Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Sex and Relationships

How Abstinence-Only Programs Perpetuate Dangerous Stereotypes

By Martha Kempner, RH Reality Check. Posted November 12, 2009.


It's bad enough the media teaches my daughter harmful gender stereotypes. Does she have to get it at school, too?
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

I’m fighting a losing battle right now. My enemy is dead, or if you are to believe the rumors cryogenically frozen, but in some ways he seems to have more influence over my three-year old daughter than I do. We’re in the princess phase that seems to have been mandated, if not by Walt Disney himself, than by his brilliant and powerful marketing machine.

I am trying to teach my daughter to be an independent thinker and have aspirations that go far beyond being pretty. She wants dresses that go all the way to the floor. I want her to understand that women are able to do anything they want to and that there is more to life than finding a man.She wants to twirl.

The other day we watched Little Mermaid, a movie I had once thought I liked, but seeing it through my daughter’s eyes, I was horrified. If you strip away the upbeat music, the scary octopus queen, and the Rastafarian crab, the message of this movie is that if you’re pretty and don’t say too much, you can get a prince to fall in love with you (because, after all, landing the prince is your ultimate goal).

The thing is, if abstinence-only-until-marriage programs have their way, all of our daughters are going to learn awfully similar messages in school. This year, SIECUS reviewed the entire Choosing the Best series which includes Choosing the Best WAY, PATH, LIFE, JOURNEY, and SOUL MATE. This series, written by Bruce Cook, founder of Choosing the Best, Inc. and a leader in the abstinence-only-until-marriage industry, remains quite popular around the country.These programs hold marriage (though not necessarily to a prince) out as the ultimate goal and are littered with age-old gender stereotypes that might even make old Walt wince.

Choosing the Best WAY, which is for sixth grader, starts by saying “guys and girls are really different. That’s one reason why it’s so hard to understand the opposite sex.”To illustrate this, the teacher is supposed to ask students first to hold three to four books and then to look at their fingernails. The teacher then explains, “…guys usually carry their books down by their sides. Girls usually cradle their books in their arms… guys usually look at their fingernails with their fingers curled toward the palm. Girls usually look at their nails by holding their hands outstretched in front of them.”

The activity then divides the class by gender and asks each group to answer questions such as: “Why do guys act silly and clam up around a girl? Why do guys pay so much attention to the way a girl looks?” and “Why do girls talk on the phone so much? Why do girls talk about guys all the time? Why do girls get their feelings hurt so easily?”

The notion that men and women sure are different is at the center of best-selling books, at least one Broadway play, and pretty much all episodes of “Everybody Love Raymond.” But as much as it can be mined for humor, it can also be pretty damaging.

Choosing the Best SOUL MATE, which is for juniors and seniors, prides itself on helping young people gain confidence and improve their self-esteem. Much of the program reads like a Myers/Briggs personality test or What Color is Your Parachute. Unfortunately, there are some incredibly stereotypical assumptions about what guys and girls can do.

One exercise asks young people to look at pictures which depict guys in football jerseys and a girl in a cheerleading uniform attempting to convince others of a point using a chart and a megaphone.The instructor is supposed to explain:“Look at the two pictures at the top of the page – one showing a guy who is good at getting things done and a girl who excels at relationships.”It goes on to say “Our guy will do well in ‘success situations’ that give him a chance to plan and achieve his goal; while our girl will excel in situations that allow her to influence and interact with people.”

The curriculum warns, however, “The guy who is great at getting things done can become so goal-oriented that he walks all over people in his drive to achieve his goal. The girl who is wonderful with people can become so people-centered that she is distracted and has a hard time focusing on her goal.”

The pictures alone set gender equality back 25 years. More importantly, providing such stereotypical portrayals of what men and women excel at undermines the lesson’s goal of increasing self-confidence. Young people should understand that sex does not determine what they will and will not be good at in life.

All of these differences, however, seem only to be included in an effort to underscore how very different men and women are when it comes to sex and relationships. In truth, neither gender is depicted positively. Men are portrayed as cads who desire casual sex with any and all women but are frequently misunderstood and the victims of nagging women. Women, on the other, will use sex to get love and are forced to tolerate the bad behavior of the men.

These stereotypes are particularly apparent in the stories the curricula tells about young couples.

Choosing the Best JOURNEY tells the story of Ashley and Jerome who marry after just three months: “Soon Ashley began to notice some things about Jerome she had never seen before. He continued to go to sports bars and party on the weekend with his guy friends…She suggested that they go to museums or plays, but Jerome wasn’t really into ‘cultural stuff.’” Roughly the same story appears in SOUL MATE, though his name is now Michael: “When Ashley suggested they go to the library, Michael said he was proud that he hadn’t read a book since college and didn’t want to start now.”


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: sex, gender, feminism, masculinity, abstinence, femininity

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Sex and Relationships! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Tools: [Post a new comment] [Login] [Signup] View:
Soul mate?
Posted by: lepidopteryx on Nov 13, 2009 1:01 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The soul mate curriculum is for high school juniors? That's a bit young to find your soul mate. I didn't have my first real boyfriend until about that time; he turned out NOT to be my soulmate, and I didn't need a textbook to figure that out.

My daughter grew up with Disney princesses, but she also grew up learning about real women and what we are capable of. When she was four, one of her playmates made the comment that girls couldn't do something or other - I don't recall exactly what. I do recall her response: "Girls can do any damn thing they want to, except pee on a wall." (Yes, I allowed my 4-year-old to say "damn").
Come to think of it, with a funnel and a bit of rubber tubing attached to it, I can write my name in the snow as legibly as any guy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Well, don't let him take all the credit.
Posted by: eklawson on Nov 14, 2009 7:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Perhaps the princess knew more about dragons than the knight and understood that the second dragon had a skin too thick to be pierced by a sword or that the third should be poisoned because its neck was too strong to be quickly snapped by a noose. According to the curriculum, she should have kept this information to herself despite the risk to the castle all to ensure that she did not offend her man."

Obviously, the correct course of action here would be to let the night get eaten by the dragon, then the princess could go and slay the dragon herself. No reason to let some stupid knight get all the credit for her idea.

I wouldn't worry too much about the Disney princess thing, though, since the attitudes of parents and other female role models are far more important to whether a woman ends up with a true sense of herself as a person.

I too, enjoyed the Disney princess thing, the movies have great production value and the musical bits were always fun to sing along to, but I was always more drawn to stories whose female protagonists had a less watered down version of female heroism.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Generations of Coddled, Lazy Infants
Posted by: abbadon2007 on Nov 18, 2009 3:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The appeal of these princess myths is easily understood. The princess is valued enough to be the object of the villain's lust, anger, or jealousy and the prince's affection and protectiveness through nothing more complex than her beauty.

This concept seems to fit beautifully into the American myth - the myth that this nation is the world's military and economic superpower, and its pillar of righteousness. To what real difference do we owe this distinction? This myth seemed real enough with the conclusion of WW2, but in the generations since, we have failed to maintain our nation's moral standing, failed to maintain our lead in advanced manufacturing, and lapsed into governance rife with corruption and chaos.

Our nation would rather believe in the myth of our greatness than buckle down and achieve it. Remember that our accomplishments in the old WW2 era demanded real sacrifice. The most striking feature of the economies that promise to eclipse ours the most quickly - China in particular - is the level of sacrifice and savings of ordinary citizens in the national interest.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Princess Myths
Posted by: ML561 on Nov 19, 2009 10:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't think that the Disney princess stories do young girls any harm. I enjoyed the Cinderella and Sleeping Beauty stories as a kid. However, my parents instilled in me a belief that I could do what ever I set my mind to, and did not need a man to accomplish that goal. (In fact, my dad gave me a T-shirt which read "A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle.")
Abstinence is not necessarily bad either, although I am not sure the schools are the best place to teach this, just as I am not sure the schools should be teaching any other form of sex education. It seems to me that that should best be left to the parents.

Perhaps the methods of teaching abstinence are not the best. One thing I object to is the message that men are hormone-driven apes whose lust can only be controlled by a virtuous woman, and that a woman who "gives in" is therefore tainted and subject to disapproval by men and women alike. BS. Men are just as capable of controlling their desires as women are.

I notice, too, that many of the "purity" programs in some schools focus ONLY of the chastity of the young woman!!! Last I heard, it takes two to have sex!! Where are the programs directed at young men? Why is there no focus on saying to young fellows that there is no disgrace in keeping it in your pants, so to speak, and that fathering children out of wedlock is not a really smart thing to do? I would have a lot more respect for abstinence programs if they were directed toward young men as well as young women.

One other thing that bothers me is the fashion of young women getting a "promise ring" from their fathers in return for a pledge that they will remain chaste until marriage, at which time the promise ring will be handed over to the husband. This sounds suspiciously like ancient times in which the woman was considered property to be handed from one male to another. And I note that unless I've missed something, no similar ritual is laid down for young men!

We live in a very wierd society in which on he one hand, sex, of all kinds, is glorified, and those who are not partaking are considered strange, and on the other hand, sex is taboo and sinful. A teenager is bound to be confused by these conflicting messages.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

jack wills
Posted by: Nike air max Special on Nov 20, 2009 6:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Excellent post! Just wanna thank you for what you have shared. Look forward to reading nice articles from you. jack wills

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Abercrombie and Fitch
Posted by: Nike air max Special on Nov 20, 2009 6:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you for your sharing. This is a good access to Abercrombie and Fitch.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement