Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Sex and Relationships

Lust in Translation: Which Country Has the Highest Rates of Infidelity?

By Pamela Druckerman, Penguin Books. Posted April 2, 2008.


Infidelity is universal. But which country boasts the most cheaters?
Advertisement

The following is an excerpt from "Lust in Translation: Infidelity from Tokyo to Tennessee" (Penguin Books, 2007) by Pamela Druckerman.

The morning after François Mitterrand's funeral, a photo showed the late president's mistress and illegitimate daughter standing by his grave alongside his wife and sons. That tableau has become famous internationally as proof that the French are uniquely tolerant of extramarital affairs.

In fact, although French presidents seem to have an infidelity record approaching 100 per cent, ordinary Frenchmen claim to be quite faithful. In a 2004 national survey, just 3.8 per cent of married men and 2 per cent of women said they had had more than one sex partner in the past year (the best approximation of infidelity) -- fewer than in similar surveys in the U.S. and the U.K.

If France isn't the world capital of adultery, which country is? I set off around the world to find out.

I quickly discovered that global sex research is patchy and incomplete. Even serious researchers can't even agree on what to call infidelity. Nigerians prefer the term "sexual networking." The Finns use the morally neutral term "parallel relationships." A French team uses an expression perhaps better suited for an accounting course: "simultaneous multi-partnerships."

Then there's the tricky matter of what constitutes cheating. A poll in one South African magazine had separate categories for men who cheat, and men who cheat "while drunk." One American survey defined sex as "either vaginal or anal intercourse," while another decided that sex is a "mutually voluntary activity with another person that involves genital contact and sexual excitement or arousal, that is, feeling really turned on, even if intercourse or orgasm did not occur." Americans haven't yet tried to count their so-called "emotional affairs," in which the "cheaters" might never meet.

Many countries simply have no reliable sex statistics. National surveys are expensive, and many governments are either too prudish or too poor to help pay for them (private funding is seldom sufficient). America's first representative national survey only got off the ground in the 1990s, after conservative members of Congress spent years trying to block it. Hints of Japan's infidelity levels come only from the enormous size of the country's paid-sex industry, which is famously frequented by married businessmen. A legal loophole permits a man and a woman to strike a private agreement for sex. Understandably, the state would rather not be confronted with the details.

In Russia, just talking about sex research can be hazardous. Soviet governments barely permitted any public discussion of sex, let alone a survey that might embarrass the government by showing that Russians were engaging in banned activities like extramarital affairs. And though the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991, Russia's Orthodox church keeps the current government from funding practically anything related to sex.

"There were never and will not be in the foreseeable future national surveys," said Igor Kon, a septuagenarian who's Russia's most prominent sexologist. When I visited him in Moscow, Kon showed me the pamphlet in which a group of Russian academics denounced him as a "danger to the Russian society and state" because of his calls for basic sex education and research. Earlier, hoodlums had attacked him while he delivered a lecture at Moscow University, and vandals defaced the door to his apartment. Kon was bothered least when he got a phone call threatening to bomb his apartment, since if the caller was serious Kon would already be dead. "To kill someone in Moscow is not a big problem," he explained.

Despite the lack of hard data, in Russia and elsewhere there are facts on the ground. In Moscow, women in their forties told me that, by necessity, they only date married men. That's because, since the life expectancy for Russian men has fallen so sharply (to 59) that by age 65 there are just 46 men left for every 100 women.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: marriage, relationships, cheating, infidelity, sex research

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Sex and Relationships! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Thank you! Thank you! Your research tells the truth
Posted by: Bobsays on Apr 3, 2008 1:01 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
On why HIV/AIDS is endemic in Africa: getting busy. People would claim it was racist to make this observation, but the facts on the ground prove it is the case. Medical officials have known this for years, but many have skirted around the issue.

Now, maybe a sensible AIDS strategy can encompase serious lifestyle componants and promote stable relationships.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Hear, hear! Posted by: Robert_Hoogenboom@leftfoot.com.au
It's Not "Cheating" If Your Spouse Approves
Posted by: terradea42 on Apr 3, 2008 5:48 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Cheating? Only religious people, uneducated people, liars or politicians do it. Everyone else engages in open, recreational sexual activity with the full knowledge and approval of their spouse.

Think about it. If one thinks sex (in any form) with someone other than one's spouse is cheating, then that person either allows religious doctrine to define marriage, or they are living with the "that's how I was raised" way of thinking, or they promised they wouldn't out of a sense of duty that they didn't really feel. Politicians, on the other hand, may "cheat" if they have sex with someone other than their spouses but, rather than being based on their sexual activity, their cheating is in the form of broken campaign promises built on a platform of religious "morality."

Defining sex with multiple people while married as "cheating" is merely a lazy way of trying to describe the changes in a society's sexual attitudes. There are too many variables to really get it away with it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» The author concedes that point Posted by: MartianBachelor
TO Bobsays
Posted by: Squarehead on Apr 3, 2008 6:18 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I suggest that a reasonable analysis of HIV infection, includes

1. The likely origin was of a mutant Simian virus, in perhaps Botswana, which used to have (~10 years ago) one of the highest rates of infection in Africa. That this event happened in the early 1940s. The passage of time has lead to the infection pattern noted

2. The social behavior noted may be common in sub-Saharan Africa, but is hardly exclusive to that place or people

3. The Cubans noted, at the time of an infection of pigs with a HIV like virus, that this infection, common in Africa, was the first recorded event in the Americas. They stated their belief that they were the subject of US agency attack, using aircraft to seed the organisms. This was I think, 1980 or 1981

4. A British researcher noted the synchronicity in time of the Cuban pig disease (all animals were slaughtered) and Human Immunovirus infection in Haiti, which is, I think, less than 50 miles from Cuba.

5. Other researchers have noted the prevalence in early stage of the epidemic of infection among the Haitian community in New York (both sexes) and the male homosexual community in New York and San Francisco

6. The general promiscuity (at that time) of that homosexual community certainly led to increased rates of infection

7. The combination of all these facts does lead to suspicion (at least) of US government and a sort of biological un-intended consequence from economic war on Cuba

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» love the concept Posted by: Squarehead
» TO Squarehead Posted by: wal55
» RE: TO Squarehead Posted by: Squarehead
» RE: TO Squarehead Posted by: wal55
» RE: TO Squarehead Posted by: Squarehead
» Connecting the dots -- wrong. Posted by: BenCaxton12
Sex and Food
Posted by: Gravitas on Apr 3, 2008 8:51 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our obsession with sex and food keep us distracted from politics and in perpetual guilt so we are all tham much more easily manipulated!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Sex and Food Posted by: MartianBachelor
» RE: Sex and Food Posted by: Ignatz deFyre
» RE: Sex and Food Posted by: morticia
» RE: Sex and Food Posted by: morticia
thanks for the reminders that religions are sex obsessing fairy tales
Posted by: counterpoint on Apr 3, 2008 10:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm glad the author mentioned the opposition of churches (eg the Russian Orthodox church) against anything that has to do with sex. How long will it take for humans to comprehend that religions make up bullshit about the way things ought to be, and do so with tremendous negative impact on our lives. Oftentimes, church policies can be traced back to one influential guy with a sexual obsession who then claimed god's will accordingly. It's arbitrary philosophies, with a random chance of being on the mark.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sexual inequity in connectivity
Posted by: jearls on Apr 3, 2008 10:43 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is a lot of research into the general structure of sexual networks. In the countries where there are sufficient data (Sweden, USA, Uganda and a few more) the pattern is much the same: a few people are very well connected while many are poorly connected (or "monogamous"). Here are just 2 articles you might find interesting.

"An Assessment of Preferential Attachment as a
Mechanism for Human Sexual Network Formation"
James Holland Jones,Mark S. Handcock,
in Proc. Royal Soc. 2003, 270, 1123-1128.

"Distributions of number of sexual partnerships have power law decaying tails and finite variance"
Fredrik Liljeros, Christofer R. Edling, H. Eugene Stanley, Y. Åberg, and Luís A. Nunes Amaral. Find it online.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Research??
Posted by: gellero1 on Apr 3, 2008 1:39 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of course the 'government' really doesn't pay for this kind of 'research'. It's the TAXPAYERS who foot the bill.

A study of this sort is just a form of CORPORATE WELFARE for ACADEMIA.........

Something AlterNeters are always very much against !!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: esearch?? Posted by: kiel
a book on "Cheating" ????
Posted by: Tahlavi on Apr 3, 2008 2:47 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can't believe anyone would even buy a book on this subject.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

gathaiga
Posted by: gathaiga on Apr 3, 2008 4:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some weird names for what is basically "screwing around"(cheating) on your spouse.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Completely bananas!
Posted by: wireup on Apr 3, 2008 4:38 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
WHY, then, marry?

If you want to screw around, by all means do so, BUT why marry and bring misery into the marriage?

This simply makes no sense to me!

Stay single!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]