Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Sex and Relationships

Vampires, Werewolves, and "Scary" Female Sexuality: the Sexist World of Twilight

By Carmen D. Siering, Ms. Magazine. Posted May 19, 2009.


Adults have an obligation to start a conversation concerning the darker themes and anti-feminist rhetoric in the extremely popular Twilight series.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

In Stephenie Meyer's Twilight saga, a wildly popular four-book series of young adult novels, the protagonist Bella Swan -- by all accounts a very average human girl -- has two suitors. One is the unimaginably beautiful vampire, Edward, the other a loyal and devoted werewolf, Jacob. Fans of the books, and now a movie version, often break into "teams," aligning themselves with the swain they hope Bella will choose in the end: Team Edward or Team Jacob.

But few young readers ask, "Why not Team Bella?" perhaps because the answer is quite clear: There can be no Team Bella. Even though Bella is ostensibly a hero, in truth she is merely an object in the Twilight world.

On the surface, the Twilight saga seems to have something to please everyone. Moms are reading the books and swooning over Edward right alongside their teen and tween daughters. Librarians and teachers are delighted to see students with their heads tucked into books, and since Twilight's romantic sensuality is wrapped up in an abstinence message, all the kissing and groping appear to be harmless.

But while Twilight is ostensibly a love story, scratch the surface and you will find an allegorical tale about the dangers of unregulated female sexuality. From the very first kiss between Edward and Bella, she is fighting to control her awakening sexuality. Edward must restrain her, sometimes physically, to keep her from ravishing him, and he frequently chastises her when she becomes, in his opinion, too passionate. There are those who might applaud the depiction of a young man showing such self-restraint, but shouldn't the decision about when a couple is ready to move forward sexually be one they make together?

Bella is also depicted as being in need of someone to take charge, someone to take care of her. Edward isn't just protective, though, but often overprotective of Bella. Edward is jealous of Bella's relationships with other boys, going so far as to disable her car to keep her at home. He is condescending, assuming that he knows what is best for her in every situation.

Maybe it's difficult for Edward to see Bella as an equal because Bella has almost no personality. Meyer writes on her website that she "left out a detailed description of Bella in the book so that the reader could more easily step into her shoes." But Meyer fails to give Bella much of an interior life as well; Bella is a blank slate, with few thoughts or actions that don't center on Edward. If Meyer hopes that readers see themselves as Bella, what is it she is suggesting to them about the significance of their own lives?

Meyer also insists that she sees Bella as a feminist character, since the foundation of feminism is being able to choose. What Meyer fails to acknowledge is that all of the choices Bella makes are Meyer's choices -- choices based on her own patriarchal Mormon background.

In Breaking Dawn, the latest book in the series, Meyer finally allows Bella's subordination to end as she takes her proper place: in the patriarchal structure. When Bella becomes a wife and mother, Meyer allows her to receive her heart's desire -- to live forever by Edward's side, to be preternaturally beautiful and graceful, to be strong and be able to defend herself.

The Twilight saga has become something of a bonding phenomenon among mothers and daughters. But reading the books together and mutually swooning over Edward isn't enough. As influential adults, mothers (and, by extension, teachers and librarians) have an obligation to start a conversation concerning the darker themes and anti-feminist rhetoric in these tales. There is plenty to work with, from the dangers of losing yourself in an obsessive relationship to the realities of owning one's sexuality.

Director Catherine Hardwicke's film version of Twilight remains true to the novel, but there are subtle changes that make it much more feminist-friendly. Kristin Stewart's Bella is more outspoken and forthright, and Robert Pattinson's Edward is much less condescending and overbearing. Their relationship seems to be built on equality and friendship, and includes scenes of mutual sexual frustration and restraint. Here is a Bella we can root for, a Bella who stands just a little bit more on her own and is a part of the action. It will be interesting to see if the next film in the Twilight series, to be directed by a man this time, Chris Weitz, will take a similar path. Or, once again, will Bella be left without a team of her own?

For the full version of this article, pick up a copy of the Spring 2009 issue of Ms. on newsstands, or have a copy sent to your door by joining the Ms. community at www.msmagazine.com.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: sex, gender, sexism, teens, abstinence, sexuality, twilight

Carmen D. Siering is an assistant professor of English and women's studies at Ball State University in Muncie, Ind. One of her research areas is popular culture and its influence in the lives of girls and women.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Sex and Relationships! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
It must be a slow news day.
Posted by: Eddie Van Helsing on May 20, 2009 6:14 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If Alternet is willing to publish an article that overanalyzes a crappy romance novel, then it must be a damned slow day indeed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sometimes It's Just a Story..a well loved story.
Posted by: LMB on May 20, 2009 6:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I hate this. Ok, Yes, Bella is a sorta weakish girl, but you have to understand, she's a MERE mortal in a basically WORLD of supernaturals(i.e. vampires, werewolves , some with additional superpowers).

No one ever mentions Alice who basically is the vampire who's psychic senses drive a majority of the story and who's influence is strong and powerful throughout ALL of the books! Or Jane who shatters that "little weak girl" image by being the most frightening and POWERFUL of the Volturi.

As for the supposed sexual chasity of the series. The character Emmett (Edward's "brother") is constantly teasing Bella about her sexuality and talks about how Rosalie and he are "very" active in their sex life.

The whole marriage that happens was based on Edward being old fashioned. He is the old fashioned prince charming. A rare character nowadays in literature or film. What's wrong with that? Must every man be an uncontrolable brute? (If you want that character, the Saga has that too in the brutish, yet lovable Jacob)

And what's wrong with having restraint of some sort? I'm not a mormon or a conservative by any means. I'm actually a liberal pro-choice democrat who is a HUGE fan of the Twilight Saga.

I have READ all four books, the draft of Midnight Sun (Edwards perspective of Twilight) and all excerpts/outtakes on S. Meyer's website.

It seems painfully obvious to me that A LOT if not all of these journalists reporting on the underlying message of the saga have not read past the first book. (And seeing the movie DOES NOT count.)

If they did read the saga, they would have to eat their words. Because deep down what The Twilight Saga is is a completely original and captivating story.

It is a series of books after all, not political commentary. Did anyone ever analyse Harry Potter like this?

Why must everything fit into this little political box?

And in reference to the above comment, its not just a romance novel... no romance novel has characters this rich. Or instigated so much passion on so many forums!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I read my wife's copy. Posted by: Eddie Van Helsing
Who cares?! It's a fucking novel!!
Posted by: countingdaisies on May 20, 2009 8:14 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Does everything in the world have to follow the feminazi agenda?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If 'anti feminist' means no ugly broads
Posted by: Daito on May 20, 2009 10:43 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I suppose the film could be construed that way. However, I doubt this film would have been as popular with teens if the chick was a butch cut lesbian wearing a wool sweater and size 12 boots. Maybe in Maniacland a film maker will spend 50 million making that kind of film, but not here in Realityville where hot babes sweating over a vampire kiss spend $11 a ticket to sit in a movie seat and then go buy the DVD to boot.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Get a Freaking Life!
Posted by: cdmsr on May 23, 2009 8:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is an adolescent novel, a derivitive, diluted and not very good one. If there is any real concern here, it is the secret religious messages hidden in the series by its Mormon author.

GOTCHA! That's a joke, but more reasonable than your tripe. It's sad, but some minds can see antifeminist intent in the fact that men urinate while standing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» The ad to the left . . . Posted by: cdmsr
Oh, please
Posted by: BlueTigress on May 23, 2009 10:35 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Twilight" is just a Buffy the Vampire Slayer fanfic that had the names changed for legal purposes.

Bo-RING!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's just a book means it can't be critically analyzed?
Posted by: littleblue on May 26, 2009 7:59 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I take objection to idea that just because Twilight is "just a book" that it is somehow unworthy of critical analysis. I also take objection to the phrase "femi-nazi" posters are using here, as if critical analysis of culture, mores, religion, and politics that affect society can even compare to Nazi ideology.

But anywhoo... back to the matter at hand.


I did read the series after a dear friend suggested them. I continued through all 4 books only to see how terribly worse it could actually get. It's clear to me that the author is using vampirism - with it's attendant immortality, extraordinary powers of mind and physical body, ability to have dominion over the more terrestrial world - as a metaphor for her religion's concept of everlasting life, becoming gods (or at least god-like) through physical (though apparently not material) asceticism, families are forever, and "living in the world, not of the world" ideal.

The only way Bella can achieve that "immortality" is first through motherhood as a human and then being awarded that immortal "blessing" (vampirism) via a "gift" of venom from a patrilineal line (as in, say, the priesthood carried by males). Physical ever-lasting life is a patriarchal version of immortality, where as a matriarchal version holds that immortality is a woman's gift - being linked like a spiral to the generations through time, like Demeter and Persephone, for example.

Vampirism, that metaphor for a patriarchal version of immortality, comes along with god-like special talents (like being a shield against mind control), apparently mind-blowing and hilarious building-blowing sex, material rewards, AND then the worst part - ultimate physical supernatural ability and beauty. The only cost of such gifts seems to be silence for individual (female?) pain and suffering in deference to others and minimal physical asceticism (no drinking human blood). Alternatively, when the vampirism is conferred matrilineally (like Victoria and her newborns), it becomes crazed and evil and uncontrollable.

The intense, inevitable love affair between Bella and Edward that never really was explained why they're so inexplicably drawn to each other is more about predestined plans (Adam and Eve who then give rise to the human bloodline) as well as a paternalistic and protectorate "relationship," as Edward is a 100 year old experienced, educated man trapped in a 17 year old body.

I'm wondering why Bella's introduction to motherhood had to be so graphic and so graphically grizzly (oh, and it was grizzly!)? Surely there is more to it than just protecting youngsters - making it seem bad so they don't run off themselves and have babies at 16. Maybe it's because the patriarchy paints the pain of childbearing as a punishment for The Fall/Original Sin rather than giving the female the credit for realizing immortality, in a broad sense, really does come through spawning generation after generations through time - like the Demeter and Persephone myth illustrates. Throughout history for thousand and thousands of years, it was biology pushing girls into womanhood, for better or for worse, not devils or snakes or men duping women into it.

What makes the series sexist is that Meyers has an obvious disdain for every single female character in that book, save for Alice and Esme (and *only* because they are relatively asexual and represent the Good Mother figures (like the typical fairy godmother figure)), and romanticizes the female stereotype, even the parts where being controlled is considered "only a little over-protection". It isn't until Bella arrives at the quintessential female stage - married and mothering and, I'd argue, aligned with the patriarchy - does Meyers give Bella any strength and self-confidence.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Woman are suffering all over the world...and this is what you're worried about.
Posted by: KSD on May 26, 2009 6:32 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...and thinking feminists have an obligation to point out ridiculous ideas are being pushed in the name of feminism. Almost every anti-Twilight rant I've read really comes down to this: they don't like the kind of character Bella is (and thus, they don't like the kind of girls that identify with her -- how is that feminist?) and they don't like kind of relationship she has with Edward, which is pretty typical, except for the parts that directly flow from the fact that he's a vampire. Why a certain school of feminists has decided that Twilight is so much more 'dangerous' (paternalistic much?) than Sweet Valley High or Juno or Sex in the City, I'm not sure, except that I think there are some people who just automatically take issue with anything young women embrace. That strikes me as a far more misogynistic stance than anything I read in the Twilight series.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's the teeth, stupid
Posted by: geometeer on May 26, 2009 6:33 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
American teenagers suffer strongly but spasmodically from their sexually awakening bodies, and get pleasure at least sometimes.

American teenagers suffer without let-up and without sensual reward from the wires pushing their teeth into an 'ideal' as fake as Barbie's outline.

No wonder they love fantasies of vampires and werewolves, with teeth growing free and unashamed, used without remorse.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bad, lazy writing & crap characters
Posted by: EmpressRiz on Jun 1, 2009 11:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The main problem is identified in the article--Bella is a blank slate. She's a TERRIBLE role model for the tween girls reading these books (and if you don't think the books they read are an influence on young readers, you have no tweens in your life). She's 16 at the opening and 18 by the end--she has not gone through that crucial change that most young women experience between 20 and 25, and because of her immortality, never will. She's sold herself into marriage too young, and sacrifices nothing in the end--she has an immortal child and an immortal husband, endless wealth, and all the bad guys are dead or defeated with none of her loved ones dead.

In short, bad, sloppy, lazy writing--what should have remained fan fic turned into a
multi-million dollar marketing phenomenon. Four novels with no real plot development (important points just sprung on the reader, something Stephanie Meyer, had she participated in any kind of editing process, would/should have been severely taken to task for)and cookie-cutter characters. It's Disney for the supernatural set. THAT'S the real objection most of us have--bad, lazy writing that's made way too much money while other, worthier books waste on the shelves.

This IS an appropriate topic for Alternet--"Twilight" is a part of the dumbing of America, and (as someone mentioned above) a great tool for the religious right, written by one of their members, pushing an unhealthy agenda.

The defenders of the book really make me wonder who they had for teachers. Or if they were ever taught to read critically.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the massage is the message
Posted by: maxsmart on Jun 1, 2009 2:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The answer is pretty simple in this dilemma, if you can't do it then do the next thing to it!! And it might be a good sexual learning tool to discover mutual intimacy and satisfaction too without all the fear...there might be quite a few more orgasmic women if they could have had a guiltfree and fearless beginning to their sex awakening...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Overanalyze much?
Posted by: daisygurl523 on Jun 7, 2009 8:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Man u people overanalize things too much. If u would just take a deep breath and NOT think it wouldnt be such a big deal. The Twilight saga is one of the best I have read and thats that. No more, no less. Quit overanalyzing!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

so much STUFF.
Posted by: bustamove on Jun 15, 2009 7:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Edward is always restraining Bella. In the first book, I can see that he is doing it because he wants to eat her (so they face touch instead). in the second book, he's not really there.
In the third one, Bella really really wants to have sex with him. He says no, because he wants to wait until they're married. Bella doesn't want to get married, and for a ton of good reasons! Her mom wouldn't like it (except she did, which was really really strange. writing shortcut?), and she didn't want to have all that attention.
her situation just sucks in that book! It's like, no marriage, no sex. Why is that solely edwards decision? He says he doesn't want to hurt/kill her. how does getting married make the sex less dangerous for them?
and another thing: sex is life threatening in the book! When they finally do it, she is covered in bruises!
They do do it again though, and everything is fine.

Teenagers are sexually repressed. today, in health, we watched a birth (straight up yoni shot) so we would "make good decisions over the summer."
i don't know if this is a very feminist thing to say, but it was really gross for me. the vagina pretty much coughed up the after birth. it made me not want to have sex.
Why is having sex a bad decision for us to make over the summer? We know about protection.
the crazy sex and disgusting birth (it was like something out of the movie, Alien! SERIOUSLY!) in twilight were supposed to have the same effect.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement