Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Sex and Relationships

What We Should Take Away From the "Pregnancy Pact"

By Ellen Goodman, Truthdig. Posted June 26, 2008.


We spend too much time arguing with each other about teens and sex, and too little time talking to kids about healthy sexuality.
Advertisement

Well now, isn't that a relief. The infamous "pregnancy pact" at Gloucester High School turns out to be an urban legend. The media mobs that descended on the fishing town may now pack up their cameras and their moral outrage.

It's all over, folks. Except for the 17 Gloucester girls in the late stages of pregnancy or early stages of motherhood. And except, of course, for the 140,000 other American girls between 15 and 17 who'll be having their own babies this year.

Let us review the feeding frenzy that seemed to please so many palates. The natives of the Massachusetts town already knew there had been a bump in the number of baby bumps. High school pregnancies had quadrupled in one year. But this didn't get much outside notice until the high school principal told a Time magazine reporter that nearly half the girls "made a pact to get pregnant and raise their babies together."

Pregnancy Pact! "Sisterhood of the Maternity Pants!" "Jailbait Girls in Tot Pact!" Quick, ride your favorite hobbyhorse over to the nearest cable station, network or blog.

The tale of the pregnancy pact led all the usual suspects to cast all the usual blame. It was because the state rejected abstinence-only funds. No, it was because the school couldn't dispense condoms. It was because the celebrity culture bred Jamie Lynn Spears wannabes. No, it was because the town was in the economic dumps. It was because the school had day care. No, it was because of an "absolute moral collapse."

Just when the dudgeon rose high over the outrage levee, along came the beleaguered mayor of her struggling city to tell a packed news conference that there was no evidence of a "blood oath" and that the high school principal had gotten a bit "foggy in his memory." Next, some of the pregnant girls spoke up and the pact fell apart at the seams. Maybe some got pregnant intentionally, maybe some bonded before or after the pregnancy test, but there was no mass plunge into motherhood. Phew.

Uh, phew? Before we comfortably return to ignoring reality, may I remind you that the "Girls Gone Wild in Gloucester" merely raised this school's pregnancy rate up to 3 percent, or just under the national average for teens from 15 to 17. Are there no cameras on, say, Holyoke, Mass., where the pregnancy rate is 9 percent?

The Gloucester 17 have real troubles, but some 4,000 teens gave birth in Massachusetts (in 2006), and we're near the bottom of the chart, with a 2 percent teen birthrate. If you want real numbers, go west young media, to Texas, top of the teen birth heap at 6 percent. And if the gee-whiz factor was that some girls got pregnant intentionally, guess what? About 15 percent of all teen pregnancies are intentional -- not counting those in that gray zone between intention and accident.

So why does it take the myth of the mommy pact to get attention? Patricia Quinn, head of the Massachusetts Alliance on Teen Pregnancy, figures that the story touched some deep fear. "We are terrified that we don't actually decide for our kids when they have sex. We don't decide when they become parents," she says. The notion that a group of girls made that decision together and without us caused a freak-out.

Indeed, the pregnant girls of Gloucester were described by one social worker as "socially isolated." How many teens are in fact isolated, particularly from the adult world?

"In our fear, we fail to do what we can do. Parents need to aggressively articulate their values," says Quinn. They need to say, she adds, "I know this is in your own hands, but here are my values, here are my expectations, here's what I hope." About two-thirds of our children have had sex before they graduate from high school. Have they heard what we believe about sexuality, about relationships, about pleasure and responsibility?

If this is still a "teachable moment" -- a phrase used to make us feel better when we've been gobsmacked by reality -- what's the lesson from this media frenzy? That we're spending way too much time arguing with each other in public about sex education, abstinence, condoms and shame. We're spending way too little time talking to kids over the kitchen table about sexuality and sexual values.

Anyone ready to make a new pact?

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: teens, sexuality, teen pregnancy, sex ed

Ellen Goodman is a member of the Washington Post Writers Group.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Sex and Relationships! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
BABIES ARE ALOT OF FUN, RIGHT?
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Jun 26, 2008 2:56 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Movies and TV give the impression that having a baby is a laugh a minute. Being pregnant alone is a blast. Children can bring so much joy to those prepared for them. Teenagers are not ready for motherhood no matter how much they've learned about sex. It's a lifetime committment. There's no way they understand what they're doing. It's time to teach them about what it's like to be a mother. Teenaged motherhood is scary & very lonely. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: BABIES ARE ALOT OF FUN, RIGHT? Posted by: WickedGrace
babies having babies
Posted by: WyrdSister on Jun 29, 2008 8:51 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Most of the young women that I work with see pregnancy as a way to feel special, a way to get attention, or a way to keep their boyfriend, and I have plenty of them doing it on purpose.

These girls have no one at home that really cares about them, couple that together with the lack of real sex education and you have a young girl longing for love in all the wrong places. They believe that the love they are longing for and lacking in their lives is going to come out of their uterus. I feel really bad when they dont understand that's not the way it works.

Being a teen parent is extremely lonely and isolating. Those babies do not come out the womb loving you; they come out screaming and crying leaving this young mother in a very dangerous delusion. I seriously do not think they fully understand that they have to now raise that child and be responsible for the next 18 to 20 years. They really do not think that far ahead.
I m not just speaking out my ass either, I was a teen mother who's son has now turned 19.

