Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Sex and Relationships

What the Humble Fruit Fly Can Teach Us About Sex

By Greta Christina, Greta Christina's Blog. Posted April 17, 2008.


Research that traces bisexuality in fruit flies to a genetic variation challenges assumptions about sexual attraction.
Advertisement

This piece was originally published on the Blowfish Blog.

I love science.

From the vaunted Pharyngula science blog comes this hilarious and enlightening news of mutant bisexual fruit flies.

(As they say on Mythbusters: "Warning: Science Content." Lots of it, if you read the whole linked story.)

The gist, in case you don't feel like reading all the darned neuroscience: In a particular species of fly, there is an occasional genetic variation -- I'm trying not to call it a mutation, that's such a judgmental word -- that causes them to behave bisexually. It causes some females to try to initiate sex with other females; it causes some males to wait for other males to initiate courtship; and it causes some males to attempt, equally, to initiate courtship with both females and males.

They will, to be blunt, fuck anything that flies.

And researchers haven't just identified the existence of the mutation -- excuse me, the variation. They haven't just identified the gene that causes it, even. They've identified the specific neurological mechanism.

(Hence the science content.)

Now, PZ Myers, Pharyngula blogger of song and story, warns that we shouldn't jump to conclusions about what this might mean for human sexuality. And I think he's right to do so. Human beings are rather more complex than fruit flies. And our sexuality is, to put it mildly, a lot more complex. Fruit flies don't, for instance, get hot for spanking, for latex, for women in seamed stockings, for men in seamed stockings, for bits and saddles, for stuffed animals, for cartoon characters, for curly-haired brunettes who look like Bette Davis.

So the fact that sexual orientation is genetically determined in fruit flies doesn't prove, even a little bit, that it's genetically determined in humans.

But it does tell us something about humans, and human sexuality.

It doesn't tell us that our sexual orientation is genetically determined, or even genetically influenced.

But it tells us that it might be.

It tells us that it's not ridiculous to consider the possibility.

It tells us that, at least in some animals, a tendency towards heterosexuality or bisexuality -- and arguably homosexuality, if you think about those male flies waiting coyly for the other male flies to make the first move -- is genetically determined. Entirely, as far as anyone can tell. And therefore, it tells us that it's not out of the question to think that it might be genetically determined -- at least partially -- in other animals as well.

Including humans.

And this is an important message: not just for the homophobic right wing, but for the queer-theory crowd as well.

There are queer theorists and activists who would be delighted to learn that sexual orientation is genetically determined at birth. For no other reason, they think it makes the civil rights battle easier to fight if they can play the "We were born this way" card. There are queer theorists and activists who think, not only that we might be born queer, but that we definitely are, and that the case is closed.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: culture, genes, sexuality, patriarchy, nature vs. nurture, queer theory

Read more of Greta Christina at her blog.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Sex and Relationships! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
pinch me
Posted by: pfeifer999 on Apr 17, 2008 5:21 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I must be dreaming.

And feel free to pinch me whether you're gay, straight, bi, unsure, modulating, m2f, or f2m.

Feel free to pinch me even if you're a fruit fly.

I must be dreaming.

Is this a story that talks about the intersection of sex and morality and doesn't include the word "repressive" or "misogynistic"?

Could this be a story that talks about science and morality and suggests that we should be concerned with . . . . the truth?

And pinch me again . . . it actually does all of the above with a sense of humor!?!

I'm starting to get aroused thinking about sexually aroused fruit flies pinching me.

So I'll just say: thank you. What a great piece.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And what about the critique of science (not creationism but Kuhn)
Posted by: doraroja on Apr 17, 2008 10:52 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It seems to me that a huge part of the notion of constructivism is born out of an understanding that science itself is limited by human interpretive methods and how experiments get cast. Constructivism is born from an extremely productive moment in the questioning of the social power of science and its truth making mechanisms. This is particularly true for the study of species behavioral patterns. (See for example biologist Donna Haraway's Simians, Cyborgs, Women.)

The problem is that currently mainstream thought is controlled by the opposition between the religious production of truth and the scientific construction of it. It now appears very left to combat fundamentalism with rationalistic science. (It's unfortunate that science has a history of monopolizing the concept of rationality.) In contrast, constructivist theory uses science against itself. It forges an approach that accepts neither doctrine, but understands instead that experiments which may appear unquestionably true during one era, may be easily disproven under different political and social conditions, with different ingrained knowledges or funded by different institutions.

So, yes, I'm sticking with my constructivism.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

about bi sexuality--Turning Heterosexuality On and Off
Posted by: brucerise on Apr 18, 2008 1:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don’t see why anyone’s sexual orientation should be the government’s business, and I also don’t see why anyone’s decision to change sexual orientation — from straight to gay, or vice versa — should be the government
’s business either. I can understand why some readers are concerned about what might be done should this new technology ever become available. But when it comes to figuring out how to use it sensibly, I put a lot more trust
in individuals making decisions for themselves than I do in any committee in Washington.
bisexual http://findbilover.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

won't change the private hell many have gone/will go through
Posted by: KaptainSpiffy on Apr 18, 2008 4:43 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
in times of plenty gangs allow strangers peace along the fringes of their societies. the times of plenty are almost gone.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]