The Lancet. Oct. 17, 1998.

"In the Great Lakes area of Africa, to stimulate a man or a woman and induce them to intense sexual activity, he-monkey blood (for a man) or she-monkey blood (for a woman) was directly inoculated in the pubic area and also the thighs and back. These magic practices would therefore constitute an efficient experimental transmission model and could be responsible for the emergence of AIDS in man." -- The Lancet. June 27, 1987.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: racism, sexuality, africa, aids

A journalist since 1984, Gbemisola Olujobi is presently a Pulitzer Fellow at the Annenberg School For Communication. She was Editor of the Living Section at The Guardian, Nigeria’s biggest and most influential newspaper, before she was designated a Pulitzer Fellow. The bulk of her work as a journalist has been in the area of women’s rights as human rights.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Sex and Relationships! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
some other ways the US differs from Africa....
Posted by: dmruggles on Jul 28, 2008 1:15 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'd like to comment in public that the previous poster's violates the the criteria of alternet's posting requirements and leave it at that.

I would also like to mention the smile that went across my face as my eyes were diverted from reading this article to a "sugardaddy.com" add. Apparently google's ad technology hasn't caught on to social criticim yet. But it does prove that these things happen just as much in the US as elsewhere in the world.

Just a few other thoughts-- while (attempting to) teach a fairly progressive HIV-prevention curiculum in a South African township, I realized the 60 children in front of me cared more about the free lunchs I had come with than learning much about risk-reduction.

Poverty DOES have a profound effect on a child's/person's ability to learn.

Many NGO's in Africa have not taken into consideration the cultural context with which they teach harm reduction, just as their Christian missionary predecessor's did before them. If abstience-based education isn't working stateside, why would the global gag rule produce any different results?

Thanks for wiriting such a thought-provoking aritcle and challenging so many assumptions that prove racism is alive and thriving in the world today.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Let them be, I agree Posted by: edith
Why do racists think they can analyze critically?
Posted by: racetraitor on Jul 30, 2008 4:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Since I agree that the author should have included more facts as to why poverty lends that helpful hand to disease transmission, (just to refute early on the individualist/racist arguments of biomedicine fans), I will provide it for her, and in the process demonstrate to an inarguable extent why Edith is a moron:

To begin with, the symptoms of AIDS are curiously present in the 1950's among the straight, white population of the US, but somehow 'AIDS' as we know it only evolves in Africa. The researchers who we trust have run the gamut in terms of blackballing entire groups, in what is known as the '3 H's', or Homosexuals, Haitians, and Heroin Addicts. The initial group to be blamed shouldn't be confused with the Manhattan trust fund gays by any means; they were the poor, male prostitutes who catered to SF's richer clientele. Haiti, as we all know, is a formerly colonized nation which the West has shunned, both politically and financially since its liberation. Heroin addicts were then told that their drug use was to blame, as they struggled to pull themselves out of the dire reality of impoverished addiction. All of these groups share one thing in common: poverty. Gays aren't Haitian. Haitians are heroin addicts. Heroin addicts aren't gay. The common thread is and has always been poverty.

AIDS, as any disease, will continue rampantly if not treated. In Africa and much of the colonized world the access to antibiotics and medicine in general is largely underfunded. Why is it that the only time Brown people are given treatment is when they are being tested? Why does the cocktail that has so generously aided the West and specifically those in the West who can afford it become scarce, (even when production costs are low)? I feel this series of questions may be over Edith's head, so let me articulate it better.

As the author states, the myth of African sexuality is a veil for a colonial relationship. What is happening simultaneously with the high AIDS infection rates? It's called crushing poverty, a state of existence that followed the withdrawal of the colonial powers. What is happening now? The IMF is unabashedly enforcing 'structural adjustment', i.e. the privatization of state and public services, so that countries in the colonized world can secure desperately needed loans, which maintain the colonial relationship of dependence and inferiority. The question needs to be diverted from African sexuality; that's not what is at stake and us arguing about whether it's true or not is not only preposterous but time consuming and racist in and of itself. The heart of the matter is that while goods, services, etc. are available to one segment of the world's population, they are disproportionately withheld from another. That is not to mention the lab animal testing of Africans for drugs that will only be available in the West because the latter can afford them, (see the article 'Cosmetics and Cosmology' for the reference).

And don't even get me started on Edith's gross misunderstanding of what race really is...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]