Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Sex and Relationships

Why Can't Tila Tequila be Polyamorous?!

By Sean Thomas-Breitfeld, Movement Vision Lab. Posted January 18, 2008.


If Tila Tequila didn't have to choose between boys and girls, we could feel less guilty watching her show.
Advertisement

When looking for visionary ideas, I wouldn't normally think about our entertainment industry ... but when it comes to sex and sexuality, they're always on the frontier, so it shouldn't be a shock that MTV almost brought us a glimpse of a new vision for sex and sexuality.

OK, I understand that I'm revealing a guilty pleasure, but I was oddly fascinated by Tila Tequila's "reality" show -- A Shot at Love -- on MTV. What made this spectacle of drunken fights, inane drama and half-naked pseudocelebrity interesting was that Tila -- "the least lonely girl on the Internet" -- outed herself as "a bisexual" in the first episode and went on to be wooed by both dudes (I use the term "dude" to differentiate the men on the show from straight men in general) and women over the run of the show.

Despite my hopes, there were many ways in which the show fell short and disappointed. First, the show completely ignored sexual options for men outside of the heterosexual norm and reinforced the gay/straight binary: all of the male contestants had to be straight, and all of the female contestants had to be exclusively gay, but with eyes for Tila alone, of course (rumors that a female contestant had "hooked up" with a male contestant and kissed another female contestant got her sent home).

Furthermore, the racial politics of Tila's choices were troubling. Tila, who is of Vietnamese heritage (she mentioned this at various times during the show, seemingly to emphasize her "exotic" appeal), eliminated the people of color very early on in the show. From an original pool of 32 contestants that was roughly 70 percent white, Tila had whittled it down to only six women and six men by the third episode -- only one of those people left standing was not white (that's a 92 percent qhite dating pool).

Lastly, the show's elimination-style competition between contestants for Tila's affections enforced monogamy as the only option, forcing Tila to choose Bobby (one of the dudes) over Dani (the kinda-butch female firefighter who was my personal favorite) even though she claimed to love them both.

So Tila Tequila's "A Shot at Love" ultimately squandered the possibility of offering a radically different vision of sex and sexuality. Instead, it reinforced the racism embedded in our society's hierarchy of desire, where Asian women are sexually desirable but Asian men are invisible and interracial relationships must always involve a white partner. And the show's treatment of female bisexuality largely pandered to the voyeuristic fascination of straight dudes, featuring Tila making out with other bikini-clad women. Finally, Tila's ultimate choice of a dude reinforced the reassuring idea for straights and paranoid fear for queers that bisexuals ultimately choose heterosexual partnerships.

(Un)Fortunately, the show was a huge success. It was MTV's biggest hit in over two years, garnering roughly 6 million viewers and making it the network's top-rated series among viewers 12-34 in 2007. That huge viewership could have been boosted by the controversy that one would expect a bisexual dating show to generate, with supporters on the left and detractors on the right.

As big media will always do, MTV is following the money, and the network is giving Tila another "Shot at Love"(that Tila's relationship with Bobby didn't last shocked no one and helps remind us just how unreal and scripted "reality" TV is). So what can Tila and her handlers do the second time around to air a show with a new vision for sex and sexuality in the 21st century?


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: tila tequila, mtv, polyamory, a shot at love, bisexual

Sean Thomas-Breitfeld is the deputy director of the Taproots Project at the Center for Community Change.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Sex and Relationships! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The Bonobo Iliad
Posted by: waltermoss on Jan 18, 2008 3:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Gosh, I never knew polyamory was like, so awesome! Imagine if in ancient times they knew about this cool new idea! Why, they could have prevented the Trojan war: Helen could be with Menelaus and Paris; Paris could be with Helen and Hector ('cause incest is just a social construct). No one should have gotten so worked up over mere social constructs such as betrayal, murder, love, honor, fidelity etc. These are simply historical entities that have no place in enlightened post-meaningful society.

Rather than participating in ugly masculine death rituals (if this horse is a rockin' don't come a knockin'), Greek and Trojan alike could have sat around playing with themselves and each other. Perhaps the thousand ships could have remained in port, never to be launched. Though, I suppose that this story would be pretty dull.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Bonobo Iliad Posted by: g50
Ummmm . . . actually, it just looks like a cigar to me.
Posted by: Scientz on Jan 18, 2008 4:33 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Man, it really bugs me when people read into things too deeply.

"[T]he racial politics of Tila's choices were troubling. Tila, who is of Vietnamese heritage (she mentioned this at various times during the show, seemingly to emphasize her "exotic" appeal), eliminated the people of color very early on in the show. From an original pool of 32 contestants that was roughly 70 percent white, Tila had whittled it down to only six women and six men by the third episode -- only one of those people left standing was not white (that's a 92 percent qhite dating pool)."

What on EARTH is troubling about that? She's attracted to white people. This then, is obviously a sign that the producers are setting out to enforce racial norms.

What an idiot.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» . . . indicated otherwise? Posted by: Scientz
» RE: . . . indicated otherwise? Posted by: juanpecan81
» LMAO. . . Posted by: Scientz
Remember "Indecent Proposal"
Posted by: JohnU on Jan 18, 2008 5:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's the movie where Robert Redford offers Demi More and her husband, Woody Harleson, a million dollars for one night of "love" with Demi. If you just sat quietly at your local Starbucks, you could her guys arguing about whether they would let their wives do it or not, and the wives sitting there with a smirk that said "what's money got to do with it?"

The polyamorous, bisexual answer would be, "A mil for a night with my sweetie, why not? But, Bobby, for a mil five, you could have us both."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Sell her Posted by: gellero
Apparently, she chose her partner based on personal preferences in a partner.
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Jan 18, 2008 6:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A woman exercising choice! Gasp, someone call the preacherman or the boggoshpere!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

F*cking YAAAAAAAAAAWN
Posted by: meetmeineleusis on Jan 18, 2008 7:48 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
who gives a shit

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I feel dirty just reading this article...
Posted by: Jackrabbit on Jan 18, 2008 9:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, first of all, you're nutz for thinking you are going to find anything at all of merit in an idea space like MTV.

But on top of that, the commodification of relationships in any "dating" show is inherently anti-human: the point is to sell some of the most intimate moments of our lives, the things that make us most human, as a product; thereby turning us into soap or a pair of sandals.

Any cultural analysis that does not take this into account is missing the point - ie you can't pick and choose what people are going to take away from something like this. The fact that Tila's "relationship" "failed" is a perfect example. Here you see the stated goal of the entire series - "a relationship" - that doesn't last as long as a commercial break! Just so Tila can be back at it sopping up the bucks for her corporate overlords?

It is disgusting! Straight up vulgar shit. Even our analysis goes some way to contributing to some kind of validation for this drivel. Ech.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Sex makes us most Human??? Posted by: gellero
Polyamory Seems Especially Tailor-made for Bisexuals
Posted by: Libertine on Jan 18, 2008 10:52 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Currently, in our monogamy-mania society, bisexuals must shut down one side of their sexuality in order to conform to societal expectations for monogamy. They cannot express the full range of their sexuality in long term relationships without risking disapproval from society at large. Society expects bisexuals to "pick one" and live life, de facto, as either straight or gay.

Polyamory, on the other hand, recognizes that sexuality for bisexuals is like two sides of a coin and allows for both sides to be expressed.

But as the author stated, non-monogamy isn't just for bisexuals. Straights and gays are just as likely to consider monogamy as "mating in captivity" as bisexuals are.

I'm straight, but I've never been monogamous. I'm in my late 40s and I've lived nonmonogamously openly and honestly for my entire adult life. Though it wouldn't work for many people, it's natural for me, and, more importantly, it's worked well for me.

But, to clarify to those who know little about nonmonogamous lifestyles, there is a difference between polyamory and swinging, and there are more nonmonogamous options other than the two mentioned above.

Polyamory emphasizes love; the idea that a person can love more than one person concurrently and doesn't believe they must be made to choose. That is, polyamorous people believe that if a married person falls in love with another person while married, that one can continue to love the original spouse, too, and that one shouldn't have to divorce the first spouse in order to have another. Polyamorists point out that we can love more than one of our children concurrently -- so why can't we love more than one spouse at the same time? And unlike polygyny or polyandry, it's not a one-sided deal: both men and women may have more than one partner.

Swinging, on the other hand, is all about the sex. Swingers are usually monogamously married couples who engage in organized extramarital sex activities together as a couple, but they generally are emotionally monogamous. That is, though they have sex with others, they reserve their love for that one person, like traditional monogamous people do.

As for me, I take a third road. Like my user name indicates, I am a libertine. That is, I'm neither sexually nor emotional monogamous, but a sexual and emotional free agent. Unlike polyamorous people, I don't try to justify my nonmonogamy by claiming to love everyone I have sex with. I openly acknowledge that I'm not going to love everyone I have sex with and that's OK and, in many cases, preferable. Unlike swingers, I'm not in a monogamous marriage, nor am I emotionally monogamous. Nor do I bring my primary lover with me when I have sex with others, nor do I participate in organized swinger events.

Rather, my sex life is composed of having several friends with benefits/fuckbuddies, along with the occasional one night stand. I usually also have at least one love relationship going on at any given time. Everyone is on the same page, knowing I'm not monogamous from the start, but they don't know all the details, as it's a "don't ask, don't tell" kind of a thing.

I am fully aware that many people reading this will find my life reprehensible, but that's OK, as I find traditional married monogamy to be stifling and monotonous.

Different strokes for different folks and all that, you know.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Ommmmmm Posted by: gellero
» Valid points... Posted by: Libertine
Polyamory=communication
Posted by: ethicalslut on Jan 19, 2008 9:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Polyamory isn't a difficult or exceptional thing, as long as you have communication.

That being said, a lack of communication is a cause of so many relationship problems. People breakup because of it; it doesn't matter if they're vanilla prudes or swingers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I just read this article again . . .
Posted by: Scientz on Jan 19, 2008 10:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
. . . and its even more asinine the second time around. Even supposing polyamory is the "future" of sex and sexuality in the 21st century is quite a stretch. The anecdotal evidence used to back this canard is thin, biased, and rather ridiculous, not to mention the fact that trying to find evidence of an egalitarian and progressive society on MTV is like looking for the influences of Faust in "Horton Hears A Who."

Really, Alternet, why do you post this crap?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Who gives a CRAP about Tila Tequila?!
Posted by: monkeywrench on Jan 19, 2008 5:04 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... Or any "reality" show (actually, scripted – badly – with abyssmal acting and standard-issue, fake, fights, sniping and drunkeness). You actually expect some dumb "reality" show to be a harbinger of future sexual mores?! GEEEZ LOUEEEZ!!

That's is like trying to determine the future of american theater by watching a Hanna Montana concert.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What is great about bisexual
Posted by: bitsfick on Jan 20, 2008 5:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The great thing about being bisexual is it doubles your chances on Saturday night. Wouldn't it be wonderful if we took 1/10 of the money we spend killing and used it to study and understand the naked ape.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

this is a hard generation to take by suprise.
Posted by: brucerise on Jan 20, 2008 6:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
this is a hard generation to take by suprise. We have a high shock factor, largely because we’re used to watching videos of girls deficating into eachothers assholes. The concept of a bisexual bachelorette is a measly one on our Richter scale.
Bi,Gay,Lesbian
http://www.findbilover.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How about a bixexual MAN show
Posted by: strahlungsamt on Jan 20, 2008 11:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When I was in college, it seemed, all the girls went "bi" for the duration. Yet guys stayed straight (and proved it by having naked frat parties). It seems every girl passes through this rite of passage, whether she is really bi or not (usually not).(Of course, this all ends in time for graduation and marriage to Mr. White Wall Street who will buy her an SUV, a McMansion and 2.5 brats.) Face it, it's a societal expectation.

Yet, you never hear of guys going bi. Guys are either gay, bi or straight from the get go and stay there. If MTV really wants to be politically correct, why don't they do a bi-guy-gets-(a date/laid) show?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lets call it what it is...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Jan 21, 2008 8:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A bi-sexual woman on this show chooses a straight male over another woman... and this is groused about as being somehow heteronormative? Lets just call that grousing what it really is... blatant sexism.

While I know very well that those of other genders and sexual persuations suffer discrimination, etc... I'm certainly not willing to, nor do I somehow deserve to suffer the same at their hands simply because my sexuality is purely heterosexual.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Beginning of the New World
Posted by: popsicle67 on Jan 23, 2008 6:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why stop with one woman? Why not give all women
a shot at keeping all of the partners they want?
Much of the world already allows for men to have
many wives, it's high time the women had the same
luxury. It is a fact that the most successful
creatures on earth have a queen at the top and the males are used by her and thrown away when she has
no further use for them. Humans seem to be bucking
the status quo.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» and how do YOU define success? nm Posted by: JoshuaLudd