Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.
Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.
Readers Write: Revisiting Queer 101
Also in Sex and Relationships
What Republicans Can Learn from "Gossip Girl"
Sarah Seltzer
Why Do We Need to Talk About the Female Orgasm?
Susan Crain Bakos
How My 7-Year-Old Learned About Pre-Marital Sex from John McCain
Karen Dolan
Yet Another Obscenity Trial? We Should Be Ashamed
Dr. Marty Klein
Sex Worker Rights Are Human Rights
Juhu Thukral
Why Young Women Delay Marriage
Erich Goode
Last week we published Cameron Scott's Queer 101: A Guide for Heteros, and it drew quite a response from many of our readers.
Some people felt the article did not include the full spectrum of queer people -- and took issue with the author for not addressing bisexual people or drag queens.
Others felt the use of the terms themselves was limiting in trying to understand the diversity of the queer community.
"Who gets to decide what term means what, what terms are affectionate and what terms are offensive anyway? Is there a president of gender terms that I'm not aware of?" wrote one reader. "I think this article and the obsession with terms and labels is pretty damaging. I know it's only human to want to put a name to things, but the sad fact is you can't always do it."
Another reader, who identified himself as a gay man, said he had a difficult time relating to the article: "It's like some kind of game show lightning round for homosexual terminology that doesn't do a very good job of explaining or understanding any of them!" he wrote.
But for others, the piece was an opportunity to see the larger picture: "The point of anything our community and our allies write about us is this: We should have the same rights and responsibilities as all other citizens, whether or not we conform to anyone's notion of correct behavior (including those in our own herd), as long as we are not hurting anyone else (Jerry Falwell's delicate feelings notwithstanding)."
Other readers discussed the characterization of trans people and posed some of their own questions:
What I find particularly fascinating about the transgender movement are the endless questions about what it means to be a woman or a man or somewhere in between that are rarely fully answered. While there seems to be a focus on genitalia, hormonal changes (induced by ingesting synthetic hormones) and outward appearances, I think it will be more interesting to focus on the brain. After all, your brain will always be pre-op, no?
Many people found the piece difficult -- probably for a number of reasons that aren't surprising -- after all, thinking about gender identity and how we all fit (or don't) together, is not easy. One of the beauties of the queer community is getting to self-identify -- to call yourself, if you choose to use such terms, whatever you'd like. It is more difficult, however, to see someone else's version of what those words mean. And that's what this piece was intended to be -- one person's view -- not the official gay Webster's.
Since so many people responded to this article, we asked the author to provide some more information on how he approached this piece, his larger intentions, and his reaction to the comments. Cameron Scott wrote:
The editors at AlterNet asked me to write a primer on queer culture because they felt that readers, however tolerant, didn't know much about the "gays and lesbians" often referred to, but rarely described, in the mainstream media.
See more stories tagged with: gay, queer
Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Sex and Relationships! Sign up now »