Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Sex and Relationships

Bristol Palin Says to Teens: Don't Get Pregnant

By Jodi Jacobson, RH Reality Check. Posted January 6, 2009.


Bristol Palin may be way ahead of her mom when it comes to one of the country's most controversial issues.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

On December 27, Bristol Palin, daughter of Alaska Governor and former Republican VP candidate Sarah Palin gave birth to a healthy baby boy.  Today, Bristol, who is 18 years old and just shy of achieving her high school diploma, joined her mother in a statement on the birth of her first child, Governor Palin's first grandchild.

Governor Palin, obviously elated with the safe delivery of her grandchild and the health of her daughter, stated;

We are over the moon with the arrival of this healthy, beautiful baby.

And, she continued:

The road ahead for this young couple will not be easy, but nothing worthwhile is ever easy. Bristol and Levi are committed to accomplish what millions of other young parents have accomplished, to provide a loving and secure environment for their child. They are both hard workers, they're very strong, and have faith they've made the right decision in setting aside their own interests to make this child their highest priority.

The operative word here is "decision."  Bristol and Levi, along with their families, made a decision that was right for them.  And the fact that they have this choice is instructive on many levels.

Bristol Palin said she "obviously discourages" teen pregnancy and knows that plans she previously made for herself will now forever be changed.

Teenagers need to prevent pregnancy to begin with - this isn't ideal. But I'm fortunate to have a supportive family which is dealing with this together. Tripp is so perfectly precious; we love him with all our hearts. I can't imagine life without him now.

In many ways, Bristol Palin is incredibly fortunate.  She grew up in the United States, where the choice still exists for all people, at least in theory, to practice safer sex, and where the choice still exists, at least in theory for all women, whether or not to bring a pregnancy to term.  She is part of a family with the means to ensure she had access to good pre- and post-natal care, and safe delivery services.  And she also has strong family support in raising her child while finishing school and going on to the next steps in her life.  As she underscored in her own words, her original life plans may be forever changed, but she is exercising choices that are hers to make, according to her own situation, needs, and beliefs.  I have no doubt that Bristol and Levi have the same dreams for their child as I do for mine or as any parent would.

Yet the situation is also full of irony.  Bristol grew up in a family which espoused abstinence-only policies, not just as a familial choice, but also a state- and national strategy.  During the Presidential campaign, MSNBC reported that in response to an Eagle Forum questionnaire during her gubernatorial race, Sarah Palin supported abstinence-only sex education.

Eagle Forum: Will you support funding for abstinence-until-marriage education instead of for explicit sex-education programs, school-based clinics, and the distribution of contraceptives in schools?

Palin: Yes, the explicit sex-ed programs will not find my support.

(The report, quoting campaign aides, shows that Presidential candidate McCain held the same views).

Sarah Palin, the VP candidate, was unequivocally anti-choice when it came to women's rights to determine whether and when to have children.  As Gloria Steinem wrote in September in the Los Angeles Times:

[Palin] opposes gun control but supports government control of women's wombs; she opposes stem cell research but approves "abstinence-only" programs, which increase unwanted births, sexually transmitted diseases and abortions.  She doesn't just echo McCain's pledge to criminalize abortion by overturning Roe vs. Wade, she says that if one of her daughters were impregnated by rape or incest, she should bear the child. She not only opposes reproductive freedom as a human right but implies that it dictates abortion, without saying that it also protects the right to have a child.

The "daughter-of-abstinence-only-politician-gets-pregnant" scenario might just be fodder for comedians if not for the stark realities.  The situation is deeply emblematic of what the evidence has long told us about the efficacy of abstinence-only programs: They don't work. 

Research findings, government policies and funding of abstinence policies have been well-covered on RH Reality Check, including a recent article by Scott summarizing findings of a Johns Hopkins University study on the failure of virginity pledges, a popular aspect of abstinence-only programs.  Extensive coverage of such programs domestically can be found on the websites of the Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States, the Guttmacher Institute, and the National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy, among other sources. 


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: pregnancy, sex education, teen pregnancy, abstinence-only, sarah palin, bristol palin

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Sex and Relationships! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
RE: When will those dirt bag hicks fade into obscurity?
Posted by: countingdaisies on Jan 7, 2009 7:16 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What happened to Honky the Nihilist? I can't decide which one I like better but I always give a 5 rating to both.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

God bless them..
Posted by: 2thepoint on Jan 7, 2009 6:40 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Think Liberals would have had them kill that baby, healthy beautiful baby.. How can such group ( far left nuts) be against what is a wonderful moment be so depraved.

To be liberal means to be for drugs for teens and adults and for killing a baby you may not want...a sick bunch for sure!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: God bless them.. Posted by: mtatasmith
» RE: God bless them.. Posted by: 2thepoint
» RE: God bless them.. Posted by: Schlarmie
» RE: God bless them.. Posted by: 2thepoint
» RE: God bless them.. Posted by: perri6
» RE: bless them.. Posted by: WyrdSister
RE: When will those dirt bag hicks fade into obscurity?
Posted by: sunnywater on Jan 8, 2009 12:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All you need is Love

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Bristol" Palin
Posted by: TDyl on Jan 7, 2009 2:40 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Please let it be known that she has nothing to do with the original Bristol in the English West Country. She is not wanted, cared for or appreciated and if she wants to associate with a Bristol isn't there a nascar track or oval or whatever they call that excuse for proper racing?

Sorry.
Chris Simmons
Pissed off European chappie.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: "Bristol" Palin Posted by: moreteavicar
» RE: "Bristol" Palin Posted by: morticia
» RE: "Bristol" Palin Posted by: littlepitcher
What???
Posted by: adp3d on Jan 7, 2009 3:11 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not one word of the life Levi must have been living, about all we know of him is that he just wants to chill with his buds and that he doesn't even want children. Oh, and how about the fact that his mother is an alleged drug dealer???

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE: No one cares about the male in an unwanted pregnancy.
Posted by: Sushi on Jan 7, 2009 4:51 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One of my friends once told me that throughout her life, she'd (thus far) slept with about 25 different men (this was pre-AIDS). She told me that out of all those men, only one ever asked her what kind of birth control she was using. Guess the other guys didn't want to "spoil the moment" that they were about to get their dicks wet by asking about the responsibility before the act.

If we are supposed to be "free" and have sovereignty over our bodies and minds, we are all better served if we do a little pre-planning, folks, and not be so spontaneous as to ruin three lives for a fleeting, ego-boosting jolly.

Sushi
"A dozen condoms are cheaper than a dozen diapers."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not sure what your point is
Posted by: olderworker on Jan 7, 2009 5:00 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In your first sentence, it sounds like you are opposed to women having the right to choose abortion and then later, you seem to be opposed to men having to pay child support. (If women are forced to have children, someone has to pay for them, don't you think?)

Also, the 14th amendment has nothing to do with either of these issues.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Not sure what your point is Posted by: aussidawg
» Another point ... Posted by: countingdaisies
» RE: Another point ... Posted by: WyrdSister
RE: No one cares about the male in an unwanted pregnancy.
Posted by: Schlarmie on Jan 7, 2009 5:06 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"No one" is supposed to care, Honky; the participants are the ones who should care. It is the innocent children (or bastards as you so eloquently put it) of such liaisons who must be "cared" for. If men don't want to be forced to become parents, they should protect themselves. Pretty simple, I think.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

REally? YOU'RE laughing?
Posted by: Beck on Jan 7, 2009 6:55 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Must be one of those rueful, embittered chuckles.

Who SHOULD care about the male? Any reason I should? If he wants to be involved, he should fight for this to happen. But this sad scenario you outline as constantly breaking male hearts is not the one that seems most common. The other side of your argument is why should a man have to pay? I guess the truth is this: alot of us do NOT care about the kind of man you describe. He apparently has no self-control, and you seem to make it clear that that's the woman's job anyway. All these sad, sad men who had sex with someone obviously not committed enough to them to want to raise an unexpected child with them just don't seem the norm to most of us. If you want a baby, make sure you have sex only with women who also want a baby. Doesn't that just make sense? If you DON'T want to pay for a baby, wear a condom and better yet, stop having sex until you do.

