Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Sex and Relationships

The Rise of the Student Sex Columnist Movement

By Alex DiBranco, The Nation. Posted October 4, 2009.


The explosion of student sex columns represents a campus movement possessed of the same subversive potential that fueled 1960s student activism.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

The 1996 launch of "Sex on Tuesday" at the University of California, Berkeley -- birthplace of the 1960s national student activist movement -- triggered the campus newspaper sex column phenomenon.

Within a few years, the sex column had spread to campuses across the country, becoming the "most publicized, electrifying, and divisive phenomena in student journalism," in the words of Dan Reimold, leading expert on the student newspaper sex column.

Reimold estimates that "during any given semester more than 200 sex and dating columns are being published in U.S. student newspapers, magazines, and online outlets.... What's most important here is perspective. In the mid-nineties, the number of student sex columns: zero." In addition to increasing student readership, the proliferation of student sex columns has drawn national attention, like a 2002 New York Times profile of student journalism's most famous sex columnist, Yale's Natalie Krinsky, whose most popular "Sex and the (Elm) City" articles drew hundreds of thousands of hits.

"We're not Generation X -- we're Generation Sex," one student columnist quipped to Reimold during the course of research for his upcoming book, Sex and the University: Celebrity, Controversy and a Student Journalism Revolution.

The attraction of a sex column is simple: most college students -- honestly, most people past puberty, period -- are either a) having sex; b) talking about having sex; or c) all of the above. Entertainment is usually a key reason behind the publication of sex columns, but the writing is not all about fun. These controversial pieces have proved battlegrounds for the rights of the student press and "appropriate" subjects for publication (ironically, only increasing their popularity and fueling the movement).

Frank LoMonte of the Student Press Law Center points out that "sex is one of those red-flag subjects," especially on conservative or religious campuses, whether in the form of sex columns, explicit pictures or other writing about sex. At private institutions where students lack First Amendment protections, this can lead to direct censorship -- hundreds of copies of a Wagner College newspaper running a sex column in 2003 were yanked from the stands, as was a 2004 publication at La Roche College, a Catholic institution, that advocated teaching safe-sex practices.

Other times, the controversy at a private or public institution is confined to angry letters to the editor or university administration, such as a letter from a parent (self-described as "no shrinking violet and certainly not a prude") expressing his shock at "the whole total lack of any self respect, self worth or religious morality" he felt was exhibited by a University of West Florida sex columnist, whom he also believed to be "emotionally disturbed and quite possibly mentally challenged."

Despite the constitutional right to freedom of the press, occasionally state universities and even state legislators have attempted to put a stop to sexual content they've found inappropriate. Reacting to cover art depicting a woman's breast and a column on oral sex in publications on two state-funded campuses, in 2005, Republican Arizona state legislator Russell Pearce, added a provision to the state budget that would deny funding to student newspapers. Mark Goodman of the SPLC told a local paper that, in twenty years of work on student press issues, this case about sex in the student press was the first time he had ever seen a state legislature attempt to bar student newspaper funding.

In the most recent incident, this spring University of Montana law professor Kristen Juras attempted to get the Montana Kaimin"Bess Sex" column censored, even contacting state legislators in her efforts to get the paper's funding pulled.

Reimold told me that for 90 percent of sex columnists, the only "political" point they are trying to make is that sex is OK and something we should talk about. Bess Davis of "Bess Sex" agrees that "sex really has nothing to do with politics...that's just an impression built up by the media," and views her column as serving a purpose in opening up discussion in an underreported subject. Yet her column attracted the ire of Juras, who "has a history of advocacy for extremist Christian and right-wing causes," writes Bill Oram, former editor in chief of the Kaimin, such as her position as adviser for the student Christian Legal Society, which sued in 2007 when the Student Bar Association denied it funding due to the group's exclusion of gay students from leadership positions and voting. And in Arizona, it was Pearce (described as "ultraconservative" by a Democratic representative) and his Republican colleagues attempting to censor student papers, with vocal dissent from Democrats.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: sex, gender, sexuality, college, sex columns

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Sex and Relationships! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
oh well
Posted by: wwittman on Oct 4, 2009 11:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"..."We're not Generation X -- we're Generation Sex," one student columnist quipped..."


apparently this is some new, weakened, definition of "quip"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You don't think...
Posted by: njguy73 on Oct 5, 2009 8:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...all this has to do with a certain sex columnist writing a certain book, which became a certain pay-cable show, and now every co-ed and her sister wants to be the next to hit the jackpot?

No. It's done purely for the empowerment of the gender.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

selfish sex: the Christian value
Posted by: littlepitcher on Oct 6, 2009 5:12 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The real opposition to discussion of female sexual organs and sexual pleasure is derived from the Judeo-Christian male ethos of sex being not for procreation, but for the sole satisfaction of the male. Thus the popularity of the blowjob, not only among men, but among women with sexually ignorant, selfish, or clumsy husbands. Why drag ineptitude out for twenty minutes when it can be dismissed in two?

Student sex columns are, in a word, great. Now we'd like to see some columns and real discussion on discrimination and bigotry based on consumption patterns, income, and the lifestyles derived from these. Such bigotry is the basis of the true, evil, and constant screwing endured by an enormous proportion of the US population. Now, during a recession which has trickled down to the narrow and bigoted middle and professional classes, is the ideal time to out this issue.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Oh, really?
Posted by: mainspark on Oct 6, 2009 7:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Dan Reimold, leading expert on the student newspaper sex column."

Wow. I wonder what it takes to become such an expert?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Oh, that's rich: somebody from The Nation lecturing us on the journalism of dissent
Posted by: leafsong1 on Oct 6, 2009 7:58 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yeah, no need to worry about the obsequious attitude of big media names like The Nation. There's plenty of subversion in the media. Why, just look at the sex columns on campus that carefully and deliberately have nothing to with politics: that's potential for dissent right there. Not far away is an article on how tits and ass journalism has added vibrance and integrity to Italian media, so it's easy to see how vagina monologues will lead to meaningful political reform. Why, compared to the pages of The Nation, these columns issue practically no gushing praise of either party. That makes them subversive. Score another one for the irony-impaired blatherers at The Nation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Female dominated = raunchy Posted by: MartianBachelor
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement