Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Sex and Relationships

What's Wrong with Staying Single?

By Bella M. DePaulo, American Sexuality Magazine. Posted February 18, 2008.


The significance of getting married has changed dramatically in recent decades. When will our views of single people catch up?
Advertisement

I'm fifty-four years old and I have always been single. I love my single life. But for a long time I rarely said that out loud. I thought I was the only happy single person.

I didn't love everything about my single life. I didn't like that "poor thing" look I'd get when others first learned that I was single. I didn't like their assumption that I must be miserable and lonely and pining for a partner.

There were other things I didn't like that I thought I could pin on my single status, but I wasn't really sure. For example, sometimes at work colleagues with partners would assume that I could cover the tasks that no one else wanted. Maybe they presumed that since I was single, I didn't have a life and so had nothing better to do with my time. Socially, I was invited to lunch with my coupled colleagues during the week but not to their dinner and movie outings over the weekends.

Tentatively at first, I began asking other single people if they thought they were viewed and treated differently than coupled people just because they were single. The responses were overwhelming. It was time to proceed beyond anecdotes.

Years later after I had read hundreds of scientific studies about marital status, happiness, and discrimination, and after I conducted my own program of research, I realized that much of the conventional wisdom about people who are single was either grossly exaggerated or just plain wrong. The place of singles in society and the significance of getting married have changed dramatically over the past decades. But our views of single and married people have not yet caught up. I wrote about this in my book Singled Out: How Singles Are Stereotyped, Stigmatized, and Ignored, and Still Live Happily Ever After. The subtitle captures what I learned about singles. Let me explain.

After collecting stories of singlehood, informally, from hundreds of others, I began conducting systematic research. My colleague Wendy Morris and I first studied perceptions of people who are single and married. We approached this work in a number of ways. In one set of studies, for instance, we created profiles of married and single people that were exactly the same (in terms of the person's age, hometown, interests, employment, and so forth) except for their marital status. In one experiment after another, we found that the single people were viewed more negatively than the married people. For example, they were seen as unhappy, lonely, and self-centered compared to their married counterparts. (The one exception is that single people were consistently viewed as more independent than married people.)

We looked up federal statutes and found more than a thousand instances in which official marriage was linked to federal protections and benefits. We found discrimination against singles in the workplace and the marketplace. We then did research of our own on discrimination and found that realtors (and other people we asked) would prefer to rent to married couples than to single women, single men, unmarried couples, or a pair of friends -- even when they all had equally positive references and ability to pay. They even preferred the married couple to the unmarried couple when the unmarried couple had been together six years, compared to only six months for the married couple.

The story that was taking shape in my mind was becoming clear. Single people are not as happy as married people in part because they are targets of stereotyping and discrimination.

At first I did not doubt that getting married made people happier. I saw indications of that in headlines and book titles. In fact, the assumption had become so much a part of conventional wisdom that some began to build other arguments on that foundation. In an op-ed in The New York Times, for instance, Jonathan Rauch argued that gay men and lesbians should be allowed to marry because social science research shows that marriage makes people happier.

When I set out to study the research on marital status and happiness, I thought I was looking for nuances -- are there some people who benefit from marriage even more than others? I was amazed by what I found.

In the typical study people in different categories are asked to rate their happiness, perhaps on a 1 to 4 scale, with 4 indicating "very happy". The categories usually include people who are single (and always have been), currently married, divorced, or widowed. Here are the results of one such study by Walter R. Gove and Hee-Choon Shin published in 1989; the numbers are the average happiness ratings of 2,200 Americans in the four groups:

3.3 currently married

3.2 single

2.9 divorced

2.9 widowed

The first thing to notice is that all four groups are on the happy end of the scale. They are all closer to calling themselves a 3 in happiness (the scale point that has the label "pretty happy") than to any other label. Second, the differences between the groups are not impressive, and the smallest difference is between those who are currently married and those who have always been single.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: discrimination, marriage, relationships, stereotypes, single

Bella DePaulo is the author of Singled Out: How Singles Are Stereotyped, Stigmatized, and Ignored, and Still Live Happily Ever After. She is a visiting professor of psychology at the University of California, Santa Barbara and a contributor to the Huffington Post. Her op-ed essays have appeared in papers such as The New York Times, The San Francisco Chronicle, and Newsday. Visit her website at www.belladepaulo.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Sex and Relationships! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
It's not that there's anything wrong with being single....
Posted by: Thetorganization on Feb 18, 2008 12:41 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
it just sucks. Big time!

Although this article comes off very well and good, not everyone has a burning desire to be alone for the rest of their lives.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» we're NOT alone Posted by: deborama
» RE: we're NOT alone Posted by: WyrdSister
» Whoa there! Posted by: hagwind
» RE: Whoa there! **TO HAGWIND** Posted by: maribelle
» oh yea? Posted by: abbadon2007
» RE: Whoa there! **TO HAGWIND** Posted by: WyrdSister
» RE: let's clarify, maribelle Posted by: WyrdSister
» Sucks for you, maybe... Posted by: hurricane hugo
» Stop being such a sentimentalist timemachinist Posted by: Democratic Socialist
» In defense of love Posted by: timemachinist
What about Children?
Posted by: aberdeen on Feb 18, 2008 12:52 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
According to the authors of the New Testament and, according to the vast majority of historians, sociologists and similar, marriage is an important and integral factor of societies, other than a few isolated tribal groups. The reasons are many but the most obvious reason is, families theoretically provide children a safe place both emotionally and physically, to relate within and be sheltered from the strained and often scarey from a child's view, demands of society at large.

Of course, many family situations are not ideal but overall, consider the travesty for children in children if there were no family at all. It is both interesting and telling, that many so-called modern "thinkers", such as this author, make no mention of children's happiness, well-being or emotional security, in their haste to afford adults whatever pleasure suits our fancy and let the chips fall where they may.

When one talks about the joys of sex inside and outside of marriage, one needs to consider the ultimate societal consequences, as well as the immediate physical pleasure. That is, if one gives a damn about our children, which apparently such thought has never crossed this author's myopic mind.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What about Children? Posted by: dmaciewski
» RE: What about Children? Posted by: aberdeen
» Selfish is selfish. Posted by: kepstein7777
» RE: Selfish is selfish. Posted by: NoKidding
» RE: What about Children? Posted by: hagwind
» RE: What about Children? Posted by: chrysalis124812
» RE: What about Children? Posted by: goeswithness
» RE: What about Children? Posted by: marilee
» RE: What about Children? Posted by: aberdeen
» RE: What about the Chinese Children? Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
» RE: What about Children? Posted by: lefty010
» RE: What about Children? Posted by: kabac55
» Community... Posted by: buffeliscious
» RE: What about Children? Posted by: aberdeen
» RE: What about Children? Posted by: aberdeen
» RE: What about Children? Posted by: left_libertarian
It's not so much that marriage is causing happiness...
Posted by: sabrinamorgan on Feb 18, 2008 1:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It looks to me like the German study indicates that the people who wound up getting married tended to be slightly happier overall to begin with, before marriage.

Which makes sense - long-term relationships, let alone marriage, are hell on pessimists, whereas it's easier to attract good relationship material when you display a positive outlook (at least, judging from some of the interestingly damaged people I attracted in my Goth days...).

It also makes sense that those who are happy when single will be happy when (or if) married.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Married or single?
Posted by: RobNLA on Feb 18, 2008 1:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'd say the grass is greener on the other side. Many singles would love to be in a good marriage. Many married people would feel trapped in a bad or boring marriage and wish they were single again.
Like this article says: if you were miserable as a single, marriage won't fix that...you'll just make your spouse miserable too. And if you are a happy person single, then if you get married wisely, you'll likely end up still happy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Breakthrough
Posted by: socialpsych on Feb 18, 2008 4:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've read Dr. DePaulo's book and as a single person and fellow social psychologist I was thrilled that she has broken through the mythology about singledom--and about marriage. Single people can take comfort in the confirmation that, yes, we really are discriminated against by businesses and government, and, yes, married people really do look down on us and treat us like pathetic losers. Her message that single people do not have to put up with that baloney is liberating. Unfortunately, it is also extremely threatening to many married people. How about another book exploring why that is, Bella?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Skeptical
Posted by: raymondg on Feb 18, 2008 4:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm 47 and I've been single almost all of my adult life. I believe much of what the author says about living the single life, but I think that her comments lack nuance. The studies she cites need to be disaggregated in a number of ways. Gender: There might be a significant difference between how women feel and how men feel. SES: Wealthier single people may feel happier than poorer single people. Culture: Depending on cultural background, some people may feel more social pressure to couple up than people from other cultural backgrounds. Geography: The same can be said for where one lives. Singles in large metropolitan areas may have a very different take of single-hood than their suburban or rural counterparts. Age: Younger singles may not worry as much about being alone as their counterparts who are older. Experience: Singles who have had bad experiences with coupledom may have grown to greatly appreciate being single in a way that singles who have not had such experiences can possibly understand.

