Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Sex and Relationships

Sanford's Sordid Sex Saga: Why We Like Publicly Shaming Hypocrite Politicians

By David Rosen, CounterPunch. Posted June 29, 2009.


Last week, Gov. Mark Sanford participated in one of the oldest social rituals in American history: public shaming of the moral hypocrite.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Nothing captures people’s attention more then watching an elected official cry before the national media. The spectacle of South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford, shedding tears, admitting to an adulterous affair and pleading for forgiveness, “I’ve been unfaithful to my wife,” captured all media attention throughout the country. He is separated from his wife and children and stepped down as chairman of the Republican Governors Association.

He joins his fellow Republican, Sen. John Ensign (NV), who admitted an adulterous affair last week and resigned as chairman of the Republican Policy Committee, the party’s leadership group in the Senate.

The revelations about the two adulterous affairs by self-righteous Republican Christian pols continue the sad saga of sex scandals that have become part of the American body politics. It also further erodes the all-but-bankrupt moral standing of the Republican party and further cuts the ranks of Republican worthies preening as potential 2012 presidential candidates.

In all likelihood, additional political hypocrites will be outed in sex scandals, becoming media fodder. (We’re still awaiting the outing of the recently married Gov. Charlie Crist [FL] who has been long rumored as a closeted homosexual.) Sadly, like the earlier episodes among Republican and Democrat pols, the Sanford and Ensign scandals are tawdry affairs lacking the spectacle of many of the earlier outings that marks American political history.

The political question is simple: Will Sanford and Ensign remain in office or be forced to resign? Their respective decisions will determine the extent to which the culture wars is over. In the age of Obama, adultery should no longer be illegal as it still is in many states, nor should it be immoral, a subject of shaming. Adultery, like all other sexual activities, should be a private matter, the concern of only those most intimately involved.

***

Over the last few years, Americans have watched with amusement as one pol after another was outed for his wayward sexual ways. The sex scandal momentum began to build in 2006 when Mark Foley was outed and intensified as revelations about Dan Sherwood’s adultery came out; revelations about religious leaders Paul Crouch and Ted Haggard only made things worse for the moralistic right. The subsequent outings of Larry Craig and David Vitter in ’07 intensified the issue of scandalous sex among the political class. However, revelations about John Edwards and Eliot Spitzer as well as Vito Fossella and Tim Mahoney before the ’08 election, seemed to have little impact on the national election which saw a shift in the balance of political power to the Democrats.

Numerous scandals occurred during the Clinton presidency that culminated in his dalliance with Monica Lewinsky and the Impeachment follies of 1998. Outings involved Senators Bob Packwood (R-OR) and Daniel Inouye (D-HI) and Representatives Ken Calvert (R-CA), Charles Canady (R-FL), Mel Reynolds (D-IL), Helen Chenoweth (R-ID) and Dan Burton (R-IN). Under the Clinton halo, these scandals are likely little known or all long forgotten

Adultery is a shadow haunting the Christian right. The Moral Majority was founded in 1979 proclaiming the sacredness of marriage and pushing for a Constitutional Amendment sanctifying the family. The Reagan era witnessed increased divorce rates and numerous politicians caught up in out-of-wedlock liaisons. The most publicized scandals of the period, involving Sen. Gary Hart (D-CO) and Rep. John Jenrette (D-SC), reflected the adulterer’s sense of power as much as his hypocrisy. Other scandals involving Sen. Roger Jepsen (R-IA) and Reps. Thomas Evans (R-DL), Sue Myrick (R-NC) and Arlan Stangeland (R-MN) only intensified the moral hypocrisy of the Moral Majority.

Jerry Falwell founded the Moral Majority against a background of political sex scandals. In 1979, Rep. Robert Bauman (R-MD) was arrested for soliciting a 16-year-old gay male dancer and Robert Leggett (D-CA) revealed that he had fathered two out-of-wedlock children in an adulterous relation with a congressional secretary and had an affair with another female aide (who became his wife). In 1978, New York congressmen Fred Richmond was arrested for soliciting a 16-year-old African-American delivery boy and an undercover police officer. A few years earlier congressmen from across the country, including Wilbur Mills (D-AK) and Wayne Hays (D-OH) as well as John Young (D-TX) and Allan Howe (D-UT), were involved in front-page scandals that destroyed their reputations and forced them from office. The Moral Majority was formed to stem the breakdown of traditional values, values often broken by its own constituency.

These are but some of the scandals involving prominent politicians that have occurred over the last three decades. The recent announcement that Mimi Beardsley Alford, a retired New York church administrator, was publishing a memoir about her affair with John Kennedy while she was an intern, reminds us that once upon a time presidential peccadilloes were discreetly hidden by the press. This discretion was the norm during the 20th century so that the actual or alleged adulterous liaisons of Harding, FDR, Ike, JFK, Nixon, LBJ and Bush-the-Lesser were either denied or hidden. Clinton’s outing was more about politics that sexual morality.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: politics, sex, marriage, christians, obama, relationships, vitter, sex scandals, ensign, sanford, moral majority

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Sex and Relationships! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
This ain't no disco
Posted by: Perry Logan on Jun 29, 2009 3:16 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The example of President Clinton proves the author's thesis wrong. Sexual scandals were created and deployed--not as entertainment, but to destroy a popular President.

Recall there was a well-funded campaign to assassinate the character of President Clinton and his family. If you don't know about it, you need to read The Hunting of the President, by Joe Conason and Gene Lyons.

In a nutshell, the Republican Party attempted a coup, using accusations of sexual misbehavior as their tool. This is a far cry from mere entertainment.

The attacks on the Clintons are easily the greatest example of character assassination in world history. A fair percentage of progressives will go to their graves believing every piece of sh!t the Arkansas Project made up.

Even today, when some male progressives start to talk about Bill Clinton, you think you fell into a porno novel.

Many of the big "progressive" blogs began repeating hoary old anti-Clinton smears during the primary. They used right-wing smears against a fellow Democrat, marking the death of progressivism in America. This ain't no disco.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: This ain't no disco Posted by: brunowe
» Doing a Monica Lewinsky Posted by: brunowe
How important is it?
Posted by: weathered on Jun 29, 2009 3:23 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The biggest fraud and phonies of them all?
Aging yuppies or hollywood?

The vehicle for hypocrisy NewYorker/NYtimes/PBS/NPR the epicenter of PHONY, self-serving agenda. Enjoy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Read This: So Funny
Posted by: Lilly on Jun 29, 2009 6:21 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Google "my trip john kenney" to get a really funny little piece (not surprisingly titled "My Trip" by John Kenney) in today's NYT. Note: don't bother unless you watched Mark Sanford's unforgettable press conference as it will be like reading a satire before you've read the original that's being satirized. Kenny has GOT the press conference. Perfectly.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hypocrisy......
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Jun 29, 2009 7:38 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While both sides of the aisle have participated in shameful behavior, it was Mr. Sanfords behavior while in Congress hawking righteous indignation and impeachment of then President Clinton - the height of hypocrisy in the face that he NOW doesn't feel he should be impeached! People in public office should hold themselves to a higher standard, practice what you preach!

My problem isn't that people are human and they do make mistakes, my issue is that the GOP not only deludes themselves about being the party of "FAMILY VALUES" - but then have the nerve to get righteous and point fingers when democrats fail - yet when it's one of their own it becomes a "private family matter"! WTF!!! HYPOCRISY AT ITS WORST! This appears to be something that the GOP is best at! And I really would like to question their "base", because while I understand forgiveness, I also know that forgiving someone doesn't mean that you continue to play suckers and keep falling for the okey-doke!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hypocrisy...... Posted by: andrushka
» RE: Hypocrisy...... Posted by: uncertain
No one
Posted by: Archie1954 on Jun 29, 2009 8:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
should get too agitated about sexual pecadillos. The only time it interests me at all is when a party is completely hypocritical about it. I detest the Republican party for its supposed lock on moral, family values when the leaders are the worst immoral, unethical and venal scum you can find anywhere. I don't care if they are, I care that they pretend they are not.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Chuckleheads
Posted by: willymack on Jun 29, 2009 9:40 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Listen to 'em long enough, and you might become one yourself.
Ours is one of the few remainng countries in the world where sex is NAUGHTY.
We let chuckleheads dictate to us what morality is, rather than using our heads.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We like to shame them.
Posted by: Eddie Van Helsing on Jun 29, 2009 11:46 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Because we don't have the balls to drag them out of office, tar and feather the bastards, and run them right the fuck out of town.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Any claim to moral superiority should be met with vicious mockery.
Posted by: ikonoklast on Jun 29, 2009 12:35 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Look around at any of the traditional pillars of morality and you will find they are build on foundations of sand. Far too many people in America think that morality is based on a belief (whether an ancient superstition or a personal code of ethics) rather than the practical application of treating people well. We need to rebuke the notion that morality has anything to do with the sanctity of one's belief. Only one's actions can be judged--intentions and beliefs are irrelevant.

Knowing how easily people can make mistakes or yield to temptation, any claim of moral superiority should be dismissed. Indeed, those who set themselves up on a pedestal have the furthest to fall. And when the hypocrites do fall--as they must--we should point and laugh and learn from them how not to act.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

These two are different
Posted by: westomoon on Jun 29, 2009 4:34 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They're cleverer at using the fundamentalist culture's other big theme -- redemption for sinners (a sacrament reserved only for fellow-fundies, of course).

Unlike most of the scandals cited in this article, both Sanford and Ensign outed themselves -- in press conferences, no less. The big bursts of publicity surrounding their falls from grace have been self-generated. Sanford managed to stretch his out over several days of press conferences, and turned all but the first into fundamentalist sermons where he equated himself with various Biblical good guys.

Sanford and Ensign are also unusual in that they have been lauded by their fellow-conservatives as "stand-up guys", apparently for outing themselves and for stepping down from their leadership positions in the R Party -- though they still think they're fine for their political offices. Honest to God, Sanford got heaped with praise, and the meme his fellow wack jobs were parroting was that bizarre "stand-up guy" line. Not to mention Limbaugh's depiction of him as a martyr to the Reign of Obama.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What's the problem?
Posted by: wisegalah on Jun 29, 2009 8:16 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Most of the denizens of Hollywood and other supposedly significant amusement centres are screwing anything which moves and they are treated like gods.
Always included in interviews as if they had something important or even interesting to say. Every manufactured effort at being funny or insightful is greeted with whoops of amazement or laughter.

Politicians are living in much the same way as the greater part of the population. Who is surprised? Nobody should be.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Veritas/truth
Posted by: Veritaetdignita on Jun 29, 2009 8:43 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We seem to get our vision altered by his SIN, forget about the affair the very real issue is that he left the state of South Carolina without someone at the helm. Fortunately nothing of major consequence happened in his absence, but for the people of S.C. He truly showed what he thinks of his constituents, obviously he does not give an F or a D. That's why he should resign as governor or be forced to resign. What a difference it would be if he were a democrat, then again we would see the true colours of the fublicans. -- ooops meant refuckyoucans.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I can see why men cheat
Posted by: messedup on Jun 30, 2009 6:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The media glorified wifey as a saint, and judging from what they said about her, what she looks like, and the things she has said, and people around her have said.

She is as cold as ice.., and maybe she pushed him away. She's about to go on vacation, taking all the kids with her.

So yeah, he should have been at home with his wife and kids instead of screwing around.

All I know is that I'll never have to worry about a scenario like this, and I don't watch the soap operas, nor do I care for any of the glamour in all of this.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I know, I know
Posted by: BlueTigress on Jun 30, 2009 9:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Affairs are distressingly common and we should not get too worked up about it.

The way he handled it was completely irresponsible. Larking off for five days so he can give Mr. Happy a workout without so much as a "call the Lt Gov if anything comes up" shows how little he thinks of everyone who is not him.

Any time the adulterer is a Repug they should get called out twice. Once for the affair and once for being a hypocrite.

Yes, this is because Repugs think they're morally superior to the rest of us. That's why this is an issue.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement