Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Sex and Relationships

Hey Miss California, How Does God Feel About Fake Breasts?

By Sheldon Filger, Huffington Post. Posted May 11, 2009.


Carrie Prejean claims God disapproves of gay marriage. How does the Almighty feel about her breast implants?
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Maybe I'm just Miss California dreaming, but it seems to me that Carrie Prejean is afflicted with a terminal case of breast envy. Just as some men may feel inadequate if they perceive a certain part of their anatomy doesn't "measure up," it could be that the actions, thoughts and words of the 21 year old beauty queen and runner up at the Miss USA pageant are merely a disguise for her own sense of not "measuring up" to her beauty queen peers in the natural state God endowed her with.

There is a reason why I inserted God into this narrative. The whole premise of Ms. Prejean's political antics has been predicated on the claim that she is a devout, Bible-believing Christian woman and her outspoken posture on the issue of same sex-marriage is an act of pious conscience. Whether or not I agree with Carrie Prejean's decision to place her celebrity persona in the service of the anti-Gay marriage organization known as the National Organization for Marriage, I could respect her decision if it was based on consistency. However, it strikes me that this devout Bible-believing Christian woman missed one verse in the Bible, no doubt unintentionally. Allow me to quote from Chapter 4, Verse 5 of the Song of Solomon: "Thy two breasts are like young roes that are twins, which feed among the lilies."

If you are a conservative Christian who believes that the entire Bible, chapter and verse, is the inalterable word of God almighty, then it appears clear that God thought female breasts were quite important, or otherwise the Lord of the universe would not have bothered to reveal what is essentially an erotic ode to the bosoms of women. My interpretation of this biblical verse is that God thought breasts as they exist on each woman are beautiful, "like young roes that are twins, which feed among the lilies." And for the record, young roes are somewhat on the small size.

So, it is obvious that God adores female breasts (kind of like me, or maybe it is vice versa). But more importantly, God created female breasts, along with everything else in the universe. So the essence of that verse from the Song of Solomon is that God thought his creation of the bosoms of women was perfection. Furthermore, it is a principal of conservative Christians such as Carrie Prejean that everything God created in its natural state is perfect and should never be altered, such as the institution of marriage being solely a union for a man and a woman. So Ms. Prejean, what about hiring a cosmetic surgeon to alter your breasts, and undo God's perfect creation?

According to Keith Lewis, the co-Director of the Miss California Pageant, Carrie Prejean approached his organization, and they acceded to her request to arrange the surgical insertion of implants into her breasts, so that she would be more "competitive" as she came to blows with her rival beauty queens. This may be calculating and even cynical, but is hardly a reflection of Christian values, unless I'm missing something Ms. Prejean is more attuned to.

Statistics from the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery indicate that in an average year, more than 300,000 American women have their breasts surgically enlarged. As someone who has been involved in extensive fine art photography of the female nude, this strikes me as tragic. Medical science confirms what my own eyes have observed; 60% of women in the United States have breasts that fit into bras with an A or B cup. Most breasts at maturity are of modest or small size, and historically most artists have preferred female models with bosoms on the small size as the ideal manifestation of feminine beauty.

In my book on the aesthetics of female sensuality, entitled Erotic Book, I explored the reasons why so many women have been seduced into believing that external perceptions of their state of beauty and feminine allure are solely determined by the quantity of fatty tissue contained within their mammary glands. Not only is size the least important aesthetic component of breasts; the consequences of surgical implants have often led to dire results for women.

In my opinion, Carrie Prejean did not set a sterling example by succumbing to superficial and vulgar definitions of feminine beauty and going the implant route, in a crass attempt to win a contest based on factors that have nothing to do with her character or innate human qualities. For that reason, her awkward attempt to now transition from the woman with the implants to a virtuous moral crusader lacks all credibility. A veneer of pseudo-Christian hypocrisy will not camouflage Ms. Prejean's vapid breast obsession, no matter how tightly she wraps herself with it.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: breast implants, same sex marriage, entertainment news, carrie prejean, miss california carrie pr

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Sex and Relationships! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
On Beating Up Women
Posted by: terryhallinan on May 11, 2009 2:22 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Do you perhaps kick puppies when you aren't beating up on women?

It is, of course, a universal obsession.

Ms. Prejean's bio is a really horrendous tale of an allegedly homosexual father - and perhaps mother.

That may not be any kind of excuse for her prejudice against gay marriage - which I am happy to support - but it does argue that it might be best not to bash the young lady for saying the same thing people like Barack Obama said in the Democratic debates in agreement with nearly all of his opponents.

You have won the war. There is little but mopping up left.

It is a glorious victory.

Why not celebrate rather than berate those left behind?

JMO.


Best, Terry

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: On Beating Up Women Posted by: i_17bingo
» RE: On Beating Up Women Posted by: pickles539
» RE: I agree pickles539 Posted by: Lara1967
» RE: Why? Posted by: BlueTigress
» RE: Why? Posted by: Lara1967
» RE: Why? Posted by: iolanthe
» RE: On Beating Up Women Posted by: Lizard of Oz
» Apples and Oranges Posted by: reelman
Congrats on the Free Implants Carrie!
Posted by: Cory.Goodman on May 11, 2009 4:31 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"....are merely a disguise for her own sense of not "measuring up""

I really don't think she is coming out so strongly against gay marriage because she is self conscious about her breasts, it is because she is self conscious about the fact the she actually might NOT be the center of the universe! I think her righteous indignation is caused by an inability to accept defeat, as we call it "sore-loser", with a splash of megalomania. Usually people are humbled in defeat, NOT HER!

"transition from the woman with the implants to..."

As though she is the only one in the competition with implants? News flash, in Mrs. USA they ALL have implants. It was just fortunate for Carrie that she didn't have to go through what most women who want implants go through. Most women shamelessly bare all with their small breasts, putting themselves on display, small breasts and all. They must ignore their insecurities and act "sexy" on stage. They must rub their small breasts all over the faces of old men and scumbags. These men aren't the nicest sorts either, so they often ridicule and demean these women for their perfectly normal size breasts.

Once they have worked hard save up enough money, or some old rich guy "sugar daddy" decides he's tired of the small breasts rubbing on his face and wants an upgrade, they can finally get the operation that will increase their earnings potential.

I think strippers should be the ONLY people allowed to get implants! They PAY THEIR DUES with their small breasts. Not only do they bare the same burden that society has placed on them, but they have to shamelessly put them on display, and endure direct insults (I doubt sexual harassment suits against strip club patrons get very far). While bored housewives deal with their media induced fear of inadequacy, and want to feel "sexy" for their husbands (as though "sexy" ever implied big breasted) these women are constantly on the front lines, burying their own media induced shame, and putting themselves out there for all to see.

Maybe if Mrs. Prejean ever had to bare-all in front of a live audience (I understand she did photos, not the same) she would be a bit more humble, and recognize that maybe there isn't some "conspiracy" to see her fail because of her conservative beliefs. Maybe she would just accept that maybe, just maybe, there is a better beauty contestant than her in the world.

flame on :D

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bill Goldschein
Posted by: billgee on May 11, 2009 4:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ads
Ever notice how many ads (on breasts, penii, etc.) an article like this kicks up on internet pages (google, yahoo)?
Look who is paying the bills.

He who knows does not speak, he who speaks does not know.
Lao-Tsu or somebody remakably like him

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» That's because of Google and Yahoo Posted by: strahlungsamt
» RE: That's because of Google and Yahoo Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN
Fake breasts are not pretty
Posted by: xvictor on May 11, 2009 4:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
it's a violation of nature. the whole character is one big fake. prejean is a telling example.

men are banned from using sports enhancement drugs. fake breasts should be barred from any beauty contest.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

implants
Posted by: bobcoejr on May 11, 2009 4:58 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
BEING A MALE SEXIST PIG..COULD I PLEASE CHECK THOSE CUTE LITTLE PUPPIES OUT???????

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Puppy check Posted by: BlueTigress
breast implants and beauty
Posted by: raine1 on May 11, 2009 5:12 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Despite what your friendly plastic surgeon will tell you about breast implants ( they are purchased for about $100 each and resold to the unlucky people who have them installed against their chest walls for about $5,000 minimum...think about this), they will make the "wearer" sick at some point. There are more than a quarter of a million women in this country alone who suffer from horrible medical conditions from these devices. Because they are huge money makers to the chemical companies that manufacture the ingredients in them, the device manufacturers that put them together and the plastic surgeons who install them, then take them out and replace them on average 3 times per woman,they make a huge profits for all concerned except the "consumer." They have been in the past, and are currently advertised as a device that is "harmless" and one that will make a woman have "more self-esteem", preying on female insecurities about their natural bodies, thus inducing the gullible and insecure to buy them and have them stuck in their bodies. Implants are major money makers. This and only this, is the reason they were allowed back on the market. Don't believe me, ask Dr.David Kessler.

I feel sorry for any woman who believes her beauty and worth are wrapped up in mammary tissue. Large breasts are not going to make you smarter, happier,or healthier. They are going to make you sick, eventually deformed and sorry that you ever allowed yourself to be sold on a bad idea of what women area all about. If you want to see what breast implants do to a woman, go look at the siliconeholocaust.org website.

For young people who feel that the only thing they have going for them is their looks, i would suggest getting some in-depth counseling. The insecurity issues they are dealing with are more than just skin-deep.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: breast implants and beauty Posted by: lynned2002
» RE: breast implants and beauty Posted by: signalfire
» RE: breast implants and beauty Posted by: lynned2002
The "Juicing" of Beauty (all Pun intended)
Posted by: Purple Girl on May 11, 2009 5:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is a problem of Illegal use of 'enhancements' in these beauty contests. How many not only have breast implants - but have had little injections to make their lips poutier? Or eliminate the asymmetrical 'dimple'? Even added a little more reflective color to their hair?
At this point we should be calling them Cosmetic Contests. This shit should be as illegal as any athelet who resorts to 'juicing' or corking their bats or tarring the ball...or whatever other little tricks contenders use to get an edge on the competition or ways to screw the opponent up unfairly.
What is even more horrrendous are these 'beauties' are sent out as OUR Representative in interantional contests wearing a sash saying "Miss America"- Do we really want to be represented by an idiot- wasn't Bush an embarassment enough, must we reconfirm there is a large element of Self induced brain damaged in our population by granting the least curious among US a crown?
If we are going to continue to choose only the most Beautiful in these contests then perhaps we should also have another for the Brightest, as a way of proving this woman Represents US too. Of course that is ridiculous- because brains and beauty can be found it one person, and no doubt we have plenty of examples of that in this country (just don't look towards Politics to find one).
Really if we are choosing the Female designate to be the shining example of our great country- shouldn't she not only be beautiful,and intellegent but have some grasp of the "inalienable" Rights and Freedoms in our Founders Documents?
And what are we telling the young girls about what constituties our countries values- beauty but not brains insight or compassion?
and what are we telling the men around the world- our woman would be the perfect slave trade candidates? All tall blonde, perfectly proportioned and dumb as a doorknob? Willing to do anything just as long as she is admired?
As a femele I don't want women like this representing the population of Females in this country- we are far more than mere beauty. And as a citizen I do not want these type women representing Our country- We are far more complex and forward thinking than that.Our country was founded on the rejecting the 'old ways' and venturing into New ways...Reason we've been called the 'Great Experiment' was not referring to new procedures to perfect the exterior, but new ways to perfect the interior of the Union and it's citizens.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» in all fairness Posted by: Cory.Goodman
» RE: in all fairness Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN
Phoney Breasts? bummer
Posted by: jrmart on May 11, 2009 5:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I must be very naive. I thought that the contestants in the Miss America contest were of a natural beauty. Boy was i wrong.
How can the pageant allow that? I am shocked. Not by what the girl said, she has every right to speak her mind. After all celebrities do it daily. First amendment and all that. And I don't think it fair to attack her for saying what she believes. But she "enhanced" herself to win a beauty contest? NOT FAIR. The pageant should be ashamed. Oh, wait, it is a "beauty contest". sorry nuff said.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Phoney Breasts? bummer Posted by: Cory.Goodman
» RE: Phoney Breasts? bummer Posted by: Mrs. Jefferson
not really sure...
Posted by: sureshot45 on May 11, 2009 6:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
why anyone is listening to what a 21 year old miss usa runner up has to say about marriage, race relations, christianity, etc. who is she? and who cares? so she is a hypocrite? big deal. shes not leading our country or even close. shes just some pageant girl who got a boob job and is against gay rights. there are bigger hypocrites out there..ones whose lies actually affect my life, retirement fund, well being, health care etc. this is so trivial.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: not really sure... Posted by: medusa
» RE: not really sure... Posted by: luzmejor
Prejean's mother was
Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN on May 11, 2009 6:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
a contestant on a game show~~~~

URBAN RENEWAL??

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

if you're a KKKristian hypocrisy is automatic
Posted by: rastaman on May 11, 2009 6:49 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
why is anyone surprised that a KKKristian is uneducated, regressive, hypocritical and stupid?

those are the main tenets of this false dotrine
cult.....Carrie is just exercising her religious muscles.

for her supporters, who delight in being as neanderthalic as they can be (sorry to all the neanderthals out there), it's a celebration of their willful, demanded and expected mental midgetry.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Artificial enhancement is prohibited to athletes...
Posted by: leafsong1 on May 11, 2009 7:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...because they are presumed to be role models, even though their primary function is as athletes. Miss America contestants are ONLY role models; that is their only stated purpose. If there was any moral sense among the organizers of these events, they would take the role model role seriously. Congress wastes their time investigating steroids in baseball, but would never consider wasting it on breast implants in a contest that brands itself with the word "America" even more than baseball does. There is definitely some hypocrisy here somewhere.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Falsies
Posted by: QQOblivion on May 11, 2009 7:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a guy I say, small real breasts are INFINITELY more attractive than fake big breasts any day.

I used to really like big breasts. But now days the very real possibility that such big breasts are fake leads to me enjoying the beauty of smaller breasts at least just as much -- there is more chance that the smaller breasts are natural.

All real breasts are beautiful! They come in a variety of shapes and sizes, and that is a big reason why they are beautiful!
Fake breasts all look alike. If I wanted to enjoy looking at or feeling fake breasts, I would make out with a mannequin.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Falsies Posted by: SalB
REALITY - THE BIBLE IS CLEARLY AGAINST WRONG SEX BUT SILENT ON BREAST IMPLANTS:
Posted by: iris89 on May 11, 2009 7:58 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hi Everyone

I, an Ordained Minister of the Gospel, find nothing in the Bible even remotely related to breast implants; however, I do find plenty in the Bible related to wrongful sexual desire and acts. For example, Romans 1:19-28, “Because that which is known of God is manifest in them. For God hath manifested it unto them.
20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made. His eternal power also and divinity: so that they are inexcusable.
21 Because that, when they knew God, they have not glorified him as God or given thanks: but became vain in their thoughts. And their foolish heart was darkened.
22 For, professing themselves to be wise, they became fools.
23 And they changed the glory of the incorruptible God into the likeness of the image of a corruptible man and of birds, and of fourfooted beasts and of creeping things.
24 Wherefore, God gave them up to the desires of their heart, unto uncleanness: to dishonour their own bodies among themselves.
25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie and worshipped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.
26 For this cause, God delivered them up to shameful affections. For their women have changed the natural use into that use which is against nature.
27 And, in like manner, the men also, leaving the natural use of the women, have burned in their lusts, one towards another: men with men, working that which is filthy and receiving in themselves the recompense which was due to their error.
28 And as they liked not to have God in their knowledge, God delivered them up to a reprobate sense, to do those things which are not convenient.” (Douay-Rheims Catholic Bible; DRCB).

I think it is high time that all learn what the Bible really teaches and I recommend a book, “What Does The Bible Really Teach?”


To learn more, go to:

Discourse Against Deviant Sex Acts and Need For Repentance:

Click Here

Iris89

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Excellent self analysis. Posted by: wolfgangmo
» Bwahahahahaha Posted by: wolfgangmo
nasty
Posted by: hilaryuk on May 11, 2009 8:45 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nobody expects beauty queens to be particularly intellectual, but I suppose they have a right to express an opinion. The writer obviously thinks he is somehow better than his object of loathing for today, and smugly launches into a comprehensive and demeaning attack on this relatively harmless woman. He might think he has right on liberal beliefs but he has a nasty mindset more usually associated with the likes of right wing shock jocks. I don't know how he feels about gays, but he certainly hates women.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: nasty Posted by: Sympa
» RE: nasty Posted by: hilaryuk
"Beauty" pageants? Whose idea of beauty is this?
Posted by: monkeywrench on May 11, 2009 8:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Did God also invent tooth whiteners, Vaseline for the lips (and teeth) and that pasty makeup "beauty queens" wear to hide their freckles, pimples and any hint of individuality?