Finally, we cannot discount that people are likely to rate themselves happier than they actually feel; this is especially true if they feel there is not much they can do about their current situation.

As someone who has been single for most of his adult life, I know there are periods when I want to do cartwheels because I don't have the attachments that come with a committed relationship. Then, there are those periods when I want to slit my wrists precisely for the same reasons. We live in a society that is obsessed with people "hooking up," so much so that to be single is in some ways an act of rebellion. But, rebellion can be liberating and exhausting all at once.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Malvina Reynolds sang it a long time ago
Posted by: hagwind on Feb 18, 2008 4:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From Malvina's song "We Don't Need the Men":
It says in Coronet Magazine,
June nineteen fifty-six, page ten,
That married women are not as happy
As women who have no men.
Married women are cranky,
Frustrated and disgusted,
While single women are bright and gay,
Creative and well adjusted.


Full lyrics here. When Malvina wrote the song, "gay" didn't have quite the double meaning that it does today, but hey, it works for me. ;-)

Maybe the situation has changed, but well into the 1970s most studies I saw suggested that single women were happier than married women, and married men were happier than single men. I figure this has something to do with the fondness that patriarchal religions have for the institution of marriage.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I think MEN are happier being married... Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
» To each their own Posted by: sanddollar
Save the Cool Aunts
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Feb 18, 2008 4:56 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't give into the pressure, man! Big Brother wants us to produce drones to buy his stuff and fight his wars. As progressives, it's our duty to drain the swamp. Give your spouse her half and wish her well. She was going to spend more than half anyway, right?

As for the old maid thing, how many cool single aunts are out there? I've met a few. And they seem happier and less stressed than the rest of us, don't they?...They take your kids to the zoo when you can't stand another minute of them. They're your daughter's buddy when she broke up with her boyfriend. They'll listen to your troubles when your parents don't understand you, which is most of the time. What would we do without them?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Save the Cool Aunts Posted by: MyLeftFoot
» RE: Save the Cool Aunts Posted by: seenaymah
» RE: Save the Cool Aunts Posted by: hagwind
» RE: Save the Cool Aunts Posted by: lianne
» RE: Save the Cool Aunts Posted by: mr. joshua
What's wrong with staying single?
Posted by: donl51 on Feb 18, 2008 5:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
NOT A GODDAMN THING!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It is
Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line on Feb 18, 2008 5:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All how you look at it. I am currently unattached. That said, though I have a few options that are available to me....This does make being single more interesting. For a while I really did not like being single and felt all alone, and felt unloved. The truth of the matter is that in order to have a fulfilling adult relationship you need to love yourself unconditionally. At that point you will know how to love someone else unconditionally. All other relationships other than unconditional love turn into someone trying to change you because they do not like something about themselves.
Does single life suck? It can if you let it. But considering what I did this weekend I can truly say it does not. I hung out and shared meals with friends and had really in depth conversations as well as an amazing day of skiing. Obviously not every weekend is like this, but I did not have to answer to anyones needs or desires. Certainly I would love to have shared it with that special someone. She will come along when the time is right.Until that point I am grateful for the time I can enjoy with my self and my incredible friends.
I am all for marriage and kids etc because I think that raising children properly is the most important thing we can do as humans. Sharing time with others in a healthy relationship is about the most special thing that we do. But in order to be able to have that magic in your life it is highly important to enjoy your single life to the fullest first.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It is Posted by: cyclopsina
Small capsules
Posted by: zeofredo on Feb 18, 2008 5:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hard to place people on a happiness index decisively if one only allows a few criteria to base it on. But I concur with this data as I'm someone who by nature tends to be happier alone than with someone else.

If we look at our usual lifestyles in the West, we find that the nuclear family model: the couple-- plus kids-- is the only 'accepted' way to be. There are few instances of multi-generation households now... spouses rarely get to spend long periods of time away from their families (not including business trips for the executive elite), and large networks of friends are short-lived at best, usually terminating in one's late-20's.

Because of this, we actually have a pretty constricted arrangement that places a lot of emotional burden and social comfort exclusively on one's partner. It's a lot of work to have a happy home life... my married friends tell me all the time about 'give and take... mostly give!', and I hear laments about how old friendships have died out and the family seems to occupy all the time left over from an already-considerable work week.

For me, happiness ought to be sourced out from many directions (no, I'm NOT a promiscuous SOB!), and community and friends celebrated just as much as the personal love relationship is.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

An excellent change in perspective...
Posted by: craigandrew on Feb 18, 2008 7:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think that the future will show that a healthy society needs happily single people. If we can strip away all of the pomp and circumstance of religion and look at the institutional structure of the Roman Catholic Church we will see that the institution benefits from the fact that their leaders cannot have children or own property; no nepotism or outside corruption. (That would be nice right about now in our government, no?)

Coincidentally, I had blogged on such things more elaborately last week: An Inverted Beehive Part One and Part Two.

Have fun,
A happily single person.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Back in the day... Posted by: BlueTigress
I Made a Conscious Choice to Remain Unmarried
Posted by: Libertine on Feb 18, 2008 7:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'll preface my comment by noting that I've read Dr DePaulo's book and I agree with most of her points.

Barring one brief, misadvised marriage in my early 20s, I've been legally single most of my adult life. I have made a conscious choice to remain so for two major reasons.

First and most relevant in my situation, I'm a decidedly non-monogamous heterosexual and I have no desire to be anything different. I prefer having several friends with benefits and the freedom to have occasional one-night stands, rather than limiting myself to one woman. I greatly value my freedom and the privacy that comes from living alone and not living in a 24/7 domestic situation with any one woman -- I like to come and go as I please.

To me, being married is "mating in captivity" and I know that I would be miserable trying to limit myself to one woman -- and would no doubt be unable to do so for any extended period of time.

But because I'm honest, I decided to remain legally single and stay true to my own nature, rather than trying to force myself into the ill-fitting niche of marriage as it is currently defined, and inevitably becoming a "cheater".

The second reason that I object to legal marriage is a philosophical one. I don't think the government has any business defining what a legitimate intimate relationship is between consenting adults, nor should it regulate any such relationships. And I think it's inappropriate for the government to promote any one type of relationship among consenting adults above all others. I also find offensive the notion of having to get a legal license for a private, intimate relationship and registering that relationship with the government in the same way one gets a license to drive and registers their car.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bru
Posted by: Bru on Feb 18, 2008 7:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I did not see any reference to aging and happiness in this article. Most of the people I know ( married and single) have mellowed a lot as they aged and have made their peace with lots of things that used to bring unhappiness. Peace MAY equal happiness.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

happiness-singleness-poverty-children
Posted by: billwald on Feb 18, 2008 8:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are studies that claim people on poor nations are happier than those in rich nations, that single women with children are on the bottom of the economic scale. (The latter seems a given.) A meta study combining all three factors - marriage status, poverty numbers, and children would be interesting.

The essay mentions but doesn't address long term effects of shack ups. It is easier to split the sheets when married.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Togetherness
Posted by: willymack on Feb 18, 2008 8:35 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
About 74,000 years ago, Mt. Toba in Indonesia blew up and spewed so much particulate matter into the atmosphere that mankind was reduced to a few thousand members. We came close to extinction that time and didn't even have a polluting "civilization" to help it along. We're ALL descended from those few thousand survivors as evidenced by an exahustive study of mitochondrial DNA, passed down only through women. No wonder creation myths abound and exhort us to be "fruitful and multiply". That requires togetherness, at least temporarily. For myself, I HATE being alone or doing anything alone, so at age 29, I got married and fathered three kids. They're all highly successful adults now, and on their own. I'm still living with my wife of some 40 years, in part because I STILL don't to be alone or do anything alone. Of course, I'm speaking only for myself and I don't think for a minute this is the way everybody should live. Back to volcanos. It seems we have a doozy of a volcano right here in the good ol' USA which is every bit as dangerous as Mt. Toba (maybe even more so) and is overdue for eruption. If it does blow, we're probably thoroughly screwed and may not survive the catastrophe. The volcano is called the Yellowstone Basin and has a magma chamber the size of Lake Michigan. So, quit sweating the nickel and dime stuff about togetherness and conduct your life as though the volcano could erupt any minute. Hope this cheered you up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It Takes Two
Posted by: freshlemon on Feb 18, 2008 8:40 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
people to make a marriage into a loving relationship. It only takes one of them to turn it into a nightmare. The nightmares are hard to escape since we have turned marriage into an financial institution that can only be dissolved by somebody in the marriage losing both emotionally and financially.

Those tax breaks for marriage and for children may be nice, but in essence they are totally unfair to anyone who is single or for married couples with no children. Taxes should be extra for having children. Maybe then people would think a little harder about having children.(Today the 'news' media is glorifying, via celebrities, having babies. Great message for young women!) A family of five uses a lot more of our tax resources than a single...doesn't it make sense that they should pay more?

I have been both single and married and definitely prefer the single status(pure selfishness!). Children might be a good reason for marriage, but they often end up being victims in an unbalanced,unhappy relationship between two adults.

Singles are not treated fairly by the tax system and are often thought of by society as 'having something wrong with them' if they choose to remain single. Truth is, they also have an American dream. It just isn't the same dream as those who have bought into the cookie cutter concept of people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bias Against Singles? Baloney! The Culture Glorifies Singles!
Posted by: AlexCathy on Feb 18, 2008 8:53 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The U.S. does not need another "victim" ideology. Nothing wrong with being single. Nothing wrong with being married either.

Yes, I freely admit there is some discrimination against singles, particularly single women with children.

Nevertheless, the idea that singles are a poor persecuted group is about as ridiculous as the idea this culture persecutes Christians. Our popular culture endlessly glorifies and romanticizes the "swinging" single. It's an extension of the America's extreme individualism. You hardly ever see a happy, sexually active married couple in movies or television. Marriage is almost always depicted as a "trap." In "romantic" comedies, the characters have an interesting story as singles and then their lives end when they get married.

Ironically, one of the reasons why some singles are unhappy is because they don't understand why their own lives are not the American single ideal.

I was a single guy until I go married for the first time at age 41 and I would never go back to being single again.

The U.S. does not need another "victim" ideology. Nothing wrong with being single. Nothing wrong with being married either.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Oversimplistic in analysis
Posted by: nfamous on Feb 18, 2008 8:53 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is rampant discrimination against single people. I guess we can call it singleism. Men would almost never get married if they could do so without losing a good woman and good sex. Men get married for sex and women for security. There are plenty of exceptions but in general these hold true. Today though people have such short attention spans that almost no one person can satisfy anyone for long.

Once the hormones die down, marriage becomes a prison for many people and not just men. That's why we see the rise in swinging amongst married couples. People genuinely love each other but just get bored with the same thing over and over again. You can tell people to spice it up to keep it new but few actually go out of their way after they've grown tired of the routine.

I'm single because I don't want to be smothered by someone all day long and have to do things that I normally wouldn't do as a single person. Married people call that selfish but I call it independent. I've never had sex with anyone I didn't care about. To me that's enough. We don't have to get married or even live together, although sometimes you do miss having someone there. Hey that's what pets are for.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'm very happily single.
Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN on Feb 18, 2008 9:02 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've been married more than once.
Without being a blamer, I have come to realize that I am not a person who should be married.
I'm 69 and still extremely active vocationally, athletically and socially.
I am far from being lonely in any way.
I have friends, business associates and neighbors with whom I socialize.
I date a few women with whom I like to golf, fish and do other things.

I see too many people who seem to be desperate in their loneliness and never seem to find that inner peace and self acceptance.
They spend their lives looking for "Mr/Ms Right", someone who doesn't actually exist.
One reason this is so is the obssessive perfectionism in others sought by these types of people.
As for children, I am fortunate to not have any that I know of.
My nextdoor neighbors have two daughters and, if I go on a trip, I'll pick up something for their kids.
I get along with most kids as, I'm still in my own terrible twos.
I don't succumb to those who want to get me "hooked up" with someone as, I am comfortable in my own skin/life and don't need anything which I don't already have.

Through experience, I have learned that there are no rewards for me in marriage.

I enjoy living my life and am happy allowing others to live theirs.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

My $.02
Posted by: strahlungsamt on Feb 18, 2008 9:12 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm 45 now and have never been married. I plan on staying that way. Here's why:

In my 20s, I was able to hitch hike around Europe and the USA, sleeping at the side of the road or in dingy squats. I drank and partied all the time, did everything except drugs. Was poor and unemployed many times (my own fault entirely) but at least I hurt nobody except myself.

In my 30s, I pulled my life together, gave up drinking and partying, went back to school and financed it by working in menial jobs. I lived in a rent-controlled apartment with other guys to save money.

Now I have a nice, well paying job as a computer programmer in a big firm. Right now, I'm shopping for a new apartment but I have everything else I could ever possibly want. And I'm still not married and have no plans to.

All the time I was young, whenever I would meet one of my "stable" married friends, they would lecture me to "find a good woman and settle down". Later, when I was doing menial jobs, all my female co-workers kept telling me to "finding a good woman". Guess what? I was still poor. The last thing I needed was someone to support, least of all kids, on less than $300/wk.

It seemed better to them to be married with kids in rags than to be single and lonely in a big mansion.

Now that I'm "rich", I get young model girls trying to get to know me. Guess what? I send them all away. Several of my married friends (who married young) are now living alone again, paying child support and struggling to make ends meet. Even the hottest model is not worth losing my freedom for.

Besides, people get married when they both have incomes, get a mortgage, have kids. Then one wage-earner stays home to mind the kids (or they hire a babysitter - just as expensive). Later on, the husband gets downsized and can't find another job, they lose the house etc. etc..

Not to mention, you can't discipline kids any more. If you deprive them of an iPod, you're a bad parent. If you lose your job through no fault of your own, you're a bad parent. If you DON'T send them to college you're a bad parent. If you let them out on the street unattended, you are exposing them to pedophiles. If they stay in and play videogames, they grow fat. The list goes on. And don't even mention drugs.

I never understood the rush to get married when a person's young. I never felt it myself. I preferred my freedom anyday. I sometimes thought that once I got older that would all change.

It didn't.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: My $.02 Posted by: monkeywrench
» RE: My $.02 Posted by: NoKidding
» RE: My $.02 Posted by: mr. joshua
I didn't start dating until my late 20s. As for being single,
Posted by: maxpayne on Feb 18, 2008 9:31 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
one thing that is undeniable is the fact that if a person ain't happy while single, it ain't gonna get better when they're married. I was happy when I was single and carried it into my marriage. Life can be busy but don't let society "pressure" you too far.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

IF YOU'RE HAPPY AND YOU KNOW IT CLAP YOUR HANDS!
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Feb 18, 2008 10:05 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't read so much into public opinion. Your choice of a lifstyle is not a popularity contest. Most social situations are designed for specific groups. That's just the way it is. I've been married & single. I prefer single. Pairs still prevail, aleways will. That's not the end of the world. As more people chose to stay single I see things changing.People no longer stare a women alone in restaurants or on vacation. Patience! ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

an advertisement I once saw
Posted by: abido0 on Feb 18, 2008 10:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This reminds me of an advertisement for a personals/dating service that I saw years ago, in the early 90s.

(Two of my single friends, sharing an apartment, had cut it out of a newspaper or magazine and taped it to their refrigerator door)

It went something like this:

-------
SMART?
HAPPY?
SUCCESSFUL?
HEALTHY?

Then why are you still SINGLE?

-------
One of my friends had circled the word "SINGLE", then drawn a big red arrow pointing all the way back up to the word "SMART".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just a thought
Posted by: maddy on Feb 18, 2008 10:24 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am a 32 year old woman and I too have never wanted to marry, which is why I'm surprised by what I'm about to write...

I couldn't help noticing how many folks in this message board see connections with other human beings as obligations or traps. I think that is sad indeed. Maybe the quality of all of our relationships would improve if we understood that we *are* interdependent and that being loved is a gift.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Being single is not often a life choice
Posted by: Andrew_S on Feb 18, 2008 10:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Forming relationships in todays society is no longer desireable, and the choice to choose between compromising what your belief systems are along with the media culture forming imprints is tentative at best. This is particularly more pronounced in gender opposite unions, where the state will often cuckold an established but fragile relationship for additional ideological and fiscal reasons. While the idea of marriage as a lost institution forms the culutural building block by way of children or the understood implication of children, that is from this males perspective off the table. Particularly when we look at the terrible statistics for the quality of lives, and possible future. If I could describe myself as slightly paranoid regarding the way the states fiscally operate. I would say it was a deliberate attempt at subtle population reduction, particularly against the weakest of us. Especially against the old, the poor and the young. However in terms of staying single as a male I would highly recommend that you remain single and possibly have a certified vasectomy to avoid any possible complications of the state interfering or inserting itself in your life. I chose to marry and it was a very bad experience, hence it ended up in divorce, upon which I was assailed upon by the state and entourage since I had children. This is an experience and secret legal world that one has to experience to even understand, and hence my recommendation. I can now enjoy my life with improved quality, choosing with caution to form physical relationships without commitment or demands from the rising pool of equally or more single females. However I do advise everyone be extremely cautious medically, but that is my personal choice. As for my children I was never allowed to know them, and the legal obstacles placed to forming a relationship too insurmaountable, meaningless and expensive. But I wish them well wherever they are.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Times are changing
Posted by: Sunfell on Feb 18, 2008 11:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When I was a small girl in the late 60s, I was told that my ultimate fate was to be a wife and mother. I could go to work, but the jobs that were available were 'waiting for Mr. Right' jobs: teacher, nurse, secretary, shopgirl. The goal was marriage, and my peers bought the meme, hook, line and sinker.

I did not. Things were changing, and the second-wave feminists said that kids like me would have better lives, and did NOT have to marry.

They were right, for the most part. When I was very young, marriage was necessary to permit a woman to live an economically viable life. Back then, one wage could support a family, but women were not permitted to have their own lines of credit or mortgages. Happily, that had changed by the time I started working in the early 80s. Today, this is no longer the norm, and single women can live as well, or even better than their married counterparts. Spouses are no longer economically necessary. I think that this has had an enormous impact on marriage today.

While many people prefer to be married, I am not one of them, and I count myself fortunate that I did not have to go through marriage and divorce to find this out.

I have a strong circle of friends, good support, good health, viable dreams, and the 'just me' time I need to make a positive impact in things I do.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Married happiness
Posted by: LeeAnnG on Feb 18, 2008 11:53 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've read about studies indicating that married men rate themselves as the happiest group, while single women rate themselves happier than married women. I don't know if this is true now or ever really was true, but it would be interesting to see this rather than just "married, single, divorced, or widowed."

I have been married twice. During my first 25 year marriage, I was mostly not just unhappy, but desparately unhappy. This was due to being manipulated, emotionally bullied, and psychologically abused much of the time.

My mother was unhappy in her marriage, but as the article states, she was not a well-adjusted person to begin with. Her view of her marriage to my father was clouded by her self-image, and it had an impact on me. I didn't realize how bad my marriage was because it seemed better than my parents'. This is probably why it took me so long to recognize how resentful and oppressed I felt all the time and to finally end it.

Obviously, I had some self-image problems myself or I would not have remained in a marriage that made me so unhappy for so long. It's probably true that I had many issues that might have made me unhappy as a single adult, but I never really had time to discover this, as I married young the first time. Many teenagers go through periods of angst, so it's hard to judge myself.

When I met my current husband 15 years ago, right at the end of my first marriage, I felt like I had encountered the other half of my soul. I still feel that way. But during the course of my divorce, I had discovered that I could be very, very happy by myself. In the five months between my separation and meeting my new mate, I became convinced that I would be quite satisfied to live alone, be single, and have a great time. I made the existential decision that my job was a way of supporting the rest of my life, I made new friends, renewed my interest in art, and found many activities I enjoyed.

By the time I met my husband, I was truly finding peace with myself in many ways. At the age of 60, I've been in my second marriage for 14 years. I could be single or I could be married, and I don't think it would make any difference now except that I am still so thrilled with my life with the most wonderful man I've ever known. I love him enough to recognize that he's not perfect and still find him to be a miracle in my life.

I don't think it's married or single that is important; it's a matter of liking yourself and, in the event of marriage or a long term relationship, finding the right person.

Marriage per se might not make you happy, but a bad marriage can make you miserable.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 -