COMMENTS: 42
Why Sex Is So Much Better Today
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Sex & Relationships headlines via email.
Today, I am putting on my Incurable Optimist hat.
I want to talk about the sexual world we have today. And I want to talk about how vastly, immeasurably better it is than it used to be. Not that long ago, either. I want to point out some of the ways that, as painful and terrible as our sexual world can be, it is so much better than it has been . . . in ways that we sometimes take for granted.
When you’re fighting for social change — whether that’s for racial equality or sexual liberation, ecological consciousness or LGBT rights, free speech or feminism — it’s easy to get despondent. It’s easy to focus on how lousy things still are, how slow the going is, how much further we still have to go. So today, I want to take off the Cranky Pants, and put on the Incurable Optimist hat, and remind us all of how very far our sexual world has come in a remarkably short time.
I started thinking about this for two reasons. I was reading a recent “Savage Love” sex advice column, consisting of letters thanking Dan for specific, practical ways his advice has made people’s sex lives better. And I was watching “Mad Men,” the excellent TV series about life — including some of the more appalling aspects of sexual life — in and around a Madison Avenue ad agency in the early 1960s. Right around the time I was born.
And it started to strike me: Damn. Thing are so much better now for sex than they were when I was born. In so very many ways.
I want to talk about some of those ways.
•
When I was born, vibrators and other devices for female sexual pleasure were sold underground, with their true purpose disguised . . . if they were sold at all. Today, an astonishingly wide variety of vibrators and such are readily available to anyone with a computer and a credit card . . . giving millions of women easy access to orgasm at the touch of a finger.
When I was born, the very idea of female sexual pleasure, and the idea that women had as much right to sexual pleasure as men, was shocking and controversial. Today, the notion that women actually enjoy sex, and that we have a right to ask for the kinds of sex we enjoy, is generally understood and accepted. (At least, more so than it was 47 years ago. Even right wing Christian evangelicals are pushing the idea of sexually satisfying marriages . . . satisfying for both partners, not just men.)
When I was born, it was generally assumed that women in an office were there (a) for the sexual enjoyment of men, and (b) to catch husbands. Today, it is generally assumed that women in an office are there to get some work done.
When I was born, birth control was still illegal in about half of the States in the U.S . . .. and the birth control methods that were available were ineffective, dangerous, or both. Today, birth control is legal, widely available, available in a variety of forms, and much safer — thus enabling women to enjoy sex without the constant fear of unwanted pregnancy.
Ditto abortion.
When I was born, kids and teenagers looking for information about sex mostly got it from their friends . . . who didn’t know any more about sex than they did. Today, kids and teenagers looking for information about sex can talk to San Francisco Sex Information, or Scarleteen, or any number of other sources of accurate, anonymous, non-judgmental sex information.
Hell, that’s true for adults, too, not just kids and teenagers. When I was born, the available sex information for adults was mostly Kinsey, a handful of bad marriage manuals . . . and their friends, who didn’t know any more about sex than they did. Now, accurate and detailed information about sex — from “How can I help my female partner reach orgasm?” to “What is a safe way to pierce my genitals?” — is readily available, simply by turning on a computer or picking up a phone.
Stay up to date with the latest Sex & Relationships headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: noir on Sep 5, 2009 12:28 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
More importantly, however, I wonder why what I see as one of the most positive differences between now and 50 years ago, for heterosexuals, is only distantly alluded to: in contemporary society it is much more possible, and normal, for men and women to talk to one another about sex, both in ordinary group conversations while socializing casually and on a one-to-one basis. The Feminist movement had a lot to do with this, not only to the benefit of many women, as Ms Christensen points out, but of men as well. Sex is--no rocket science here, surely!--much better, more fun and more deeply gratifying, when the two partners can feel that each is participating freely and each may experience erotic joy. And the opening up of the conversational agenda to the topic of sex enables this. Maybe the best indication of where we are at now--some or many of us, at least--is that it has become increasingly difficult over the decades to understand how anyone could ever have derived much satisfaction from sex conceived of as male dominance over dutifully (or worse) compliant females.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: armorypk on Sep 5, 2009 3:28 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No AIDS. No herpes. No Dr. Phil. No Dr. Ruth. No need for "sex advice" columns. God, what a time! We didn't know how lucky we were. I have a lot of sympathy for today's young adults. I remember when sex was actually FUN! And, yes, CAREFREE! Today, with the disease, the guilt, the expectations.......it must look more like a homework assignment than a fun-filled, spontaneous adventure.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Better Than It Was 50 Years Ago?...It was the guilded age!!!
