COMMENTS: 21
Virtual Sex: How Online Games Changed Our Culture
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Sex & Relationships headlines via email.
Editor's Note: The following is an excerpt from Porn and Pong: How Grand Theft Auto, Tomb Raider and Other Sexy Games Changed Our Culture by Damon Brown, published by Feral House.
The camera zooms in on a perky young woman. She looks to be in her late twenties, perhaps early thirties, and she starts talking to you about her first date: how the restaurant had to kick them out because they talked until it closed, how she looked in his eyes and could tell he was the one for her, about that instant spark, you know, the spark you feel when you click -- connect -- with someone. The distant strains of Natalie Cole's "Everlasting Love" -- also used in the Diane Lane movie "Must Love Dogs" and other modern divorcee-looking-for-love films -- begin to swell in the background.
Her husband (see the ring flashing as he's gesturing?) is now talking to you about the same incident, but he has a different, complimentary interpretation. A grey-haired, honey-voiced old man begins talking to you. His face seems to take up the whole TV screen. Aren't you tired of dating, he asks. "Find your soul-mate." He tells you that eHarmony uses scientific data to match people together. There is a science, founder Dr. Neil Clark Warren implies, a science to chemistry, something his company eHarmony analyzes and gives to its subscribers.
The Pew Institute's first online dating survey, released in 2006, found that one out of every three people knew someone who belonged to an online dating service and more than one in four knew someone who has gone out with a person they met online. "Nearly overnight, it seemed, dozens of similar sites emerged," The Atlantic Monthly wrote the same year as the survey. "Online dating became almost de rigueur for busy singles looking for love." The Los Angeles-based eHarmony alone had nine million members.
Up the coast, California developers Tom Anderson and Chris DeWolfe were also convinced social technology was going to be the next big thing. They worked within a computer company -- eUniverse -- and began MySpace, the first mainstream multimedia blog. (A disputed history has MySpace culling its concepts from eUniverse CEO Brad Greenspan, a man who has called himself "the true founder of MySpace.")
After a five-minute setup on MySpace, you can type in your interests, post messages and music, and make new friends who, in turn, would provide links to their personal web pages. It would be a test of six degrees of separation, the concept that every single person knew every other person in the world through a maximum of six connected people. Every personal site is one-page deep, but can scroll down as much as someone could fill it up with new friends and content. The average MySpace site would have a small box of bio information (22, Los Angeles, CA, Sagittarius), an uploaded picture serving as background (usually a personal pic or a favorite band photo) and stacks of friend "testimonials" reminiscent of high school yearbooks ("You are the kewlist! Stay sweet!"). Wired News called it a "highly customizable amalgam of blogging, music sharing and social-discovery services, a typical page is a near perfect reflection of the chaos and passion of youth: a music-filled space, rudely splattered with photos and covered in barely-legal prose rendered in font colors that blend together and fade into the background." MySpace grew to have seventy million users, roughly one-fourth the population size of the United States.
Geriatric mogul Rupert Murdoch bought the site for $580 million. Within weeks of the Rupert Murdoch News Corporation purchase, ABC, CBS and NBC, influential papers such as the San Francisco Chronicle and other major news outlets began covering MySpace in earnest -- as a virtual smorgasbord for teen predators. Popular among kids, MySpace entries often gave detailed personal information, if not actual data on their location. It was like a diary open to the world. "This site," said the Connecticut Attorney General, "is a parent's worst nightmare."
MySpace was not the only site of its kind. Before MySpace was a popular networking website called Friendster, and, after MySpace, Facebook became the most discussed site. Launched in 2004 by student Mark Zuckerburg as a college networking website, Facebook grew into an older-skewing version of MySpace. Newsweek featured Zuckerburg on the cover. On the inside the feature story told what happened when Facebook had one of its rare maintenance shutdowns. "Over the course of those four hours I probably tried to get in five or more times. I'm addicted to Facebook," one person lamented. She was a 40-year-old mother of three.
As Facebook began, Linden Labs released the program Second Life. It was a 3D virtual world where you could create an avatar (a digital representation of yourself) and buy land with real money, mortgage a virtual home, get married, get drunk, make new friends, start a money-making business -- in other words, you could begin and live a new life. That was it. Second Life was a video game with no video game in it. The virtual world remained quiet until Wired and other tech tastemakers began claiming Second Life could be "Web 2.0," the almost mythical multidimensional Internet that would take over the now dated World Wide Web. The New York Times, Time and others "discovered" the program in 2006. A woman, who's avatar name was Anshe Chung, became the first Second Life resident to become a millionaire in real life. (The value of the Second Life Linden dollar fluctuates like a real economy, but was roughly $300 Linden to every U.S. dollar in 2006.) She did it by buying up virtual real estate and flipping it for a higher price. Sony, Nike, and other companies created virtual stores with real products. Reuters opened up a Second Life branch. Several 2008 presidential hopefuls hopped on digital soapboxes to hold town meetings. By May 1st, 2007, Second Life had six million citizens (though critics argued that this figure was inflated since some people had multiple avatars).
Stay up to date with the latest Sex & Relationships headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Woodpecker on Nov 27, 2008 2:45 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Second Life/MySpace/Facebook isn't bad (in moderation) that is
Posted by: Blue Heron
Comments are closed-
Posted by: salt-of-the-earth on Nov 27, 2008 2:48 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Meantime, we now have all this porn and corruption that is flooding the Internet like a tsunami.
I agree with Alex Jones when he says the best way we can resist tyranny and death, to fight the New World Order, is to live right: refuse their drugs, the Illuminati's suffocating evil culture, and stand for truth and for right.
For example, while the government (aka CIA) smuggles in the same drugs from South America and Afghanistan it uses to bust young people and send them to their private (money laundering) prisons where they will work for free for a decade or more, we have the option to live drug free, to refuse to become entangled with the corrupt culture that is thrown at us from every conceivable direction by the control freaks who want to destroy us all.
All they offer is lies, virtual reality, cheap imaginations, drugged delusions, and death and slavery. Choose life, truth, reality and defeat them at their own game.
Their corrupt culture will only enslave and ruin us: body, mind and soul, as in the fairy tale Hansel and Gretal being fattened up by the witch for the kill.
We must stay strong and use the Internet for good things, to discover truth, to share and connect with each other in pursuit of what is right. We must fight to keep the Internet free. For example, a new filmmaker called Noreaga has a series called "The Arrivals." Watch this series and be blown away by truth and fight to keep such films available to everyone.
Death to the New World Order!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Sorry, but you are mistaken...
Posted by: DanoM
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kenhymes on Nov 27, 2008 4:38 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Timberbee on Nov 27, 2008 6:14 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yet, all I see on television, and now here, is this game "Second life". Why? Because its the virtual representation of face book, or something similar?
I have no ancedotes which link sexuality to these games, other than the one aspect which becomes so obvious, and so forefront soon after you begin playing, this being that most female avatars are played by males, and that you never, ever, take someone at face value, and yet, by the same token, you allow them to play in the manner that they will.
The caveat is, that people are people. The more trying the game (Pre Care bear Ultima Online) the more "griefers" that game will spawn. Griefers being those who seek to injure others in any way they can, persistantly, and with every fiber of their being. This is an "in your face" issue in these games. One which many game designers structure their games around. Either to promote it (yes, I said to promote the griefing of the game population), or to greatly reduce the ability to grief others.
In World of Warcraft, it is almost impossible to grief other players, whereas, in Shadowbane (google it), griefing was the underlying structure, something the developers were initialy proud of. I just don't see the impact of these kinds of games on sexual models.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Second Life is not indicative of online gaming
Posted by: Plexius2
Comments are closed-
Posted by: salt-of-the-earth on Nov 27, 2008 6:52 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sprightx on Nov 27, 2008 9:36 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What I mean is, AlterNet is full of bullshit articles that aren't worth reading, and just because the editors brand themselves as progressives doesnt mean they are above the smear tactics the right use in their crusades. They follow the exact same method's, they just take the time to make themselves look nice and educated when they do.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Alternet + Video Games = Bad
Posted by: mainspark
» RE: Alternet + Video Games = Bad
Posted by: carlos63
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Skytha on Nov 27, 2008 5:22 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm also trying to figure out how Grand Theft Auto is sexy - yes, let's continue to glamorize the beating and murder of prostitutes.
What goes for progressive these days, boggles the mind.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Yeah, ok.
Posted by: Dboy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Auk on Nov 27, 2008 6:25 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't even comment about this comment, don't even rate it!!! Just go back to watching TV!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: avatar_singh on Nov 27, 2008 8:57 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
donto subscribe to this british bastrds. any site or paper..
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Dboy on Nov 29, 2008 11:07 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
dboy
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Maybe not there, but close enough for orgasm
Posted by: Plexius2
» RE: Maybe not there, but close enough for orgasm
Posted by: Knot_Rich
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Rebbs on Nov 30, 2008 6:47 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And also I think people use .com only for fun of flirt while they still prefer the same age old "guy meets girl" stories...and that is where I think that Mobile technology is much better suited to improving the odds of natural, spontaneous meetings than traditional online dating can ever be.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: PeterMadsen on Dec 4, 2008 1:58 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: charles000 on Dec 21, 2008 7:34 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But Second Life??? Why? Why would I want to spend endless hours pretending to be some sort of avatar character, interacting with all sorts of other "fake" people avatar entities, knowing all the while that no one is anything remotely resembling who they really are.
I'm missing something here . . .
Silly me - I happen to actually enjoy interacting with real, living and breathing humanoid lifeforms, but I know, such activity actually requires real effort. If I want drama, I'll go see a play or a film.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Woodpecker on Nov 27, 2008 2:45 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Second Life/MySpace/Facebook isn't bad (in moderation) that is
Posted by: Blue Heron
Comments are closed-
Posted by: salt-of-the-earth on Nov 27, 2008 2:48 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Meantime, we now have all this porn and corruption that is flooding the Internet like a tsunami.
I agree with Alex Jones when he says the best way we can resist tyranny and death, to fight the New World Order, is to live right: refuse their drugs, the Illuminati's suffocating evil culture, and stand for truth and for right.
For example, while the government (aka CIA) smuggles in the same drugs from South America and Afghanistan it uses to bust young people and send them to their private (money laundering) prisons where they will work for free for a decade or more, we have the option to live drug free, to refuse to become entangled with the corrupt culture that is thrown at us from every conceivable direction by the control freaks who want to destroy us all.
All they offer is lies, virtual reality, cheap imaginations, drugged delusions, and death and slavery. Choose life, truth, reality and defeat them at their own game.
Their corrupt culture will only enslave and ruin us: body, mind and soul, as in the fairy tale Hansel and Gretal being fattened up by the witch for the kill.
We must stay strong and use the Internet for good things, to discover truth, to share and connect with each other in pursuit of what is right. We must fight to keep the Internet free. For example, a new filmmaker called Noreaga has a series called "The Arrivals." Watch this series and be blown away by truth and fight to keep such films available to everyone.
Death to the New World Order!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Sorry, but you are mistaken...
Posted by: DanoM
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kenhymes on Nov 27, 2008 4:38 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Timberbee on Nov 27, 2008 6:14 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yet, all I see on television, and now here, is this game "Second life". Why? Because its the virtual representation of face book, or something similar?
I have no ancedotes which link sexuality to these games, other than the one aspect which becomes so obvious, and so forefront soon after you begin playing, this being that most female avatars are played by males, and that you never, ever, take someone at face value, and yet, by the same token, you allow them to play in the manner that they will.
The caveat is, that people are people. The more trying the game (Pre Care bear Ultima Online) the more "griefers" that game will spawn. Griefers being those who seek to injure others in any way they can, persistantly, and with every fiber of their being. This is an "in your face" issue in these games. One which many game designers structure their games around. Either to promote it (yes, I said to promote the griefing of the game population), or to greatly reduce the ability to grief others.
In World of Warcraft, it is almost impossible to grief other players, whereas, in Shadowbane (google it), griefing was the underlying structure, something the developers were initialy proud of. I just don't see the impact of these kinds of games on sexual models.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Second Life is not indicative of online gaming
Posted by: Plexius2
Comments are closed-
Posted by: salt-of-the-earth on Nov 27, 2008 6:52 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sprightx on Nov 27, 2008 9:36 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What I mean is, AlterNet is full of bullshit articles that aren't worth reading, and just because the editors brand themselves as progressives doesnt mean they are above the smear tactics the right use in their crusades. They follow the exact same method's, they just take the time to make themselves look nice and educated when they do.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Alternet + Video Games = Bad
Posted by: mainspark
» RE: Alternet + Video Games = Bad
Posted by: carlos63
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Skytha on Nov 27, 2008 5:22 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm also trying to figure out how Grand Theft Auto is sexy - yes, let's continue to glamorize the beating and murder of prostitutes.
What goes for progressive these days, boggles the mind.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Yeah, ok.
Posted by: Dboy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Auk on Nov 27, 2008 6:25 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't even comment about this comment, don't even rate it!!! Just go back to watching TV!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: avatar_singh on Nov 27, 2008 8:57 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
donto subscribe to this british bastrds. any site or paper..
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Dboy on Nov 29, 2008 11:07 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
dboy
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Maybe not there, but close enough for orgasm
Posted by: Plexius2
» RE: Maybe not there, but close enough for orgasm
Posted by: Knot_Rich
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Rebbs on Nov 30, 2008 6:47 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And also I think people use .com only for fun of flirt while they still prefer the same age old "guy meets girl" stories...and that is where I think that Mobile technology is much better suited to improving the odds of natural, spontaneous meetings than traditional online dating can ever be.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: PeterMadsen on Dec 4, 2008 1:58 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: charles000 on Dec 21, 2008 7:34 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But Second Life??? Why? Why would I want to spend endless hours pretending to be some sort of avatar character, interacting with all sorts of other "fake" people avatar entities, knowing all the while that no one is anything remotely resembling who they really are.
I'm missing something here . . .
Silly me - I happen to actually enjoy interacting with real, living and breathing humanoid lifeforms, but I know, such activity actually requires real effort. If I want drama, I'll go see a play or a film.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Why Sex Toys Need a Woman's Touch
Unhappy With Your Birth Control? 10 Methods You May Want to Try
Is Our Sexed-up Society Creating Prosti-Tots?




