COMMENTS: 76
Sex Toys and the Technology of Orgasm
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Sex & Relationships headlines via email.
The film is based on Rachel P. Maines's 1998 book The Technology of Orgasm: "Hysteria," the Vibrator, and Women's Sexual Satisfaction (Johns Hopkins University Press), updated to include the tale of Burleson, Texas, resident Joanne Webb, who was arrested for peddling dildos and vibrators in 2005 under a state law that prohibits the sale of any "device including a dildo or artificial vagina, designed or marketed as useful primarily for the stimulation of human genital organs." This despite the fact that she was on the board of her local Chamber of Commerce and got a license to peddle her wares when she started selling for Passion Parties.
Under the Texas law, ownership of six or more "obscene devices" is also illegal, based on the assumption that one intends to sell them. There is a loophole: the exception for "a bona fide medical, psychiatric, judicial, legislative or law enforcement purpose." In other words, getting off is not something the state of Texas wants to encourage in and of itself, unless you do so with your hand. A few other states such as Georgia, Mississippi and Alabama have similar laws (the Supreme Court recently declined to hear a challenge to Alabama's law).
Policing women's sex toy use isn't new, but the meaning of the vibrator has changed dramatically over time. The Technology of Orgasm shows how women's sexuality, pleasure and masturbation have been regarded alternately as taboo and important, flip-flopping back and forth between being in vogue and cloaked in secrecy and shame.
Introduced in the late 19th century, the vibrator was originally intended as a cure for so-called hysteria -- a disease manufactured by doctors during the time of Hippocrates -- and soon became a medical staple. Doctors believed that using massage to bring women to orgasm would make them less emotional, but that process took too much time, limiting the number of patients a physician could see in one day. Enter the vibrator. With help from the mechanical friend, women could have orgasms more efficiently -- and on their own time.
The perceived medical need for vibrators evaporated after only a couple of decades. By the early '20s, women were purchasing them for pleasure, with no fear of being ridiculed -- let alone arrested.
"There was no stigma attached to selling vibrators, advertising them, [or] shipping them," says Maines in the film as she shows an ad in the 1918 Sears, Roebuck and Co. catalog for "Aids That Every Woman Appreciates." Another ad shown in the book for the White Cross Electric Vibrator proclaims, "Vibration is Life."
But the film isn't just about the public's acceptance or rejection of vibrators. It reveals the longstanding connection between women's sexual exploration and their freedom to explore in other arenas.
Take Joanne Webb, for example. Was she arrested merely for selling vibrators? Filmmaker Omori doesn't think so. "Passion Parties has been selling in Texas for at least ten years," she said. "I think in this case Joanne Webb was targeted. She had a license and was perfectly legitimate as far as everybody knew. There's definitely a deeper story about persecution. Here's a woman who's very pretty, who liked to flaunt that. She was on the Chamber of Commerce committees. Obviously she offended somebody, and they dug up that law."
One of the most interesting concepts the film offers up is that the enactment of these anti-sex toy laws coincided with the rise of the feminist movement. "Independent orgasms lead to independent thoughts." Slick says, quoting author Betty Dodson. "Who was in power at the time? Men. The feminist movement was picking up power, and it was all very threatening."
"I came from an era when sex was for the man; my job was to please him, and if I wanted to be pleased, I was a whore. That was the belief that I grew up with," relates Webb's lawyer, BeAnn Sisemore, who wasn't even aware of Texas's dildo law until after she took on Webb's case. Webb's take on modern sex ed reveals that for many women, sexual knowledge hasn't come much further. "I see just from talking with women, they really don't know a whole lot about sex, especially having been so involved in the church for so long; it's just something you're not allowed to talk about," she says in the film. Charges were dropped against Webb in 2004, but fighting them led the Webbs to declare bankruptcy.
When asked about their motivation for bringing Maines' scholarly tome to the screen, both filmmakers said they wanted to open up a history of women's sexuality not known before. Though Maines' book caused quite a sensation upon its release, Slick and Omori knew they could add even more depth to the story. So they went about interviewing Maines as well as prominent masturbation advocates Betty Dodson, author of Sex for One, and Dell Williams, founder of the feminist sex toy shop Eve's Garden.
"Betty Dodson became the glue that brought it all together," Omori said. "She was one of the key ones for me because she had this reputation of being a 'tough broad,' and then when she told her very poignant story of her history of feeling [genitally] deformed, and when Joanne Webb tells us her husband had a nervous breakdown, these were things we didn't know that came out." They were still working on the film when Webb's story broke and knew they had to include this modern-day incarnation of the erasure of women's sexuality.
Unlike the radical feminist comedian Reno, who learned the joys of self-love from her family's bathtub jet, Dodson and Williams found masturbation initially through boyfriends who allowed them to be comfortable with enjoying their bodies. Williams was also inspired by a workshop of Dodson's she attended. "We grew up in a culture that made women feel shame and guilt about their bodies and their sexuality, and certainly about masturbation," Williams observes. Dodson thought her inner labia were elongated from too much childhood masturbation until age 35, when her then-boyfriend said, "I love your pussy. It's one of my favorite styles. Do you mind if I look at it?"
While some of the film's imagery begs for an update (frequent sexual metaphors include (crackling lightning, blossoming flowers and fluttering jellyfish), the women at the film's center are feisty, outspoken advocates, all the more so because many didn't start out as such. Joanne Webb was looking for some extra cash when she became a Passion Parties saleswoman, never dreaming that she'd one day find herself on the phone with her local sheriff informing her that there was a warrant for her arrest.
Both boomer-aged women, Slick and Omori originally made the film for others like themselves, who were schooled by feminism in the '70s but didn't realize the politicized history of the female orgasm. They've found that younger women, though, are grateful for their message as well. Slick concludes, "A lot of what we learn about sex is about performance: How long can he last, how quickly can she come, etc. This documentary redefines and clarifies the needs of women's sexual satisfaction. And performance is not the ultimate answer. People should not see the vibrator as a competitor, but rather a member of the team."
That's not to say that buying a vibrator is a revolutionary act, but not being able to buy or sell one serves no one (not even the states in question, which are losing out on commerce) and only furthers women's sexual ignorance. Watching this film will be an eye-opening experience for those who think the vibrator's stigma finally wore off when Charlotte used her Rabbit vibrator on Sex and the City.
Williams makes the connection between feminism and women's sexuality explicit. "When I opened Eve's Garden, it was not only focused on selling vibrators, but empowering women so that they could be responsible and get in touch with their own sexuality, their own power, which would enable them to act in such a way as to change the world. So Eve's Garden became a continuation of my feminist philosophy." Think about that next time you use your Pocket Rocket -- or even your hand.
Stay up to date with the latest Sex & Relationships headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Darkly on Oct 4, 2007 1:38 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
we need to realize freedom of choice grants you the freedom to make the wrong choice as long as it only affects yourself.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Nanny gov
Posted by: Intellect
» RE: Nanny gov
Posted by: lepidopteryx
» RE: Nanny gov
Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN
» RE: Nanny gov
Posted by: drmeow
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Einherjar on Oct 4, 2007 1:48 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Who was in power at the time? Men. The feminist movement was picking up power, and it was all very threatening."
Was in power at the time? I know that at the last White Male Supremacist Patriarchal Capitalist meeting, we felt we were still very much in power! (Yes, I have Hooks) Ok, now that the comedy is out of the way, let me dig in. Women getting off without me being there always angers me... Ok, ok, actually getting serious now.
I think that the general fear of female sexual empowerment is alive and well in the average American male mind. Speaking for all American males is pretty big, so I am going to stick to my country, but looking at pop culture, I feel that I can say the fear of women "turning off the spout" is real. It may manifest in different ways, but it is there. The clothing, pharmaceutical
and fashion industry has really been turning the screws on us men folk in recent decades. "Your fat", "You cannot get it up", "Your naked male insecurity makes me dry as a desert", well, that last one was from a bad date, but I think you get my point. In the great Western cultures of yore (which of course are the only ones that matter right?) Sex has been about MALE pleasure.
American men of my generation or so, have been exposed to the idea from our earliest years that "Scoring" is all that is Man, that women who refuse us are "Bitches" and that women who give in as easily as we want them to are "Sluts". Let's call this the Ultra Man myth. The idea that women should be given equal thrift, that they should get off as much as we do, is blasphemy to the Ultra Man myth. A recipe for disaster in terms of female pleasure in our male dominated world, but hey, I didn't design it that way. With all the suppression and shame that permeates American sex, the last thing it seems many heterosexual men want to deal with is worrying about their female partner's sexual gratification. Which is to say that they worry about it constantly on a subconscious, "I'm not a Real Man" level.
It's my hypothesis that when men who have taken this to heart hear about how great the effects of vibrators are, it causes a massive hemorrhage. A giant hole blows open in the dam they have built up to hold back the flood of self-doubt that stress and culture has built up in them and all that self-hatred starts to flood their minds. Men who pass laws against vibrators want to kill that doubt. They want to put themselves back in a mindset of control. For, if women start controlling their own orgasms, what's next? Controlling their own leisure time? VOTING??!!
Sex, properly done, is a massively creative and empowering force for both genders. It helps the heart, the mind and the spirit. When you are happy, you can start worrying about other people's unhappiness. You might even stop buying as much crap and then the hammers would really start coming down.
"This documentary redefines and clarifies the needs of women's sexual satisfaction. And performance is not the ultimate answer. People should not see the vibrator as a competitor, but rather a member of the team."
Sure. I can buy that. After all, a vibrator cannot hug back(so far)nor can it provide critical feedback or hold your hair back while you puke. Women who are more in touch with themselves, who masturbate often, are much more capable of enjoying themselves during sex in my experience. Plus, it's not always about the almighty O. Sometimes it's just about being that close to another human being. A woman with a partner who cares about her sexual needs is not going to stop sleeping with her partner because she buys a vibrator. On the flip side, a woman with a callous lover who never cares may just find him or herself dumped or divorced when she rediscovers the pleasure that sex can bring. Is that the vibrator's fault?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» wait.. you NEVER hear about "playboy" (read: male centered porn) being banned???
Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: Banning Vibrators... I never hear about Playboy being banned
Posted by: Einherjar
» RE: Banning Vibrators... I never hear about Playboy being banned
Posted by: Einherjar
Comments are closed-
Comments are closed-
Posted by: GPFrank on Oct 4, 2007 4:25 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Intellect on Oct 4, 2007 5:00 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Laws such as these emanate from unnatural religious tenets which dictate that sex is for procreation only and should not be enjoyed.
"Life in Lubbock, Texas, taught me two things: One is that God loves you and you're going to burn in hell.
The other is that sex is the most awful, filthy thing on earth and you should save it for someone you love."
[Butch Hancock]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: lepidopteryx on Oct 4, 2007 5:33 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: How exactly do such laws get enforced?
Posted by: Chickensh*tEagle
» RE: How exactly do such laws get enforced?
Posted by: Sushi
» RE: How exactly do such laws get enforced?
Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN
» RE: How exactly do such laws get enforced?
Posted by: Denver Dem
» RE: How exactly do such laws get enforced?
Posted by: frantaylor
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Aussie Kim on Oct 4, 2007 6:04 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Maybe you could march down to your state governments and have a Mass Wank-A-Thon to protest the laws. (A Mass-Turbation????) ;)
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: There are LAWS against buying and owning sex toys????????
Posted by: casey60622
» RE: There are LAWS against buying and owning sex toys????????
Posted by: Aussie Kim
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Q30 on Oct 4, 2007 6:28 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Pornography = evil.
This is all neatly encapsulated in one langhable little line: "Who was in power at the time? Men."
BOOOOOOOOOO! HISS!
Stereotyping women is always wrong. Stereotyping men? That's ok.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Ok, just to recap the Alternet belief system...
Posted by: lepidopteryx
» RE: Ok, just to recap the Alternet belief system...
Posted by: momly
» Everything man does is evil...
Posted by: ahmlco
Comments are closed-
Posted by: richholland on Oct 4, 2007 6:40 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: if she has a good lover
Posted by: Chickensh*tEagle
» A number of reasons....
Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: if she has a good lover
Posted by: lepidopteryx
» hahahaha...are you serious?
Posted by: hurricane hugo
» I'll tell you what surprises me on this subject.... how little people understand...
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: I'll tell you what surprises me on this subject.... how little people understand...
Posted by: maddy
» Could you clarify something here?
Posted by: Chickensh*tEagle
» RE: I'll tell you what surprises me on this subject.... how little people understand...
Posted by: lepidopteryx
» RE: if HE has a good lover
Posted by: Sushi
» RE: if she has a good lover
Posted by: crooked7
» RE: if she has a good lover
Posted by: flower
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Spock on Oct 4, 2007 7:04 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Words, words, words
Posted by: deltadancer
» lol
Posted by: Iconoclast421
» RE: Words, words, words
Posted by: morticia
» RE: Words, words, words
Posted by: Einherjar
» RE: Words, words, words
Posted by: abbadon2007
» RE: Words, words, words
Posted by: Einherjar
Comments are closed-
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Oct 4, 2007 7:30 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Chickensh*tEagle on Oct 4, 2007 7:37 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.grist.org/news/maindish/2005/12/06/gertz/
That's from back before it all hit the fan about imported toys with lead paint and pet food with melamine.
I doubt things have gotten better since then; if Congress or the state legislatures had "tried to make America safe for dildos," we sure would have heard about it from the rightwingers.
You gotta be careful about what you put in any orifice.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Not to be a spoilsport, but...
Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN
» Thanks, I was trying to say that and it got taken all wrong and egos had to come out of the ....
Posted by: Prophit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: gellero on Oct 4, 2007 9:50 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: FEMINIST DOUBLE STANDARD
Posted by: LeeAnnG
» RE: FEMINIST DOUBLE STANDARD
Posted by: YogiBear
» RE: FEMINIST DOUBLE STANDARD
Posted by: frantaylor
» RE: FEMINIST DOUBLE STANDARD
Posted by: YogiBear
» IT'S ACTING
Posted by: gellero
» RE: FEMINIST DOUBLE STANDARD
Posted by: Aussie Kim
» RE: FEMINIST DOUBLE STANDARD
Posted by: dogman44
» RE: FEMINIST DOUBLE STANDARD
Posted by: abbadon2007
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cocozane on Oct 4, 2007 9:56 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: gellero on Oct 4, 2007 10:35 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: And the Texas legislators??
Posted by: cocozane
Comments are closed-
Posted by: MTguy on Oct 4, 2007 3:16 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
than poked to death...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Famous old saying comes to mind...
Posted by: Aussie Kim
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Jasonix on Oct 4, 2007 5:03 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Whose morality do these idiots think they're trying to legislate, anyway? I know that Baptists - even the Southern ones - officially leave these types of moral grey areas to the individual to decide. (Want to use a vibrator on your wife? I'm afraid the Bible doesn't say much about that, or about masturbation, either, so you'll just have use your own good sense - at least if you're a Baptist.) Most folks in Texas and Alabama belong to either the Baptist or closely-related evangelical churches. These idiots in the state legislatures are asserting their own moral judgments over that of the individual despite the absolute silence of the Bible on this matter - and that's as much a violation of the south's dominant religious tradition as it is the right of people to own vibrators.
But, of course, people are mostly sick, craven little creeps who need authority figures to tell them what to do, and who can't manage to think for themselves. Even if a religion starts relatively enlightened, like the Baptists, it'll become a totalitarian cesspool if you give it enough time.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: frantaylor on Oct 4, 2007 10:02 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» ixnay on the onguetay!!!!
Posted by: hurricane hugo
» RE: HaHa
Posted by: lepidopteryx
» RE: HaHa
Posted by: lepidopteryx
» I know...
Posted by: hurricane hugo
» RE: I know...
Posted by: drmeow
» RE: I know...
Posted by: abbadon2007
» RE: I know...
Posted by: lepidopteryx
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Phenix on Oct 5, 2007 11:14 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So, women do not know where their g-spot is and some don't even know where to find their clit. I hope I find one of those girls, it'll be a lot of fun. But fewer women know that their clit is the head of a penis and their gspot is the female equivalent of the prostrate.
O and if a woman is reading this. Men are more than their cock. It might be a surprise but our bodies are actually EXTREMELY similar and this includes the erogenous zones. Many women like to feel special as if they are the only ones who can feel pleasure. Its a lie.
Wait I'm sorry, the Progressive movement helped ban all things fun. The Progressive movement brought us so many horrible things yet people look so fondly on this movement.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Yawn
Posted by: TheNamelessCity
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Aussie Kim on Oct 7, 2007 11:14 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: yellow on Oct 10, 2007 1:18 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Why Sex Toys Need a Woman's Touch
Unhappy With Your Birth Control? 10 Methods You May Want to Try
Is Our Sexed-up Society Creating Prosti-Tots?