Posted by: peridot
» Yes, the the 1960-70s were much better
Posted by: Alenna
» RE: Yes, the the 1960-70s were much better
Posted by: Sekhmetnakt
» Spoken like a true Baby Boomer
Posted by: J-
» Sex in the 70s
Posted by: Libertine
Comments are closed-
Posted by: brer on Sep 5, 2009 4:03 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: From your title
Posted by: armorypk
» RE: From your title
Posted by: noir
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Suzon on Sep 5, 2009 5:16 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, some things have changed for the better and an out lesbian would understandably appreciate being able to be out and accepted.
But despite the negatives of coming of age in the late 1950s (fear of pregnancy being the most oppressive), I feel that I was better off than my college-age granddaughter has been.
When I married I had only seen "pin-ups" not porn. My ignorance was bliss as it would have been impossible to imitate someone else's idea of sex. Finding out for myself was a privilege.
With the possible exception of the Amish and perhaps Muslims, today's young girls will have been exposed to soft porn sexual displays in music videos even as children and many of them would know a lot about even the most extreme practices.
The fashion and celebrity industries, with their emphasis on size 0, have a detrimental impact on the bodies and minds of ordinary women.
Where is the recognition that women are also under pressure to look and act like "hotties" and not just in privacy, but for the whole world to judge. Since when did hookers become role models?
The pornographers have taken something natural to us and have been selling it back to us in an increasingly deformed state.
There would have been prostitutes in town when I was growing up, but I didn't see their advertisements in phone booths or the local paper. Now not just weather girls but newsreaders show off their cleavage.
Funny how old-fashioned the word "dignity" seems to be. You can't hang onto it in bed, nor would you want to, but it would be great to see more of it in public.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: no mention of the commodification of sex and the pressure on young girls to display themselves
Posted by: goldmarx
Comments are closed-
Posted by: The Other Katherine Harris on Sep 5, 2009 9:24 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Looking back with some girlfriends in the late 1980s, we all agreed we'd enjoyed the unique benefit of 20 great years between the Pill and AIDS -- and that we very much pitied those who would never know such freedom.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: on Sep 5, 2009 9:42 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All joking aside (?), I am pushing 70 & my sex life is far better than it was when I was 20-30 ... the reasons for this vary from things like finally having the right companion on the pillow next to my tasteful-silvered hair, to a variety of toys, lubes, openness, good grass, happiness, warmth, willingness to share, continuing/ever-growing desire & a climate that shrugs & goes on with its own sexual choreography (for the most part) w/o worrying very much about ours.
Of course, our adult kids & young gran'kids would be (maybe) HORRIFIED @the activity that goes on almost nightly in the Master Bedroom. Ha. Funny.
m. swof.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Ahm, I'm just confused, I guess ...
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Bob Horn on Sep 5, 2009 10:50 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Sojourner on Sep 5, 2009 11:09 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, there is more talk plus the other aspects mentioned such as pills, the LGBT community, trained professionals and less shame. Unless one indulges in group sex regularly or is doing interviews on the topic regularly, there’s only what happens for you.
Most of my acquaintances haven’t the slightest idea what personal intimacy is all about, since it takes work and time. And that includes those in the LGBT community who struggle with the same issues that wreck all relationships and marriages. I can still count on one hand the couples I know who have equalitarian relationships with a capacity for endurance. Most partners I know avoid one another by keeping busy.
The availability of porn might be helpful if it were not just a matter of performance. Sex for show entertains but a love relationship is plain old hard work. Maybe we are less screwed up today, but it is only by a thread.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms on Sep 5, 2009 11:19 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is not a little like the days when a Catholic priest (supposedly celibate) counseled prospective newly weds on sex. The blind leading the blind (actually, this is more like the lost acting as pathfinders), in other words.
Any behavior having anything to do with sex is normal behavior, in other words. Odd, isn't it that we haven't included pedophiles, masochists, coprolagniacs, coprofiliacs, urolagniacs, and other sexually related deformities in that list - and how long can we expect that it will be before that pedophiles, excrement-eaters, urine drinkers, and all the rest demands "normalcy" of us all for their particular aberration?
And thusly work mightily to assure that millions born or otherwise subsequently deformed and behaviorally aberrant will be condemned by the fellows' cowardice to languish without hope of cure for the foreseeable future - until we somehow throw off the fetters of more ideological crap like Victorian morality having to do with sex, that is.
It's just great to be FUBAR where one's sexual perception and behavior (emotionally and mentally, or what have you?), in other words - all you have to do is SAY so.
And must we also accept today's sexually FUBAR generation's definition of "better?" Yet another esoteric and solecistic equivalent to "male chauvinist" and the ism-fevered like? With the political and sociological cancer of militant feminism eating at the core belief vitals of the society and nation - that nowhere more evident than in the bewildered and chaotic reasoning and spastic ratiocination of the author here - and a nation in steep decline largely on that account, we continue to wallow in this sort of titillating-for-the-degenerate tripe.
All while a nation as mangled mentally where the most fundamental understanding of them all is concerned can't divine how it came to be in the pickle it's in where the rest of its affairs are concerned.
Remarkable? Not really; pretty much what you'd expect - from outside, that is.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Oh, good - another essay about sex . . .
Posted by: Sekhmetnakt
» RE: Oh, good - another essay about sex . . .
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» RE: Oh, good...a suggestion for next time
Posted by: noir
» RE: Oh, good - another comment about fear of sex . . .
Posted by: wouldhe
» RE: Oh, good - another comment about fear of sex . . .
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» RE: Oh, good - another comment about fear of sex . . .
Posted by: Jacob Kline
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maxsmart on Sep 5, 2009 12:49 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If we as a race cannot learn to balance body and mind, instinctual nature unrepressed without linking with conceptualizations that justify excessive collateral damage we will be the cause of our own extinction.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: hysteria persists
Posted by: Jacob Kline
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jrmart on Sep 5, 2009 11:44 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: richard0a37 on Sep 5, 2009 11:47 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks for a stimulating article. As I slowly make my way through it, so many memories surface that it is not easy to put one’s finger on what might constitute a statement about sexual attitude.
Unless of course, it's a girl's pussy you are putting your finger on, and then that says all you need to know about sex.
The comedian Chris Rock told us that when the hoes get together at their annual convention, clear heels is the fashion statement they wish to make, but when he bought a pair for his wife, she told him to throw that shit away and go wash his hands cos it’s time for dinner.
Even my Dad thought it was funny and he’s getting on for 90. His advice to me back in the early 60s was to ‘keep it in your trousers’.
My first girlfriend at the time was a couple of years younger than me, but growing very rapidly. We would sit next to each other on the settee in her parent’s living room. Her father would sit directly opposite us and periodically he would glare at her and growl things like ‘cover your knees up, pull your skirt down’, as if he was a disgruntled hyena waiting to pounce on his unsuspecting prey.
This used to upset her very much, so I would explain the Oedipus complex and tell her that he was unable to deal with his daughter growing into a woman.
My best friend had a really attractive younger sister in her teens. Her father would call her things like ‘an ugly cow’.
It has always puzzled me why some fathers had so much difficulty with their daughters once they began developing into young women. Did it never strike them that their daughters’ sexuality is for the rest of us? Fathers are supposed to view their grown up daughters as still the little babies that they held in their arms and consequently be blind to any sexuality they may or may not possess.
Personally, I don’t think there has been any change in anything related to sex, ever, although I empathise with everything that the author has written. There is a museum in Paris that shows the pornographic movies that were around in the early 20th century, and men appreciated a good blow job then as much as we do now.
The only sex that matters is the one you’re having with your current partner. If you’re not getting any, then who cares what’s happening to the rest of the world.
The fact of the matter is females are born with a vagina, and boys are born with a penis, and what happens between then and now is all down to you.
To finish, I’d like to comment on what armorypk has said. Back in the 60s, there was syphilis and gonorrhoea and other venereal diseases, male contraception was crap and female contraception non existent. Unwanted pregnancy was a real problem, and its potential effect on young females could not be underestimated.
As regards sex being fun, that’s an odd choice of word I think. Fun is playing ‘snap’ with your kids, but creeping into the bedroom of a married woman when the husband is away evokes emotions and memories that are impossible to quantify. This would constitute forbidden sex of the highest order, and an experience ranking high in the list of the 20 things one must do before you die.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jrmart on Sep 5, 2009 11:51 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: willymack on Sep 6, 2009 10:09 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sex is scary
Sex is naughty
Sex is fun
Sex is natural
Sex is a chore
Sex is mundane
Sex? You mean WITH SOMEBODY? (Al Bundy)
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maxpayne on Sep 6, 2009 11:53 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Age of Reason on Sep 6, 2009 7:55 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
September 11, 2001. You see, if they can get away with that (and they are) then they can get away with anything. And the next false-flag attack will make 9/11 pale by comparison. Enjoy your sex...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Raymond Emerson on Sep 6, 2009 9:53 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: pfm on Sep 7, 2009 12:29 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is OK to discuss sex, but only within certain undefined boundaries. But heaven help those who step outside and over that undisclosed line in the sand. We present the picture one is free to engage in sex with whom ever they choose carefully concealing the persecuting repercussion should one inadvertently find themselves across that undisclosed line in the sand. Premarital sex is tolerated but only within closed sanctioned undisclosed parameters. Should these sexual acts result in the birth of a child, American society enforces its own form of veiled shunning.
Is sex merely a physical act…? Or is sex part of an attitude which promotes openness, honesty, understanding and even acceptance…? The physical acts associated with sex might be better today, and I submit that depends on how one defines better, than it was 50 years ago, but, does America honestly embrace the full gamut associated with sex, better…?
Respectfully,
http://waterman99.wordpress.com
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Foresthiker on Sep 7, 2009 7:55 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: C. Rich on Sep 9, 2009 5:02 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://americaspeaksink.com/2009/09/americas-war-on-sex/
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: messedup on Sep 9, 2009 12:13 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kevinfedorr on Sep 10, 2009 3:43 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Jacob Kline on Sep 11, 2009 12:03 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Its erotic description of consuming physical desire within a committed relationship, and of the unbearable longing that is experienced by the two lovers during an unexpected and fearful separation, serves as an inspiration to ones like myself who wait for marriage to become intimate.
I do have the good fortune of being surrounded by actual families that were founded on committed love, by parents that waited in this way.
I believe there is something worth waiting for.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: micko on Sep 11, 2009 8:13 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sammyb on Sep 24, 2009 8:32 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: lukewatson on Oct 2, 2009 12:28 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: noir on Sep 5, 2009 12:28 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
More importantly, however, I wonder why what I see as one of the most positive differences between now and 50 years ago, for heterosexuals, is only distantly alluded to: in contemporary society it is much more possible, and normal, for men and women to talk to one another about sex, both in ordinary group conversations while socializing casually and on a one-to-one basis. The Feminist movement had a lot to do with this, not only to the benefit of many women, as Ms Christensen points out, but of men as well. Sex is--no rocket science here, surely!--much better, more fun and more deeply gratifying, when the two partners can feel that each is participating freely and each may experience erotic joy. And the opening up of the conversational agenda to the topic of sex enables this. Maybe the best indication of where we are at now--some or many of us, at least--is that it has become increasingly difficult over the decades to understand how anyone could ever have derived much satisfaction from sex conceived of as male dominance over dutifully (or worse) compliant females.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: armorypk on Sep 5, 2009 3:28 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No AIDS. No herpes. No Dr. Phil. No Dr. Ruth. No need for "sex advice" columns. God, what a time! We didn't know how lucky we were. I have a lot of sympathy for today's young adults. I remember when sex was actually FUN! And, yes, CAREFREE! Today, with the disease, the guilt, the expectations.......it must look more like a homework assignment than a fun-filled, spontaneous adventure.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Better Than It Was 50 Years Ago?...It was the guilded age!!!
Posted by: peridot
» Yes, the the 1960-70s were much better
Posted by: Alenna
» RE: Yes, the the 1960-70s were much better
Posted by: Sekhmetnakt
» Spoken like a true Baby Boomer
Posted by: J-
» Sex in the 70s
Posted by: Libertine
Comments are closed-
Posted by: brer on Sep 5, 2009 4:03 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: From your title
Posted by: armorypk
» RE: From your title
Posted by: noir
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Suzon on Sep 5, 2009 5:16 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, some things have changed for the better and an out lesbian would understandably appreciate being able to be out and accepted.
But despite the negatives of coming of age in the late 1950s (fear of pregnancy being the most oppressive), I feel that I was better off than my college-age granddaughter has been.
When I married I had only seen "pin-ups" not porn. My ignorance was bliss as it would have been impossible to imitate someone else's idea of sex. Finding out for myself was a privilege.
With the possible exception of the Amish and perhaps Muslims, today's young girls will have been exposed to soft porn sexual displays in music videos even as children and many of them would know a lot about even the most extreme practices.
The fashion and celebrity industries, with their emphasis on size 0, have a detrimental impact on the bodies and minds of ordinary women.
Where is the recognition that women are also under pressure to look and act like "hotties" and not just in privacy, but for the whole world to judge. Since when did hookers become role models?
The pornographers have taken something natural to us and have been selling it back to us in an increasingly deformed state.
There would have been prostitutes in town when I was growing up, but I didn't see their advertisements in phone booths or the local paper. Now not just weather girls but newsreaders show off their cleavage.
Funny how old-fashioned the word "dignity" seems to be. You can't hang onto it in bed, nor would you want to, but it would be great to see more of it in public.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: no mention of the commodification of sex and the pressure on young girls to display themselves
Posted by: goldmarx
Comments are closed-
Posted by: The Other Katherine Harris on Sep 5, 2009 9:24 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Looking back with some girlfriends in the late 1980s, we all agreed we'd enjoyed the unique benefit of 20 great years between the Pill and AIDS -- and that we very much pitied those who would never know such freedom.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: on Sep 5, 2009 9:42 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All joking aside (?), I am pushing 70 & my sex life is far better than it was when I was 20-30 ... the reasons for this vary from things like finally having the right companion on the pillow next to my tasteful-silvered hair, to a variety of toys, lubes, openness, good grass, happiness, warmth, willingness to share, continuing/ever-growing desire & a climate that shrugs & goes on with its own sexual choreography (for the most part) w/o worrying very much about ours.
Of course, our adult kids & young gran'kids would be (maybe) HORRIFIED @the activity that goes on almost nightly in the Master Bedroom. Ha. Funny.
m. swof.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Ahm, I'm just confused, I guess ...
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Bob Horn on Sep 5, 2009 10:50 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Sojourner on Sep 5, 2009 11:09 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, there is more talk plus the other aspects mentioned such as pills, the LGBT community, trained professionals and less shame. Unless one indulges in group sex regularly or is doing interviews on the topic regularly, there’s only what happens for you.
Most of my acquaintances haven’t the slightest idea what personal intimacy is all about, since it takes work and time. And that includes those in the LGBT community who struggle with the same issues that wreck all relationships and marriages. I can still count on one hand the couples I know who have equalitarian relationships with a capacity for endurance. Most partners I know avoid one another by keeping busy.
The availability of porn might be helpful if it were not just a matter of performance. Sex for show entertains but a love relationship is plain old hard work. Maybe we are less screwed up today, but it is only by a thread.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms on Sep 5, 2009 11:19 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is not a little like the days when a Catholic priest (supposedly celibate) counseled prospective newly weds on sex. The blind leading the blind (actually, this is more like the lost acting as pathfinders), in other words.
Any behavior having anything to do with sex is normal behavior, in other words. Odd, isn't it that we haven't included pedophiles, masochists, coprolagniacs, coprofiliacs, urolagniacs, and other sexually related deformities in that list - and how long can we expect that it will be before that pedophiles, excrement-eaters, urine drinkers, and all the rest demands "normalcy" of us all for their particular aberration?
And thusly work mightily to assure that millions born or otherwise subsequently deformed and behaviorally aberrant will be condemned by the fellows' cowardice to languish without hope of cure for the foreseeable future - until we somehow throw off the fetters of more ideological crap like Victorian morality having to do with sex, that is.
It's just great to be FUBAR where one's sexual perception and behavior (emotionally and mentally, or what have you?), in other words - all you have to do is SAY so.
And must we also accept today's sexually FUBAR generation's definition of "better?" Yet another esoteric and solecistic equivalent to "male chauvinist" and the ism-fevered like? With the political and sociological cancer of militant feminism eating at the core belief vitals of the society and nation - that nowhere more evident than in the bewildered and chaotic reasoning and spastic ratiocination of the author here - and a nation in steep decline largely on that account, we continue to wallow in this sort of titillating-for-the-degenerate tripe.
All while a nation as mangled mentally where the most fundamental understanding of them all is concerned can't divine how it came to be in the pickle it's in where the rest of its affairs are concerned.
Remarkable? Not really; pretty much what you'd expect - from outside, that is.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Oh, good - another essay about sex . . .
Posted by: Sekhmetnakt
» RE: Oh, good - another essay about sex . . .
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» RE: Oh, good...a suggestion for next time
Posted by: noir
» RE: Oh, good - another comment about fear of sex . . .
Posted by: wouldhe
» RE: Oh, good - another comment about fear of sex . . .
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» RE: Oh, good - another comment about fear of sex . . .
Posted by: Jacob Kline
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maxsmart on Sep 5, 2009 12:49 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If we as a race cannot learn to balance body and mind, instinctual nature unrepressed without linking with conceptualizations that justify excessive collateral damage we will be the cause of our own extinction.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: hysteria persists
Posted by: Jacob Kline
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jrmart on Sep 5, 2009 11:44 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: richard0a37 on Sep 5, 2009 11:47 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks for a stimulating article. As I slowly make my way through it, so many memories surface that it is not easy to put one’s finger on what might constitute a statement about sexual attitude.
Unless of course, it's a girl's pussy you are putting your finger on, and then that says all you need to know about sex.
The comedian Chris Rock told us that when the hoes get together at their annual convention, clear heels is the fashion statement they wish to make, but when he bought a pair for his wife, she told him to throw that shit away and go wash his hands cos it’s time for dinner.
Even my Dad thought it was funny and he’s getting on for 90. His advice to me back in the early 60s was to ‘keep it in your trousers’.
My first girlfriend at the time was a couple of years younger than me, but growing very rapidly. We would sit next to each other on the settee in her parent’s living room. Her father would sit directly opposite us and periodically he would glare at her and growl things like ‘cover your knees up, pull your skirt down’, as if he was a disgruntled hyena waiting to pounce on his unsuspecting prey.
This used to upset her very much, so I would explain the Oedipus complex and tell her that he was unable to deal with his daughter growing into a woman.
My best friend had a really attractive younger sister in her teens. Her father would call her things like ‘an ugly cow’.
It has always puzzled me why some fathers had so much difficulty with their daughters once they began developing into young women. Did it never strike them that their daughters’ sexuality is for the rest of us? Fathers are supposed to view their grown up daughters as still the little babies that they held in their arms and consequently be blind to any sexuality they may or may not possess.
Personally, I don’t think there has been any change in anything related to sex, ever, although I empathise with everything that the author has written. There is a museum in Paris that shows the pornographic movies that were around in the early 20th century, and men appreciated a good blow job then as much as we do now.
The only sex that matters is the one you’re having with your current partner. If you’re not getting any, then who cares what’s happening to the rest of the world.
The fact of the matter is females are born with a vagina, and boys are born with a penis, and what happens between then and now is all down to you.
To finish, I’d like to comment on what armorypk has said. Back in the 60s, there was syphilis and gonorrhoea and other venereal diseases, male contraception was crap and female contraception non existent. Unwanted pregnancy was a real problem, and its potential effect on young females could not be underestimated.
As regards sex being fun, that’s an odd choice of word I think. Fun is playing ‘snap’ with your kids, but creeping into the bedroom of a married woman when the husband is away evokes emotions and memories that are impossible to quantify. This would constitute forbidden sex of the highest order, and an experience ranking high in the list of the 20 things one must do before you die.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jrmart on Sep 5, 2009 11:51 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: willymack on Sep 6, 2009 10:09 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sex is scary
Sex is naughty
Sex is fun
Sex is natural
Sex is a chore
Sex is mundane
Sex? You mean WITH SOMEBODY? (Al Bundy)
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maxpayne on Sep 6, 2009 11:53 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Age of Reason on Sep 6, 2009 7:55 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
September 11, 2001. You see, if they can get away with that (and they are) then they can get away with anything. And the next false-flag attack will make 9/11 pale by comparison. Enjoy your sex...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Raymond Emerson on Sep 6, 2009 9:53 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: pfm on Sep 7, 2009 12:29 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is OK to discuss sex, but only within certain undefined boundaries. But heaven help those who step outside and over that undisclosed line in the sand. We present the picture one is free to engage in sex with whom ever they choose carefully concealing the persecuting repercussion should one inadvertently find themselves across that undisclosed line in the sand. Premarital sex is tolerated but only within closed sanctioned undisclosed parameters. Should these sexual acts result in the birth of a child, American society enforces its own form of veiled shunning.
Is sex merely a physical act…? Or is sex part of an attitude which promotes openness, honesty, understanding and even acceptance…? The physical acts associated with sex might be better today, and I submit that depends on how one defines better, than it was 50 years ago, but, does America honestly embrace the full gamut associated with sex, better…?
Respectfully,
http://waterman99.wordpress.com
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Foresthiker on Sep 7, 2009 7:55 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: C. Rich on Sep 9, 2009 5:02 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://americaspeaksink.com/2009/09/americas-war-on-sex/
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: messedup on Sep 9, 2009 12:13 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kevinfedorr on Sep 10, 2009 3:43 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Jacob Kline on Sep 11, 2009 12:03 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Its erotic description of consuming physical desire within a committed relationship, and of the unbearable longing that is experienced by the two lovers during an unexpected and fearful separation, serves as an inspiration to ones like myself who wait for marriage to become intimate.
I do have the good fortune of being surrounded by actual families that were founded on committed love, by parents that waited in this way.
I believe there is something worth waiting for.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: micko on Sep 11, 2009 8:13 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sammyb on Sep 24, 2009 8:32 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: lukewatson on Oct 2, 2009 12:28 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
'Reality' Show Lets You Decide If Women Get Abortions?
Sex Addiction: A B.S. Excuse for Not Thinking
Why Do People Want to Have Sex with the 9-Foot Tall Natives in 'Avatar'?




