Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Sex and Relationships

The Zen of Porn: If Pornography Is Everywhere, Is it Nowhere?

By Shannon Rupp, The Tyee. Posted January 22, 2009.


The ubiquity of porn has rendered it invisible for most adults. But why has pornographic imagery become such an acceptable part of public culture?
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

When Vancouver mom Trina Campbell went public with her outrage over American Apparel adding a porn mag to a clothing display, I considered sending her my copy of The Porning of America, along with a good-on-you note. She deserves a prize for saying something no one else has the courage to utter.

Oh, the book won't help Ms. Campbell feel any better. Might even make her feel worse. Authors Carmine Sarracino and Kevin M. Scott, an academic duet from Elizabethtown College in Pennsylvania, have overwhelming evidence that the most dehumanizing style of porn has infected every aspect of life, and they trace the history of just how this came to be.

Readers learn about all sorts of things they were probably lucky enough to have overlooked. Like "toilet cams." Apparently, not content with web cams documenting the action in dorm rooms, some enterprising folk started attaching them to public toilets and posting the results. Who knew?

The book is subtitled The Rise of Porn Culture, What It Means, and Where We Go from Here, and while they're short on ideas about the latter, the authors are brilliant at mapping out the former. In short: we have "normalized the marginal." Starting sometime in the 19th century, and with increasing enthusiasm and speed in the 20th, we have given over much of the public square to pornographic ideas and degrading, humiliating and gory sexual imagery. To the point that the non-stop sexualization of women and children is so common that our conscious minds just shrug it off.

What Are We Normalizing?

Most of us noticed the trend to skankwear, but unless you have children you probably missed the thongs-for-all movement. As the book relates, you can get your pre-schooler a thong emblazoned with cartoon characters, which serves to simultaneously impress upon her the importance of buying brands and being hot. She can also tart up her Bratz doll in streetwalker ensembles.

Do manufacturers even consider the implications of sexualizing children? Am I alone in thinking it gives pedophiles license when we normalize the notion of children in garments designed to inspire desire?

The authors cite Madonna for taking slutwear mainstream, and making huge leaps in getting us all to embrace taboos. Sometimes for the good -- in the U.S. she was among the first to talk about AIDS and safe sex -- but just as often she broke down barriers that would have been better left in place. Rounding out the half dozen cultural icons who led us down this path are pimpin' rapper (and professional pornographer) Snoop Dogg, literal porn star Jenna Jameson, crusading pornographers Russ Meyers and Al Goldstein, and yes, I'm sorry to say, we must always have Paris. That's Hilton.

Porn Baron with Regrets

In the surprisingly sweet rom-com Zack and Miri Make a Porno, the insightful Zack notes that Paris went from doin' it doggy-style on the Internet to selling perfume to tweens. Porn was a career-maker for the heiress, whose only talent seems to be for exhibitionism, and he plans to follow suit.

Of course, the movie's jokes rely on widespread knowledge of porn conventions. The mass audience has to know all about the cheesy imagery, the wooden acting, the boom-chuka-lucka music, the peroxide-hair and fake-tits aesthetic, and the fetishes and situations that lead to one of the movie's grosser gags, the frosting incident. (If you don't know, don't ask. If you do, well, there's no shame in knowing. It qualifies as cultural literacy now.)

We get the gags because, as Porning of America details, the blue movie went mainstream in the '70s with Deep Throat, which played ordinary theaters and was a fave reference for TV comics. A decade before, legendary racy-flick-maker Russ Meyers had made what was known as "tittyboom" -- the marriage of naked mammaries and violence that still graces our screens today. That bushwhacked the way to our current fascination with BDSM. Before that came graphic novels combining sex and violence -- only in the 1940s they were called comic books. (Yes, as long as comic books have existed, grown-ups have read them.)

The history of thin-edge-of-the-wedge techniques used to install porn in the public square is fascinating. Anyone who opposes its march is labeled a censor or worse, a prude. That's about as low a blow you can deliver in an era when every middle-aged mom supposedly aspires to be a MILF. Even more interesting is that some of the mid-century porn purveyors are now disgusted by the torture and degradation that characterizes the bulk of contemporary smut. (Gore-laden porno is so common it even has a nickname -- gorno.) Al Goldstein, a 1960s anti-censorship advocate who founded the magazine Screw, calls today's streaming video offerings a "fleshy catastrophe" that displays the "worst possible kind of sex."

" ... it desensitizes us, it makes [sex] more boring ... " Goldstein told the authors.

A Nation of Porn Stars

Today, at the click of mouse, there are hundreds of sites with names like pornhub.com, redtube.com, and youporn.com. The latter is one of a myriad of DIY sites aimed at enthusiastic amateurs who like to film themselves in the act and throw it up on the web.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: culture, media, porn, censorship

Shannon Rupp is a contributing editor at The Tyee. Read her previous columns here.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Sex and Relationships! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Using Zen Label
Posted by: jaymur on Jan 22, 2009 1:24 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I won't comment on the pro's or con's of porn but I would like to comment on using the Zen label. I find it offensive that you connected Zen Buddhism with pornography.

You mention Zen only in two sentences of the entire two page article with the koan reference.

The body of the post has nothing to do with Zen Buddhism and yet you use it in your title. Is that because "Zen" has become the catchy label? A different title would not offend a mainstream religion while explaining more accurately what the article is about. On first read of your title I thought there was some Zen style of pornography!! Imagine my confusion!!

Would you so easily say "Christianity of Porn?" I doubt it. You seem offended my pornography and that's fine but then you turn around and offend Zen Buddhists?? If you are concerned about pornography please be concerned of what it means to connect a compassionate religion to pornography.

Thank-you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Puritanical belief systems
Posted by: ahmlco on Jan 22, 2009 2:30 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sex is, like it or not, a major part of life. I view the increase and acceptance of porn to be POSITIVE indications that we're finally shedding the straight-laced puritanical belief systems that have damaged our country and culture for so long.

It's been obvious for decades that sticking your head in the sand simply doesn't work. Pretending that sex doesn't exist doesn't work. Encouraging teenage abstinence or worse, refusing to discuss the matter entirely doesn't work (ask Mrs Palin's daughter).

Finally, the article attempts to link banning porn with the public cigarette smoking ban. Okay, but how many first-hand, or even second-hand cases of cancer have been caused by porn? How many people die each year from its consumption?

Nearly all porn is consumed in the home, in private, and even when browsing the internet one generally has to go looking for it. No one is forcing the author to partake, and no one is slapping the author in her face... yet.

Because that's what needs to happen to those who think they have the right to legislate their particular views of morality on others.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Puritanical belief systems Posted by: Barbara O'Brien
Truly terrible article
Posted by: mofoshrimp on Jan 22, 2009 4:40 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wow, that was painful to read. "Gorno"? Who has ever heard of that? These anti-porn crusaders are always trying to find some extreme example of evil violent porn to indict the idea of porn itself. It's like right wingers who insist that all Muslims are terrorists, etc. The vast, vast majority of porn available online and everywhere is just people having sex. There is no mass gore, no snuff, no horrible degradation (unless you're looking through Robert Jensen's personal collection). Besides, things like "degradation" are completely subjective concepts. What one person finds degrading another might find a huge turn on, so who are you to judge someone else's consensual sexual acts?

Sure, you can find extreme examples if you look hard enough. Andrea Dworkin found rape in everything. But look at youporn. It's mostly normal, boring people having participating in totally standard sex acts. Are the people uploading all that material really doing it to get famous, as the article preposterously suggests? They probably are just expressing their sexuality in a way they enjoy. This writer seems to fear and loathe human sexuality itself.


And that CEO the writer is trying to demonize has not actually been convicted of anything, so maybe we can without the assumption of guilt? The experience of the reporter appears to be totally consensual, so what's your problem? This is just basic Lawrence vs. Texas...

And of course we have the ever present victims, "women and children" and the all-purpose perpetrators... Men. Who have apparently been responsible for all sex crimes since the beginning of time, according to this article. This statement is so sexist it's actually hilarious.

Then the author evokes the classic fear of Pedophiles, second only to Terrorists as public boogeyman #1. By allowing human sexuality to be openly visible in our culture, even allowing children to be exposed to sexuality (because children on their own are never sexual, and abstinence education works the best) we're giving comfort to the enemy! (the pedo-terrorists, who are almost certainly male)


And of course, we find the classic defense of "I don't object to that, I just don't want it in my face!" Does that sound familiar? It's because it's the identical argument that conservatives use against public acceptance of gayness. And finally, the gem of "If people aren't going to show some civility, I'm all for legislating it!" O'Reilly couldn't have said it better himself.

And is the author seriously bitching about the scourge of comic books leading to the moral decline of society? Could this article be any more ridiculous and full of laughably dated lines of argument? God help her if she ever discovers rap music!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Total waste of internet bandwidth
Posted by: mkdelta69 on Jan 22, 2009 6:24 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Get a life.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Excellent question
Posted by: planet doomed on Jan 30, 2009 10:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But why has pornographic imagery become such an acceptable part of public culture?

For the benefit of the sexist piggies, let's be clear: it isn't egalitarian sexual imagery which is the problem, it's the proliferation of images which consistently portray females as existing only to satisfy the sexual whims of men. No matter how much we know that message to be false, the sheer amount of it cannot help but to seep into someone's subconscious over time.

I'm sure it's each advertiser trying to outdo their competitors, and while each one knows that this public bombardment is ultimately unhealthy, each one also denies responsibility for contributing to the problem. They probably justify it by telling themselves, "well if I don't someone else will".

It's also an easy way to tell that a product isn't good enough to be evaluated on it's own merits. If they have to use sex to sell beer, for instance, then it's probably intended for swine.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

hard to handle.
Posted by: RobP on Jan 31, 2009 3:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
many people don't like having to
justify their addictions, or be called out
on their abnormal behavior,
so of course they will take offense
at an article like this-

the truth hurts.

it's sort of like smokers
being told that smoking will kill you....

or mobile phone users being told that
they are ignorant when overused in a public place....
oh, and by the way, they'll kill you too.

or drivers being told that they are too aggressive.....
and shouldn't use a cel phone while driving.

it's always someone else- never me.

so go on, keep on doing what you do.

sleepy humans are the kookiest creatures.....
-to the bitter end.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sex culture
Posted by: MDS on Feb 7, 2009 12:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I always thought that one day, everyone would only just want to have sex, from the way it is increasing in society. Here's the problem. If we start losing our skill from this, then a serious disease will one day wipe us all out.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement