SEX & RELATIONSHIPS  
comments_image -

Is This the Last Generation That Will Face Opposition to Interracial Marriage?

In her memoir, “Kissing Outside the Lines” actress and writer Diane Farr unveils the xenophobia and racism that continues to persist in, of all things, the realm of love.
 
"Kissing Outside the Lines" explores interracial relationships.
Photo Credit: Seal Press
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Sex & Relationships headlines via email.

 
 
 
 

In his 2003 book “Interracial Intimacies: Sex, Marriage, Identity, and Adoption,” Harvard law professor Randall Kennedy says that interracial relationships should be a “focus of inquiry for anyone seriously interested in understanding and improving American society.'' Kennedy draws on history, literature, and policy to illustrate how intimate relationships are one of the last arenas in which racism is still tolerated in the United States.  

In her new memoir, “Kissing Outside the Lines: A True Story of Love and Race and Happily Ever After,” actress and writer Diane Farr arrives at the same conclusion, albeit with a few more funny family stories and drunken escapades. Farr writes about what happened when she, and others, decided to shack up with someone from a different race, unveiling the xenophobia and racism that continues to persist in, of all things, the realm of love.

 “But for all the social progress we have made over the last thirty years in public – in education and real estate, and business and friendship even – forward movement has not fully crossed over into the privacy of people’s homes, “Farr writes in her introduction, pointing out that sometimes even the most outwardly progressive parents recoil at the idea of their children marrying outside their race or religion.

Farr fell in love with a first-generation Korean-American man.  If this doesn’t sound like the scandal of the century, well, Farr didn’t think so either--until she met the in-laws. Farr recounts what it was like to be engaged to a man whose extensive family who had no interest in opening up their family to a half-Irish half-Italian woman from New York. 

Farr’s own story is, for the most part, funny and sweet and she ultimately forges a good relationship with her husband’s close-knit extended family. This is due, in no small part, to her determination to make things work, which drove her, among other things, to deliver a speech in Korean at their wedding. But for the other five couples profiled in her book, happily ever after proved a bit more elusive. 

There is white Lisa who had twin boys with black Dave, and whose mother thinks that biracial relationships are unfair to children. There is Jennifer whose evangelical parents cut of their relationship when things got serious with Hindu Sonu. And African American Natalia and Caucasian Jake who have avoided getting married because they feel the disapproval from Jake’s mom would cast a black cloud over the day.

On a brighter note, Farr also profiles Palestinian-English David and his Mexican-American wife Suzanne who are loved and supported by their families, and Israeli Ellie and Trinidian James whose persistence and patience led to acceptance.

“I have never heard from my friends or peers that interracial relationships are a bad idea – this is just something we hear from our families. As a kid you grow up learning everyone is equal, but then parents still feel comfortable acting otherwise,” Farr said, in an interview. 

The first laws banning interracial marriage between blacks and whites appeared in the late 17th century in Southern Colonies. By the early 20th century, 30 states banned interracial marriages, 16 of which still had such laws on the books when the Supreme Court declared such prohibitions unconstitutional in 1967 in Loving v. Virginia. 

Five weeks after newlyweds Mildred and Richard Loving wedded in 1958 sheriffs came to their home in rural Virginia and arrested them. Mildred was black and Richard was white, which meant they had violated Virginia’s anti-miscegenation statue the “Racial Integrity Act of 1924.” The appropriately named Lovings fought back and their case made its way to the Supreme Court, who sided with the couple stating that “the freedom to marry, or not marry, a person of another race resides with the individual and cannot be infringed by the State.” (A new documentary on the case, “The Loving Story,” will be airing on HBO in February.)

submit to reddit

-
Email
Print
Share
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest Sex & Relationships headlines via email
See more stories tagged with: sex, racism, relationships, love
Advertisement
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading most read content ..
Advertisement
AlterNet Radio: What's At Stake in Wisconsin; Real "Defense" Budget Is $1 Trillion; the Right's Phony Race War

By Staff | AlterNet

 
 
Fox, Breitbart, and Ricketts Try to Bring Back D'Souza's Pseudo-Birtherism

By Steve M | No More Mister Nice Blog

 
 
Activists Speak Out Against Lack of Access to Bradley Manning

By Agence France Presse

 
 
NYPD Catches Sexual Assailant, Then Lets Him Go Free Because He Didn't Feel Like Being Questioned

By Jill F | Feministe

 
 
Gov. Scott Orders Purging of Florida’s Voter Rolls - Just in Time For Prez Election

By Adele Stan | AlterNet

 
 
Abortion Clinics Across Country Put On Alert In Wake of Georgia Clinic Arson Cases

By Robin Marty | RH Reality Check

 
 
Former GOP Congresswoman Blasts New GOP Women’s Caucus: ‘They’re Not Voting In Best Interest Of All Women’

By Josh Israel | ThinkProgress

 
 
Debbie Wasserman Schulz is Wrong on Wisconsin

By LaFeminista | DailyKos

 
 
Pro-Coal Group Pays People to Wear Its Shirts at EPA Hearing

By Heather Moyer | Sierra Club

 
 
Kids Inundate NY Governor With Concerns About Fracking

By Seth Gladstone | Food and Water Watch

 
 
 
 
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
 
[ page served from web 1 ]