You YEARN for the good ol' days, don't you? SEx with no consequences and no responsibility. It must really suck to have to deal with the fact that women get pregnant from sex, and that if she is really not into you, she might not be interested in the baby you so obviously crave. And if she is into you OR a baby, she might want you to pay, as law requires, for your DNA running around eating and needing clothes.

Not fair, is it? Aren't you supposed to have all the sex you want and nothing messy like this ever should come up? GROW up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE: males and caring
Posted by: WyrdSister on Jan 7, 2009 10:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
wow. how incredibly misogynistic.

it's truely surprising that you would get to have sex with ANY female. more to the point; i feel really bad for her.

there is more to life than sex.

if you never want to have children, best fix that yourself by vasectomy and stop putting all of the responsibility on women; you obviously do not trust them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE: No one cares about the male in an unwanted pregnancy.
Posted by: NozzleDude on Jan 7, 2009 10:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
On the surface the whole abortion responsibility equation seems unfair to men. However, I totally and wholeheartedly support a woman's right to control her body and by extension her destiny, but I also support the same rights for men as well. Unfortunately, biology dictates terms to men in this scenario. It's simple: a woman's choice can take place before and/or after she becomes pregnant. That's the way it is and the way it should be. But fellows, you've only got one shot (pun intended) at this: your decision point has to be BEFORE you take your clothes off. You have got to take the responsiblity of ensuring that if you don't want to become a father that you properly use birth control. IE: condoms. That's it. Your choice, your control, and your responsibility to yourself and what you want happens BEFORE you have sex. If you abdicate that power by leaving the control and choice in the hands of others, IE women, you've got no one to blame but yourself if you later wind up making child support payments that you could have avoided. Finally, since 1981, there has been no reason for men of all ages who are not in a committed long term relationship not to be using condoms anyways. One word: AIDS. HIV, along with a whole host of other STDs/STIs are still out there and you owe it to yourself to protect yourself and your future options.
Just my take.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE: I’m a little boy because I want a life free of responsibility. Women are little girls because...
Posted by: mtatasmith on Jan 7, 2009 7:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Keep talking

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Awesome. Could alternet now go check on the younger Spears sister?
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Jan 7, 2009 6:07 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't get nearly enough useless gossip regarding individuals that I could give a hoot less about from Katie Couric or Tom Brokaw. In fact, I think their is a nice, private lady down the street going thru a rough divorce. Roll the news...er...bogger vans!

I will say, however, that I wish progressives would laud choice in healthcare in general as much as abortion-'rights' activists laud a single medical procedure for one-half of the sexes--abortion--as a matter of choice. Why can't they see through Clinton's (etc.) anti-choice mandates (hello? "mandate"?) when it comes to MY healthcare, the way I support their ability to correct their failure to plan with a visit to the family planning clinic.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» A hypocrite? Posted by: Beck
Excellent Article
Posted by: Bushmaster on Jan 7, 2009 7:24 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yeah, the religious right is so religiously wrong.

I married at 20 a 17 year old bride who was pregnant at 16. This is not the ideal way to pursue a life course.

It turned out alright due to my parents help. If left to my own I cringe at what would have happened to my sons.

One now calls his own shots in the computer industry and one teaches at a major University. I could not have done more than encourage them to go beyond what I had achieved. Which wasn't much.

The religious right and its philosophy is pernicious, and in fact evil, if you value humanity.

I am a former fundamentalist Christian. I know the mentality inside and out and it is a mentality designed to ruin people.

Nothing will come of Bristol getting knocked up. Except a Tripp. Her family may be able to provide better for him than mine was, and who knows he may be president some day.

I have my doubts that Levi will be around to cheer him on.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Excellent Article Posted by: jshubbub
Too Late...
Posted by: Squeeky on Jan 7, 2009 8:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Honey, you should have followed your mother's advice and kept your legs closed...too late now to be telling teens what to do...your not a good example.

Why do folks come to their senses AFTER THE FACT?!! *rolls eyes*

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Too Late... Posted by: jshubbub
No sex ed for me! I'm preggars, don't you see?
Posted by: monkeywrench on Jan 7, 2009 9:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From the article:
"Palin: 'Yes, the explicit sex-ed programs will not find my support.' "

Hey! Guess what, Madam Goofernor Palin; Bristol and Levi must have developed their own explicit sex-ed program –– because they sure figured out what goes where, heh? Does "knocked up" mean the same thing in Alaska, Sarah?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Paling with apaling Palin
Posted by: Pop on Jan 7, 2009 9:35 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have nothing against Palin, in fact I think it was really "loving" of her to take over the birthrights of her alleged last child when she showed no signs of pregnancy, while Britol did. But had she allowed Bristol to take responsibility for her own child the first time around, perhaps she wouild have thought twice before having her second? Palin is probably a good grandma. Hope she is. Maybe she stretches herself too thin. Politice brings good bread, but growing kids need domestic guidance Palin wasn't home to give. Tryin to do both jobs resulted in both coming up short of attention?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Change her mind?
Posted by: BlueTigress on Jan 7, 2009 9:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sarah Palin will change her mind on abstinence-only sex ed when the hell she so fervently believes in freezes over.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Palins are lucky-and Sarah Palin probably contradictory
Posted by: davmills on Jan 7, 2009 9:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They're lucky in that their child or grandchild was born in an era when getting pregant outside of marriage is not a disgrace-at least not the way it once was. Bristol Palin's pregancy and birth have generally been treated with understanding, as they should have been.
However, Sarah Palin is likely one of those conservatives who refer to the pre-1960s past as a sort of golden age, when men were men, women were women, and sheep were sheep. In those days, her daughter and and the man responsible would have been married almost immediately after the pregancy was discovered; otherwise,young woman would have "visited an aunt" to have the baby secretly before that baby was put up for adoption. There were single mothers then, but they kept quiet about it.
Point: Conservatives, or right-wingers, whatever, benefit from the progress they despise.
Even abortion is a suitable example: how many anti-abortionists campaign to have it made illegal again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

More money for the pharmacuetical companies
Posted by: entdev on Jan 7, 2009 10:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I used to think the one good thing Bush did was take Bono's advice and help Africa with the massive AIDS problem. However, with the abstinence only clause (no funds for condoms) it just means the problem is going to get worst. That means more customers for big drug companies with taxpayers footing the bill.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Anybody seen a photo of alleged child?
Posted by: truthteller on Jan 7, 2009 10:32 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I want not only to see a photo of this supposed new son for Bristol Palin, I want to see a DNA profile for both the new son and Gov. Palin's supposed Down's child, Trig. I still have extreme doubts about the parentage of Trig, and whether or not Bristol actually gave birth the other day. If Gov. Palin hopes to have any kind of future in national politics, then she should be willing to answer questions that cut to the very basics of personal honesty that must be answered for anyone interested in seeking higher office.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Wow. Posted by: Scientz
Ahead of her mom? Maybe. But good luck trying to prove it.
Posted by: ZPaul on Jan 7, 2009 11:33 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"she is telling teens to prevent pregnancy in the first place, and by doing so at least implicitly suggesting that they be able to exercise responsible choices if and when they engage in sexual activity. Maybe Bristol is way ahead of her mom."

Do you think, if Mama Palin has her way, Bristol will ever, ever admit to what you're implying here? Don't count on it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

One thing no one is talking about...Bristol and Tripp's health insurance
Posted by: chaoslegs on Jan 7, 2009 12:47 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I bet the decision to get married post pregnancy was based largely on having Bristol covered with health insurance.

I wonder when they get married, what type of job they will have and if they will get health care with it, or access SCHIP for little Tripp?

This is a story that should be followed that might help us make the case for universal health care, it could even win over some conservatives.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The apple doesn't fall far from the tree!
Posted by: bbq on Jan 7, 2009 2:36 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You would think that Sarah Palin would have a more enlightened opinion on sex-ed as she herself was pregnant and unwed. She and Todd "eloped" and their first child was born just shy of 8 months later.
A person who can't even learn from their own mistakes is truly dangerous.
As for Bristol and Levi, couldn't think of a better case for abortion, too young, not graduated from high school and apparently ignorant of how their own bodies work. Oh, and let me add- unemployed. The only thing going for them is her parents, who will make over this baby and probably support them all for a long, long time to come. What a price to pay... a condom costs what...a buck?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Newest numbers show spike in teen pregnancy, except in the liberal northeast
Posted by: Beck on Jan 8, 2009 7:05 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mississippi's teen pregnancy rate is now the highest in the nation: 68.4 births per 1,000 teens. New Hampshire, Vermont and Massachusetts have the lowest rates. Remember how conservatives called Kerry "that most liberal senator from that most liberal state"? At that time, that liberal state had the lowest divorce rate, and lower crime rates than the "real America" that Sarah Palin's heart warms when visiting.

The only states with teen birthrates that declined were North Dakota, Rhode Island and New York.

These numbers were just released by the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and this rise ended a 14-year decline.

The executive director of the Beverly LaHaye Institute, which is comprised of conservative women, a woman named Janice Crouse, said that this rise stems from an atmosphere of permissiveness and the use of alcohol. She claims teen pregnancy has been glamorized. She also complained that TV shows don't show the discomforts of pregnancy, the swollen feet and nausea, etc.

Funny that Mississippi has a greater atmosphere of permissiveness than New England. And that apparently more alcohol is used by teen there, and that teen pregnancy apparently is more glamorized there. It's also funny that conservatives aren't tackling this problem right where it's worse, and aren't looking to the northeast to discover why they're more, not less, successful in preventing teen pregnancies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Something to consider
Posted by: floridahank on Jan 12, 2009 8:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While this survey was done on Sept. 7, 2004, I believe the same results would be found if done today:

Teenagers who are exposed to a large amount of sexual content on television programs are twice as likely to have sexual intercourse as teenagers who have less exposure to such programs, according to a RAND survey published in the September issue of Pediatrics, the AP/Seattle Times reports. Lead researcher Rebecca Collins, a RAND senior behavioral scientist, and colleagues identified 23 popular programs that regularly featured "abundant" sexual content, such as "That 70's Show," "Sex and the City" and "Friends." The researchers then surveyed 1,792 adolescents ages 12 to 17 about their television viewing habits and their sexual behavior.

Teens who participated in the initial survey were asked the same questions one year later (Tanner, AP/Seattle Times, 9/7). The survey also took into account how additional social factors -- such as parents' involvement, views concerning sex and education levels, religion, depression, academic performance and age -- can influence sex among adolescents (RAND release, 9/2).

Survey Findings
The researchers found that the percentage of teenagers who reported having sex increased from 18% in the initial survey to 36% one year later. The percentage of teens who reported sexual behaviors other than intercourse increased from 62% to 75%, according to Collins, the AP/Times reports (AP/Seattle Times, 9/7). In addition, the top 10% of teenagers who watched the most sexually related content were twice as likely to engage in sexual intercourse as the bottom 10% of teens, according to Collins (Elias, USA Today, 9/7). The survey also found that programs in which sex was talked about but not portrayed had as much influence on teenage sexual behavior as programs that were more "explicit," according to Reuters/New York Post (Reuters/New York Post, 9/7). Excluding African-American adolescents, the survey found that there was no "strong" association between television content that addressed the risks related to unsafe sexual behaviors and teenagers delaying sexual intercourse, according to a RAND research brief.

The researchers concluded that "more effective tests" on such content is needed to determine whether it is associated with a delay in initiating sex among youth of other ethic groups, according to the brief (RAND research brief, September 2004). A previous RAND survey, which was published in the November 2003 issue of the journal Pediatrics, found that teenagers in the United States absorb sex education messages from television programs, and watching and discussing television programs with an adult reinforces the sex education messages (Kaiser Daily Reproductive Health Report, 11/3/03).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]