I truely believe that the increase in teen pregnancy is a direct result of Abstenence -Only sex ed. (the ultimate oxy-moron)

This is a very unrealistic view and very dangerous. If children do not have the correct information, they are going to fill in the blanks themselves. What a tragedy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: babies having babies Posted by: bobtr900
abstinence- based sex ed ! yes, it really works , mister bush & co.
Posted by: cherylsass123 on Jun 30, 2008 3:12 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
a while back while I lived in orlando, FL for 13 years, the fucking county of orange school board decided to give in to the " moral" southern baptists, born agains, and other devoted "moralists" . about two years after this " highly intellegent plan" was instituted in orange county's schools, 1997 or so; the teenage high school dropout rate was right at 40%. more then half of those dropouts were, you guessed it- pregnant teen girls! yet, then orlando mayor glenda hood, repug-nican; as well as county chairman linda chapin- all saw this as " what was best for the children." I often saw the other side of this, both up in the south orange blossom trail "hood"; as well as the shacks and trailers of apopka's white-redneck hood. I'd see these 13-15 year olds along that trail carrying their babies into the 7-11 store at gore/SOBT; complete with " pimp daddy dealer man" waiting for his " ho'" back in the yellow cadillac; mush the same thing with those "barefoot in winter/pregnant in summer" poor white girls in both apopka and kissimmee/st cloud[osceola co.] I then realized how stupid the abstinence-only sexual ed plan was!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Raised by teen mother
Posted by: Red Emma on Jul 2, 2008 9:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My mother may have gotten intentionally pregnant at 14 in order to leave an abusive/alcoholic home in 1957. This was "that golden age" the rightwing conservative "christians" go on & on about. She & my father (18 at the time) croosed the TX stteline to Oklahoma & got married, returned & presented their parents with a fait accompli.
I was born (premature) 5 months later and then 18 months later my brother arrived. So, at barely 16, my mother had 2 kids and by 18 she was divorced. She re-married twice before I left home at 17. (I didn't have much contact my father until I was grown.)

She also had middle-class parents who provided 24/7 aviailable child care for free, helped to fix the car or pay for pediatrician ect.
AND MY MOTHER WAS STILL A BAD MOTHER--even with access to child care and econmic help! She was a bad mothre becasue TEENAGERS ARE NOT MATURE ENOUGH TO PARENT and she RESENTED "losing her freedom".

We need to focus on PREVENTING TEEN PREGNANCY--NOT just using the FAILED "policy" of the FAILED 'war on drugs"--that is, reject JUST SAY NO. Instead REALITY-based sex ed--for the sake of BOTH terenagers and children:
1.medically-based FACTS about sex & reproduction
2.access to cONTRACEPTIVES
3.PARENTHOOD EDCATION FOR BOYS AND GIRLS. Theres' been real sucess with program where a girl ahs to carry arund an 'eLectronic babY' that cries periodically and DOES NOT STOP unitl you do certain things. This part of the educaiton could also include changng diapers, making a budget for HOW MUCH RAISING A BABY COSTS and other REALITIES bout being a parent.
4.VALUES: and I don't mean "abstinence only" relgious values: I mean RESPECT FOR OTHERS. Boys leanring to take NO for an answer if a girl says no---information on date rape and battering in relationshiops. Helping girls assert their boundaries and counter the sexist notion that their ONLY value is to be "sexy".
5. Communicaiton skills. Talk about EMOTIONS AND INTIMACY RELATED TO SEX--that, sex is NOT ONLY about bodies!!!
6.And to hell with the right-wing homophobes: lets get real that some teenagers are going to be gay, lesbian bisexual or transgendered/GLBT : some BASIC informaiton WITHOUT JUDGEMENT would help end bullying, lower the higher suicide rate for GLBT teens and again, create more SEUXALLY HEALTHY TEENS.

It's NOT rocket science,folks.
While some young single woman do become good parents--I think it's fair to say they only do so with a LOT of support. Should parents be expected to RAISE THEIR GRANDCHILDREN?
I wonder how many of the problems--gangs, violence, drug abuse-- of inner citiy neighborhoods right now are NOT ONLY due to raicsm and poverty (tho of course, those ARE factors), but, EQUALLY DUE TO immature (& sometimes abusive) teen mothers and absent teen fathers. Children grow up being resented by immature teen mothers who take their frustrations out on their children(& I SEE THIS ALL THE TIME: jerking a toddler around and yelling "Shut up you little motherf---er" is ABUSIVE, folks.) Boys growing up without their fathers search for older male role models--& attach to young male gang-members. The increading Black-on-Black crime seems to me to be out of a deep sense of RAGE that can only PARTLY be explained by continuing racism and/or poverty: violence WITHIN the community wasn't THIS bad under segregation!!!
And I'm NOT blaming signle teen mothers alone --I'm really blaming ADULTS WHO ARE NOT TEACHING THEM THAT PARENTHOOD IS A RESPONSIBILITY THEY ARE NOT READY FOR. I'm tired of children paying the price for society's UNwillingness to get real about sex with teens.
I've got the emotional scars from being raised by a teen mother so I know what I'm talking about.
Lydia

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]