The Sexy Path to Good Health
Also in Sex and Relationships
Why Fake Optimism Is the Worst Way to Deal with Life's Problems
Liz Langley
6 Tricks to Sex After a Divorce
Julie Bogart
"You Like That Baby, You Like That?": Has Porn Made Men Bad at Sex?
Cord Jefferson
Hot Mormon Muffins and Models for Jesus: What's With All the Sexy Christians?
Liz Langley
How Abstinence-Only Programs Perpetuate Dangerous Stereotypes
Martha Kempner
9 Silly Things People Say When They Hear You Don't Want Kids (And Ways to Counter Them)
Liz Langley
There's been wide coverage of a study showing that man-masturbation prevents prostate cancer. But before you take your hotdog in hand (if you happen to be of the schlong persuasion), let's expand the conversation and declare: hot sex is good for humans.
Heart
There, I've said it. But looking around, I'm certainly not the only one saying it. In fact, the bigwigs at Forbes Magazine -- premiere reading for the wealthy and their admirers -- devoted pages and pages to the benefits of sex. Among other treats, they relate that in a 2001 study at Queen's University (Belfast), higher rates of bonking produced half the risk of heart attack and stroke.
A parallel German study at the University of Tubingen reinforced the belief that the quantity of sex directly impacted on both blood pressure and heart strength in the 51 men they followed. Quantity seems to bring a particular glow to men, whereas some researchers, such as Dr. Gina Ogden, find that for women it's all about quality.
Weight
Women and men alike enjoy assuming that active ardor leads to a slender silhouette -- and they're not half wrong, as long as you do plenty of it. There's wide agreement that you can burn at least 150 calories in an average session (of course "average" is here an elastic concept), which is equal to a game of squash or a quarter-of-an-hour on the treadmill. Strangely enough, that same Forbes article insists that:
"British researchers have determined that the equivalent of six Big Macs can be worked off by having sex three times a week for a year."The Brits have got to get their cuisine together.
"They found those who had ejaculated the most between the ages of 20 and 50 were the least likely to develop the cancer ... Men who ejaculated more than five times a week were a third less likely to develop prostate cancer later in life."Screwing isn't as efficacious as the one-hand cuddle because of the diseases one can pick up (raising the statistical vulnerability to cancer). Apparently, cumming helps rinse away any little nasties that are nestling into the balls, according to this "prostatic stagnation hypothesis."
See more stories tagged with: sex, health, weight, heart, prostate
Sue Katz has published journalism on the three continents where she has lived; her topics range from Middle East peace movements to the impact of ageing on sexuality. Visit her blog at www.suekatz.com
Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Sex and Relationships! Sign up now »
You've chosen to turn comments off for the entire site. Would you like to turn them back on?
Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.
Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.