Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Sex and Relationships

Fewer Sexually Active Teens Are Using Condoms

By Marissa Miley, Huffington Post. Posted June 3, 2008.


What should we do about this alarming trend? We could rend our garments and cry to the heavens. Or we could talk to teens about safe sex.
Advertisement

Once again, the alarm has sounded. Here's a novel idea for this time around: Let's actually react to the noise.

Yesterday the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) released its biannual Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance data and revealed that across the nation, teens' condom use has flat-lined since 2003. This means that just over 60% of sexually active teens use condoms. Teen sexual activity may be on the rise, too. At the same time, fewer teens (89.5% in 2007 vs. 91.5% in 1997) are learning about AIDS or HIV infection in school. No doubt this is in part because of the push for abstinence-only education and the series of school budgetary cuts that have eliminated sex-ed entirely.

Though disturbing, the data shouldn't surprise you. Back in March, the CDC issued data showing that 1 in 4 teenage girls has at least one sexually transmitted disease.

Clearly, these STDs had to come from somewhere.

Still, it may have been easy to dismiss the significance of the March data. That study looked at only 838 girls. Surely those girls with STDs must live in some other neighborhood, some other town, some other state. That's not going on at my local high school. Next story, please.

But this time around, the CDC surveyed over 14,000 teens. How much more data do we need before we're willing to see the reality?

In the 1990s, we saw a decline in risky teenage sexual behavior. More students were using condoms, fewer were having sex. But a countercurrent is threatening the tide of progress, and we need to pay attention.

By this, I do not mean we should freak out for a few days, read every article about teen sex and so-called scandal, and tuck the horror stories in the back of our minds until the next cause for freakout comes along, months later. I do not mean we should throw up our hands in despair and cry out, We give up! I do not mean we should blame pop culture, though I see how easy that could be (just think: Gossip Girl, Jamie Lynn Spears' pregnancy, Juno; hey, even that Today Show Casanova sensation/creep Paul Janka).

What I do mean: Let's delve further into the data and go directly to the source. Let's talk with teens about what's going on. Let's talk with parents. Let's all talk about sex.

I recently read that a nurse in private practice outside of Boston launched a free, joint parent/child sex-ed course called Smart Sex Education Program. Over five weeks, this nurse, Thu Anh Lewin, met with parents and their middle and high school children separately -- teaching the kids about sexual, physical, and emotional health, and encouraging the parents to continue educating their kids at home -- not in one fell swoop, but in many. The course received rave reviews.

So far the sex-ed debate has centered on comprehensive vs. abstinence only sex-ed. The Left and the Right. But Nurse Lewin is onto something. Isn't there room for a third -- and independent -- party? A place where we can meet in the middle -- where we can bring together parents and children -- and discuss sexual health, family values, and everything else under the sun?

We could call it Intergenerational Sex-Ed. That sounds intimidating and dry, actually. I'm sure we could come up with a catchier name. Like Generation Sex. Or Sex and the Real Talk. It could be as open and funny as that scene in The 40 Year Old Virgin where Steve Carell has more questions about sex than anyone else in the room. But sensitive, of course. It would be about listening and talking and informing, not judging.

These days when it comes to the future of sex-ed, it feels like we're all waiting for teachers and educators and policy makers to figure out what's going on with teens today and intervene. But it's taking a long time. And in the meantime, more kids are engaging in risky behavior, as the CDC data show.

Maybe it's easier to start small.

That's what Nurse Lewin did. She came up with the idea on her own, advertised in local media, and held the class at a public library.

She reacted. And just like that, she made a difference.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: teens, sex-ed, safe sex, condom use

Marissa Miley is the coauthor of Restless Virgins: Love, Sex, and Survival at a New England Prep School. She is a graduate of the University of Pennsylvania, and has worked for Harvard University and The Atlantic. Miley lives in New York City, where she is working on a second book of nonfiction.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Sex and Relationships! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
I Choose To Call it : This is a CONDOM, You are a TEENAGER and if You...
Posted by: Turiye on Jun 9, 2008 3:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...choose not to use this IF you decide you are going to engage in sexual activity(Yes, my dear daughter, oral sex is SEX) and you INCREASE your chances of contracting an STD by the time you are 25. These include : HIV, Hep C, human paploma(genital warts), Chlamydia, Gonorrhea, Bacterial Vaginosis, Herpes, PID, Syphilis and Trichomoniasis.
40% of persons that contract Chlamydia or Gonorreah WILL develop PID which can result in Infertility.
Please come to me or a School Nurse or Counseler, whomever you trust for any answers to questions or concerns. I will NOT ever judge you for I love you sweets!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

barebacking
Posted by: bomec on Jun 9, 2008 5:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So much of porn these days--both hetero and homo--features what is called barebacking or unprotected vaginal or anal penetration. I truly deplore this, as it is adding allure and the excitement of the suicidal to truly dangerous practices. This is not helping propagate healthful notions and healthful behavior, needless to say. Come on porn makers, get with the program, will you? (I suppose we'll always see unprotected oral sex, although that is less dangerous though not without risk.)

Every time a see a condom clad dick in a porn flick, I give a little silent cheer for the producers and for the performers.

Add into the mix the ignorance that abstinence only sex (non)ed fosters, and you have a really stupid and suicidal bunch of sexually active young people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

baby momma dramma
Posted by: JibreelRiley on Jun 9, 2008 5:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
if you want to avoid it, were a rubber. Make the 12 buck investment in your safety.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Oooh...Alternet...BAD! Teenagers...
Posted by: jvaljon1 on Jun 9, 2008 6:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
..at least, good solid Christian ones, shouldn't even be THINKING about having sex! Don't you know that Sex Education in the classroom turns the children into whores? Didn't your Preacher tell you this? Didn't PreacherMan tell you all to "sublimate your sexual feelings until 'the time is right' on your wedding night"??? And as for young teenage BOYS--which Alternet doesn't even mention--any of you ride bareback, you will deserve the lifetime of hurt and infertility and possibly even AIDS, that your dewy-eyed little compliant high-school partner may well be setting you up for. Some of these STDs--AIDS in particular--don't even show up on tests for MONTHS after the fact (until the body's stopped trying to resist the infection).

Yeah. But don't worry. GAWD wants boys to 'ride bareback' and girls to 'wait until their wedding night' to have sex. Shades of the 50s! Except--in the 50s, there was no AIDS.

There also was no Alternet, but that's another story...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Make condoms ubiquitously available to teens
Posted by: 2dogarage on Jun 9, 2008 8:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Put them everywhere for kids to take as they wish, at the back of every classroom, at the end of the cafeteria line, parents should give their kids a box of them for birthdays, Christmas...

How about a bold ad campaign that would glamorize condoms and give them a place of interest in popular culture?

Parents can't continue to keep their heads in the sand when it comes to their teen's sexuality. It is a given that they are going to do it, ignoring the issue doesn't make it go away.

It is ultimately parent's responsibility to keep their children safe from harm but everyone seems to want to abdicate that responsibility to the schools or the state. I'd like to see mandatory parenting classes for everyone who decides to have children; that's where the problem begins.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Same here. Don't make a profit on condoms.
Posted by: PaulK on Jun 9, 2008 9:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We, the adults (ok as a group we're pretty childish and spreading STDs all over the place) should look to ourselves, not some stupid kids, for the answers.

First off, condoms are not for making a profit. Condoms are not band candy that you can mark way up. Condoms are so that we don't have to bury our own kids someday. Understood?

Go to the high school bathrooms and put in condom machines that your PTA or your medical safety group paid for up front, and crank the cost of a condom way down to the nonprofit level or below. Bite the bullet and put the same condom machines into junior high school bathrooms. Thanks to huge beefsteak consumption in our country, some of the junior highers are already into puberty and having sex.

Now go to the roller rink and laser tag joint and get the owner to put up the same machines in his bathroom.

Next, you find some way to advertise. If you can't teach public health in schools, use a billboard or give out book covers to kids. The really outre kids will put these covers on their books, and you'll get the message out at your school.

Note: I tried to post this an hour ago but Alternet crashed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Natural sex - Contemplated risk taking.
Posted by: aouie01 on Jun 9, 2008 11:30 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Voicing some reasons to not use a male condom as well as some related issues. It is not meant to detract from the reasons to use condoms (greatly reducing the risk of STD transmission and pregnancy).

I say contemplated rather than calculated, since these choices are a combination of vague calculation, perceived safety, personal preference, estimated social approval or disapproval, likelihood of finding someone to go along with preferred choice, etc. Vague calculation in the sense that even if there is a change in the perceived risk from close to 99% to less than 1% or vice versa, people will likely not change their choices right away. E.g. Many people believe that unprotected sex with an HIV infected person would almost certainly result in catching the infection (loaded gun analogy). In reality the risk is closer to 1% or 2%. With most female humans engaged in (presumptive) serial monogamy without condoms using natural rythm or IUDs, dying from pregnancy may be a greater threat than acqiring HIV.

Penises (especially the ones with foreskins) may find that condoms do not feel the same as the soft skin of the vagina. The functionality of the foreskin in keeping the natural lubricants inside of the vagina is also impaired. Quoting from a source - "For those who don't understand why for women, condoms rob many women of vaginal moisture and they get dry quickly (thus sex may hurt or feel unnatural) and some women are allergic to the spermicidal that coats the outside of condoms or to latex. Some women just don't like how they feel either." There can be a displeasurable psychological element to having something between the people engaged in sexual intercourse. Condoms tend to slip off non-erect penises and are difficult to get onto a non-erect penis. Many people like to engage in sexual play involving genital contact even if the penis is not erect.

