Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Sex and Relationships

Settle, or Else

By Melissa Lafsky, Huffington Post. Posted April 18, 2008.


Just what we need -- another alarmist book telling women to settle for bad relationships.
Advertisement

A month ago, I woke up feeling peaceful for the first time in months. I'm 29, I had just closed on my first apartment, and I was leaving a five-year relationship that, despite my dogged hopes of marriage, had become a stew pot of resentment and anger. While scores of articles eagerly inform me that unmarried men are now as scarce as a renewable energy source, I've stubbornly refused to write the last five years off as a colossal failure. Instead, I've been throwing all my energy toward taking responsibility for my part in the relationship, learning what I can from it, and moving on with life.

Then, like every other white-collar woman north of the equator, I read this. At first, I laughed it off. It was assumptive. It was illogical. It was judgmental. It reeked of the "It is INEVITABLE that all women feel this way, and if they don't think they do then they're just in DENIAL!" school of social theory -- never much of a recipe for enlightenment, for yourself or anyone else. So I shrugged, chocked the piece up to yet another woman existentially disappointed by men, and went back to my inner harmony.

Like many (not all) women around my age, I want the full package -- a husband, children, a life that's multidimensionally fulfilled, but centered around more than my own needs and ambitions. It's a strange time to be female, in an era where women are labeled selfish if they decide not to procreate, but tarred and feathered if they do it too much. I don't proclaim to know if the Malthusians are right -- all I know is that, as a female in possession of a working uterus, I don't have a clearer desire for my time on this planet other than to produce offspring. As a child of divorced Boomers, I have no illusions about marriage, but I consider it a gamble worth taking. In short, I want what every human being wants: happiness, in the brand and packaging of my choice.

But a few days later, my hard-earned harmony was gone, replaced by something new: Gottlieb, the new voice of late-thirties angst, preaching in the back of my head. "Settle now, or you'll wind up alone!" Her words had crept into my subconscious, blending all my fears and anxieties into a constant mosquito whine of self-doubt. Would I ever find someone as near-perfect as the man I'd just left? Had I blown whatever miniscule chance I had at happiness? "What makes you think you know better than her?" my inner dialogue ranted. "What makes you think you deserve better?"

Within a week, this 5,500 word tome of regret and resignation, from which book and movie deals have sprung, had fixed itself a permanent spot in my head. It's there, in every phone conversation with my ex, in every attempt at a date, the first thing I hear every morning when I wake up in my new bedroom, alone. All those nagging anxieties now have a champion, a single crystallized voice intent on plotting a future for me based on fear. My power and self-assurance have a new enemy, and it's being adapted for film by Tobey Maguire.

Logically, I know it's all smoke and mirrors. Gottlieb's sentence on my life is not The Truth. It is the interpretation of a late thirties woman who is apparently unhappy with the way things turned out for her. It is a hopeless bastardization of the fact that no man or woman is some fantasy version of perfection, and the choice to be in a committed relationship is just that -- a choice made every day, regardless of faults, foibles, or annoying idiosyncracies. The Truth is that I've known bliss with another person. I've watched it fall apart, but I'd do it all again in a heartbeat. And I know that I'll have the opportunity.

So honestly? Screw you, Lori Gottlieb. Screw you for exploiting my deepest fears for a piece you knew would clang the inflammatory gong. Screw you for cashing in after injecting me with your own regret and disappointment. I know of you only what I read in online bios, but I do know that you made your own choices in life, and have no right to dictate mine. And so, I hereby exorcise your past from my future. I may end up wizened and alone; I may not. But either way, it won't be because you decreed that my fate as a woman was "Settle, or Else."

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: lori gottlieb, marriage, women, gender, sexism, children

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Sex and Relationships! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
huh?
Posted by: 23skidoo on Apr 18, 2008 11:32 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why is Alternet posting rambling diary entries?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'm glad I'm not the only one
Posted by: AmyWW on Apr 18, 2008 12:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I couldn't believe it when I read that article. I'm so glad somebody else read it and felt the same way.

I couldn't understand why, instead of settling, the author and her single-mom friend didn't set up house together. Co-parent both kids and make life a little easier.

So much healthier than 'settling,' marrying some guy you're not crazy about because childcare is easier when you're divorced than if you're a single parent.

It was such an odd article.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Unwise choices
Posted by: leerhok on Apr 18, 2008 10:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Both sexes have a tendency to mate the wrong person. The plain simple nest-building girl on low heels and with only a modest part of the chemistry factory produce on her face doesn't stand a chance. Neither does the honest hardworking, home-loving, non-smoking and non-drinking guy.

And female instinct includes an urge to participate in building/exploding the demographic bomb in an age where every unborn baby is a blessing and every born one a threat to global ecology and hence to the survival of life itself on the planet.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» female instinct Posted by: e rice
» RE: female instinct Posted by: Spot
wizened and alone
Posted by: e rice on Apr 18, 2008 10:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
if you live long enough, you will end up wizened, whether you're alone or not.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Susan B. Anthony on marriage
Posted by: Zenobia on Apr 19, 2008 9:53 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It astounds me that young women today are so much more conservative than feminists of years past, but think they are so progressive.

Susan B. Anthony said,

“When I was young, if a girl married poverty, she became a DRUDGE; if she married wealth, she became a DOLL. Had I married at twenty-one, I would have been either a drudge or a doll for fifty-five years. Think of it!”

Has anything really changed that much? We have more women in the work force (though lots of women worked outside the home in Anthony's day in factories and mills and stores, and the home/farm was also a sphere of economic production). We clearly have more legal rights (though some hang by a thread). In terms of relationships and sexual double standards, though, things have barely budged, as we see in the gross misogyny of so many Alternet posts.

In mainstream, average American households, today's married woman still does more housework if the family is too poor to hire someone to do it. Still drudges.

Middle class and upper-middle class women are dolls even MORE than in the 1950s, getting plastic surgery in droves, even pathologizing the natural changes to the female body that occur from pregnancy with "mommy makeovers." Yikes! Suburban wives still spend countless dollars to smear toxic chemicals on their faces to "look good" for their husbands, feeling like they are in constant competition with all the media images and strip clubs whereby husband is offered t&a on a plate at every turn. (Women, on the other hand, are offered only a miniscule fraction of similar meat in the male form.)

Progressive young couples all seem to say THEIR marriage is going to be different. And then they find just how hard it is to swim against the current. I am not saying it cannot be done. I have seen some examples. Mostly, though, I see couples gradually, gradually falling back to 1950s patterns--especially when they have kids--because this is how the culture is still set up around them and it gets tiring try to fight it.

Maybe this will be the generation to change that. They will make it more mainstream to be stay-at-home-dads or practice 50/50 parenting and 50/50 bread winning. They will get on-site childcare at their work places andl acquire equal pay for equal work so that the woman doesn't become the one to stay home with kids by economic default.

Of course, that also requires getting more women in high paid fields like tech and engineering, and getting the culture to recognize higher economic value for so-called "feminine" (nurturing) fields like teaching and counseling. HA! Yeah, right! So far this generation has been more focused on proving how "empowered" they are by flashing their boobs and swinging around stripper poles to even consider such equity. The number of women in computer science has actually fallen WAY DOWN this generation. I guess it gets hard to focus on all that math when you are groggy from plastic surgery anesthesia. Today's pop "feminism" is not a "third wave," IT IS ***REPUBLICANISM.*** --1950s gender roles re-marketed, stirred together with a fixation on the individual (self-"empowerment") over the collective (equality).

So power to this young woman author for wanting to be true to both her heart and her reason. Power to her for being able to sand strong and give a raspberry to a sexist diatribe about needing to settle. But if you don't find that perfect match right away or ever, then pride yourself on avoiding the pitfall of becoming a drudge or a doll. And remember, it was early feminists--Victorians even--who were advocates for free love and AGAINST the trappings of marriage.

My grandmother gave me two invaluable pieces of advice when I was a girl: 1) Never depend on a man for your happiness. You have to find it in yourself. 2) You are never too old to go sled riding.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You read beautiful...
Posted by: Spot on Apr 19, 2008 10:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
let me buy you a drink?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hmmmm....
Posted by: talkville on Apr 20, 2008 6:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Points for personal honesty. Points for perserverance and steadfastedness and focus. Points for assertiveness and individual striving. Points for that "can do" attitude and fortitude, for reaching for that 'brass ring' and getting what one wants.

However,:

"In short, I want what every human being wants: happiness, in the brand and packaging of my choice."

Minus points for utter superficiality. At least SOME human beings want and seek at least one other goal: perhaps Truth, or Understanding. A quick little bit of reflection might demonstrate that these two Goals will rapidly come into direct conflict with the search for "Happiness", however that meaning is taken.

Choice, branding and packaging are not so simple as all that. What this writer seems to want is: what she wants. The work is in getting it, the conditions necessary for getting it and the means of keeping those conditions in place for getting it. That's a little messier, especially in a society such as this one.

And just WHO is saying "No!"?

For myself, I'd rather set aside a litte happiness (sometimes a whole lot!) in order to look for the truth and understand that question a little more. Perhaps then it may be a little more possible and probable to reach that other goal and have a bit of 'happiness' as a welcome side-effect.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Marriage is overrated
Posted by: ronaldravin on Apr 20, 2008 2:13 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Marriage is an anachronism. Who invented its current form? The Church. What was the most infamously corrupt organization for the longest time in history? That's right, the Church. The difference now is that starting with Henry VIII, the State gradually took over its role.

There is no longer any logical case for the institution of marriage, if for no other reason than the ease of divorce. Throughout history, and still today by various groups, its been used as a tool to keep an eye on and control the sexuality of the population. (Seen in their opposition to gay marriage. They are still yet among us, in our bedrooms.) The only case now is some absurd fantasy about marrying your Prince Charming, and various State benefits, that in my opinion should not exist as the State should treat everyone as individuals not Single/Married/Divorced. (Since once you've been married, you can never go back, only to the Divorced category, it's like joining the military, once you join they've got you for life.) In the age of DNA testing it's not as if there is any such thing as an illegitimate child. Why willingly bind yourself in the chains of the State and another person that probably won't like you in 5 years? Some sense of false security? Is that really worth it?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sad...
Posted by: Smartcookie on Apr 22, 2008 8:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have no idea why you are ranting, ms gotlieb's article is one of MATURITY. She didn't say it in the best of terms but she understood the law of diminishing returns, no matter HOW PERFECT something appears to be, doesn't mean your feelings will last.

Feelings are so ephemeral, it's like the stock market, you can have a good run for so many years and then have it just sink like a rock.

"The one" is a myth, there are many ones, many people you are compatable with. I don't think she's saying "be unhappy" rather, she's mourning the fact that she didn't do it earlier in her life.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's not "settling," it's pulling your head out
Posted by: janvdb on Apr 24, 2008 4:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some women, without waiting, pull down Mr Perfect. That's probably got something to the fact that they are Ms Perfects.

And then, some women, without waiting, hook up with someone about as flawed as themselves and get on with it.

(And then there are those who don't particularly want children or marriage, but let's leave that demographic out of the discussion for a moment.)

Then, there are all those (mostly male) types who just persist on insisting that it is only ramdom chance which has handed them flawed partners so far, that merely HOLDING OUT will surely mean that the quality of mate they can command will, at last, conform to their fantasies of "what they deserve."

Ha.

You know, Lori Gottlieb, those guys you dismiss as tweebs, nerds, and so on -- those are the kinds of guys YOU CAN COMMAND. For some reason. Like, whatever, but probably because you are a lot LIKE them, only female.

Live with it.

For some women, yeah, being with that tweeb would be settling. But for YOU, well, it's just being reasonable for once.

It's not settling, it's getting over your narcissistic overestimation of yourself and what sort of mate is going to actually want you. Get over yourself, mate like with like and move on.

And spare us the sexist spin on the whole thing -- I know attacking women will get you published in The Atlantic, book deals and so on but that doesn't make it right.

This goes double for men. Men are far worse about this behavior than women, IMHO.

Jan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

So this is 2008?
Posted by: tesscano on Apr 24, 2008 12:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm 52 (this Oct.) and was warned of this fate when I became sexually active. I'm happy to say that while it took me until I was 48 to get married, he was worth the wait. Not like I wasn't asked, but even I knew those wouldn't last. I am a grandmother by marriage & while the darlings are a blast, it's nice when they go home too! It's tragic that the same old myths of being alone are still thrown on impressionable women. I was once told, "If you hold out for the best, you'll get it". That's a much better belief than the former. Besides, who wants to be around someone who's a downer?!!!

Bottom line is if you have lived awhile alone, cherish that time instead of pining away for some fantasy. Fill it up with being creative/helping others/reaching out to your family/building a career. Life is too short to sit around & contemplate your naval! I met my husband when I was a teenager, never dated & we re-met 28 years later. Would we have been "perfect" then if we hooked up? I doubt it, we both had to go thru life to appreciate each other, and folks, if you don't have a partner that is faithful & worships you, don't bother until you do!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]