Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Sex and Relationships

Is the "L Word" Feminist?

By Sal Renshaw, Ms. Magazine. Posted March 11, 2009.


There have been a lot of shout-outs to feminism on the "L Word", albeit not a consistent feminist politics that will please everyone.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

OK, so I admit it: The L Word is one of my guilty pleasures and I will be more than a little sad to see it go.

Showtime's breakout lesbian TV drama, set in Los Angeles and starring an ensemble cast of gorgeous, femme women, is about to roll out its sixth and final season, and fan forums are sparking with speculation. Will Bette (Jennifer Beals) and Tina (Laurel Holloman), the "perfect" lesbian couple, stay together? Will Shane (Kate Moennig), the lesbian lothario, be converted to the joys of monogamy? Will the formerly bisexual Alice (Leisha Hailey), now a TV celebrity, and Tasha (Rose Rollins), the Iraq vet who was don't-ask-don't-tell'd from the military, split up now that Alice has eyes for another woman? And what of Max (Daniela Sea), the female-to-male transgender character who may or may not go through a full transition? Then there's Jenny (Mia Kirshner) -- will there be anything redeeming in this last season about Jenny, the character viewers have most loved to hate?

These are the kinds of questions that tap into how The L Word, and indeed all TV dramas, hook their audiences and, like it or not, reveal how voyeuristic we are. Turns out lots of us like to watch this sort of visual gossip. And, it turns out, lots of us -- no matter whom we sleep with -- like to watch lesbians. In fact, here in North America, we have a less-than-distinguished tradition of turning the act of watching lesbians into high ratings. As media critic Virginia Heffernan has noted in The New York Times, women kissing women has been a consistent "sweeps week" tactic since 1991.

But this is precisely what The L Word isn't doing. It's not exploiting women's sexuality for straight pleasure, which in some sense is what its straight big sister, Sex and the City, did. Showtime even tried to connect the two by advertising The L Word with the slogan "Same Sex, Different City," but the differences between the shows are far more notable than the similarities. The L Word broke new ground in its focus on women who love women, who live with women and orient their intimate and daily lives around women. Yes, there are men on The L Word, and there are heterosexual relationships, but they are never the center of the action or dialogue for very long. This women-centered focus makes it very different from not only Sex and the City but almost every other TV drama or sitcom, even those with predominantly female casts such as The Golden Girls.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: gender, feminism, television, lesbian, l word

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Sex and Relationships! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
I am going to miss The L Word!
Posted by: ladyoracle on Mar 14, 2009 6:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But I want to know why it was cancelled? I thought it was very popular, and personally I loved it, and I got at least 10 people to start watching it also, and I bought all the DVD's and CDs associated with the show. I thought it dealt with feminist issues in a smart way, and the characters were deep and interesting as woman-identified-women. It was also an excellent show as a night time soap like SATC or Grey's Anatomy, etc, measuring up to other successful shows at least by my standards. Kudos to everyone involved with making it a success and bollocks to whomever killed the show.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Transgender focus on f-->m but they laughed off the 'gay male lesbian' and..'
Posted by: laurenaislinn on Mar 17, 2009 5:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
thus even daring to approach m-->f transgender issues and feminism. The first season quickly humiliated a gay male who felt he was a lesbian and dismissed this as 'confused'. They haven't dared approach a true m to f transgender scenario in which the transwoman is Lesbian. Why is this important?

If you're a hetero male feminist, the most you can Really be to the feminist community is, it seems, as a support person--but there's still an unspoken suspiscion about one's loyalty to the cause and attitude toward women. On s purely political basis, such males are welcomed. But on an interpersonal, intimate level the male is 'always' suspect. This, I know by my first 40 yr as a 'male'-who was, btw, raised in a truly non-sexist household in the 50s & 60s.

This is unfortunately still true in the minds of many older feminists. If you're m to f trans you Must 'of course' be gay (attracted to men or at least bi, leaning largely gay). Such is the presumption of too many lesbians who, given what they've gone through to get so far, should know better.

Sexual preference and gender are Not the same--attraction of opposites is Not an inviolate rule and gays males and lesbians should know better than to think in black and white. I see this rigid mindset too often, and know it by personal experience over the last 6 yr as a totally out, 24/7, non-op m--f transgender person attracted to genetic Females.

It's true, there remain many differences even between genetic femaales and transexuals and very numerous environmentsl pressures we will not have known directly. But must everyone who's transGender, yet not transSexual be suspect among feminists and lesbians? Must we Still endure taunts and complaints from women for using the Women's Room?--even when the law says we can?

Must we endure jeers, derision, suspicion and claims that "we're 'in denial' " or "confused" from other lesbians? Are feminists free of their Own prejudices that crept in in their early years or were forced by pure politics?

More than once I've been told I'm not accepted, even if on hormones, w/real breasts and functionally impotent. Unless, that is, I'm rid of 'my thingie' and do something about my (very low, but fortunately soft) voice, which prevents me from 'passing'. Must all of us want &/or be able to afford surgery?

Open your minds people. Why should all trans people have stereotyped, inviolate sexual preference while gays and lesbians rightly rail against w/the same assumptions, stereotypes, restrictions and prejudices? Must we in the m to f trans world remain forever misunderstood, misrepresented and isolated when up to 1/3 of us prefer women exclusively in intimate relationships? Must hanging out w/the girls as a girl mean forever living alone and lonely? Feminism still has ground to progress--just as trandendered do--befor we're free-of-mind.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement