COMMENTS: 36
"Restless Vagina Syndrome": Big Pharma's Newest Fake Disease
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Sex & Relationships headlines via email.
It’s not your fault, ladies (and certainly not your partner’s), that you don’t orgasm every time you have intercourse, or that you lack the libido of a 17-year-old boy. You have a disease: female sexual dysfunction (FSD), and the pharmaceutical industry wants to help.
You are among the "43 percent of American women [who] experience some degree of impaired sexual function," according to a Journal of the American Medical Association article. The FDA’s evolving definition of FSD includes decreased desire or arousal, sexual pain and orgasm difficulties -- but only if the woman feels "personal distress" about it.
So, convincing women to feel distress is a key component of the drug company strategy to market a multi-billion-dollar pill that will cure billions of women of what may not ail them.
By promoting the belief that "normal" women have explosive sex all the time, BigPharma helped launch the disease. However, the FDA has yet to approve a treatment for women who fall short. Until then, they could try the Orgasmatron: a dial-a-delight spinal implant that rarely works -- and risks infection and paralysis. Or, for $60/month, pop LexaFem pills -- containing (how-could-it-not-work) "horny goat weed extract" in order to "feel like a real woman today." Its website promises, "You won’t ever feel unhappy again with LexaFem in your arsenal."
But the big swinging dicks of global FSD marketing (and off-label marketing) are Pfizer -- whose stop-gap strategy is selling women Viagra based on the fact that it works for men, and Procter & Gamble (P&G), which, using the same logic, has put its money on testosterone.
Viagra’s failure in trial after trial to work on women has not stopped doctors from writing 1.4 million off-label prescriptions. FSD is "a classic example of starting with some preconceived, and non-evidence based diagnostic categorization for women’s sexual dysfunctions, based on the male model," said John Bancroft, director of the Kinsey Institute, in an interview with BMJ (British Medical Journal).
No drug follows the male model more literally than testosterone. Despite FDA refusal to approve P&G’s testosterone patch Intrinsa, U.S. doctors wrote 2 million off-label testosterone prescriptions in 2007. Like Pfizer’s little blue pill, the Intrinsa patch doesn’t really work for women. No wonder: Researchers don’t even know what constitutes a "normal" female testosterone level, and women with low levels of the hormone are as likely as those with high levels to be happy with their sex lives. And as filmmaker Liz Canner shows in her excellent new documentary Orgasm, Inc., (www.orgasminc.org), testosterone is usually teamed with estrogen, which increases risks for stroke, cancers and dementia.
The companies and clinics that narrow the range of sexual normality to porn industry standards suffer their own disease. Symptoms include: a compulsion to concoct illnesses and then develop drugs to treat them, and vice versa. Either way, the syndrome is typically accompanied by a rash of conflicts of interest.
A Pfizer survey in Malaysia found that Malay women are even more diseased than their American counterparts, with "69.6 percent experiencing some form of FSD," according to the Journal of Sexual Medicine, which also published an industry-supported supplement on FSD. Journal editor and urologist Irwin Goldstein denies a conflict of interest. "Science is science," he says. "It comes down to the bottom line. What the data shows, the data shows." Actually, no. Drug company-funded studies are more likely than independent studies to find the new drug superior to the old. Perhaps the bottom line Dr. Goldstein refers to is his income as a paid consultant for drug companies, including P&G and Pfizer.
Goldstein established an FSD clinic with Dr. Jennifer Berman, who now heads a Beverly Hills clinic and appears on Oprah. As one of the health professionals on a 1998 panel that received financial sponsorship from eight pharmaceutical companies, she helped define female sexual dysfunction. Some 22 drug companies, including Pfizer, had financial ties to 18 of the 19 authors of that panel’s report, the BMJ revealed.
"Maybe the best approach is not ineffective, over-hyped drugs with nasty side effects, but an end to disease mongering and a strong dose of comprehensive sex education," says filmmaker Canner. Her film hits female erogenous zones that pharmaceutical fixes can’t find: your brain and your funny bone.
Stay up to date with the latest Sex & Relationships headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: citizen chump on Nov 3, 2009 1:01 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Ladies?/Gents? Perhaps Boycott Oprah Sponsors as was done with Beck?
Posted by: mainspark
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ashbar on Nov 3, 2009 5:49 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: How about a vaccine instead?
Posted by: plmcat
» Think business, think synergy
Posted by: eddie torres
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Roger Király on Nov 3, 2009 6:17 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Grandma Crabby on Nov 3, 2009 6:28 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Marijuana!
Works for me. Truly did. Helped me overcome HUGE issues and problems in the area of sex that had all been caused by being raped constantly as a kid.
Gimme a joint and let's go for it honey!
Luv,
Granny
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Great Remedy....but
Posted by: moloko velocet
» A Truly Great Remedy....but
Posted by: moloko velocet
» Sorry for the double post...1st one didn't appear to post
Posted by: moloko velocet
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Gravitas on Nov 3, 2009 7:10 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN on Nov 3, 2009 7:24 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Let's play doctor
Posted by: COhippie
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Libsrule on Nov 3, 2009 10:43 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Going down is how most women get their best orgasms. When they talk about Malaysian women you can see why. They don't get any time spent down there as most are of Muslim culture, NOT ALL, but a great many along with the fact that doing something like that is beneath the men there.
Anyone remember The Sopranos? That wasn't a joke, Italian men consider doing that disgusting although it appears to be changing.
Learn how to do the alphabet on your girlfriend's or wife's "little man in the boat" and you don' need no steeking pill.
OR and this is the most important. ASK HER!!
You would probably not be surprised at how many men are to macho to ask what exactly they like.Women love being asked and will be happy to let you know exactly what pushes the right buttons.
And as far as I am concerned, with it all shaved smooth it makes using your tongue that much more enjoyable instead of feeling like you are working your way through a wig.
Men do have a problem getting it up on demand all the time though, especially as we get older and ED drugs holp.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» And what's wrong with hair down there?
Posted by: LightningJoe
Comments are closed-
Posted by: PaulK on Nov 3, 2009 3:20 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Women are designed to not always have vaginal orgasms
Posted by: jenergy5
» Not a teaser. A necessary adaptation for an act that carries a risk of death for women.
Posted by: Beck
» Yes, women's sexual problems are all in their heads
Posted by: MartianBachelor
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jmmartin on Nov 3, 2009 4:32 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: leafsong1 on Nov 3, 2009 4:46 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Can we now all agree that it was a very bad idea...
Posted by: monkeywrench
» RE: Can we now all agree that it was a very bad idea...
Posted by: moloko velocet
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dadanbetty on Nov 3, 2009 8:35 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: WEED
Posted by: LightningJoe
» RE: WEED
Posted by: TonyWicher
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Verena2010 on Nov 4, 2009 5:37 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ArtOfMe on Nov 5, 2009 10:59 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Women should be encouraged to a.) masturbate and b.) communicate to their partners what they like and what they want. Then perhaps they would find more sexual satisfaction. Must must also be encouraged to think of the woman's needs and what she finds most pleasurable. Women may also find it difficult to enjoy sex when we're so bombarded with conflicting messages about being the perfect girlfriend/wife and about our bodies, that it's no wonder some of us can't enjoy sex.
The only "dysfunction" is the sexual culture that devalues women's pleasure while also expecting them to only enjoy one specific sexual practice (PIV). But of course the pharmaceutical industry would take advantage of women's insecurities about sex in order to profit.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» This will come as news to most men
Posted by: MartianBachelor
Comments are closed-
Posted by: TonyWicher on Nov 7, 2009 10:09 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» did you know...
Posted by: undrgrndgirl
Comments are closed-
Posted by: MartianBachelor on Nov 10, 2009 6:16 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is this article saying that was a lie all along?
Anyway, I was surprised the article didn't at least mention the work from several years ago of Kate Dunn, Lynn Cherkas and Tim Spector, which “show that the wide variation in orgasmic dysfunction in females has a genetic basis and cannot be attributed solely to cultural influences” or to hormone levels, which is why various hormone-based strategies sometimes work and sometimes don't.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: susy3c on Nov 10, 2009 6:25 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: undrgrndgirl on Nov 11, 2009 5:51 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the fraud and deception administration (fda) does NOT require testing of a new drug's efficacy against a previous drug (or treatment)...they only require that a new drug be better than a PLACEBO...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: crowgirl on Nov 15, 2009 9:30 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am an extremely well educated feminist. I know all the little 'tricks'. (No, oral doesn't work on me-- I ***cannot get aroused enough for it to feel good***, and just licking at my clit is going to make me sore before it turns me on... Trust me it has happened way too many times, I hate the feeling of oral now because of it. Also, it has never once brought me to orgasm, and I'm definitely not the only girl in the world like this.)
I would LOVE if there was some sort of supplement I could take that would actually help me out. Marijuana is the only thing that has helped me, not any of all those cool little tricks the orgasm classes/videos teach you. It is the ONLY thing that works and it only works when I get *really* bombed.
Look, just because the drug companies are stupid doesn't mean that this problem isn't real. There are a lot of women who really are in pain, who really are having unsatisfying sex that isn't their or their partner's fault, that really do want and/or need some kind of real help.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ML561 on Nov 19, 2009 10:51 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All I can say, ladies, is if you are unhappy with the way your sex life is going, do whatever you think best. Talk to your spouse or boyfriend about your needs, or "take matters into your own hands". If you feel you need some medication, look into that possibllity.
Just don't let outside forces such as drug companies and women's magazines dictate to you what your sexual responses should or should not be. That can be intimidating and make matters worse.
Be yourself, not some mythical sex goddess. Best Wishes.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Why Sex Toys Need a Woman's Touch
Unhappy With Your Birth Control? 10 Methods You May Want to Try
Is Our Sexed-up Society Creating Prosti-Tots?