Sex with condoms is not 100% safe even if the condoms didn't break. Tongue kissing can also transmit some infections (e.g. Herpes). Just cuddling up and having skin to skin contact or merely lying on another's bed can also expose oneself to some infections (e.g. Genital Warts, Scabies). Just breathing air can transmit some infections (e.g. Influenza). This does not take into account the potential of future (or current?) air transmissible human engineered biological weapons. Some day we may have gas masks distributed to almost everybody just like in Israel. A day may come when we are expected to carry and use a pocket sized filter outside of closed safe air systems and people get admonished for wanting to breathe the natural air thus taking and subjecting others to the then unacceptable risks of biological weapon incubation and subsequent transmission.

Hope people will carefully contemplate their important sex related choices and factor in the possibility of lying sexual partners, condom breakage, non-regular menstrual cycles, risk of changing the plan (hoping it was discussed prior to pregnancy risking activities) with respect to abortion in case of an unplanned pregnancy and related mental anguishes, risk of a failed vasectomy (re-tunelling?), etc.


Sincerely,
Aouie

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Good!
Posted by: arclight7 on Jun 9, 2008 2:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Excellent news!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Only one technique works
Posted by: Romans1 on Jun 9, 2008 2:54 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The fact is that abstinance works. Condoms break. No other form of birth control works 100% of the time. Having sex with multiple partners outside of marriage is like playing with a loaded gun. It's Russian Roulette. Maybe you'll make a baby. Maybe you'll get sick.

Abstinance works all the time every time. Anyone who says they tried it and it didn't work obviously didn't stay abstinant.

Liberals are all about promoting choice. How about we make some SMART choices. Choose abstinance.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Only one technique works Posted by: MyLeftFoot
» RE: Only one technique works Posted by: Romans1
» Cheap buying of votes.... Posted by: CatDad
» lies, lies, lies Posted by: frantaylor
» RE: lies, lies, lies Posted by: Romans1
» Citation continued... Posted by: mjabele
» RE: lies, lies, lies Posted by: Xadiz
Condoms? Why?
Posted by: Cowardly_lion on Jun 9, 2008 8:58 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ok, I understand what condoms do, and how important they are in the fight against this and that.....but isn't sex about love making, not fighting? I, as a young 20-something year old, have chosen NOT to wear a condom when I have sex and this is why.

Sex is something that is supposed to be about love and sharing a moment with that certain someone that no one else can share with them. And a side effect IS having a baby. That is the responsibility you should BOTH be willing to take on the moment you decide that sex is something you're ready to experience.

The psychology goes like the psychology of any other problem with teens that you have these days. Rebellion. We're all brought up knowing that our parents took up these ideals of free love, drugs and basically being irresponsible. The motto then became, It never happened if you don't get caught. So condoms and contraceptives started gaining popularity. This seems a bit unethical and immoral and regressive to the true meaning of sex. So instead, I opt to be held responsible for the actions of myself and my partner and delete the condom and contraceptive. The rebellion isn't in getting MORE irresponsible as adults view it, but in getting more RESPONSIBLE for what I've done. After all if making love is what it's about, why not get the credit?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Stop making babies! Posted by: frantaylor
» Nice post, PaulK Posted by: 2dogarage
» RE: Condoms? Why? Posted by: aouie01
» RE: Condoms? Why? Posted by: Cowardly_lion
» RE: Condoms? Why? Posted by: aouie01
» RE: Condoms? Why? Posted by: Romans1
I've never been pregnant
Posted by: Ayla87 on Jun 11, 2008 6:21 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nor have I contracted an STD, or feared that I might get one. My friends on the other hand are a different story... I wonder why?

Oh thats right! I chose abstinence! They chose to spred their legs to whomever told them they were hot. I wonder if there's a connection...?

Nah! It's probably just some right wing republican conspiracy to get votes. Yeah, thats it! I mean, nothing in life can be that simple, can it?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Irrefutable comment Posted by: 2dogarage
» RE: Irrefutable comment Posted by: Ayla87
» No one is saying..... Posted by: mjabele
» RE: No one is saying..... Posted by: Xadiz
Intergenerational Sex-Ed
Posted by: Xadiz on Jun 13, 2008 7:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"We could call it Intergenerational Sex-Ed. That sounds intimidating and dry, actually. I'm sure we could come up with a catchier name."

That sounds like Bill Henson, I'd translate it into Dutch, and if you get a book offer out of it, it's wrong for America.

The thng about sex-ed, not that I know that much about it, is that it is a squabbling frontier for the porn industry and ACLU,

(Why is the porn industry in US schools?)

In Britain, the kids that don't have any, that is, any at all, have never become pregnant, ever, whilst at school.

A true statistic, amazing isn't it? The rub is, that those that opt out, are simply not going to get pregnant, or a disease.

Work it out. The other way that stat was bumped to me, is that more kids have been made pregnant by their teachers than the non-paticipating category.

I'm sure there is a lesson there, pro-sex feminism, have a solution they desperately need to avoid, because it has belief attached to it, so that won't do.

If planned parenthood designed nuclear reactors, it'd be time to buy a bunker, is the blue-collar way of knowing which siode is buttered.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]