These pageants have always relied on a certain amount of fakery, but this year's candidates took the prize, looking like "The Parade of the Living Barbies."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

God Talk on Knockers
Posted by: Douglas_Wilson on May 11, 2009 9:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Knockers...Who coined that? Anyway I think that was David who write those lines. He was big on Roes and Lilies. I think those lines are from an email to Beth (sheda). I am not a big fan of ridicule but I guess we can poke fun at breast work. There is certainly a large portion of the bible dedicated to the fate of vanity. For myself I have one problem with the so called "enhancement". They don't look good. So enhancement seems inappropriate. It's more like building. We should only let good artists create better breasts. The guys doing the work are more like - contractors.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: God Talk on Knockers Posted by: hilaryuk
Hey, Alternet
Posted by: SalB on May 11, 2009 9:27 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
She said something bad about gay marriage, but you're the one doing the slut shaming. Breast implants have nothing to do with marriage laws. You're almost as bad as the misogynists that wanted to hate fuck Palin.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hey, Alternet Posted by: Lara1967
» RE: Hey, Alternet Posted by: iris89
Why, oh why ..
Posted by: messedup on May 11, 2009 9:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A lady I work with just took a few months off for this. I cancelled my playboy subscription because of implants, got tired of looking at them. Every girl I talk with about any kind of body augmentation I tell them you are going to sacrifice your body for vanity?, and they say sure, why not. And, me, being kind of a shy, reserved kind of guy just thinks wow women really are nuts!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Whatever happened to "Perfect 10" Posted by: QQOblivion
» Probably bought out or merged. Posted by: messedup
Bible Silent on Breast Implants?
Posted by: garyfee on May 11, 2009 9:39 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Very Reverend Doctor Iris89, an "Ordained Minister of the Gospel" (whatever in Hell that means), professes that the Bible is silent on breast implants. However, like all thumpers, he manages to demolish his own argument within the wallop of his scriptural smackdown. How is enlarging your breasts to win a beauty contest not aptly described by Romans 1:24, "God gave them up to the desires of their heart, unto uncleanness: to dishonour their own bodies among themselves?" How are beauty pageants not worshipping and serving the creature rather than the creator?

My parents raised literate children; I don't need some cock in a frock to tell me what's in the Bible. So here's a lesson from 1 Timothy 2:9-10, "In like manner also, that women adorn themselves in modest apparel, with shamefacedness and sobriety, not with broided hair, or gold, or pearls, or costly array. But (which becometh women professing godliness) with good works."

Father Iris89 is right about one thing, "it is high time that all learn what the Bible really teaches," and I can also recommend a book, "The Bible".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» quit while you're behind, Iris89 Posted by: hurricane hugo
trying to sell a book or perhaps you saw Bill Maher
Posted by: thealltheone on May 11, 2009 10:10 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the other night?

"So, it is obvious that God adores female breasts (kind of like me, or maybe it is vice versa)".

WHAT A JERK!!! FIND ANOTHER WAY TO SELL YOUR BOOK AND COME UP WITH ORIGINAL IDEA'S, OR GIVE BILL MAHER A PIECE, YOU HYPOCRITE!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

n/a
Posted by: sygma on May 11, 2009 2:18 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Leave the woman alone. She obviously has good morals, unlike these "alternative lifestyle" individuals. They will use anything to justify their perverted lifestyles!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: n/a Posted by: johnbradleycopeland
» RE: n/a Posted by: iris89
The Dobsonites and their daily lies!
Posted by: johnbradleycopeland on May 11, 2009 2:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Today I received my "daily" epistle from the Dobsonites whereby Mr. Daly the new Pres. and CEO states that Carrier Prejean because of her stance on "traditonal" marriage "may have cost her the crown"! I immediateluy sent Pres. Daly an email asking why he and his organization which claim to be "christian" would lie about the claim that Prejean would have won if only she had answered the question regarding marriage differently. Donald Trump and other pagenat officials have all said that Prejean did not win because her score was lower than the actual winner. Trump and the pageanst officals also said that if Prejean has scored better on the subject question she still would not have won. Therefore the Dobsonites are lying!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

God and False Titties
Posted by: Jaffe on May 11, 2009 5:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How does God feel about false titties? Real good.

I queried Him last week and He texted me this AM.

He said: "Any kind of jive that biotechnology comes up with is cool with me."

Signed: "God."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

God has no feelings
Posted by: grindermonkey on May 11, 2009 6:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And Sheldin, He obviously has no feelings on male brains since he didn't give you one.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

so what comes next..after carrie prejean??...
Posted by: Annapurna1 on May 11, 2009 6:28 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
why carrie postjean..of course...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's stuff like this that divides parties
Posted by: Brice on May 11, 2009 7:21 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For a blog that's as proud of its "PC" status as Alternet, I am frankly dissapointed to see such disgusting sexism in place of real political discourse. You're basically calling her a slut and non-Christian just because she disturbed your ideals (and therefore God's ideals, of course!!) of perfect breasts. I can't possibly praise her for her homophobic values, but I can't praise you for typing up this horrific piece.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wow - how small can you get?!
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms on May 12, 2009 8:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And, given mass and weighted by the diatribe and ad hominem so delighted in by the ideological extremes. the rhetorical race to the bottom gathers momentum. I predict the tabloid black hole of scurrility and scatology, verbal garbage like this, will soon suck everything into it, and the republic dependent upon reasoned opinion and effective discourse will vanish into it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Let me get this right. If She had Lied to the judge
Posted by: Caleb Darkstar on May 12, 2009 9:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and told him what HIS OPINION WAS. Then she would be a stand up gal and probably would have won. She would also not be dragged through the mud and her breasts would not be an issue.

Since she gave a TRUTHFULL answer, (Like President Obama did).And refused to lie to gain favor. She loses the pageant and she is framed as a horrible person and a phony. Maybe next time the judge will ask the question " What is MY opinion of gay marriage"? But I thought they asked HER opinion.

Sounds like short sighted, bigoted, redneck type hatred to me. Nothing at all progressive in this case.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Prejean is 21 years old.
Posted by: Jasonix on May 12, 2009 10:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
She's not exactly an expert on gender theory or anything else. Her job is to be eye-candy. Who cares that she says about anything?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: You misunderstand Posted by: Jasonix
» RE: You misunderstand Posted by: iris89
parrotuya
Posted by: parrotuya on May 12, 2009 10:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Fake breasts are great in Hustler, Playboy, Penthouse, etc! Those big knockers are also great in XXX movies and video! Ditto for strip clubs! Since most beauty contestants will end up there anyway, why not get the implants? There certainly are career implication involved. Why deprive the well-endowed from making a living?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Carrie Prejeans Boobs...
Posted by: alive on May 12, 2009 9:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Proof that yet again anyone who dares to use her constitutionally guaranteed right of freedom of speech, and goes against the uber-leftists grain, will be crucified and villified in the most despicable and unconscionable ways imaginable. But hey, on the lighter side, you can also make fun of her for having cosmetic enhancements, as if she was the only young women on that stage with fake breasts. Every person here who doesn't feel sympathy for this young women for the treatment she has unfairly received, deserves the narrow minded ignorance they are displaying!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Meeow
Posted by: Daito on May 14, 2009 9:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Still pissed at a bikini contest hottie because she doesn't personally think gay marriage is good? tsk tsk.

How do you gays feel about someone who likes spicy food instead of bland? How about fat people? Are they OK with you?

'Tolerant' my ass.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Some Life Style Adjustments Are Needed
Posted by: iris89 on May 15, 2009 9:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some Life Style Adjustments Are Needed

Those favoring deviant sex need to change their life styles instead of worrying about trivial items like breast implants and/or other plastic surgery. They need to realize that Almighty God (YHWH) said Adam and Eve, NOT ADAM AND STEVE.

Let’s look at some facts, realities in line with John 8:32, "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free" (Authorized King James Bible; AV).

Now let's consider the facts, the reality in depth, go to the following:

[1] Discourse Against Deviant Sex Acts and Need For Repentance:

Click Here

[2] GOD'S VIEWS ON DEVIANT SEX AND OUTCOMES IN THE PRESENT

Click Here

[3] Child Sexual Molestation's - Two Religious Groups Different Take On The Problem:

Click Here

[4] Discourse on Sodomy Always Having Been Wrong:

Click Here

[5] Discourse on the Subject of Adultery:

Click Here

Deviant sex aficionados and terrorist are the dregs of society and are both attempting to ruin society as we know it. As I said on another thread:

Let's Get Real

First, [b]I think it is just plain dumb to care so much about what happens to good for nothings that are guilty with respect horrible crimes. NOW WHEN WILL ATTENTION BE GIVEN WHERE IT BELONGS? To wit, to their unfortunate victims?[/b]

Let’s get real, the only thing that really matters was whether their treatment was effective or not which I do not know.

Second, Many try to cover up the terrible wrongs committed by members of this crime against humanity - 9/11/2001 - by this evil and wicked organization - Al Queida under the direction of Muslim religious leader Sheik Osama (Usama) bin Ladin. This cover-up is of course by evil groups and individuals that sympathize with their evil and wicked ways. For details, go to:

See Part Two

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

just back that azz up to a glory hole & get it over with
Posted by: hurricane hugo on May 17, 2009 4:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We won't tell. Honest.

#@!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» meant as a reply to Iris89, btw Posted by: hurricane hugo
Let’s Get Reasonable And Face Facts And Make The Necessary Life Changes
Posted by: iris89 on May 17, 2009 5:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let’s Get Reasonable And Face Facts And Make The Necessary Life Changes

FIRST, I am an independent religious researcher, I go out and carefully research a subject, dig out the facts, and only then write a balanced and truthful research product, article, detailing what I have found.

Now what is anyone’s objections to the truth?

To learn more, go to my educational forum and web site and check out my informative articles:

http://religioustruths.proboards59.com/

An Educational Referral Forum intended to let all know the truth so they can correct their life style and bring it into harmony with Almighty God (YHWH) word, the Bible.

I CHALLENGE YOU OR ANYONE ELSE TO SHOW A SINGLE FACTUAL ERROR IN ANY OF MY RESEARCH PRODUCTS AND/OR ARTICLES. Now try and show me a factual error, I do not believe you can.

SECOND, As an example, but on a different subject other than deviant sex and breast implants – but very important. All should consider the facts on Palestine which rightly belongs to the Hebrews. Now go to:

Land Theft Of Seventh Century Responsible For Middle East Problems of Today:

linked text

And, Yes, the conflict in Gaza is religious in nature because it is due to a land theft made in the 7 th. Century by religious leaders in the name of religion - be sure to read the above and learn the truth.

THIRD, Some post dumb unintelligent nonsense.

FOURTH, You need to stop looking at things superficially and/or going to sources that look at things superficially, and go 'dig' in and start learning the REAL ROOT CAUSES for events - the truth per John 8:32, "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free" (Authorized King James Bible; AV).

FIFTH, NOW I HOLD THE SAME CHALLENGE OUT TO ONE AND ALL! Let's start accepting the facts and being objective instead of being none objective and closed minded. I am just the bearer of the truth, the facts, NOT the maker of the facts! I am just a messenger of the truth which all should want if they are honest with them selves in keeping with John 8:32, "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free" (Authorized King James Bible; AV) .

Note, I am none political and belong to NO political party ad have NO political agenda as I support only God's kingdom. Now when Jesus (Yeshua) Christ was on earth, the theme of his teaching was God's Kingdom. By means of that Kingdom, Matthew 6:9-10, "After this manner therefore pray ye. Our Father who art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name. 10 Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done, as in heaven, so on earth." (American Standard Version; ASV). That Kingdom government is very shortly going to bring an end to Satan's world and then supervise the doing of God's will throughout the earth. As Daniel foretold, God's Kingdom, Daniel 2:44, "And in the days of these kings shall the God of heaven set up a kingdom, which shall never be destroyed: and the kingdom shall not be left to other people, but it shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms, and it shall stand for ever." (ASV).

Iris89

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Boobs Aren't the Only Fake Thing on Her
Posted by: Libertine on May 18, 2009 11:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Viewing pageant photos of this young woman, I was surprised to learn how young she really is. To me, she's decidedly harsh and severe looking, and looks as if she's approaching 40, rather than being 21. There's nothing of the freshness of youth about her.

She's overdyed, overtanned, overly made up. In a word, she's overdone. Not my type at all. I hate to see what she'll look like when she's really 40.

I don't see why anyone is surprised that she'd had a boob job. I suppose there are some people who are still under the illusion that these beauty pageants are somehow "wholesome".

In reality, pageants differ from porn only in degree, not kind. Both involve women using their appearance for their personal gain. The only big difference is that porn is honest about what it is.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Link NOT Working
Posted by: iris89 on May 19, 2009 9:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hi Everyone

I notice the link I posted in my last post, "Let’s Get Reasonable And Face Facts And Make The Necessary Life Changes," is NOT working.

Now here is a 2 nd. attempt that I hope will work for this link so all can learn from the rsearch product (article) there:

Land Theft Of Seventh Century Responsible For Middle East Problems of Today:

linked text

Iris89

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement